Content is important; expected are at least two meaningful paragraphs (5+ sentences each)
Images of work ⇒
Thorough description of what you looked at /read about, etc. (pretend you’re describing the work to someone on the other end of a phone). Be sure to include artist name/s.
the artist was researching things about magic so he decided to do something different and unique
Describe some thoughts you have about this, or questions for the artist about the technique, etc. Demonstrate some additional thinking about what you’ve seen/read about.
I found the pieces super interesting and I would just like to know what he thought when he was doing it or what was the first thing that came into his head when he wanted to do something like that
Month and year of your magazine
Ceramics Monthly
Hyperlink to your portfolio post⇒
https://sites.google.com/d/1h-YUZ5iP2ZyUjVRadm_Z1iBeieqYdQVk/p/1H9Mna-S0-8qlf2bUqT03W81w1Ym7qxkP/edit
Add your work in images to the slideshow in G. Classroom (and on Landing Doc) so you can share with the class.
Add this table to a Research page on your portfolio.
p.s. Doing the above MEETS standards. Including more images, more questioning, and more clear investigation will move you towards EXCEEDING standards, but only if it is quality, not fluff. Fluff is nice with peanut butter, but not with your homework.
Reflective Writing Rubric: Highlight where you think your writing is:
4 - Exceeds the standard
3 - Meets the standard
2 - Approaching the standard
1 - Does not meet the standard
Depth of Reflection
I put more emphasis on this area of your reflection, yet it will be difficult to receive a “4” without great Conven-
tions
Clearly and effectively demonstrates a thorough understanding of the chosen work/article by making specific connections to the artwork/article and/or process. Thoughts/ideas are compelling, unique, very organized, flow logically, and well-developed.
Effectively demonstrates an understanding of the chosen work/article by making connections to the artwork/article and/or process. Thoughts/ideas are organized and well-developed.
Understanding of the chosen work/article is limited. Little evidence of making connections to the artwork/article and/or process is apparent. Ideas are generic , lacking depth, and are not well-organized, making the response difficult to understand.
Understanding of the chosen work/article is very limited. Little to no evidence of making connections to the artwork/article and/or process is apparent.
Conventions
Spelling
Punctuation
Mechanics
Uses articulate and appropriate language, sophisticated word choice and varied sentence structure. Little or no errors in standard English conventions.
Uses appropriate language, word choice and sentence structure. Few errors in standard English conventions.
Word choice and sentence structure is limited. Exhibits errors in conventions, but does not hinder meaning.
Word choice and sentence structure is very limited. Many errors in conventions are evident, hindering the meaning.