The Spring term session took place on March 17th, with a group of around 60 staff and students from across the University taking part.
The session was divided up into three 30 minute panels of staff and students loosely organised by scope and focus on the department/programme level, the level of the module and the level of the individual.
You can view the programme details below and follow the links on the page or in the menu to the left for recordings and resources related to each panel.
At the bottom of this page, you can also click to view the comments of participants who provided a response to the question 'What is your number one 'COVID keep' related to learning and teaching?'
Michael Thornton and Mathilde Peron (Economics): Reflections on Learning and Assessment in Economics
Gareth Evans, Pen Holland, Richard Waites and Thorunn Helgason (Biology): Use of feedback in the Department
Lisa O'Malley and Dan Horsfall (Social Policy and Social Work): Teaching Methods to Undergraduates in COVID: The Good, the Bad and the Take-away.
Tony Ward (Electronic Engineering): Monitoring engagement in and responding to questions from a large (n=188) student cohort module and keeping sane.
Mark Egan (Management School): ‘Fireside chats‘: Weekly podcasts in an autumn 2020 module. In the recordings, the module leaders and tutors delivered a weekly discussion of the lecture theme in a relaxed atmosphere giving them an opportunity to observe and learn from detailed academic debate and discussion.
Sara Boulton (Law): The Law Clinic module at York Law School. Our practice (such as around interviewing clients, and the storage of confidential data) has had to change dramatically. Many of the changes are now seen as improvements in our practice by the colleagues involved.
Stephanie Luke (Politics); Experiences and reflections on whether Covid restrictions had an impact on the benefits of in-person teaching.
Mary Stewart-David (TFTI): Teaching and Collaborating in WebBased Virtual Reality - and why it's better than Zoom!
Taryn Bell and Caitlin Kitchener (Archaeology): Using breakout rooms with students.
Thomas Ron (Politics): Re-Imagining Office Hours.
Emily Patterson (TFTI): An undergraduate student reflection on the delivery of online content, specifically about the VLE and pre-recorded lectures (recorded contribution)
Attendees were asked to give their views on the following question as part of the sign up form:
Responses were as follows:
Keep it simple (but this also doesn't mean your lessons have to be uninteresting!)
That face to face contact is a really important part of the higher education experience but that the (often forecast) demise of the traditional one or two hour lecture has become closer.
Using online lectures to clear space for different face-to-face teaching and learning activities when we return to 'normal'
Jamboards!
24 h exams
Some revision type events are better delivered via zoom
Online/open exams
Making a 'connection' with students through various means is important in distance learning.
The 'can-do' attitude exhibited across the department over the year and diversification of our teaching and learning approaches
Online recorded content to be used to support future f2f sessions
Share and experiment new ideas/technology with colleagues
Online conferences
A recognition of the fact staff involved in facilitating learning require support and development that is not simply professional programmes, such as PGCAP.
better structured student activities outside synchronous sessions
Communicate very regularly, much more than normally
That non-contact learning in the humanities can be much more than merely reading in advance of a seminar discussion, preparing a seminar presentation. Ongoing asynchronous peer conversation is really valuable and can be activated beyond the informal setting of friendship groups.
Freedom of choice, particularly whether students prefer to engage with lecture content online or in-person.
Flexibility to set your own schedule
Distance learning/teaching has potentially huge accessibility benefits for disabled students and staff in enabling them to participate. I hope this can be carried forward.
Checking in with students a regular intervals
Recorded lectures are more popular than expected. Apparently students can't (don't/won't?) concentrate for a 50 minute lecture so they like "chunked" videos.
VLE contents
Opportunities for online learning for additional/optional courses to support learning
Well-structured VLE sites.
Attractive, structured VLE sites. Use of tools such as Jamboard or Padlet for engagement prior to live sessions.
Supervisorials online - far more student engagement for those rather than in person where they’d have to turn up for a 15min meeting in my office.
That HE teaching colleagues have started to ask the same questions that those in earlier phases of education ask, specifically: How do I facilitate learning in every student? Why am I teaching this way? What understanding and skills development should this learning activity promote? How can I enable a more effective learning experience? I am not saying nobody did this before, but it is pretty clear that PGCAP and similar programmes do not promote enough of this when one looks at how a lot of teaching and learning both in York and elsewhere is done.