WHAT ROLE DOES THE BIBLE PLAY IN OUR LIVES?
Peter Y. Woo 9/27/87
1. ITS NATURE.
It is fully human, yet fully God-inspired.
"All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching,
for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness."
Inspired: literally, God-breathed. (a) When God breathed into the
man made of clay, the man lived. Thus Scriptures vitalize our
spiritual awareness and thirst. It brings us life. (b) Breath is the
same word as Spirit. Hence, the Scriptures are inspiring, spirit
lifting, life-guiding. (c) When you read the Scriptures, you hear
God's holy breath. How awe-inspiring. You see His way of operations.
You become aware of His personality.
2. ITS AUTHORITY IS SUPREME.
No human institution can claim higher authority than the Scriptures.
On the contrary, the Scriptures are the judge of all human life,
conduct, beliefs, and institutions.
A Christian's duty is to submit his life to all commands in the
Word of God, and to eagerly study it. It is the most normal way
of receiving daily instructions as well as spiritual insight and
nurture from God. Hence it is of utmost importance for each believer
to develop good methods and habit of daily devotion time.
3. THE LIBERAL POSITION.
The ultimate goal of the Liberals is to reject the indictment of the
Word of God, that we are sinners, cannot save ourselves, and need
to receive Jesus as Savior. This would greatly humiliate the
"lofty" human spirit. This belief in the innate goodness in man is
the foundation of secular humanism which they will not surrender.
The Liberal therefore has to resort to downgrading all Old Testament
Scriptures as myths, that convey moral truths, but were scientifically
wrong and historically untrue. This remove the foundation and
unique authority of the moral teachings of the Bible, and now they
are free to reinterprete such moral teachings to compromise with the
prevailing philosophy of the times, such as existentialism, atheism,
Darwinism, Marxism, Buddhism, etc. They regard the Evangelical
Christian's submission to the literal teachings and active seeking
of Divine guidance for daily living as superstition or at best self-
improvement.
4. POSITION OF ROMAN CATHOLICS AND OTHER CULTS.
The Roman Church claims its traditions has higher authority, and
rejects all evaluation of their beliefs based upon the Scriptures.
For years their members are severely warned against reading the
Bible themselves, lest they err. This fear of freedom to read the
Bible alone and dependent only on the Holy Spirit's guidance, seem
to pervade all cults. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, even Mr. Witness
Lee's Local Church, all demand believers interpret the Scriptures
according to their strict writings on interpretation. "Relying on
the Holy Spirit alone" is regarded as dangerous, and is allegedly
the cause of so many denominations in Protestant churches today.
5. THE EVANGELICAL POSITION ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE SCRIPTURES.
During the Reformation, the reformers (e.g., Martin Luther, John
Calvin, Zwingli, Wycliffe) rediscovered the following principles
of Biblical intrepretation.
II Peter 1:19-21 "So we have the prophetic message reaffirmed,
to which you do well to pay attention as you would to a light that
shines in a dark place until the day dawns and the Daystar arises in
your hearts, with this most clearly understood, that no prophetic
Scripture can be explained by one's unaided mental powers. Because
no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead men spoke from God
as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit."
(a) It is possible, in fact only so, to know the meaning of the
Scripture by reading it with a humble spirit, seeking the guidance
of the Holy Spirit.
(b) God intends us to heed primarily the literal meaning of a message,
especially the original meanning of the human writer with regard
to his original listeners. Any "hidden meaning" may have spiritual
insight, but has less or little authority, unless collaborated by
other Scriptural passages. This basic principle of Biblical
interpretation is called the "Grammatical and Historical method".
(c) Even when one passage may have a primary meaning, it may have many
applications. For prophecy, some may have been partially fulfilled
in historical events, but there may be a final fulfilment in future.
E.g., the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 a.d. and the Holocaust under
Hitler are but preludes to the final, more terrible judgment to come
upon the Jews, during the Tribulation.
(d) All Scriptures are consistent, therefore any interpretation
must be consistent with all other Scriptures. Out-of-context
interpretations have no authority. Thus interpretation that
the Apostle Peter is the Rock on which Jesus is to build His Church
is inconsistent with the teaching from the rest of the Scriptures,
that Jesus Himself is the one and only Rock of our salvation.
(e) The Scriptures are a witness of God's intervention in human
history. Therefore all its historical records are to be accepted
as more reliable than other human records. Modern archaeology
have repeatedly verified this belief. The Bible is not a scientific
treatise. It talks of the Sun coming out from the east, from a
phenomenological point of view, rather than the earth rotating on
its axis. However, there are passages telling of the earth like
a ball hanging in space, that is not only scientifically accurate,
but far ahead of the scientific knowledge of the times of writing.
The belief that ALL Scriptures being inspired and historically
accurate, including Genesis Chapter 1, is known as Verbal
Inspiration or Literal Accuracy. It does permit us to attempt
to look at the Creation in more than one way. It is not inflexible.
The Liberals reject this doctrine as "idolatry of the Bible".
(f) We must interpret the Scriptures just as Jesus did. He took
the Old Testament verses literally in its authority, e.g., during
his temptation, or during his debate with the Jews. Yet He infused
new and profound meanings to the Scriptures, e.g., "God is the God
of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob." "Thou wilt not allow your Holy One to
see corruption."