I.

Many occultists, including Rudolf Steiner, have expressed a belief in Atlantis. Indeed, some have said that the “Aryan” race originated there or later arose from the descendants of the “Atlanteans.” Here is Steiner’s position: “The ancestors of the Atlanteans lived in a region [i.e., Lemuria] which has disappeared ... After they had passed through various stages of development the greatest part of them declined. These became stunted men, whose descendants still inhabit certain parts of the earth today as so-called savage tribes. Only a small part of Lemurian humanity was capable of further development. From this part the Atlanteans were formed. Later, something similar took place. The greatest part of the Atlantean population declined, and from a small portion are descended the so-called Aryans who comprise present-day civilized humanity ... [T]he Lemurians, Atlanteans, and Aryans are root races of mankind.” [1]

True to form, Steiner tried to take some of the sting out of this doctrine, referring to “so-called Aryans.” But his belief in, and exaltation of, the “Aryans” is clear. We also see here the germ of Steiner’s derogation of “inferior races”: They arose from the “stunted” men of Lemuria and the “declined” population of Atlantis. [2] Note that in the quotation, above, Steiner omits the phrase “so-called” in his second reference to the Aryans, and note that he explicitly identifies Aryans as the sole representatives of “present-day civilized humanity.”

After the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis in the name of the Aryan “master race,” it is hard to extend even a presumption of plausibility to the concept of Aryanism. But let’s not dismiss it out of hand. Instead, we should examine relevant scholarship. Peter Staudenmaier reports the following: “[T]he notion of an Aryan race was invented by European thinkers who began by tracing linguistic connections among different Indo-European languages, an entirely legitimate enterprise, and then conflated these linguistic theories with emerging anthropological, biological, and spiritual theories about race and ethnicity, an obviously illegitimate move. The essential confusion at the heart of the Aryan myth is that peoples whose languages share linguistic similarities must be racially similar as well ... Already in the mid-19th century ... anthropologists pointed out the fallacy of collapsing language into race and vice versa. And later in the 1800s even Friedrich Max Mueller, whose work was one of the major sources for the ideologists of Aryanism, emphatically criticized the conflation of linguistics and race that is the core of the Aryan myth (the same is true for T.H. Huxley and many others).” [3]

The most important point, for our present discussion, concerns the mutually reinforcing errors that can derive from failing to grasp distinctions between linguistics, racial theory, and history. As Staudenmaier points out, historical fallacies — such as the Aryan myth as well as the Atlantis myth — readily arise from linguistic confusions. Also of interest: There once actually was a prehistoric race that we now identify as Aryans. They lived in what is now Iran and Northern India. These “Aryans” have no connection with the later Middle European so-called Aryans. Note that the Germanic peoples (usually considered prime examples of the Aryan race) arose in a completely different region, far away: “The German-speaking peoples ... are extremely heterogeneous in their ethnic origins ... The German people appear to have originated on the coastal region of the Baltic Sea and in the Baltic islands in the Bronze and early Iron ages. From about 500 BC they began to move southward, crushing and absorbing the existing Celtic kingdoms; from 58 BC they clashed with Rome along the line of the Rhine and Danube rivers.” [4]

In sum, the modern Eurocentric “Aryan race” — whether the Fascist or Anthroposophical variety — is a fantasy: “During the 19th century there arose a notion — propagated most assiduously by the Comte de Gobineau and later by his disciple Houston Stewart Chamberlain — of an “Aryan race.” Members of the so-called race spoke Indo-European languages, were credited with all of the progress that benefited humanity, and were purported to be superior to “Semites,” “yellows,” and “blacks.” Believers in Aryanism came to regard the Nordic and Germanic peoples as the purest members of the “race.” This notion, which had been repudiated by anthropologists by the second quarter of the 20th century, was seized upon by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and was made the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and other “non-Aryans.” [5]

Thus, the “Aryans” championed by Steiner, Hitler, and others, are a myth. But what about their place of origin? Steiner traces the Aryans back to Atlantis (not Iran and northern India, nor the Baltic region). Let’s turn our attention, then, to the fabulous lost continent, which presumably played a key role in the ascent of civilized humanity. Dr. C. Scott Littleton, chairperson of the Department of Anthropology at Occidental College, provides the following summary of recent scholarship on Atlantis. “Atlantis was a legendary continent that many people believe sank into the Atlantic Ocean thousands of years ago. The first mention of Atlantis appeared during the 300's B.C. in CRITIAS and TIMAEUS, two works by the Greek philosopher Plato. According to Plato, a brilliant civilization once existed on Atlantis. But its people became corrupt and greedy, and so the gods punished them. During one day and night, great explosions shook Atlantis, and the continent sank into the sea.”  [6]

Dr. Littleton goes on to say that, over the centuries, there have been various theories about the location, importance, and even future of Atlantis. “Some people have claimed that Atlantis was the basis of all later civilizations. A few have even predicted that the continent will someday rise from the sea.” [7] In recent times, numerous expeditions searched for the ruins of Atlantis, but always without success. The most likely inspiration for Plato’s legend, according to Dr. Littleton, was the volcanic destruction of the small island Thira, which was situated in the Aegean, north of Crete. Volcanic eruptions demolished Thira in about 1470 B.C., and the effects were felt on Crete. Minoan civilization, which had held sway on both islands, was essentially wiped out. [8]

Note the discrepancies between the occult belief in Atlantis and Dr. Littlelon’s analysis. Myth: a continent. Probable truth: a small island (smaller than Crete). Myth: sunk in the Atlantic. Probable truth: sunk in the Aegean. Etc. Most critically, note that despite the repeated efforts to find Atlantis, no expedition has done so — even though the presumed location of the lost continent should have made discovery fairly easy. Here is what the ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA has to say about the location: “ATLANTIS, also spelled Atalantis, or Atlantica, a legendary island in the Atlantic Ocean, lying west of the Straits of Gibraltar. The principal sources for the legend are two of Plato's dialogues, TIMAEUS and CRITIAS. In the former, Plato describes how Egyptian priests, in conversation with the Athenian lawgiver Solon, described Atlantis as an island larger than Asia Minor and Libya combined, and situated just beyond the Pillars of Hercules (the Straits of Gibraltar).” [9]

The BRITANNICA goes on to say that, according to legend, the people of Atlantis established an empire in and around the Mediterranean, but thereafter they became corrupted and (presumably as a punishment by the gods) their island sank into the sea due to earthquakes. The BRITANNICA agrees with Dr. Littleton that various attempts have been made to find or identify Atlantis — including strange speculations that it may have been Scandinavia or the Canary Islands — but that the most likely origin of the legend was the destruction of Thira (or Thera, as the The BRITANNICA spells it). Once again, consider the discrepancies between legend and scholarship. Myth: “larger than Asia Minor and Libya combined.” Probable truth: small island. Myth: sunk in the Atlantic. Probable truth: sunk in the Aegean. The destruction of the small island occurred around 3,500 years ago, much more recently than the fictional destruction of Atlantis as described by Steiner and others. (Plato himself dated the destruction at about 11,000 years ago.) Importantly, Atlantis was supposed to be “situated just beyond the Pillars of Hercules (the Straits of Gibraltar)” — i.e., quite close to Europe and thus presumably easy to find.

The failure to find Atlantis does not prove that the fabulous lost continent never existed. But the absence of evidence that Atlantis did exist raises the question why anyone would believe the myth. There’s no evidence to support the belief. In DISCARDED SCIENCE, John Grant explores the fallacious history of Atlantis and other mythical lost worlds: “Is there any truth in such tales, or are they total fantasies? Atlantis could have been Crete, Thule could have been the Orkney Islands, or Iceland, or ... [sic: ellipses by Grant] Yes, just possibly, some of the lost lands could really have existed. But somewhere amongst all the legends there ought to be just one about a land which was not heavenly, and whose inhabitants were not in some way supermen. Where, in short, are the sewers of Atlantis?”[10] Sarcasm is not scientifically or logically compelling, but Grant’s point is still useful. Anything is possible, just possibly some lost lands did exist, perhaps, possibly ... But where is the evidence substantiating the legends? Absent evidence, we have no proof, no reason to believe. To be charitable, we might suspend judgment. But to be strict, we must demand proof.

In THE SKEPTIC’S DICTIONARY, Robert Todd Carroll returns to the principal author of the Atlantis myth, Plato. “Plato was not describing a real place ... The purpose of Atlantis [for Plato] is to express a moral message ... The fact that nobody in Greece for 9,000 years had mentioned a battle between Athens and Atlantis should serve as a clue ... [Greeks] would have understood that he was not giving them a historical account of a real city ... Finally, if the Atlanteans were such technological geniuses who shared their wisdom with the world, why did Plato depict them as arrogant warmongers?” [11] Carroll’s argument is not entirely consistent with Grant’s. In any event, citing authorities is not, in itself, conclusive. Experts can be wrong. Still, Atlantis-doubters do raise interesting issues.

The onus is on those who want to find truth in the Aryan and/or Atlantis myths. Give us proof. Compel us to agree. Until you do, we have no reason to think that there ever was an Atlantis, or that Aryans arose there. Until you compel us to think otherwise, we are justified in concluding that the cradle of the legendary Aryan race was itself almost certainly nothing but a legend.

II.

But let’s not be too hasty. Let’s approach the subject of Atlantis from a different angle. By his standards, Steiner was rather specific in his descriptions of Atlantis. Here are two examples. 

“The ancient Atlantean did not possess a developed intellect and mind, but he was equipped with fine somnambulistic-clairvoyant forces. Logical power ... did not exist in ancient Atlantis, for man's faculties of thought and feeling were quite different. At that time, he could not have combined thoughts, nor could he have reckoned, counted, or read; as men do now; yet certain somnambulistic-clairvoyant spiritual forces lived in him. He could understand the language of Nature and could hear God speak to him in the murmuring waves; he could understand the rolling thunder, the rustling forest, the delicate aromas of the flowers; he could understand this language of Nature ... [T]he Atlantean just went out and listened to the sounds of the trees and of the wind and these told him what he had to do.” [12] 

“An Atlantean settlement ... had a character which in no way resembled that of a modern city ... [I]n the first Atlantean periods ... a settlement resembled a garden in which the houses were built of trees with artfully intertwined branches. What the work of human hands created at that time grew out of nature ... What the Atlantean built up on the basis of nature he considered to be common property just as a man of today thinks it only natural to consider as his private property what his ingenuity, his intelligence have created for him.” [13] 

Science offers no confirmation for such statements, but can we find support for Steiner elsewhere? Yes. Other clairvoyants and psychics have given accounts that jibe with Steiner’s. Edgar Cayce was an American psychic whose powers of occult perception may have rivaled or even exceeded Steiner’s own, at least according to his followers. “His batting average on predictions was incredibly high, close to one hundred percent. He may have missed once or twice ... but so much of what he said has come so miraculously true....” [14] Today an organization of spiritual seekers, the Association for Research and Enlightenment (A.R.E.), perpetuates Cayce’s insights and seeks to further them through new research. [15] It is not unlike the Anthroposophical Society, which has a similar mission concerning the work of Rudolf Steiner. [16]

Not only did Cayce gaze into the future, but he provided startling information about the distant past — and, a point that may galvanize Anthroposophists, his visions of Atlantis were often remarkably similar to Steiner’s. Here is a brief rundown of major points on which Cayce generally confirms Steiner about Atlantis. (The agreement between these savants is not total, and some of the following misrepresents Steiner to some degree, but overall the accounts are in accord.)

• Atlantis was was a huge continent that occupied the area now filled by the Atlantic Ocean. 

• The ancestors of mankind dwelling there underwent a process of evolution.

• Mankind divided into races during or soon after that period.

• Some humans there were giants; some were tiny.

• The Atlanteans were technologically advanced, at least in some areas.

• The destruction of Atlantis was caused by human activity.

• Much knowledge about these matters is derived from the Akashic Record.

Let’s sample some of the confirming quotations.

Steiner: “Several chapters from the Akashic Record will follow ... First, those events will be described which took place when the so-called Atlantean continent still existed between America and Europe This part of the earth’s surface was once land. Today it forms the floor of the Atlantic ocean.” [17] Don’t be thrown by Steiner tossing in phrases like “so-called.” He did this a lot, partly to remind us that clairvoyant explorations can be difficult, and partly to cover his back.

Cayce: “The position ... the continent of Atlantis occupied is between the Gulf of Mexico on the one hand and the Mediterranean on the other.” [18] Concerning Cayce’s use of the Akashic Record, we have this affirmation: “One of the greatest sources for information on Atlantis is Edgar Cayce. The amount of information that came through him has filled books and may be comparable to Plato's writing on this ancient sea continent. Cayce's psychic ability to read Mother Earth's memories of Atlantis — what the Hindus call the Akashic Record — is amazing.” [19]

•••

Steiner: “Human racial forms which had hardened ... could continue to propagate themselves for a good while to come, but ... these races too had to die out. Many of the forms were nevertheless able to maintain themselves right into the post-Atlantean times.” [20] Humanity was divided into races, some of which survived after Atlantis although they should have died out.

Casey: “As these took form by the gratifying of their own desire ... they became hardened or set — much in the form of the existent human body of the day ... Hence coming into that form as the red or the mixture peoples ... followed more closely by that of the yellow, the black, of the white races....” [21]

•••

Steiner:  “Just at the time when Atlantis began to sink there was a great contrast between men who were good as to their qualities of soul, and were a race of little men, and the giant forms who were wicked and in whom everything turned to flesh.” [22]

Cayce: “These took on many sizes of stature, from that as may be called the midget to the giants — for there were giants ... men as tall as (what would be termed today) ten or twelve feet in stature....” [23]

•••

Steiner: “Mighty and ominous powers of Nature were thus let loose by the deeds of men, leading eventually to the gradual destruction of the whole territory of Atlantis by catastrophes of air and water.” [24]

Cayce: “With the continued disregard of those who were keeping the pure race and the pure peoples, man brought in destructive forces ... These destructive forces combined with those natural resources of gases, of the electrical forces made in nature, caused volcanic eruptions....” [25]

•••

Naturally, Steiner and Casey did not agree on all particulars, or one may have omitted some details that the other one spelled out. For example, Steiner spoke of the flying vehicles used by the Atlanteans, while Cayce went further: 

Steiner: “The vehicles of the Atlanteans, which floated a short distance above the ground traveled at a height lower than that of the mountain ranges of the Atlantean period, and they had steering mechanisms by the aid of which they could rise above these mountain ranges.” [26]

Casey: “In Atlantis ... [vehicles] sailed both through the air and under the water ... [Atlanteans] excelled in the use of the elevator in building in the earth ... [There were devices] associated with communications, lighter-than-air machines, and radioactive forces.” [27] If, as his editors believe, Cayce said that the Atlanteans had atomic power at their disposal, Steiner probably should have included this tiny detail. It had major consequences, after all:

Another point Steiner apparently overlooked was the horrific invasions of Atlantis by animal-beings: “Then began that period when there were invasions of this continent by those of the animal kingdoms. This brought about that meeting of the nations of the globe to prepare a way and manner of disposing of them ... This animal invasion resulted in the development of destructive forces as could be set and meted out ... Hence the development of explosives ... Then ... human sacrifices began. With this also came the first egress of peoples to the Pyrenees. Later we find there was the entering into the black or mixed peoples, in what later became the Egyptian dynasty.” [28]

As we can see, there were some significant differences in the accounts given by Steiner and Cayce, but there’s no denying that the two seers agreed on many, many points. The question becomes, then, what to make of this agreement. Does Cayce prove Steiner right, and vice versa?

Of course not. By the time Steiner and Cayce began talking about Atlantis, there was already an extensive literature — all of it fantastical, none of it confirmed by science, then or afterwards — about Atlantis. Our two psychics followed in train with these. Here are some of the books available to them: [29]

• VRIL, THE POWER OF THE COMING RACE, a novel by Edward Bulwer-Lytton, 1871.

• William R. Sandbach, THE OERA LINDA BOOK, published 1876; an account centering on the North Sea.

• ATLANTIS, THE ANTEDILUVIAN WORLD, by Ignatius Donnelly, 1882, a pseudoscientific account that launched a veritable Atlantis mania.

• THE STORY OF ATLANTIS — a Theosophical version of the Atlantis myth, written by William Scott-Elliot, 1896.

• THE LOST CONTINENT, by Cutcliffe Hyne, 1900. A rip-roaring yarn.

• HOW I FOUND THE LOST ATLANTIS, by Paul Schliemann, 1912 — a hoax.

Significantly, Steiner himself admits that he based some of his statements about Atlantis on the work of William Scott-Elliot, the Theosophist: “In the little book, ‘THE STORY OF ATLANTIS’ by W. Scott-Elliot, the reader will learn that the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean was once the continent ... Details completing those given in that book [i.e., THE STORY OF ATLANTIS] and bearing on this hoary civilization [i.e., the Atlantean civilization] will be given here [i.e., in my own work — meaning that I, Steiner, will build upon the work of W. Scott-Elliot].” [30]

There is one other source Cayce may have used, one that Steiner himself could not have used: It is the book from which I have just quoted, Steiner’s own ATLANTIS AND LEMURIA, which was published in 1911. Cayce was 16 years younger than Steiner, and he outlived Steiner by nearly 20 years. Cayce had plenty of time to acquaint himself with Steiner’s work, and Scott-Elliot’s work, and all the other Atlantis yarns, hoaxes, and lies. The main point for us to absorb, here, is that there is nothing surprising about various frauds making similar claims when they develop those claims from the same body of myth. Once Plato gave the world the myth of Atlantis, subsequent embellishers created a more or less coherent set of fantasies about that legendary land, but the coherence of these fantasies proves nothing. We are still waiting for the first shred of tangible evidence that Atlantis ever existed. Don’t hold your breath.

One of the best recent studies of the Atlantis myth is IMAGINING ATLANTIS by Richard Ellis. [31] I’ll give Ellis the last words: “...Plato’s Atlantis has acquired a mythology of its own. [paragraph break] From the time he wrote the dialogues that contain the story of the origins of the downfall of Atlantis, the story has perdured, and indeed, it has been amended, interpreted, embellished, and modified to the point where it has become a standard. Not that everyone knows its origins; many believe that it was originally a Greek myth, or that Edgar Cayce heard of it while in a trance ... It has everything in it: wealth, war, floods, earthquakes., destruction, mystery, cataclysms, and the downfall of an entire civilization. We can accept Atlantis as a fiction largely because there is no reliable evidence that any of the events that are described really occurred ...  The tenacity of the Atlantis story suggests that we need our fantasies ... It is Plato’s story, and his alone, and no amount of mysticism ... will ever change that.” [32]

— Roger Rawlings

In case you were skeptical...

[encyclopedia.com]

AFTERWORD:

Aryans

by Peter Staudenmaier

The widespread notion that the Aryan myth first became racist under the Nazis is false. That this notion persists among a wide range of contemporary Anthroposophists suggests a lack of basic knowledge about the history of racist thought.

The very idea of an "Aryan race" was nonsensical from the beginning. It is based on a conflation of linguistics and biology, and does not refer to anything in the real world. Moreover, the concept of an "Aryan race," in the form which it typically took within European culture in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, was patently racist. It posited a superior Aryan stock who colonized the ancient world and founded the great civilizations of antiquity. This is how Rudolf Steiner used the term. While the confusion between philology and ethnology was common in the pre-Darwinian era, it had been thoroughly criticized and dismantled by a variety of scholars by Steiner's day.

That Aryan supremacism was not a Nazi innovation has been a mainstay of research on the topic for decades, including those works whose analysis of racial ideology is closely circumscribed. Hannah Arendt's seminal essay on "Race-Thinking Before Racism" (chapter 6 in THE ORIGINS OF TOTALITARIANISM, 1951) begins with the following remarks: "If race-thinking were a German invention, as it has been sometimes asserted,  then ‘German thinking’ (whatever that may be) was victorious in many parts of the spiritual world long before the Nazis started their ill-fated attempt at world conquest." The prominent archeologist J.P. Mallory begins his epilogue on the Aryan myth as follows: "We cannot examine the legacy of the Indo-Europeans without first dispelling the spectre of the 'Aryan Myth'. The world is all too familiar with how the concept of racial supremacy was implemented by the National Socialists in Germany, and we would be quite mistaken to imagine that this grotesque obsession with the Indo-Europeans or, as they were then more popularly known, the Aryans, was merely the creation of a handful of Nazi fanatics." (Mallory, IN SEARCH OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS, 1989.) Indeed the notion of an "Aryan race" was hardly specific to German thought; the British made extensive use of the concept during their colonial administration of India, and a number of the most influential theorists of Aryan supremacy were French.

The best comprehensive account of this phenomenon remains Leon Poliakov's 1971 book THE ARYAN MYTH. Poliakov writes in his Introduction: "In its various forms, the Aryan theory nearly always involved a value-judgement in favor of the Aryans, and the ideologists of the Third Reich did no more than stress this bias out of all proportion." While it was at least hypothetically possible for non-racists to use the term "Aryan race" without supremacist meaning (Moses Hess comes to mind as a potential example), within continental European thought the racist interpretation of the term had become predominant, indeed virtually exclusive, many years before the rise of Nazism.

Poliakov's pioneering work can now be supplemented by a range of other valuable scholarly treatments, including the following:

Stefan Arvidsson, ARYAN IDOLS: INDO-EUROPEAN MYTHOLOGY AS IDEOLOGY AND SCIENCE (Chicago 2006)

Thomas Trautmann, ed., THE ARYAN DEBATE (Oxford 2005)

Maurice Olender, THE LANGUAGES OF PARADISE: RACE, RELIGION, AND PHILOLOGY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY (Cambridge 1992)

Thomas Trautmann, THE ARYANS AND BRITISH INDIA (Berkeley 1997)

Tony Ballantyne, ORIENTALISM AND RACE: ARYANISM IN THE BRITISH EMPIRE (New York 2002)

Stefan Arvidsson, “Aryan Mythology As Science and Ideology”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 67 no. 2 (1999), 327-354

Joan Leopold, “British Applications of the Aryan Theory of Race to India, 1850-1870”, English Historical Review 89 (1974), 578-603

Peter van der Veer, “Aryan Origins” in van der Veer, IMPERIAL ENCOUNTERS: RELIGION AND MODERNITY IN INDIA AND BRITAIN (Princeton 2001), 134-157

Colin Kidd, “The Aryan Moment: Racialising Religion in the Nineteenth Century” in Kidd, THE FORGING OF RACES: RACE AND SCRIPTURE IN THE PROTESTANT ATLANTIC WORLD, 1600-2000 (Cambridge 2006), 168-202

Bruce Lincoln, THEORIZING MYTH: NARRATIVE, IDEOLOGY, AND SCHOLARSHIP (Chicago 1999)

[Note: The Afterword, above, is adapted from an essay Staudenmaier posted at http://lists.topica.com/lists/waldorf-critics/read/message.html?mid=1715726619 I have reprinted here by permission of the author.  — RR]

ENDNOTES

[1] Rudolf Steiner, COSMIC MEMORY (Garber Communications, 1990), pp. 45-46.

[2] Steiner taught that “lower” humans are susceptible to the influence of demons, and indeed they exist because demons interfered with human evolution.

“In human beings of this type [i.e., highly evolved], both the life body [a nonphysical “body”] and the physical body had portions that remained untouched by the Luciferic influence. [But] in the case of the lower types of human beings, the life body was too unprotected to be able to withstand the Luciferic influence.” [Rudolf Steiner, AN OUTLINE OF OCCULT SCIENCE (Kessinger Publishing,  1998: 1922 edition), AN OUTLINE OF ESOTERIC SCIENCE, pp. 238-239.]

“Instead of racial diversities developing consecutively, older racial forms remained unchanged and newer ones began to evolve at the same time ... As we know, around the Atlantean time, human souls gradually came down from the planets to which they had ascended ... Lucifer and Ahriman [two demons] preserved older racial forms that had developed, so that there was a coexistence of races rather than a succession.” [Rudolf Steiner, THE UNIVERSAL HUMAN: The Evolution of Individuality (Anthroposophic Press, 1990), p. 75.]

[3] Peter Staudenmaier, “The Aryan Myth,” Mar 21, 2007 08:25 PST, http://lists.topica.com/lists/waldorf-critics/read/ .

Anthroposophy is Steiner’s new age religion; its adherents are Anthroposophists.

[4] "Germany." ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA. 2007. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 15 May 2007. See also THE TIMES CONCISE ATLAS OF WORLD HISTORY (London: Times Books Ltd., 1982), pp. 6 & 52. Tracing the migrations of prehistoric peoples is complex, but a consensus theory is that from their origins in Africa, Homo sapiens branched out east and west. The prehistoric Aryans would have arisen from the branch that headed east, toward the Mideast and Asia, while the Germanic people derived from those who went west, into Europe.

[5] "Aryan." ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA. 2007. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 15 May 2007.

[6] C. Scott Littleton, Ph.D., Professor and Chair, Department of Anthropology, Occidental College; author, THE NEW COMPARATIVE MYTHOLOGY AND FROM SCYTHIA TO CAMELOT — cited in the WORLD BOOK MULTIMEDIA ENCYCLOPEDIA, Mac OS X Edition, Version 6.0.2, 2001.

Steiner said that to find “Atlantis, we would have to seek between present-day Europe and America.” [Rudolf Steiner, THE CHRISTIAN MYSTERY (Anthroposophic Press, 1998), p. 177.]

[7] Ibid.

[8] Ibid.

[9] "Atlantis." ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA. 2007. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 17 Apr. 2007.

[10] John Grant, DISCARDED SCIENCE: Ideas That Seemed Good at the Time ... (AAPPL Artists’ and Photographers’ Press Ltd., 2006), pp. 103-104.

[11] Robert Todd Carroll, THE SKEPTIC’S DICTIONARY (John Wiley & Sons, 2003), pp. 39-41.

[12] Rudolf Steiner, “The Adept-School of the Past, The Mysteries of the Spirit, The son and the Father”, a lecture, March 7, 1907  http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/AdeSch_index.html

[13] Rudolf Steiner, COSMIC MEMORY, “Our Atlantean Ancestors” http://wn.rsarchive.org/Books/GA011/CM/GA011_c03.html

[14] Jess Stern, EDGAR CAYCE: The Sleeping Prophet (Bantam, 1989) http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_cayce05.htm#Contents

[15] http://www.edgarcayce.org/

[16] http://www.goetheanum.org/336.html?L=1

Anthroposophists might pause to consider the implications: Other organizations exist to promote the teachings of clairvoyant savants whose teachings vary markedly from Steiner’s. In this essay, I point out similarities between Steiner’s visions and Cayce’s. But when we step back, the differences are at least as impressive. Steiner’s entire Theosophically inspired schema of evolution is missing from Cayce’s wondrous pronouncements. Maybe Steiner was right and Cayce was wrong. Maybe. Or maybe Cayce was right and Steiner (dare we suggest it?) was... Or (and here we approach the truth) maybe they were both full of it.

[17] ATLANTIS: The Fate of a Lost Land and Its Secret Knowledge (Rudolf Steiner Press, 2001), pp. 11-13 (p. 12 is a map).

[18] Edgar Evans Cayce, EDGAR CAYCE ON ATLANTIS (Grand Central Publishing, 1968), p. 52.

Edgar Evans Cayce is one of Edgar Cayce’s sons.

[19] Edgar Evans Cayce, Douglas G. Richards, Gail Cayce Shwartzer THE MYSTERIES OF ATLANTIS  (A.R.E. Press, 2007) , synopsis  http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Mysteries-of-Atlantis/Edgar-Evans-Cayce/e/9780876045749

[20] Rudolf Steiner, OCCULT SCIENCE - An Outline (Rudolf Steiner Press, 1979), pp. 198-199.

[21] EDGAR CAYCE ON ATLANTIS, pp. 56-57.

[22] Rudolf Steiner, THE BEING OF MAN AND HIS FUTURE EVOLUTION (Rudolf Steiner Press, 1981), p. 117.

[23] EDGAR CAYCE ON ATLANTIS, p. 63.

[24] OCCULT SCIENCE - An Outline, pp. 198-200.

[25] EDGAR CAYCE ON ATLANTIS, p. 61.

[26] Rudolf Steiner, COSMIC MEMORY (Anthroposophic Press, 1987), pp. 42-44.

[27] EDGAR CAYCE ON ATLANTIS, p. 62.

[28] Ibid., pp. 60-61.

[29] I have adapted this list from the Internet Sacred Text Archive  http://www.sacred-texts.com/atl/index.htm

[30] Rudolf Steiner, ATLANTIS AND LEMURIA (Rajput Press, 1911), p. 8.

Lemuria was an earlier, equally fictitious continent. See, e.g., William Scott-Elliot, THE STORY OF ATLANTIS AND THE LOST LEMURIA (CreateSpace, 2009).

[31] Richard Ellis, IMAGINING ATLANTIS (Vintage Books, 1998).

[32] Ibid., pp. 261-262.