Gateway to Honors was my first introduction to the University Honors Program (UHP), a highly selective program that accepts only the top 7% of UC's undergraduate student body. While it was just a half-semester course with Professor Kyle Key, it pushed me to think deeply about my goals and what I wanted to achieve during my time at UC as a University Honors Scholar.
Writing the Global Citizen Scholar Roadmap made me reflect on my journey from India to UC. Moving to the United States at eighteen wasn't just about getting a degree - it was about challenging myself to grow beyond the ideas I grew up around. It was about being the first in my family to take the risk of studying abroad and inspiring all my siblings and cousins to take a shot at their own dreams. To me a foreign education, especially one that surrounded me with a highly heterogenous community of students, meant that I would gain perspective on a variety of backgrounds, experiences, and thought processes - something that would set me up for success in an increasingly globalized society.
A moment that really stood out to me was when Professor Key sent me an email commending me for sharing my experiences in class. In one of our class discussions of diversity and inclusivity, I shared my perspective on what constitutes genuine and impactful discourse - "When you avoid asking the uncomfortable questions about someone else's lived experience, you limit yourself to seeking answers within your own perception of the world, which often times is biased towards your own experiences. While the questions you ask matter, how you ask them matters more - be curious and open-minded, while acknowledging that no one owes you their story. Personally, I don't mind questions about my race, culture, or religion as long as they come from a place of curiosity as opposed to contempt. In fact, I am more than happy to share my reasons for not wearing the hijab, avoiding certain foods, why many women in my country wear bindis (those dots on their foreheads), why I don't have the strongest accent, why I am lighter skinned compared to the Indians that you see, or why my sister and I have different last names. The answers to those questions are what makes me, me. I am someone who exercises her freedom to dress as she chooses and eat the foods she loves most. I come from a country where Hindu tradition calls for newly-wed women to wear bindis as a symbol of marriage – though my family, being Muslim, doesn't follow this practice. My education at a top ten private all-girls high school in India combined with my belief that the best way to connect with others is to mirror their language patterns explains my accent. Being from Northern India explains my fairer complexion compared to those from the South, who live closer to the equator. As for my last name being different from my sister's? That was simply because my relative who filled out my legal documents accidentally put down my father's first name as my surname and my postpartum mother did not have the energy to change it before we flew out to Saudi Arabia to visit my dad."
As someone who usually shies away from speaking in large groups, his recognition of my voice as "powerful" meant a lot. It reminded me of what I wrote in my "What Matters Most" reflection - about becoming someone who isn't afraid to take risks, attacks challenges head on, and is confident of her uniqueness.
The course helped me see how my personal ambitions aligned perfectly with UHP's vision of developing scholars who can tackle complex global problems. Our discussions about leadership and inclusiveness showed me clear paths toward becoming the kind of leader who can make real change in the world.
Below are the two essays I wrote for this course - my Global Citizen Scholar Roadmap and What Matters Most reflection.
After completing my ESL course in my first year, I specifically sought out enrollment in ENGL2089 Honors - I wanted to challenge myself beyond the standard English composition skills required for international students. Looking back, this decision reflected my approach to education: never taking the easy path when there's an opportunity to grow.
The course focused on understanding discourse communities and their communication practices, which resonated deeply with my own experience as someone navigating between different cultural and linguistic spaces. My first essay, "A Place to Belong," explored my journey of finding a middle ground between Indian English and American English, reflecting on how language shapes identity. This piece was particularly meaningful as it helped me understand that adapting to a new language doesn't mean losing one's authentic self - rather, it adds new dimensions to one's identity.
In my second essay, "Death in Fiction," I analyzed how different cultures and mediums interpret mortality, drawing connections between works ranging from Emily Dickinson's poetry to Marvel's Avengers: Endgame. This essay challenged me to engage with complex themes across various genres and cultural contexts.
My final paper examining the Marvel Cinematic Universe fan community demonstrated my growth as a writer - I conducted extensive research to analyze how shared language, traditions, and practices create a global discourse community. This piece allowed me to apply the course's theoretical frameworks to a contemporary phenomenon I was passionate about.
Professor Carlson's challenging curriculum pushed me to develop more sophisticated analytical and writing skills. From someone who started in ESL just a year prior, to producing college-level analytical essays, this course marked a significant milestone in my academic journey. More importantly, it taught me that effective communication transcends mere language proficiency - it's about understanding the intricate ways communities build meaning and connection through shared discourse.
Following are the essays I wrote for this course.
- Buckminister Fuller
American architect, systems theorist, author, designer, inventor, philosopher, and futurist
Energy, its conservation, and its environmental impact are among the most critical challenges facing our society. Our decisions about energy production and consumption today will echo through generations, shaping not just our future but the very sustainability of human civilization globally. This initial thought is what drew me to the honors seminar "Energy, Environment, and Society - The Answer Is Blowing in the Wind!"
One of the first questions we addressed during Week 1 of the seminar, was what we hoped to achieve by taking this course. While my major, Computer Science, may not directly relate to environmental issues, a large part of the decision-making regarding these issues involves statistics - statistics obtained from computer-evaluated environmental data. For example, data analysis of oil production in the 1950s, Hubbert's Peak Theory in particular, predicted that oil production would peak in the 1970s. While his prediction of the timeline was initially accurate, the advent of newer technologies like hydraulic fracturing shifted the oil production peak to somewhere between the years 2010 and 2030. Perhaps the bigger impact was how it affected the political sentiment as well as people's trust in it. Thus, the mathematics and computer science involved in the decision-making process regarding environmental issues became an excellent motivator for me to register for this seminar.
Over the course of the next few weeks, students were divided into teams and we debated some of the most discussed energy conservation and climate change issues. The topics ranged from "The Need for Immediate and Substantial Action to Limit the Effects of Climate Change" to "Nuclear Power and Its Role in Minimizing Greenhouse Gas Emissions thus, Climate Change." I think one of the most valuable parts of this seminar was debating these topics in favor of opinions that I personally opposed. It provided me with an opportunity to understand things from a very different perspective. A major part of effective communication, especially when trying to change someone's mind, is recognizing their most important motivators and how they arrived at the conclusions that they currently believe in. What may be the best reason for you to do something may not be a reason that is good enough for someone else to even consider viewing issues in a different light. Thus, by understanding the other side of the debate, I believe I have significantly improved my ability to address people with conflicting views.
A major part of the seminar was to select a geographic region and create and defend a "balance sheet". In my paper, I decided to study the state of California. Using varying credible sources, I provided a breakdown of California's current Energy Mix (both demand and supply side) as well as proposed an Energy Mix that may be more environmentally sustainable if implemented. Read the paper below for more details.
Overall, I gained a lot from this class. While I was a little disappointed about the study-abroad component to Scotland being canceled and the classes being virtual due to COVID, I was able to participate in numerous fruitful discussions that helped shape my perspective on environmental issues affecting us today.
- Nelson Mandela
Former President of South Africa, anti-apartheid activist, and politician
Prior to registering for this seminar, I spent a semester in San Jose, California. My daily commute - over an hour each way - became a space for deeper contemplation of issues and experiences I had previously only briefly deliberated. To understand what causes the divide and hate to persist despite society's claims of progress and equality, I delved deeper into the history, civics, and politics of race in America. Drawing from both my research and personal experiences, I concluded that quality education was key to fighting ignorance and dismantling systemic racism. Using education as a tool to eradicate racial inequality is akin to attacking division at its core - instilling camaraderie, compassion, and understanding for others among the future decision-makers of tomorrow.
This realization led me to register for Dr. Sarah Stitzlein's seminar course "Save our Schools! Education Controversy and Change."
Focused on educational policy controversies and systemic inequities, this course encouraged students to become active agents of social change. It challenged students to critically analyze the intersections of education, social justice, and community leadership, empowering them to develop nuanced strategies for educational reform. The course employed a discussion-based format, where students deliberated their opinions and incorporated perspectives from local community stakeholders who were invited as guest panelists. In addition, students were encouraged to communicate directly with local schools, organizations working to aid schools, teachers, and the politicians who influence school practice.
During the first few weeks, I learned about school organization and structure, and how the interaction between various stakeholders - teachers, students, parents, administrators, elected officials, etc. - creates a complicated system of checks and balances in educational decision-making. To better understand these dynamics at the ground level, my first assignment was to interview a teacher in Cincinnati. I chose Mr. Dave Caproni, an educator at Western Hills University High School, whose experience with students from low-income, crime-impacted areas revealed the deeply human side of teaching. His vehement opposition to the controversial 'Don't Say Gay, Don't Mention Race' bill (CMC, 2022) emphasized how these discussions are vital for 'educating children as productive citizens.' Yet his recollection of a harrowing incident - where students arrived at class with blood on their clothes after witnessing a shooting on their school bus - along with his grim reflection, 'I haven't had a year here at West High where I haven't lost one of my own students, highlighted the complex systemic barriers to student success in such communities. Furthermore it shed light on what perpetuates the cycles of poverty and violence, contributing to their societal disenfranchisement. His recognition of the positive impact of Social Emotional Learning and dismissal of mere resources as ineffective produced an important insight: that meaningful connection and collaboration between students, educators, and communities are essential for bridging social divides and fostering the mutual understanding needed to break these cycles of inequity.
Over the course of the next few weeks, I closely studied major American education reforms and policies such as School Choice, Charter Schools, Voucher Programs, No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, Common Core State Standards, and Every Student Succeeds Act. I not only learned about the pros and cons of said reforms but also learned how to "follow the money" in order to discern whether the push for reforms is merely self-serving tactic or is aimed at common good. The insights gained from this exercise were applied to my Take a Stand Film Analysis write up where I evaluated two contrasting films School Inc. and Education Inc. for their ideas on improving schools in America. While I had several criticisms for School Inc.'s push for privatization of the education sector through analyzing the funding sources, I also discovered that School Inc.'s narrative is backed by organizations like the Bradley Foundation and Rose-Marie and Jack R. Anderson Foundation, which are connected to Donors Trust, often characterized as the "right's dark money ATM." This financial trail raises questions about the true motivations behind certain reform advocates. In contrast, Education Inc., being self-funded, offers a critical perspective on privatization, highlighting concerning practices in places like Douglas County Schools.
Following this, I dove into topics like Alternative Teacher Prep, Teacher Unions and School Funding. I also crafted a letter to Ohio Governor Mike DeWine advocating against discriminatory education legislation, specifically addressing concerns with House Bills 322, 327, and 616 (2022), which attempt to restrict discussions of race, gender, and LGBTQ+ topics in schools.
Toward the end of the course, students were required to participate in the Education Reform Symposium where we researched and presented education reform proposals before state senators Catherine Ingram and Adam Bird, as well as press correspondents. My team and I chose to present a proposal advocating for the full implementation of the Cupp-Patterson plan to address Ohio's unconstitutional school funding system. We demonstrated how the current property tax-based funding creates educational inequities based on zip codes, and presented research showing the correlation between increased education funding and higher student success rates. Our proposal emphasized the long-term cost benefits of investing in education versus prison systems, and highlighted how the "whole student" funding approach would ensure equitable resource distribution across all school districts, finally resolving the issues identified in DeRolph v. Ohio.
Below are the samples of my work.
My exploration of education as a tool for instilling unity and bridging divides between communities last semester led me to realize the importance of accurate representation and information in media to prevent the villainization and dehumanization of already marginalized communities.While the education imparted in formal institutions serves as an important source of opinions, media—including films, music, and video games—is another crucial space where both young and old learn about experiences outside their own. This thought led me to explore representation-focused design through Dr. Eliane Bettocchi and Dr. Evan Torner's Decolonial Game Design Seminar, this semester.
The course challenges students to explore the questions: How can we design games differently? How can we foster dialogue between students in the American Midwest and Global South, an intercultural exchange premised on the game medium? How can we work to critique and decolonize game design, so as to create more space for others whose voices are not so often heard?
In the first half of the course, we spent time establishing the true meaning of decolonization and decoupling it from its casual adoption in educational and social sciences as a synonym for social justice or reform in those spaces while conveniently omitting Indigenous peoples and their struggle for sovereignty, or their contributions to the decolonial framework. As Tuck and Yang emphasize, decolonization is not a metaphor for other things we want to do to improve our societies and schools; it is a deeply unsettling historical process that decentres settler futurity and instead focuses solely on Indigenous sovereignty and futurity. We discussed the problematic parallels to colonialism in some of the most popular games like Settlers of Catan or Minecraft and deliberated the concept of a Hero in said games and how it differs from what a Hero might look like in a decolonial version of the game. Furthermore, we also established the distinction between bad, neutral, good and excellent representation of a community.
Midway through the semester we visited the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, where learned about the estimated 100,000 enslaved Black Americans who risked everything to cross the river northward in pursuit of freedom. The museum stood as a powerful testament to both the unimaginable horrors of slavery and the extraordinary courage shown by those who fled bondage, as well as the abolitionists who aided their journey toward freedom and the dream of equality.
Throughout this seminar, students were required to maintain a Reading and Play Journal that documented their thoughts and learnings from their experience playing the assigned games. Within my journal I analyzed how "80 Days" by inkle subverts typical colonial game mechanics, and reimagining "Risk" with mechanics that acknowledge native resistance in the form of Internal Politics Cards. I also explored the environmental injustice in "NORCO," and examined the potential adaptation of anti-colonial Brazilian cinema, How Tasty are my Little French Men, into an interactive format. Below is a copy of my journal entries.
Following the Spring break, I applied my learnings thus far into creating a board game that was representative of my experiences as an international student, called Fresh off the Plane in collaboration with some of my classmates and students from Brazil. With a gameplay format similar to that of Game of Life I focused on mechanics that reflect real life challenges affecting international students - from maintaining GPA to navigating cultural differences and visa restrictions. This process taught me that decolonial game design isn't just about critiquing existing structures; it's about creating spaces for authentic stories and experiences that resonate with players from diverse backgrounds.
The insights gained from this course extend far beyond game design, offering valuable principles that can be applied to any human-centered design project. Understanding how to identify and challenge dominant narratives, represent communities authentically, and create inclusive experiences has equipped me with a critical framework that will inform all my future design work. Whether developing digital interfaces, physical products, or interactive experiences, I now carry a deeper awareness of how design choices can either perpetuate or challenge existing power structures, making me better prepared to create more equitable and thoughtful solutions for diverse human experiences.
- Janine Benyus
American natural sciences writer, innovation consultant, and author
who coined the term biomimicry.
Taught by Dr. Whitney Gaskins, and Professor Nanditha Baxi Sheth, this seminar focuses on developing and practicing a variety of creative problem-solving skills by studying bees and the issues affecting them. The course encourages students to understand the relationship between humans, bees, and the environment and utilize that information to design innovative solutions.
One of the most interesting concepts I learned about in this seminar was ‘Wicked Problems.’ Coined by Rittel and Webber, this term refers to complex problems that cannot be solved easily, because of “incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize”. Many problems in this world, ranging from climate change to Colony Collapse Disorder (as taught in this course), don’t have one particular approach or solution that can fix everything. Oftentimes, decisions need to be made in order to select the best approach knowing that there are trade-offs and other possibly unknown, uncontrollable, or constantly changing variables.
In addition, throughout the duration of this course, I learned how to use a variety of technologies, such as 3D printing and laser cutting, as well as developing various types of prototypes. I also had the opportunity to work in multiple cross-disciplinary teams which showed me new approaches to design. I learned how the elements of nature could be used as inspiration for design.
The final project involved working on a bio-design project (one team will be selected to participate in the Biodesign Summit in NYC in July). Following are some of the artifacts for this course.
Following are some of the artifacts for this course.
Microplastics are small particles (1–1000 µm) of plastic debris resulting from the disposal and breakdown of consumer products and industrial waste. Exposure to them can result in a variety of health issues such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and inflammation. Various studies suggest that microplastics are associated with obesity, cardiovascular disease, reproductive disorder, and breast cancer. Current solutions for the removal of these particles, air filters in particular, are made out of plastic itself and other harmful substances, thus contributing to this issue. My team proposed a 100% bio-degradable air filter, called Plasticomb (Plastic-Comb) as an improved alternative.
One of the key facts, and the motivation for this project was a World Wildlife Fund study, according to which, humans ingest a credit card's worth of microplastics every single week. This combined with the various studies linking microplastics to a wide variety of health issues drew our attention to the concern and incentivized us to search for solutions.
The search for solutions was not as straightforward as one would hope. As mentioned before, several solutions (such as traditional HVAC filters already exist and address this issue), however, these solutions contribute to the problem by using plastic parts which in turn, generate more microplastics over time due to wear and tear. Moreover, these HVAC filters are only one tiny source of microplastics, which are generated by pretty much every industry. For example, clothing (synthetic fabrics), packaging (especially microwavable food containers), tire production, etc. There cannot be just one grand solution that addresses all these sources. In essence, the issue of microplastics is a wicked problem with multi-faceted factors impacting the effectiveness of proposed solutions. With this in mind, the team decided to narrow down what part of the problem to address.
After some preliminary research, the team decided to address one major part of the problem - airborne microplastics, one of the biggest sources of microplastics ingested by humans, using a 100 percent biodegradable air filter. This filter consists of a wooden frame with a honeycomb-like structure made using Bamboo, a layer of cotton fabric for smaller microplastics, and a woolen layer of fabric for larger particles (potentially infused with activated carbon). The team decided to use a cotton-wool blend for a couple of reasons -credible research supporting the effectiveness of this type of filter, cheap cost of materials, and high availability.
Consumers would purchase a subscription and receive replacement filters once the original one is used up. This would not only encourage the consumer to regularly clean the filters but also aid in the safe disposal of the microplastics collected by these microplastics. Moreover, the materials used to construct the air filter can be cleaned and reused for new filters.
The team used Makerspace Technologies (Laser Cutting and associated technologies) to create a prototype for our final demonstration. There were a couple of obstacles during the course of the project involving delays and time constraints. And although we did not have a chance to test our prototype extensively, or utilize activated carbon, we were able to present an artifact that gave our audience a good idea of the look and feel of our project.
Overall, this project was a great learning experience. The team received ample feedback from all those involved during the final presentation and identified several areas of improvement regarding presentation skills. The team recognized that we needed more practice to have a more cohesive presentation as well as to explain the background better. We also realized that we needed to consider the exact mechanics of how it would work with an air conditioning unit and provide more details on the usage of Bamboo. The next steps of this project involve testing and refining the product as well as addressing the criticisms provided in the feedback.