What kind of conversational practice do AI speaking apps provide?
Our analysis of 84 sessions between six Korean EFL learners and the speaking application Speak found limited opportunities to resolve misunderstandings. The application continued exchanges without addressing learners’ displayed misunderstandings, while learners’ attempts to correct speech-recognition errors met with variable success. The study shows why evaluating AI speaking tools requires examining how they support the collaborative work of maintaining understanding, alongside the opportunities they provide for spoken production.
Lee, J., & Park, Y. (2026). Conversation by design: Repair and interactional competence in L2 talk with an AI speaking application. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication.
Read the article
How AI feedback design shapes students’ revision
Our study of an AI writing tool with specialized feedback agents found that learners using the tool engaged in more revision cycles than those using standard AI chatbots. The findings highlight the importance of pedagogical interface design, while identifying limitations in feedback specificity and scoring consistency.
Park, Y., & Ryoo, J. (2026). Promoting revision in L2 writing: A mixed-methods study on the role of specialized AI feedback agents. Language Learning & Technology, 30(1), 1–20.
Read the article
How repetition contributes to conversational naturalness
In a study of synthesized speech, conversations containing structural repetition were rated as more natural than those without it. This finding identifies repetition as an interactional resource worth considering in the design of conversational technologies.
Park, Y., Cho, H., & Song, J. (2025). Not a bug, a feature? How repetition enhances perceived naturalness in synthesized conversation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction.
Read the article
Why teachers’ repetitions do different things in different activities
My analysis of second-language classrooms and ELF interaction shows how the functions of repetitions vary with the pedagogical focus and aims of the interaction. The 2014 study demonstrates why teaching practices need to be understood in relation to the activities and sequences in which they occur.
Park, Y. (2026). More than words: The multimodal practice of repetition in English as a lingua franca interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Read the article
Park, Y. (2014). The roles of third-turn repeats in two L2 classroom interactional contexts. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 145–167.
Read the article
How an emergency call becomes a dispute
Through a detailed analysis of a Korean emergency call, this study traces how the work of requesting help and establishing the reason for the call becomes displaced by argument. It demonstrates how communication difficulties develop through successive actions and responses.
Park, Y. (2025). Activity contamination in a problematic call made to the Korean emergency center. Pragmatics and Society, 17(1), 92–122.
Read the article