Figures motivating the use of ωdc instead of ξ0 for quantifying the difference between two double couple moment tensors (Figures 14 and 15, Tape and Tape, 2012, "Angle between principal axis triples").
Left (Fig. 14). The moment tensor M0 is at the origin. The measure ξ0 considers the difference in orientation between M0 and M1 to be the same as that between M0 and M2, namely ξ0 = π/2 in both cases. Yet, intuitively, the beachball M1 resembles M0 more closely than does M2. In fact, since their colors are reversed, M2 and M0 are as different as moment tensors of the same size can be, whereas M0 and M1 are not so different from each other, especially in the x direction, where both are red. Since all three beachballs have the same eigenvalue triple, any differences in appearance ought to be attributable to differences in orientation. Since the parameter ξ0 does not capture these differences, ξ0 may not always be the best measure of separation for moment tensor orientations.
Right (Fig. 15). Comparison of ξ0 and ω for 90o rotations. The angle ξ0 is constant, ξ0 = π/2, whereas ωdc varies from π/3 at U1 to π at U2. The orientations U1 and U2 are the 90o rotations about the x- and y-axes, the same as in Fig. 14. The ωdc values for U1 and U2 seem to capture our intuition from Fig. 14 better than do the ξ0 values.