Paper Guidelines and Policies

ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT & PLAGIARISM


All acts of plagiarism and scholastic dishonesty, including having someone complete assignments for you, are violations of academic integrity subjected to disciplinary action. 


Plagiarism is intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own.


Self-Plagiarism, which is submitting a paper you completed in another class (K-12 or college), is also forbidden. 

If you plagiarize and it is unintentional, you will be given a warning. If you are asked to choose another topic or rewrite the paper, the professor is obligated to report your misconduct to the chair, dean, and Student Affairs. After the second incident, you will face disciplinary action. However, if you commit an act of plagiarism or scholastic dishonesty and it is intentional, you could receive an F in the course and face serious disciplinary action. 

All students will meet with the professor in a 5-10 minute conference early in the semester and after the midterm to discuss the readings, exams, papers, and/or project. You must visit the nearest ACC campus to update your Student ID card with your photo prior to the first meeting. The professor also reserves the right to require students to an in-person or Zoom conference in the event of suspected academic dishonesty, plagiarism, or improper AI usage. Students who do not comply with my conference requirement will be subjected to withdrawal. 


USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE


Artificial Intelligence (AI) cannot be used to write papers, create presentations, or complete graded coursework. Any improper use of AI-programs, including but not limited to ChatGPT or DALL-E, is subject to due process and disciplinary action. However, the use of programs that assist in translating, formatting your papers, improving word choices, and utilizing proper grammar and spelling, such as Grammarly, Quillboth, and Packback, is encouraged.


Each paper is assessed based on the criteria set by this grading rubric

Following the Directions

Other than academic integrity, the most important aspect of writing an essay for a college course is to read the instructions carefully. Study the lectures and readings and videos that accompany the instructions for each paper or assignment. Ask questions. 

Pre-writing and Constructing an Outline

Once you have established the appropriate focus of your assignment, you can begin generating ideas via pre-writing. The different kinds of pre-writing include clustering, brainstorming, mapping, and freewriting. Freewriting is a popular choice with writers. In freewriting, the writer is given a topic and writes non-stop about that topic, paying no attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation, or style.

Writing your Outline

For each major assignment, you will need to submit an outline naming the topic, authors and works analyzed (if required), a supportable thesis or focus, clear organization, examples or quotes (if required), and at least one scholarly article (when required). The portal for for submitting your outline can be accessed via the Assignments Folder (for that particular paper) in the course menu

Once your outline is approved, you may begin drafting your paper. 

The purpose of the outline is for me to examine your focus, assess the organization of your document, approve your thesis if required (or central idea in 1302), and make sure that you are on the right track. 

Use the Basic Organization of an Essay (introduction, thesis statement, body paragraphs with topic sentences, conclusion) to design your outline and develop ideas for formal, academic writing. Also, make sure to check out the sample outlines I've provided for you in Blackboard. The traditional format of an essay does not apply to expressive narratives, written in the first person, or creative writing assignments.

Writing your Rough Draft 

After your outline has been approved, you may begin writing your rough draft. Even though you must refer to your outline, don't feel restricted by it. In the drafting stage, don't worry about spelling, grammar, or punctuation-- just make sure that you are focused on the focus or thesis and basic organization. Let the ideas flow.

Other Issues that Must be Addressed

Avoid first and second person point of view in academic writing-- unless I indicate otherwise. Also, don't make announcements about your intent or objectives for the paper in the introduction or anywhere else. Click here for pointers on avoiding the second person POV. In all formal papers in this class, I do require that first person be used in the conclusion.

Check for quality of sources when researching; avoid sources that cannot be retrieved from the library or scholarly sources. 

Introduce your quotes properly; the quotes and the surrounding words must come together to form a complete sentence. Check out: Introducing and Integrating Quotes. 

When writing dialogue in personal narrative or creative writing assignments, always indent whenever a person begins speaking.

A note about word count-- quality is more important than quantity. I don't count words. However, often a paper lacks development and needs more elaboration and examples. Try using methods of development or organization to add more depth to your paper.

Finally, your conclusion should be a reflective paragraph, using the first person point of view. How do you connect to the topic, authors, assignment, etc.? How is it relevant to modern society or to your life? Again, there is no need for a conclusion or introduction (or thesis statement and topic sentences) in personal narratives, journals, and creative writing assignments.

Peer Editing

Before peer editing, be sure to run your paper through a spelling/grammar check and make the revisions suggested above. In peer editing, each student must critique at least two papers using the guidelines in the Revisions Checklist.

Please post your paper as a DOC or PDF file (no links) for peer editing by going to the discussion board, clicking the peer editing link to the left of the post, and then creating a thread.

In the subject heading, be sure to give your name and the submission number (take one, take two, etc.), so that your paper can be easily identified, and I will know how many times it has been posted (I will review it twice, if you turn submit it in a timely fashion). Then, in the message box, let the class know your concerns: content, organization, mechanics, format, or any other specific issues. Please do this for all peer editing discussion posts. 

In peer editing, you will need to assist two classmates or more. You must make at least two suggestions that could help improve a classmate's paper, and your commentary must differ from my feedback and the input of the other students. Look at the organization, content, format, and mechanics. If you are not sure about something (such as comma usage), don't comment on that particular issue.

In addition, point out at least two positive aspects of the paper that you are critiquing. If you notice that some papers have yet to be reviewed, please critique those first.

When responding to a post, always begin by saying something like: "Hi Daniel" or "Hello Prof. Villarreal." Otherwise, we will not know to whom you are speaking.

If you have any questions about a critique, please address the person who helped you by name, copy and paste their message, and then re-attach the paper.

Students who earn the maximum number of points in the discussion board are the ones who contribute in a substantive way. Responses to other students such as “Your paper looks great!” or “Thank you!” are not considered substantive contributions.

As you critique the writing of your peers, you need to remember a few key points:

All papers have a specific due date. However, do not submit your paper for a grade before reading my comments in the discussion board and then making modifications-- unless the grace period has expired. It's important that you complete your work in the order it was assigned. For example, when you post your paper to the discussion board without giving me a chance to review it and then hastily post that paper to be graded, that's a big no no. I need at least 24 hours to review your paper (most of the time, I get to it much sooner). If you jump ahead and post the outline for the next paper, I will grade the previous paper you just submitted.

Please note the peer editing rubric below: