Consistently monitors the quality of student participation and performance.
Uses multiple strategies to teach and assess students."
Individual/Group Work in Google Tools: Possible considerations for Dimension 2.4
Do the teacher's comments demonstrate he/she clarifies student misconceptions?
Is the revision history monitored to ensure all members of a group have adequately participated?
Do followup questions ask students to apply knowledge across academic areas or within real-world scenarios?
Are students required to develop better processes or procedures?
Do students demonstrate the ability to give valuable feedback to each other - something beyond, "I agree" or "Good point". Have students defended their point of view?