Let’s be honest. When something bad happens—like a crime—most of us think twice before getting involved. But here’s the thing: if you try to cover it up, even just to protect a friend or family member, you might end up in more trouble than you bargained for.
That’s exactly what Section 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 talks about. If you hide evidence, destroy proof, or lie to protect someone who’s committed a crime, you can be punished—even if you didn’t commit the original offence yourself.
Let’s break it all down in plain English.
In simple terms:
If you knowingly destroy or hide evidence, or give false information to help someone get away with a crime, you’re committing a separate offence under this section.
Even if you had no part in the crime itself, doing anything to protect the person who did it—by misleading the police or court—is enough to land you in legal trouble.
Think of it this way: you're helping someone cheat justice. And the law doesn’t take that lightly.
For someone to be convicted under this section, a few things need to be shown:
A crime happened.
You knew about it.
You took steps to hide evidence or gave false information.
And you did it deliberately, to protect the criminal.
If these boxes are ticked, the law will treat you as someone who helped cover up the offence. That’s a serious issue.
Here’s where it gets interesting. The punishment under Section 238 isn’t fixed—it depends on how serious the original crime was.
Let’s look at the breakdown:
If the crime was punishable by death (like murder):
You could face up to 7 years in jail, plus a fine.
If the crime was punishable with life imprisonment or more than 10 years:
You’re looking at up to 5 years in jail, and a fine.
If the crime was less serious (under 10 years of punishment):
The jail term can go up to one-fourth of the max punishment for the original crime, with a fine.
So yes, the law goes harder on you if you help someone hide a murder, as compared to, say, a theft. Makes sense, right?
Let’s put this in context with examples that could happen in real life.
🔹 Scenario 1: Destroying Evidence
Ravi sees his friend stab someone in a heated argument. Instead of calling the police, he burns the bloody clothes and throws away the knife. Ravi didn’t stab anyone—but he helped cover it up. He could be charged under Section 238.
🔹 Scenario 2: Lying to the Police
Meena’s cousin is involved in a break-in. When the police show up, she says he was with her the whole night—knowing that’s a lie. That false alibi is enough to get her into legal trouble under this section.
🔹 Scenario 3: Helping the Criminal Run
Let’s say you give someone a place to hide or help them escape after they committed a crime. Even if you think you’re “just helping out,” legally, you’re screening an offender.
Fair question. There are other sections in the law that deal with lying or hiding things, but Section 238 is specific.
This law applies when your intention is to protect someone else who’s committed a crime.
You might’ve heard about Section 201 of the old IPC, which also talked about causing disappearance of evidence. That now falls under this BNS section. It’s all been updated in the new legal system.
And Section 203 (also in the BNS) deals with giving false information, but not necessarily to help someone. Section 238 is clear: it's all about helping the guilty person escape justice.
The short answer? It depends.
If the original crime is serious (like murder or rape), then your offence under Section 238 is non-bailable.
If the original offence is minor, then your offence might be bailable.
So, the bail decision is closely tied to the seriousness of the main crime you’re helping cover up.
Again, depends on the original offence.
For major crimes: Yes, police can arrest you without a warrant (it’s a cognizable offence).
For smaller offences: No, they’ll need court permission.
Bottom line: the law doesn’t treat everyone the same—it adjusts based on the situation.
Imagine a world where people could just hide evidence or lie in court without any punishment. That would mean criminals could walk free just because someone helped them hide the truth. That’s not justice, right?
Section 238 exists to protect the system. To make sure people don’t mess with evidence, and that criminals don’t get away because someone helped them cheat the law.
Indian courts have often come down hard on people who try to mislead investigators or cover up crimes.
In one well-known case—State of Karnataka v. K. Yarappa Reddy—the court said that hiding evidence was a direct attack on the justice system.
The courts aren’t just punishing the cover-up—they’re protecting the right to a fair investigation for everyone.
Let’s say this straight: if you help a criminal hide, lie to protect them, or destroy proof of a crime, you’re crossing a line—and the law will come after you.
Section 238 isn’t about scaring people—it’s about reminding us that truth matters, and that justice can only be served when people don’t interfere with it.
So the next time you hear about a crime, don’t try to "help" by lying or hiding things. The risk isn’t worth it.