研究工具

https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=10139656-201106-201106150076-201106150076-209-227

量表授權請聯繫台大心理系陳淑惠老師https://sites.google.com/psychology.org.tw/shchenlab/home/%E9%87%8F%E8%A1%A8%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E6%8E%88%E6%AC%8A/%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E9%87%8F%E8%A1%A8%E6%8E%88%E6%AC%8A%E9%BB%9E%E6%AD%A4

Background The present study evaluated the psychometrics properties of a sensitive video-based test used in the evaluation of mentalizing skills, that is, the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition-Taiwanese version (MASC-TW). Methods We recruited two independent samples of nonclinical participants (N = 167) and adult patients with schizophrenia (N = 41). The MASC-TW and two other social cognition measures, namely the Chinese version of Theory of Mind task (ToM) and the Taiwanese version of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2 (DANAV-TW-2), and an executive function measure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), were administered to both groups. Results The MASC proved to be a reliable measure of mentalizing capacity, high Cronbach’s α value of 0.87. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the MASC-TW total correct scores was 0.85 across three waves of data collection. Across the entire sample, the scores on the MASC-TW were significantly correlated with verbal and nonverbal scores for the ToM task and recognition of facial and prosodic emotion on the DANAV-TW-2. Both executive function and emotion recognition emerged as noteworthy predictors of mentalizing, indicating that these two variables might play crucial roles in the development of mentalizing capacities. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that in patients with schizophrenia, the MASC was the most accurate discriminator of diagnostic groups, highlighting the validity of the MASC. Conclusions Overall, the MASC-TW is an ecologically valid and useful tool for assessing mentalizing abilities in a Taiwanese population. 

本研究之目的乃在編修適用於臺灣年輕成人之「中文版解離症狀量表」（DSS-C），目的一為檢驗量表的心理計量特性，目的二為探討解離症狀與創傷的關聯性。本研究採用273位參與者進行信效度檢驗，其中有220位參與者自陳報告曾經歷過至少一件創傷，進一步針對最受困擾的創傷事件，評量其創傷後壓力症狀嚴重度和創傷後成長程度；最後，再以91位參與者於四週後進行再測。研究結果如下：首先，驗證性因素分析結果顯示四因素結構是較佳的模式，包括：失自我感與失現實感、意識或記憶斷裂、感官錯覺、解離式再經驗。其次，四因素和全量表的內部一致性信度係數介於.73至.92之間，間隔四週的再測信度係數介於.66至.90之間，顯示DSS-C具有良好的內部一致性信度與時間的穩定性。此外，四因素分數分別與憂鬱、焦慮及壓力分數有顯著正相關，也可顯著預測四週後的憂鬱、焦慮及壓力分數，具有良好的效標關聯效度。四因素與創傷後壓力症狀嚴重度分數有顯著正相關，與權威孝道分數以及創傷後成長分數沒有顯著相關，具有良好的收斂效度和區辨效度。最後，曾經歷過童年不當對待經驗者的解離症狀分數顯著高於未經歷者。綜上結果，顯示DSS-C在臺灣年輕成人樣本具有良好的心理計量特性，可作為未來在臺灣測量解離症狀與探索解離相關研究之用。