21世紀環境危機與多物種正義:邁向多於人的解殖
「 21世紀環境危機與多物種正義:邁向多於人的解殖」研究群隸屬於陽明交通大學文化研究國際中心。中心的第二個五年期總計畫「衝突、正義、解殖:21世紀轉型中的亞洲」,積極檢視階級、種族、性別、性取向、族裔、宗教、障礙等權力關係的施為如何交織性地製造邊緣性,藉由階層化的分類與對待而將弱勢人群置於「非人」或者「次人」的邊緣處境。作為第四個子計畫的「 21世紀環境危機與多物種正義:邁向多於人的解殖」研究群,則希望進一步將人類與非人生命所共構的生命之網(Web of Life)及其中的權力運作視為一個整合性的研究框架,藉此拓展「衝突、正義與解殖」的主體想像與交織政治。
結合跨學科的研究者與研究方法,「多物種正義」研究群致力於走出歐陸啟蒙以降現代性思維中強烈的「人類物種中心主義」,轉而發展「多於人」(more-than-human)的多物種研究視角,強調人與其他非人的生命形式之間存在著不可忽視且不可化約的相互構造關係。我們深刻體會,內在於資本主義的人類物種中心主義造就了「自然是被動、廉價、等待開發」的資本掠奪邏輯,以致於資本主義全球化的歷史進程已為二十一世紀的地球帶來嚴重的環境浩劫與物種滅絕危機。也因此,本研究群的共通關懷與基進主張是:任何對於人類社會衝突、正義與解殖的思考,必然也必須同時考量人類對於地球上「非人類生命」的衝突與殖民,並將之納入多重權力運作軸線的交織性分析。
我們也認識到,在諸多被資本主義現代性所殖民的原住民文化中,對於「人類vs非人」、「生命 vs 非生命」的分類範疇與關係性理解,往往有異於西方「單一自然、多元文化」的自然主義式存有論觀點,不必然將「人類」視為外在於「自然」的獨特存有。本研究群也因此主張:任何「邁向解殖的多物種研究」提案,有必要重視原住民與邊緣化社群的存有論和認識論,積極體察各種在地與原住民知識對於全球性生態與經濟危機的反饋。
本研究群三位創始核心成員都長期進行多物種民族誌(multi-species ethnography)研究。蔡晏霖一系列以福壽螺與友善農耕為題的研究成果,跳脫台灣社會既定的農民 vs 福壽螺的二元對立衝突視角,轉而在多物種的生態修復關係中看見人螺共生的新可能。謝ㄧ誼的研究則透過多物種關係重新理解「市場」如何不只是經濟與交換的場域,而同時也是北京都市新興中產階級重建自我感與地方性的美學感知媒介,或是日殖台灣藉由生物安全追求城市現代性的關鍵地景。Jeffrey Nicolaisen(倪杰)則持續以佛教、台灣原住民、西方動物權論述等不同宗教-知識體系的相互轉譯與不可譯性來重新思考台灣動保運動中的多物種能動性與倫理。從2022年成立以來,研究群已舉辦十餘場演講、工作坊等活動,主題包括「多物種感知」、「自然與科技聲景」、「雲豹與生態修復」、「弱化人類視/世」、「頭前溪水議題與植物走讀系列」等開創性、跨學科議題,獲得各界熱烈回應。
“Conflict, Justice, and Decolonization” has foregrounded the questions of what life is and what life matters. The sub-theme project, “Environmental Crises and Multi-species Justice in the 21st Century: Toward Decolonization Beyond the Human”, seeks to expand and develop the critical sophistication of “Conflict, Justice, and Decolonization” by expanding justice to include the planetary and multi-species justice inherent to a globalized world and an interdependent planetary system.
Through the project of 20th century de-colonization, scholars of critical theory and cultural studies have examined and theorized the role of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, class, sexual orientation, and disability to expose the power dynamics that have oppressed various forms of marginalized peoples. At the same time, in colonized or indigenous cultures, the line between human and nonhuman, the sentient and insentient, the life worth honoring and the life unworthy of consideration, has often been less clearly defined by the line between human and nonhuman. Multi-species studies grows from the new recognition in dominant academic discourse and old recognition in many indigenous cultures and marginalized communities that the process of dehumanization may not be extinguished without recognizing the agency, rights, value, or equality of nonhumans, and honoring the realities of the indigenous cultures and marginalized communities that have always honored nonhumans. Many of the most urgent problems of the twenty-first century—including climate change, species mass extinction, crisis-induced migration, pandemics, animal commodification and abuse, and economic disparity—require a multi-species approach both because humans rely on interdependent multi-species planetary systems and because these problems affect nonhumans as much as humans. The five-year project under the sub-theme brings together scholars from anthropology, religious studies, archaeology, legal studies, contemporary art, and curatorial studies – to critically engage with analysis of, and theorization on, how we account for agency politically, historically, and relationally, in order to explores pathways toward ecological togetherness beyond the apocalyptic imagination of Anthropocene futures.
研究議題
1) 我們嘗試結合「環境正義」與「多物種民族誌」兩個學術領域的洞見,一方面保持對人類內部殖民關係的批判,一方面將環境正義研究對權力的洞見延伸至人類/非人的階序軸線。我們期待深入探究:某部分人類對於另一部分人類的控制,如何透過對於非人生命的控制來成就?而資本主義對於非人生命的榨取,又是如何透過對其他人類的榨取來達成?換言之,「人類/文化 vs 非人類/自然」的界線如何被系統性地用於否定特定人群與非人物種的生命、剝奪其權利與生存條件?
2) 我們以「多物種正義」為整合性思考視角,在「多於人」的框架下重新思考何謂「正義的主體」。西方政治哲學認為享有平等自由權的主體是「人類」的特有權利,而在當時法律框架中不被視為人的「次人」與「非人」生物,就被視為自然地排除在正義的社群想像之外。有鑑於此,本研究群嘗試思考:該如何重新設計「正義」的概念,將其與虛構的自由主義式個人脫鉤,轉而面向每一個人真正賴以存活的生命之網?該如何描繪我們所身處的、更為寬廣的物性關係與生態事實,體察各種截然不同的生命計畫、才能與存活樣態,並透過制度性的安排以整全這些多元的生命形式?例如,呼應許多原住民社會早有的自然觀以及歐美新興的環境賦權運動,我們是否可能在某種新的物種能動性想像框架下,賦予山川與其他自然存有物與人類商業、社會組織相似的法人地位與權利保障?
3) 我們以「多物種的人類世藝術」為行動主軸,積極關注各種批判性的當代實踐如何學習不再將「人類」與「自然」重重分離,進而打造各種創新性的「人類」與「非人他者」的關係性想像?尤其關注當代藝術實踐如何以藝術的想像力與表現力為描繪多物種世界的重要媒介?如何透過對於不同物種間交繫關係的重新體察,同時洞察生態環境和工業環境中人與動物、人與植物、人與礦物之間的各種關係,並指出超越環境危機末世論的各種出口?
總言之,當代最為急迫的危機,包括氣候變遷、大規模的物種滅絕、核子恐怖主義、全球疫情、海洋酸化、土壤流失、海平面上升、資源耗竭、工業動物的商品化與虐待,由危機導致的經濟不平等與遷徙等課題,都亟需多物種研究的介入與分析。不僅因為上述問題同時影響到人類與非人的物種,也因為人類仰賴著這個地球系統的多物種生命之網。而受惠於文化研究以及人類學對於原住民文化和被邊緣化社群的重視,多物種研究積極在兩者的基礎與對話上開展對「非人」物種能動性、權利、和價值的探究,重新評估人類與其他非人生命形式之間的交互構造關係,同時也嘗試深化既有後殖民文化研究對於「去人性」的邊緣化過程的理解與批判力道,進而開拓批判知識界對於當代危機與環境正義的分析進路。
具體而言,本研究群是一個跨學科的研究社群,匯集了人類學、考古學、宗教研究、物質研究、環境研究、環境法學、生物藝術、生態批評、藝術策展、社會運動、政治生態學等專長:
召集人
蔡晏霖
研究員
蔡晏霖(陽明交大人社系副教授)
謝一誼(陽明交大人社系博士後研究員、清華大學人類所兼任助理教授)
倪杰 Jeffrey Nicolaisen(玄奘大學宗教與文化學系助理教授)
莊雅仲(陽明交大人社系教授)
朱華瑄(陽明交大人社系助理教授)
彭松嶽(陽明交大科社所副教授)
江芝華(台灣大學人類學系副教授)
李仲軒(台灣大學公共事務研究所助理教授)
吳映青(香港中文大學人類學系博士、陽明交大人社系助理教授)
陳冠彰(高師大跨領域藝術研究所兼任助理教授)
研究生研究員
宋芝蘭 Gina Song(隆德大學東亞及東南亞研究中心博士生)
國際合作成員
Francesca Tarocco (Professor and Director of THE NEW INSTITUTE: Centre for Environmental Humanities (NICHE) Ca’ Foscari University of Venice 威尼斯大學新學院環境人文中心主任與教授)
Tobias Linne (Senior Lecturer, Department of Communication and Media, Lund University 隆德大學傳媒系高級講師)
計畫名稱與摘要—核心研究員計畫
本研究希望突破水田地景常見的「靜態時間性」,轉而以一種變動性與關係性視角,從地質深時間角度重新理解台灣鄉間最常見的水田地景。受惠於近年地理學量體轉向中的潮濕本體論,也深受「想像一種非資源開採式的地質學與人地關係」的地質人類學啟發,本研究計畫企圖探索什麼是有別於靜態時間性的「水田深時間」,嘗試以多物種研究著重關係性與變動性的視角重新看待水田,但又超越多物種研究聚焦於「有生命之人與非人生物」的可能侷限。我將重新解讀與詮釋蘭陽平原相關的地質與環境史研究,其次透過歷史圖資與耆老口述呈現宜蘭員山水田地帶百年來的水文變遷,希望呈現一塊水田如何既是一方不斷變動中也同時具有轉化能力的物空間,同時又是在與哪些其他物的共造關係中被理解與定義的。在此視角下,水田將不再只是生命活動發生的背景,而是在漫長時限中共同參與並形塑當代經驗的行動者。
This project attempts to re-frame our understanding of wet-rice ecology and landscape in rural Taiwan through notions related to “deep time”. Too often we see landscapes composed mainly of paddy fields as either backward (in need of modernization) or idyllic (awaiting to be protected). While the modernization frame projects a temporality towards the future, the idyllic frame seeks to keep the paddy field landscape still and unchanging. Both temporalities, however, share the common framework of seeing a paddy field as the backdrop of human activities, rather than as an assemblage of agentive forces that are both transforming and transformative at the same time. Inspired by the emergent fields of volume and vertical geography (Philip Steinberg & Kimberley Peters 2015, 2019) and geological anthropology ( Zeynep Oguz 2020, Richard Irvine 2020), my study will first resituate the wet-rice landscape in Northeast Taiwan in the tectonic and the environmental histories of the Lanyang Plain, followed by a re-examination of the multispecies, co-evolutionary history of wet-rice ecology, and how such an ecology has violently displaced and emplaced the Lanyang Plain through processes of settler colonization.
2019年底新冠肺炎爆發後,國際社會對於亞洲菜市場,也就是英語中所稱 wet market,產生了一波新的爭辯 (Tan 2013, Lynteris and Fearnley 2020, 謝ㄧ誼 2020),動物保育人士與科學家更重申對濕市場 (wet market) 生物安全(biosecurity)的憂慮 (Woo 2006, Lin 2020)。1970年代,當(wet markets)一詞在新加坡出現,對應的是有冷氣的「超級市場」; 濕市場的「潮濕」,指的是魚攤慣常用冰塊來保持海鮮的新鮮,冰塊融化後,加上用來保持清潔的流水,致使菜市場地板潮濕 (Tan 2013: 3, Zhong 2020)。Wet market 不僅慣用於使用英語的亞洲國家,更廣泛受到歐美社會沿用於指稱沒有冷氣,常溫下販賣鮮肉與海鮮的菜市場。相對於歐美的農夫市場(farmer’s market),國際間對 “wet markets” 的批評,牽涉到華人菜市場在常溫下宰殺家禽與海鮮,以及肉攤懸掛生肉的模式。潮濕成為了全球感官價值的摩擦叢結。但有關亞洲菜市場的社會性與生物安全基礎設施,仍缺乏實地研究作為比較分析的基礎。
本研究建立在2021年間以參與式人類學(engaged anthropology)在台北双連菜市場的田野工作上,探討藝術介入,菜市場/濕市場改革的過程,與二戰後台灣都市發展產生糾結碰撞; 特別關注菜市場基礎建設的潮濕美學(aquatic aesthetic)。2020年間一度面臨驅趕的台北双連市集及百名攤商,結合了社區百年大圳修復與生態復育,捷運綠地保留行動,以及市集美學設計改造,以「合作型策展」與「藝術介入」重新交涉「社區菜市場」的生物尺度,沿著潮濕美學,重新連結了菜市場與環境的關係。此民族誌分析這個潮濕連結裡的食品供給網絡,延伸進入批發市場以及屠宰場,探討動物屠宰與食用「新鮮」的文化親密性,如何賦予潮濕美學的正面與反面性。面對當代生物安全風險加劇,亞洲都市被迫重新思考「社區」範籌的當代意義,而台灣菜市場相關的基礎建設,延續的是日殖民時期將清代「街市」整合進公設菜市場,採巴洛可建築,重視挑高通風性; 二戰後隨著垂直城市(vertical city)的發展,冷戰密封性的公有市場設計,將市場與社區切割開來,持續在「街市」與殖民衛生襲產間產生張力。以潮濕基礎建設為軸線,本研究探討菜市場在藝術介入與潮濕美學間,可能的共生關係。
In response to the rising criticism of Asian wet markets as possible virus reservoir for the zoonosis infections, emergent in the outbreak narrative of Covid-19, anthropologists have written to debunk the wrongful identification of wet markets and wild animal trade in China (Lynteris and Fearnley 2020, Hsieh 2020). Yet calls for reform, or even a ban, of Asian food markets taunted as wet markets—since Singapore differentiated the category of wet market from super market in the 1970s—are advocated by politicians, animal rights activists, scientists and doctors across board, accusing it as a global biosecurity risk (Lin 2020, Maxmen 2021). Without substantial research on this form of food market in Asia, wet markets and associated vendors continue to be stigmatized, as accusations evolve into a conspiracy theory coupled with anti-China rhetoric. This research project is a critical engagement of the global frictions on wet market, focusing on the clashes of the aesthetic and politics of wetness embedded in food market infrastructure (Larkin 2013).
The ethnographic research focuses on the practices of, and the discourses surrounding, wet markets by centering on a case of wet market reform in Taipei: the Shuanglian market, located at the city center. In 2020, facing eviction, the Shuanglian wet market responded the forced relocation with collaborations with community organizers and architects, forming coalition with a conservation campaign of a hundred-year-old waterway and an MRT green park in the community. The aquatic aesthetics centering on wetness connects the historical waterway and the wet market’s collaborative design, challenging the often top-down reform of wet infrastructure in Taiwan—a pattern traceable to the Japanese colonial rule when street markets in the 19th century was replaced by public indoor markets, driven by colonial hygiene policy. The research further follows the network of produce stretched from the Shuanglian market, into the wholesale market and slaughter houses, providing an urgently needed ethnographic study of wet market infrastructure, its related biosecurity, and the social value of wetness. Analyzing the poetics and politics of wet market infrastructure in the modernist development of vertical city in the postwar Taiwan, this project sheds light on how art intervention and collaborative design provide an alternative form of community curation, by re-defining “community” alongside aquatic aesthetics against the mandate of public wet markets infrastructure being housed in an enclosure compound isolated from its environment—a form inherited from the colonial legacy—which continues to clash with street vendors and now a biosecurity liability. The project incorporates design anthropology to address community-oriented art intervention as key to the reform of wet market infrastructure in Asian global
倪杰(Jeffrey Nicolaisen)採用佛教與台灣的各種「教」,來重新思考與台灣的動物保護運動有關的人類與非人類網絡中多物種交互相關的能動性與倫理。他以帶有佛教精神的動物保護組織「關懷生命協會」為對象的多物種民族誌研究,探究漢人、原住民與非人類動物之間的互相關係。倪杰將繼續完善其在博士期間的研究,該研究發現:(1)在生態保護公開言談方面,受台灣宗教法律上的政治影響,佛教受到限制;以及(2)適用於一切有知覺的生命的「生命平等」概念,與基於歐洲的政治及環境理論的國際人權與環境保育法,兩者是不可通約的。與此同時,倪杰也將推進另一項研究計劃,專注於在台灣的包含人類、狗及猴子的多物種社群中,的非人類動物主體性研究,其目的是整合進化人類學的動物行為學的研究方法,與文化人類學的民族誌研究方法。倪杰已經對兩個台灣個案進行了田野調查,包含新的動物收容所零撲殺法律以及猴子與果農之間的衝突。
At the International Center for Cultural Studies, Nicolaisen will work with an emerging NYCU research team focused on multi-species ethnography. His ethnography on relationships between Han and indigenous people and nonhuman animals in Taiwan focuses on the Buddhism-inspired animal protection organization Life Conservationist Association. Nicolaisen will be further developing his dissertation research that found that (1) the politics of religion have restricted the participation of traditions such as Buddhism in public discourse on ecological issues and (2) the Buddhist concept of“equality of life,” which applies to all sentient beings, is incommensurable with international human rights and environmental conservation law based on European political and environmental theory. Nicolaisen will also continue to work on a project that focuses on the subjectivity of nonhuman animals in multi-species communities of humans, dogs, and monkeys in Taiwan. The goal is to integrate the ethological research methods of evolutionary anthropology and the ethnographic research methods of cultural anthropology to represent how both human and nonhuman animals evaluate their multi- species relationships. Nicolaisen has already conducted field research on two case studies that involve the new no-kill law at animal shelters and the conflict between monkeys and fruit farmers in Taiwan.
莊雅仲檢視新竹科學園區及其周遭的都市化。他的研究受到Henri Lefebvre的《都市革命》的啟發,認為都市化是一連串內爆-外爆過程的持續生成,造成人群、財富、貨物、技術與思想的匯聚,帶來內城、郊區、衛星鄉鎮等空間生產。他的計畫討論這些纏繞的大小世界,如何扣連轉動。鑒於竹科的物質基礎,他聚焦於半導體生命,檢視晶片的內在力量,及其造成的外延衝擊,包括科學城和水建制構成。從到底晶圓廠裡發生了甚麼事,促成了竹科在新世紀的戰略重要性的提問出發,他卻發現竹科的多重宇宙,那些介於城市之間,他所謂的有機共和國與潮間濕樂園等多物種、超物質的複數世界 (pluriverse)。
Ya-Chung Chuang examines the Hsinchu Science Park and the urbanization of its surroundings. Inspired by Henri Lefebvre’s book Urban Revolution, his research contends that urbanization is the continuous creations out of a series of implosion-explosions, resulting in the convergence of people, wealth, goods, technology and ideas, and also making possible the productions of space that develop into inner cities, suburbs, satellites township, and so forth. His project explores how these
worlds are entangled and interact. In view of the material basis of the HSP, he focuses on the life of semiconductors, examining the interior power of the chips, and the extensional impacts they cause, including the construction of the Science City and the water regime. Starting from the question of what have contributed to the strategic importance of the HSP in the new century, he discovers the multiverse in between the city, what he calls Organic Republic and Intertidal Paradise and other multi-species, super-material pluriverses.
臺灣的在來米在帝國殖民的脈絡下於二十世紀初開始大量轉向日本米市,奠基於此主題過去幾十年由臺日學者共同累積、並明確指出日人殖民下農業措施現代化的豐厚史料、歷史批判與農業經濟研究,並受啟發於近年歐美學界包括生態政治經濟學、環境史、批判地理學等將環境納入資本主義發展理論的跨學科努力,此研究計畫回顧當時臺灣總督府採取的一系列「改良」措施,探討市場經濟如何結合殖民治理的模式,就米—既是糧食作物亦是買賣商品之物—連同該作物所連結之環境,有系統地啟動了農業現代化下人與環境在此歷程中可能具有的轉變,而其社會結構再造的啟動機制又為何,其中米的物質性也運作其中形塑著特定的社會生態生成。透過對於上述核心問題意識,此計畫也嘗試呼應Karl Polanyi在其經典著作《鉅變》中指出土地如何在現代成為虛構商品的討論。目前正在執行有關米穀乾燥與分級的檔案研究。
This project examines how the measures that Taiwan Sotokufu adopted to “improve” local rice in early colonial years initiated the long-term socio-ecological transformation of Taiwan towards its agricultural modernization, with particular focus on the impacts of the combination of market economy, commodification, colonial governance, and the materiality of rice. With insights of fruitful empirical studies and efforts to theorize the environment in capitalism, this project hopes to deepen the discussion of the making of “fictitious commodities” that Karl Polanyi forged in his classic work. The archival research about rice drying and classification is in progress for this topic.
此研究關注數位科技與數據技術相關之日常生活與環境的轉變、都市數位化的過程、跨域協作與公共化的機制,希望藉此刺激與豐富公眾介入數位生活與都市治理的想像與實作,並更進一步探討數位科技與各種人與非人生命共同生存的可能。
This strand of research is interested in capturing different ongoing changes associated with data and digital technologies, including transformations in everyday life and environments, urban digitisation, collaborative practices in digital social innovation and mechanisms of public participation in digital innovation. Building on these understandings, the research will further explore the possibilities of data and digital technologies co-existing with human and nonhuman lives.
江芝華的研究聚焦於新石器時期的蘭陽平原人與環境間的關係,透過物質遺留討論台灣早期社會的樣貌。她的研究受新物質論的影響,重新思索「物」如何在與人及其他非人生物互動過程中,展現其所擁有的能動性。無論是早期視人類文化為適應環境的產物,或是後來強調探索人與環境長期互動的過程, 傳統考古學皆將環境與人類社會視為兩組獨立客觀存在、界線分明的範疇,忽略在長時限脈絡下,環境、物及人群間多元、複雜且破碎的共構、交錯關係,而當代所見的「環境」更是在這些不同關係建構過程中的一個切面,實難一分為二。在此視角的影響下,芝華嘗試重新分析宜蘭地區新石器時期人地關係的變化,尤其強調物在這些關係建構中所展現出來的能動性,此一能動性影響了新石器時期人群及其與所生存環境間互動的過程,甚而提供我們思索新石器晚期人群移動的可能因素。在當代思索氣候變遷對人類社會的影響時,透過此一視角,將避免簡化了我們與環境間的關係,可以看到所謂的環境其實是人、非人與物透過長時間互動所建構出來的,因此,所謂的「環境變遷」並非「自然」現象,亦非單純人類行為所造成。
Chiang’s research focuses on the human-environment interactions between human and the environment in the Lanyang Plain in the Neolithic period. Her research is influenced by the new materialism, which reconsiders how "things" demonstrate their agency in the process of interaction with humans and other non-human organisms. Whether viewing human culture as a product of adaptation to the environment or emphasizing the exploration of long-term interactions between humans and the environment, traditional archaeology has regarded the environment and human society as two separate, objectively existing categories with distinct boundaries. It overlooks the diverse, complex, and fragmented co-construction and entanglements of the environment, material objects, and human communities in a long-term context.
More importantly, the contemporary understanding of "environment" is itself one facet that emerges from the processes of constructing these diverse relationships and is difficult to divide into separate parts. Under this perspective, Chiang attempts to reanalyze the changes in the human-environment interactions during the Neolithic period in the Yilan region, with a particular emphasis on the agency exhibited by material objects in these relational constructions. This agency influenced the interactions between the Neolithic populations and the environment they inhabited, even providing possible approaches to explain the migration of Late Neolithic populations. When contemplating the impact of climate change on human society in contemporary times, this perspective avoids oversimplifying our relationship with the environment. It allows us to see that the so-called "environment" is actually constructed through long-term interactions among humans, non-human entities, and material objects. Therefore, the notion of “environmental change” is not a “natural” phenomenon nor solely caused by human behavior.
氣候訴訟一方面高舉「人」作為主體的尊嚴與價值,一方面又聚焦於「物」作為客體所展示的客觀真實,此一方興未艾的法律與社會場域,似乎具有打破停滯黏膩的舊體制的力量,但又突顯了法律系統尚待持續演化,積極反思「人」權的意涵作用以及科學的「客觀」權威,才可能徹底回應對當前氣候訴訟的深層批判與限制。而一個能夠不斷擴大包容被去除能動性的人與非人的新氣候體制,可能提供法院眼下需要的答案、也是法律社群未來應當努力的目標。
The research programme conducted by Legal scholar Chung-Hsien Lee departs from the results of previous investigations (and thoughts) into climate change litigation, the State of the Netherlands vs. Urgenda Foundation (2019) in particular.
This research highlights the pseudoism of the “perceived” neutrality of the court. The legal system employs the power of science to determine causation and the legitimacy of democracy to proceed with value judgment. It must make believed that the findings are value-free and in a dichotomy, allowing no grey areas to make a fair judgment. It is, therefore, the culprit in maintaining an air of perfect science and democracy, enabling people to view the legal practice as entirely mechanical and predictable. However, when confronting issues related to climate change, these structures are beginning to show their limits. Alternative legal paradigms are needed to overcome the limitations of relying only on scientific insights to determine climate-related causation and on human rights law to cope with the lack of political consensus at the international and municipal levels. This includes reassessing the assumed neutrality of court proceedings and confronting ambiguity within the legal system. The court cannot still struggle to maintain the self-produced illusion of the existence of perfect science and perfect democracy while determined to face the climate change emergency. In this regard, this research intends to stress the significance of actively reshaping the legal system and legal institutions, including courts, and thus creating a more adaptable platform to better welcome diverse voices from alternative sources when confronting the complexities of climate change.
吳映青的研究興趣為臺灣海洋漁業,博士論文以東北角高度商業化的鯖鰺漁業為主題。目前,她關注該漁業自20世紀中葉以來網撈漁法的引進和變化歷程,透過深入研究這個個案,試圖探討臺灣作為一個「漁業後進」國家的當代處境。
吳映青藉由考察人類漁撈活度中不可或缺的技術面向——漁具和漁法,來切入這個研究,將漁具和漁法視為人類、海洋生物和其他行動者之間共同參與演化的關係載體,通過探討特定漁法變化,她旨在闡明人類與海洋生物之間的相互關係,同時審視漁業發展中所涉及多重尺度的力量。
為了脫離將海洋漁業簡化為人類資源開發手段的主流敘事,本研究力求通過重構臺灣海洋漁業的地方脈絡,拓寬對當代海洋漁業治理的視角。
Wu’s research is focused on Taiwan's marine fisheries, particularly the highly commercialized mackerel industry on the country's northeast coast. Currently, Wu is specially engaged in the introduction and evolution of netting fishing methods in this fishery since the mid-twentieth century. Through an in-depth examination of this specific example, she hopes to investigate Taiwan's configuration as a "latecomer" country in the fisheries business.
To approach this research, Wu selected to investigate the essential technological features of human fishing activities, which are fishing gears and methods. Fishing gear and methods, in her opinion, are carriers of the co-evolutionary interaction between people, sea species, and other participants. Wu’s goal is to understand the connection between humans and marine life by researching changes in specific fishing practices, while also gaining insights into the different scales of power involved in fisheries growth.
This study aims to diverge from the mainstream narrative that simplifies marine fisheries as a means of human resource exploitation. Instead, it is dedicated to broadening the perspective on contemporary marine fisheries governance. One way to achieve this is by reconstructing the local context of Taiwan's marine fisheries. By delving into the specificities of Taiwan's marine fisheries, the study seeks to provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics and challenges involved in governing marine resources.
愛玉為台灣特有種,其雌、雄異株加上是隱花果,其唯一的授粉昆蟲為愛玉授粉小蜂,愛玉小蜂寄生、成長於雄株的愛玉果內,當沾滿雄花粉的愛玉小蜂再帶著花粉進入雌株底部進行授粉,是為相互的共生關係,正因愛玉生長及授粉的特殊性,過去愛玉的來源多為野生採集。
鄒族的愛玉採集者(多具有獵人身份)過去會組成愛玉採集隊前往中高海拔處採集野生愛玉子,他們熟知森林中愛玉的分佈,甚至透過愛玉與氣候、環境、生態進行關係描述,例如猴子會咬破愛玉的底部進行「催熟」,又或者山羌等動物會頻繁的出現在有愛玉果實的樹下撿拾猴子採食的愛玉落果。當代愛玉亦逐步突破種植上的限制,已有相當的採集者模仿野生愛玉的棲地,改以樹木、棚架、甚至是水泥柱進行栽培,會入山數天的愛玉小隊逐漸減少,此研究意圖透過跟著愛玉採集者/獵人走過去採集的愛玉路,透過共伴、共行逐步認知愛玉採集者/獵人如何描繪森林、環境、生態,同時比對過去的採集與當代的栽植,並且思考愛玉、採集者/獵人/種植者、愛玉小蜂、環境物種如何重新裝配出當代的愛玉地景。
Aiyu (jelly fig) is a unique dioecious species in Taiwan. Since it is a syconus, the only pollinator of Aiyu is the Aiyu pollinating wasp which parasitizes and grows inside the male Aiyu fruits. When the Aiyu wasp, covered in male pollen, enters the bottom of the female Aiyu plant for pollination, it forms symbiosis with Aiyu. Due to the characteristics of Aiyu's growth and pollination process, Aiyu was primarily collected in the wild in the past.
The Aiyu collectors of the Tsou tribe (often also hunters) used to form Aiyu collection teams and venture to high-altitude areas to collect wild Aiyu seeds. They were familiar with the distribution of Aiyu in the forest and even developed their narrative about the climate, environment, and ecology through Aiyu collection. For example, monkeys would bite the bottom of Aiyu fruits to accelerate the ripening process, and animals like Formosan muntjacs would frequently pick up fallen Aiyu fruits that the monkeys had eaten. In contemporary times, Aiyu cultivation has gradually overcome its planting limitations. Many collectors have created an environment similar to the natural habitats of wild Aiyu with trees, structures, and even cement pillars. The number of Aiyu teams that venture into the mountains for days has gradually decreased. This study aims to investigate the Aiyu collection path taken by Aiyu collectors/hunters in the past. Through walking and exploring together with the collectors/hunters, I seek to understand how they depict the forests, environments, and ecology, while also comparing past collection practices with contemporary cultivation techniques, and considering how Aiyu, collectors/hunters/cultivators, Aiyu wasps, and multispecies can be reassembled to create a contemporary Aiyu landscape.
博士研究員計畫
宋芝蘭為隆德大學東亞及東南亞研究中心博士生。她的研究以當代台灣和中國的蔬食主義和純素主義的發展和擴展為主。她對此主題的興趣源於兩地新興的氣候和動物倡議論述的出現,其中與避免肉食傳統與宗教實踐的關連。她的項目將研究新一代的素食主義者和純素主義者如何推動動物倫理和綠色消費。對於當地就「新興」的純素主義的理解和推廣方式,以及動物權益和可持續性等概念如何在當地脈絡下被轉譯﹐宋尤其感興趣。
Gina Song Lopez (Chih-Lan Song) is a PhD candidate at the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies. Her project focuses on the development and expansion of veg*nism in contemporary Taiwan and China. Her interest in this topic draws from the emergence of new climate and animal advocacy discourses in the region where meat avoidance has traditionally been associated with religious practices. Her project looks at the new generation of vegans and vegetarians promoting animal ethics and green consumption. In particular, she is interested in how ‘new’ vegan*sm is understood and promoted locally and how concepts such as animal rights and sustainability are translated into local contexts.
國際合作成員
Tobias Linné擁有社會學領域的博士學位,目前任職於瑞典隆德大學傳媒系的高級講師。
Linné博士的研究主要集中於批判文化研究領域,尤其對於批判動物研究和人類–動物研究感興趣。
2016年,Linné博士創立隆德大學批判動物研究網絡(Critical Animal Studies Network),網絡致力於對動物在人類社會、文化和媒體中角色進行批判分析的研究和教育工作。此外,他還在2013年和2014年擔任隆德大學普芬多夫高等研究所的「探索『動物轉向』:科學、社會和文化中人類–動物關係變革的觀點」(Exploring the ”Animal Turn”: Changing Perspectives on Human-Animal Relations in Science, Society and Culture)研究主題的項目負責人。
Linné博士在人類-動物研究領域發表了大量的論文,涉及多個主題,例如乳品行業的市場營銷策略(Linné,2016)、關於新型植物性食品產品的公眾辯論(Linné等,2019年)以及農民在社交媒體上的角色(Linné,2023年)。此外,他也經常應邀就數字媒體行動主義和動物權利等相關主題進行演講。
Tobias Linné holds a PhD in Sociology, and is currently employed as senior lecturer in Media and Communication Studies at the Department of Communication and Media, Lund University, Sweden.
Dr. Linné’s research is within critical cultural studies with a special interest in critical animal studies and human-animal studies more broadly.
In 2016 Dr. Linné founded the Lund University Critical Animal Studies Network, a research and educational network dedicated to critical analysis of the role of animals in humans society, culture and the media. In 2013 and 2014 he also acted as project leader for the research theme Exploring the “Animal Turn”: Changing Perspectives on Human-Animal Relations in Science, Society and Culture at the Pufendorf Institute for Advanced Studies at Lund University.
Dr. Linné has published extensively in the field of human-animal studies on topics such as the dairy industry marketing strategies (Linné 2016), public debates about new plant based food products (Linné et al. 2019 ) and farmers on social media (Linné 2023). He is also a frequently invited lecturer on topics related to digital media activism and animal rights.
Linné, T. (2016) ”Cows on Facebook and Instagram: Interspecies Intimacy in the Social Media Spaces of the Swedish Dairy Industry” Television and New Media. 17: 8, 719-733.
Linné, T., Jönsson, E., & McCrow Young, A., (2019) ”Many Meats and Many Milks? The Ontological Politics of a Proposed Post-animal Revolution”, Science as Culture. 28: 1, 70-97.
Linné, T. (2023) ”Swedish agriculture and farmed animals in social media” in Kaarlenkaski et al. (ed.) Animal Industries: Nordic Perspectives to the Exploitation of Animals since 1870. Berlin: De Gruyter