To put it simply:
Ineffective (Unsatisfactory)
Minimally Effective (Basic) = Needs improvement
Effective (Proficient) = Grade A
Highly Effective (Distinguished) = Grade A+
Observation: An opportunity to collect evidence of professional practice.
Evaluation: A ranking/score based upon the evidence collected and growth. Done at the end of the school year.
Formative Feedback Cycle or Inquiry Cycle: A cycle of self-assessment (or mid-year), goal setting/reflection, observation and feedback (2 cycles throughout the year)
Noticing: Evidence collection during observation
Wondering: Specific questions based upon general areas of interest or wonder
Coding: Connection drawn from evidence to rubric indicators
Response: Teacher's response to the wonderings
Feedback: Administrator final reflection based upon each observation
Dimension: 6 Dimensions (headings) of the rubric
Indicator: 30 sub-dimensions; 5 under each dimension
PIVOT: Online software used to house the evaluation model
You will not receive a rating as a result of observations. You will be provided with noticings (evidence), wonderings (questions/curiosities), and feedback.
Essentially nothing. All teachers identify areas that they want support in for their own professional growth and that is captured in their growth plan. Teachers needing a different level of support in areas they are still growing in (moving from an unsatisfactory or basic level) will work with their administrator on those areas of focus and goals. This can happen at any time throughout the year based on where a teacher is an the level of intervention needed.
All probationary teachers, teachers who receive an overall EOY minimally effective rating or lower, or teachers who need more structure support during the year as evidence by trends/patterns in observation data.
Probationary teachers serve a 2, 4 or 5 year probationary period and are on an IDP for those years. The length of time for any other teacher on an IDP will vary based upon their growth. Just like students - when the intervention is no longer needed, we remove that level of support.
If a teacher is rated as highly effective on 3 consecutive annual year-end evaluations, Wyoming is choosing to conduct a year-end evaluation biennially instead of annually. However, if a teacher is not rated as highly effective on 1 of these biennial year-end evaluations, the teacher shall again be provided with annual year-end evaluations.
Start by a having a conversation with your administrator/evaluator. Only if you've received an overall rating of Ineffective, you may request a review of the evaluation and the rating by the superintendent. The request for a review must be submitted in writing within 20 days after being informed of the rating. The superintendent will then review the evaluation and rating and may make any modifications as appropriate based on his/her review. However, this is only allowed no more than twice in a 3-year period.
They are outlined in our new Mentor Handbook. WPS Mentor Program
MI Revised School Code (excerpt)