Team 2
Investigating the Effects of Microplastics Exposure on the Neurological Development of Chicken Embryo
Carden Orr, Alice Tran, Rojan Khademi
Investigating the Effects of Microplastics Exposure on the Neurological Development of Chicken Embryo
Carden Orr, Alice Tran, Rojan Khademi
Introduction
Microplastics (MPs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in our world today and serving as a global environmental challenge. They are found everywhere, from our drinking water and food to clothing and the air we breathe. Evidence shows that not only can MPs cross our physiological borders, but they can also cross the placenta during pregnancy (Ragusa et al. 2021). MPs can also be found in other reproductive tissues like the placenta, semen, and ovarian follicular fluid (Zhang, et al. 2024). This raises risks of introducing toxic chemicals to fetuses. MPs can harm humans by disrupting molecular and cellular processes. Numerous studies have shown several mechanisms that indicate the exertion of toxicity: the activation of oxidative stress, triggering of inflammatory pathways, and uptake of cells through endocytosis. While the exact physiological mechanisms that demonstrate toxicity, such as long-term exposure in humans, dose-thresholds, and physical abnormalities, have not been fully studied, this review demonstrates that these mechanisms are well-articulated in studies regarding animal and cell-based models. (Khan & Jia, 2023). The brain is one of the first (and most important) organs to be formed in an embryo. Observing the size of the brain during development has long been used to determine the health of the brain and nervous system (Watanabe, et al. 2021).
The Chicken Embryo Model
To better gain knowledge on this phenomenon, chicken embryos can be used to emulate the development of a human fetus. Human and chicken brains share similarities in the early developmental stages of life. Chicken embryology has been deeply studied and there is a vast amount of information about every stage of development (Hamburger & Hamilton, 1951). The study of MPs has not been widely introduced in avian biology; therefore, it is important to increase the research in this area.
Research Question
Does a single exposure to microplastics (105 particles/mL) affect the neurological development of the chick embryo?
Experimental Methods
Control Group:
Eggs will receive an injection of only distilled water. The container used for the control water will be glass and confirmed to be non-contaminated by microplastics.
Chemical Group:
Microplastic orbs suspended in distilled water at a stock concentration of 105 particles/mL. This dosage is an estimation of the annual microplastic intake for an adult human (Cox et al., 2019).
Day 3 of Development: Treatment Injection
Inject 0.1 mL of the 105 particles/mL stock solution into the albumen of the fertilized egg using a sterile syringe.
Day 10 of Development: Data Collection
Eggs will be opened, and neurological development will be assessed by removing and weighing the brain. Observations will be made for abnormalities such as edema, hemorrhage, and asymmetry of the brain lobes.
Key Observations:
The primary focus is to observe the size and growth abnormalities of the brain. However, secondary observations will include other physical abnormalities, such as eye size, to provide a more complete picture of systemic developmental impact.
Results
A total of 62 chicken eggs were utilized to determine the effect of microplastics on neurological development of an embryo. The largest average brain mass was observed in the treatment group (n = 39), which received microplastics treatment (Figure 1). Eggs that received microplastics had a significantly heavier average brain mass than those in the control group (t= 3.9, df = 61, p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Comparison of day 10 chicken embryos in control versus microplastic treated groups in relation to brain mass in mg (A), brain size in mm (B), and red discoloration (C), eye size in mm (D). The treatment group had a higher average brain mass in mg (t= 3.9, df= 61, p<0.01), a larger average brain size in mm (t= 3.2, df= 61, p= <0.01), no differences in discoloration (t= 1, df= 61, p= 0.31), and no differences in eye size (t= 0.71, df= 61, p=0.48).
Discussion & Conclusion
In this study, we examine the effects of microplastics on the neurological development of chicken embryo brains. Microplastics have become a recent issue in our world today. They can be found in all types of water, tap water, bottled water, and ocean water. They can also be found in food, clothing, air, and more. Evidence shows that not only can microplastics cross our physiological borders, but they can also cross the placenta during pregnancy (Zhang, et al. 2024).
We found that on average, the brains of the microplastic treated group had a larger brain mass and size than the control group. The treated group was 27.91% heavier than the control and 14.88% larger in size. One limitation of the project was the low sample size. With a larger sample size, we would have been able to perform more experiments and formulate a more credible conclusion. While the sample size was the main issue. Our equipment was also outdated and small. Another limitation was the inexperience of working with chicken embryos and the fragility of their tissues. It was easy to accidentally tear tissues while manipulating the positions of the embryos. More practice with embryos would be helpful in decreasing these mishaps.
Other studies on micro plastics have highlighted their effect and not only animal, but also human health. In both males and females, toxicity in the developmental stages of an embryo may be caused by the chemicals that reside in micro plastics. Oxidative stress, epigenetic changes, and the inflammation all occur with microplastics present in the bloodstream (Zhang et. Al, 2024). In future studies, the question of whether the swelling of the brain is caused by a blockage of microplastics in small vessels or an increase of water retention should be asked.
The entire group worked together to designed the experiment. A.T. led the data collection efforts during lab. R.K. organized the data and conducted the data analysis using image J. C.O. did data analysis and prepared the figures. We collectively wrote the first draft of the assignment and all edited and formatted it.
References
Cox, K. D., Covernton, G. A., Davies, H. L., Dower, J. F., Juanes, F., & Dudas, S. E. (2019). Human Consumption of Microplastics. Environmental science & technology, 53(12), 7068–7074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01517
Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev Dyn. 1992 Dec;195(4):231-72. PMID: 1304821. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001950404
Khan, J. N., & Jia, J. (2023). Health Effects of Microplastic Exposures: Current Issues and Perspectives in South Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2023 May;64(5):301-308. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0048. PMID: 37114632; PMCID: PMC10151227.
Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, et al. (2021). Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106274. Epub 2020 Dec 2. PMID: 33395930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274
Watanabe, A., et al. (2021). Novel neuroanatomical integration and scaling define avian brain shape evolution and development. Elife 10: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68809
Yin, K., Lu, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Secondary brain injury after polystyrene microplastic-induced intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with inflammation and pyroptosis. Chem Biol Interact, 367, 110180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110180
Zhang, Z., et al. (2024). Reproductive and developmental implications of micro- and nanoplastic internalization: Recent advances and perspectives. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 286: 117245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117245