In the world of business and law, we often come across the term “company” or “corporation.” But have you ever wondered how a company can own property, file a case, or be sued in court when it’s not a real human being?
This is where the concept of Corporate Personality comes into play. As law students, understanding this concept is very important, especially in the context of Indian law. Let's explore this topic in a simple and clear way.
Corporate Personality means that a company is treated as a separate legal person. It is different from the people who form, manage, or run it.
For example, once a company is registered under the Companies Act, it becomes a legal person. It can:
Own property,
Enter into contracts,
File lawsuits or be sued,
Continue to exist even if the owners or directors change.
This idea is supported by the famous case of Salomon v. A Salomon & Co. Ltd. where the court held that a company has its own legal identity, separate from its members.
In India, this principle is accepted under the Companies Act, 2013. Section 9 of the Act says that once a company is registered, it becomes a body corporate with perpetual succession and a common seal.
Different scholars and jurists have given different explanations for how and why a company should be treated as a legal person. These are called Theories of Corporate Personality. Let’s look at them one by one in simple terms:
Main Idea: A company is not a real person; it’s just a legal imagination or “fiction.”
Supporters: Savigny and Salmond.
Explanation: According to this theory, only human beings are real. A company is just an artificial creation of law to help manage group activities.
Example: Like a cartoon character created for a story — it doesn’t exist in real life, but we treat it as real within the story.
Indian Context: In India, the law also treats companies as separate entities, even though they are not natural persons. The judiciary recognizes this “legal fiction” to ensure smooth business operations.
Main Idea: Companies are real, living groups of people acting together as a unit.
Supporters: Gierke and Maitland.
Explanation: This theory argues that companies are not imaginary. They are real social organisms with a will and purpose. The law simply recognizes what already exists in society.
Example: Think of a school – it exists as a real institution with students, teachers, and staff. Similarly, a company has real people working and making decisions together.
Relevance in India: Courts sometimes use this view when looking at the real functioning and responsibilities of companies, especially in criminal or environmental cases.
Main Idea: Companies are created by the State, and their existence is a concession or privilege given by society.
Supporters: Dicey and Austin.
Explanation: This theory says that the government gives companies the right to exist. So, companies must work in a way that serves society’s interests.
Example: Just like a driving license is given by the government, the right to form a company is also granted by law.
In Indian Law: The Companies Act, 2013 lays down the conditions under which companies can be formed. If companies misuse their powers, the law can cancel their registration.
Main Idea: A company is a legal tool created to achieve a specific goal or purpose.
Supporters: Brinz.
Explanation: According to this view, a company is not a person but a “legal vehicle” created to fulfill certain missions like providing goods, services, or public welfare.
Example: Like a pen is created for writing, a company is created for doing business or serving public interest.
Indian Practice: The object clause in the Memorandum of Association of a company defines its purpose. The law ensures that companies stick to their mission and are not misused.
Main Idea: A company is like a living organism with various parts working together.
Supporters: Otto von Gierke.
Explanation: Just like our body has different organs (heart, brain, lungs), a company has departments like finance, HR, sales — all working together.
Example: Think of a company as a human body — each part has its function but contributes to the whole system.
Though this theory is less popular, it helps in understanding the internal coordination of a corporation.
These theories are not just academic ideas. They help us understand how law treats companies and why certain rules exist. Here’s how they are useful:
Governance: Helps in designing rules to manage companies properly.
Accountability: Ensures that companies are responsible for their actions.
Public Interest: Balances economic activities with social welfare.
Legal Framework: Guides courts and lawmakers in interpreting laws.
In conclusion, the concept of corporate personality helps us understand why companies are treated as legal persons, separate from their members. Various theories like Fiction Theory, Realist Theory, Concession Theory, Purpose Theory, and Organism Theory give us different ways to view corporations under the law.
The Fiction Theory sees corporate personality as a legal imagination.
The Realist Theory focuses on the real functioning of corporations in society.
The Concession Theory highlights that companies operate with the permission of the state and must serve the public good.
The Purpose Theory shows that companies are created to achieve specific goals.
And the Organism Theory explains the company as a system with many functioning parts.
Understanding these theories allows students, lawmakers, and business professionals to build better corporate laws that ensure responsibility, transparency, and fairness in business. It also helps balance economic growth with social responsibilities, making corporations not just profit-making entities but responsible members of society.