MIES



We’ll put Maria Mies (Professor Sociology at Cologne University) in conversation with Beauvoir. I ask that you start by reading an interview with Mies in Naked Punch.



PATRIARCHY AND ACCUMULATION


Mies. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale. (pp. 6, 36-40, 53-127, 142-3, 145-6, 168-71, 205-33)


Mies argues that patriarchy constitutes a form of predatory accumulation, and one that is fundamentally connected to other exploitive systems. For her, masculine domination really solidified when men began to use destructive tools against their more productive counterparts in agricultural and pastoral societies. Female productivity then continued to precondition male productivity during feudalism and early capitalism. Mies argues that “European big men” (e.g., lords and capitalists) did not simply emerge on the surplus of “European small men” (e.g., serfs and wage labor). There was in fact a critical “underground” that made the exploitation of small men possible and it included the triple exploitation of nature (via science and technology), European women (via witch hunts and housewifization), and others/foreigners (via colonization and slavery). To help illustrate how these systems of accumulation were connected, Mies shows how the housewifization of European women depended on colonialism and vice versa. These historical details help explain the role that patriarchy plays in the “new international division of labor.” Like the early European housewives, women in today’s Global North serve capital via consumption. They consume a massive amount of goods produced by women in the Global South. Mies closes her analysis by considering how an international feminist struggle for autonomy could threaten global capitalist patriarchy.

MIES AND BEAUVOIR


Read the "Beauvoir Excerpts for Mies" in the Excerpt Packet.


We’ll put Mies in conversation with Beauvoir. In addition to comparing their historical analyses of masculine domination, we should consider how Mies offers a familiar analysis of Western women’s present formation and situation. It’s also worth noting that both Beauvoir and Mies emphasize women’s autonomy when imagining a post-capitalist future. With that said, we should also pay attention to the many differences between Mies and Beauvoir. While Beauvoir occasionally mentions colonialism and racism, she does comparatively little to integrate these forces into her analysis of masculine domination. Mies and Beauvoir also offer different conceptualizations of production, motherhood, emancipation, and more. Of course, we may also put Mies in conversation with other theorists. She explicitly critiques Marx’s writings on the realms of necessity and freedom. We can also put her in conversation with Fanon (on colonialism), Bauman (on consumption), Wilson (on deindustrialization), Foucault (on disciplinary power), and others.