Any individual working in policy must have a strong grasp on the policy landscape in which they operate. The role of the first Unit is to help participants understand Canada’s positioning in domestic and international contexts. By the end of this section, participants should be able to:
Describe Canada’s comparative advantages and constraints as a “middle‑power” actor in AI governance.
Identify concrete policy levers Canada can use to shape safe and beneficial AI in the international context.
This blog-post offers a clear framework for how middle powers can secure both economic gains and strategic leverage by identifying and strengthening bottleneck sectors that bridge global AI advancements and domestic impact. It then lays out concrete policy and foreign-policy steps that are directly applicable to Canada’s industrial and geopolitical context.
This article demonstrates how middle powers like the UK and Canada can leverage collaborative AI governance to influence global standards beyond their individual capabilities. It shows how these countries can use their reputation for trustworthiness and technical expertise to build coalitions among like-minded middle economies, creating governance models that larger powers may adopt. The piece provides a roadmap for translating middle power theory into practical AI diplomacy through bilateral frameworks and multilateral coalition-building.
This piece provides a clear framework for why fragmented national AI regulations are failing and outlines practical elements needed for effective global governance. It offers valuable insights into preventing regulatory arbitrage and ensuring interoperability while honestly assessing obstacles like sovereignty concerns. Most importantly, it touches upon how Canada can leverage its research excellence and multilateral relationships to influence global AI norms despite economic constraints.
This article provides a concrete roadmap for how Canada can leverage its G7 presidency in 2025 to advance international AI governance through practical, incremental steps. It offers specific recommendations for strengthening the Hiroshima AI Process’s (HAIP) Code of Conduct and Reporting Framework including accountable mechanisms that could feasibly influence global AI development practices. The piece is particularly valuable for showing how existing multilateral frameworks can be enhanced rather than replaced, demonstrating a pragmatic approach to international cooperation that acknowledges the current geopolitical context.
Additional links: 2023 G7 HAIP Code of Conduct and its Reporting Framework (Do take a look at the Code of Conduct if you have time!)
Apply Leicht’s middle power lens to Canada. What is a potential role for Canada in AI?
What are the potential risks and benefits of Canada taking on a mediating role in global AI governance?
What are some policy levers available to Canada to influence global AI governance? Is a collaborative approach with other middle-powers a good option?
The following materials offer some more perspectives and resources participants can use to better understand Canada’s positioning in the global AI policy landscape.
Foresight on AI: Policy Considerations - Policy Horizons Canada
Forging a Middle Path: Canada’s Moment to Lead in AI Governance - Dr. Jodie Lobana
Global AI Governance: Barriers and Paths Forward - Roberts et al. (2024)
Options and Motivations for International AI Benefits Sharing - Centre for the Governance of AI