by Roy and Nancy
We've arrived in Changhua after an hour long ride on the train. The air feels different: just as hot as Taipei, but certainly less humid. In this city, there is no convenient walk to an MRT station, nor did I really spot bus stops on the way to our hotel, which is one of the things I first noticed. We'll probably be getting around by a private bus a lot while we're here.
After arriving at NCUE and introducing ourselves to the GEO department students of NCUE, our lecture day consisted of three different lectures discussing long term socio-ecological research at NCUE surrounding wind farms and ecological health on the coast. Yen-Chu prefaced our lectures with an explanation of why we're in Changhua: it's because this a more rural, under-resourced area that we've decided to come here. This is a really important part of exploring environmental resilience, because poorer communities are the most vulnerable to climate change and disasters caused by it.
Professor Yu-Ling Song and Research Fellow Wei Chi Lin introduced some social and environmental problems in Changhua, explaining how it is difficult for the city to push forward with renewable power because of its socio-economic troubles. It's hard to control pollution when caught between the attractiveness of green use energy and the economic/environmental harm green energy can inflict on people and animals.
For example, if you put solar panels on farmland, cultural heritage is lost. Put it on wetlands and the wildlife gets disturbed. Oftentimes, land use conflict is at the core of this controversy. Taiwan is a small island with a large (and aging) population, which is relevant to many discussions of issues in the nation.
Fangyuan is a potential area for solar power construction, and studies are being done to determine how the flat community, such as the sediment and crabs, will be affected.
We got to know the NCUE students and did a little icebreaker.
We were shown many different species of crabs from the Changhua coast.
As Yen-Chu added, Changhua "provides a window for us to understand many environmental issues that are happening in Taiwan".
"The biggest risk of climate change is the perception that someone else is gonna solve it for us" - quoated from our speaker from Orsted.
So why does all this research matter? Currently, it's the only way awareness can be spread about marginalized areas in Taiwan. No one wants to live in Changhua (especially since it's overshadowed by Taichung) and so no one really cares to do something about its environmental issues, but that can change. In such areas, the government often overlooks the negative effects of decisions such as the development of green energy.
Renewable energy is often seen as a wholly good thing, however, there is a problem with the building of wind turbines on the coast of Taiwan. Firstly, there has been an oyster production crisis. Annual production was reduced by 10%, an issue considering 60% of oysters in Taiwan come from the south. In Changhua especially, locals really rely on oysters for a living, and wind turbines make this harder because they disturb the oysters and cause more mud and algae to cover the intertidal zone. Farmers who have been in this industry for decades have only now begun to see this phenomenon occur.
Our second lecture was on data collection and why monitoring is necessary for progress. A few social factors to monitor was: Social change, economic weakness, population out flow, neew immigrants and migrant workers. Factors that are environmental changes are: ecological degradation, land subsidence, water pollution, coastal erosion. Other factors are: Industrial zone development, solar panels, offshore wind power. It is necessary because environmental changes affect sustainability and our social responses and choices are impactful on the environment and ecosystem—a cyclical equilibrium.
Our third lecture was given to us by Chih-An Lee, a representative of Ørsted, a green energy company that transformed itself from Danish oil to renewable, fully phasing out coal by 2023. Ørsted aims to create a world that runs entirely on green energy. We learned the difference between Carbon Neutral Business and Carbon Neutral Footprint, the latter targeting the entire supply chain.
Taiwan is the first place with coral that Ørsted has placed a wind farm, as a part of the Recoral experimental program, in which coral is collected from April to June and incubated before being moved to the wind farm. This way, effects on coral can be tested and any averse of effects of the wind farm can be tested in advance.
Even though the time we spent in Changhua was short, the learning gained from professionals was immeasurable. The urgency in the three presentations could be felt and we gained newfound confidence in combating climate change through renewable energy and environmental and social technology.
by Roy and Will
Dr. Tsai showing us the biodiversity of the mudflat.
During our time in Changhua, we had the privilege of taking a full day field trip to the coast. On this field trip, we participated in a mixture of excursions and lectures that helped us gain a deeper understanding of the coast’s unique landscape and the economic and cultural importance it holds for local people.
Outdoor Excursion: Changhua Coast
When we arrived to the coast, we started our day with an exploration of an intertidal mudflat– which serves a variety of economic and farming purposes. We were guided by Dr. Tsai, who is an accomplished environmentalist whose work has surrounded strengthening the environmental and social resilience of the Chanhua community. Our tour of this natural area started with an introduction to the vast fields of mangroves at the front of the shoreline. Though it is generally thought that mangroves serve as an asset to ecosystems, Dr. Tsai explained that in Changhua, rather, they pose a threat to the mudflats and the species that feed off of them– like shorebirds. Environmentalists have advocated for the removal of these mangroves as they continue to erode the mudflat, but due to public misconceptions of the role mangroves play, this has been difficult to accomplish. As we toured the coast and walked through the mudflat, we walked along a paved road which was built for local economic development. With this in place, shuttles can easily transport tourists to and from the mudflat for a price of $1,900 NTD.
You might be wondering, why exactly are tourists paying this price to travel down Changhua’s mudflat? That would be the main attraction of the area– the oyster farms. These oyster farms spread miles along the mudflat, and at low-tide, tourists are able to visit to participate in harvesting. When we visited, there was even an activity where tourists could participate in building new oyster farm infrastructure where you could compete to see who can dig the wooden stake into the ground fastest.
After learning about the centrality of oyster farming on the Changhua coast and seeing how this is incorporated into the region’s eco-tourism industry, we then walked back to the front of the shoreline, where the mangroves stretch along the coast. As Dr. Tsai guided us on a walk through the mangroves, he told us how they not only are eroding the landscape of the mudflat, but also decreasing biodiversity. Outside of the mangroves, you can find up to five different kinds of crab species in different colors– red, black, and white mainly –which serve as a valuable food source for local shorebirds. Although, where the mangroves stand, crab diversity is limited to only one species, which poses negative feeding prospects for the neighboring seabirds.
After our tour by Dr. Tsai, we left for a lunch full of traditional oyster dishes locally sourced at a neighboring restaurant to the coast. Through this start to our day on the coast, we were able to gain a close look at the ecosystems of Changhua’s coast, and how farming and economic development are related with each other in this region.
Walking through the mangrove forest, learning about the impact of sedimentation on changing the estuary ecosystem.
First was a lecture by Dr Tsai, who introduced us to one civic environmental movement: the fight against Kou-Kwang Petrochemicals.
Afternoon Lectures: Dacheng Junior High
After lunch, we returned to Dacheng Junior High to have our lectures for the day. These lectures gave us three different perspectives of environmental affairs on the coast.
Dr Tsai chose to do his dissertation in Changhua because it is a very underrepresented community. In fact, the school we were having our lecture in is in the only junior high school in Dacheng. Petrochemicals are a state-owned enterprise and therefore very hard to fight against.
Kou-Kwang Petrochemicals used to be in the natural coast area, where there is (supposed to be) no land reclamation (as opposed to industrialized coast and middle land reclamation). The government was afraid that Formosa petrochemical would be the largest petrochemical company in Taiwan and built another, Kou-Kwang DPP. Of course, the locals were very unhappy with this decision, due to health concerns such as the increase of cardiovascular disease in the area, and operation for this plant stopped in 2008. Ever since, party alteration would continue happening as the plant migrated from Yunlin to Changhua. Although the DPP are known for aligning closer to environmentalism and green energy, this is an example of how certain political parties do not always embody certain environmental positions.
Tsai summarized his strategies against petrochemicals, which are as follows: 1) The matter must be treated as a national widespread concern instead of a local one 2) Invite all NGOs to join the union 3) The time delay tactic and 4) Use star species to attract people's attention.
For number 4, we learned about the conservation efforts made for the White dolphin. More than 70 thousand people joined this environmental trust which gathered many students and citizens to gather in protests, parades, and more near the reclaimed land. We learned about how President Ma was eventually swayed to see how serious the problem was.
The core value of this trust is to protect the environment and not to make money, because ecology and ecotourism can help sustain the place. In Taiwan, as our lecturer said, environmental protection may require political neutrality.
Our second lecturer, Mr. Hsieh talked about the process of construction and supply on the coast, giving some insight into the perspective of those that do work with wind power and ocean research. To utilize wind energy on the coast, it is sort of impossible to avoid any habitat of the white dolphin, but if you can’t stop wind power from happening then you need to find a way to work with the system.
Place based education and deliberative democracy is important to conservation efforts. Tacheng represents the prevalent phenomena of tensions between governmental environmental regulations and local economic needs. The community believes that the wetland belongs to them whereas the government claims it to be public land. The core of the Changhua wetland controversy is that local people want more economic development- this is a recurring problem if you recall learning about the Jiading wetland.
The deal here is how to go from taboo to civic action. This involves deliberative dimensions; starting communication within a community, demonstrating student capacities in environmental citizenship.
Reflection
Our full day trip to the Changua coast was an experience that was pivotal in reinforcing the main theme of week three: renewable energy and community revitalization. With expanding wind power development, we often think about the local communities and ecosystems that are often disregarded. By visiting the coast and listening to the expertise of different environmentalists familiar with Changua, we were able to understand the centrality of oyster farming, local eco-tourism practices, the positionality of wind farm industries, and how place-based environmental advocacy may be fostered by Changhua’s future generations.
Our third lecture talks about engaging youth in civic action, using case studies from Changhua coast.
by Jasmine and Connor
Students walking across the rice field that has just been harvested.
The Dayu Community Farm was one of our favorite parts of the study abroad program as we got to meet a community of wonderful people and learn about the different customs and farming techniques. The entire theme of this farm visit is community revitalization as the community comes together to grow the farm and help support each other in their endeavors. We first stopped by the nest academy, which is a classroom for the elderly to learn as well as a community care center for the public to utilize. At this place, we learned that this place used to be a pig pen. They introduced us to the farm and told us to wear these bamboo hats as that is what the farmers wear when they go to work.
We toured around the farm seeing a variety of different plants and recyclable materials being put to use. We walked by a recyclable table, which means that the community utilizes recyclable materials to make a lot of their daily items. During the tour, we walked by a little house where they showed us how a man gets a woman to fall in love with them. The man is supposed to be outside on the porch and sings a song to attract the attention of the woman. The woman will then decide to open the blinds or the windows and determine whether or not to welcome the man into the house. If she finds the man attractive, then she will let him into the house. We were very intrigued by this unique custom by this elderly community.
Before we walked towards the rice field, we met a group of elderly people. These people showed us true hospitality and offered us lychee as well as some of their soup. We gratefully accepted their offer and we learned a lot about how welcoming this community is. It seems that everyone in this community knows each other and are willing to offer help towards the foreigners. After serving us their delicious lychee and soup, we continued to walk past the giant rice fields. While we walked by that place, it seemed that everything was already harvested. Therefore, we did not get to see the full stalks of rice.
They took us into a classroom where we were then taught how to make bamboo coasters. While the teacher was doing the bamboo coasters with ease, we often struggled to keep up with him. For making the coasters, there was a lot of weaving and hand-eye coordination. We had to keep track of the patterns as well as make sure that our bamboo sticks were straight. After weaving, we had to glue bamboo sticks to the edges of our weaves and wrap it in twine. I would often mess up on this step which led to me not finishing my coaster in time. However, for people who finished their coasters first, they received gifts from the farm like bamboo baskets, bamboo hats, and other bamboo decorations.
After our bamboo class, we ended it off with a giant feast prepared by the farm. This was one of the best meals we had on the study abroad program. The meal consisted of fried fish, pork belly, duck, cabbage, three cup chicken, mushrooms, and many more. The food was all from their farm and we were glad we got the opportunity to enjoy such fresh food. At the end of our day at the farm, they gave us all small souvenirs to take home.
Dayu Community Farm teacher teaching students how to make the bamboo coasters.
The Chelungpu Fault
After the visit to the Dayu Community Farm, we made our way to the 921 Earthquake Museum. The museum was the actual location of where the earthquake had happened on September 21st, 1999. This earthquake had a magnitude of 7.3, and caused 2,415 deaths.
When walking in the first exhibition, we were able to see a simulation of what a room would look like after the earthquake, and our tour guide had explained the reasoning behind the design. The room was all white because for Taiwanese culture, white had represented more negative memories. We then walked out, where we were able to see the Chelungpu Fault Gallery, and the uplifting the earthquake had caused to the area. Our tour guide further explained the design of this gallery: the white part represented the boundary, the top part of the building represented the needle, which connected with the cables, representing the thread, which all together represented the image of stitching the wound caused by the fault. Dr. Weng had also mentioned the reason how the structure had also helped the preservation of this site from erosion.
Something that was cool was the Earthquake Engineering Hall, where there was an indoor exhibition with interactive experiments. We were shown two different experiments, one called the “soil liquefaction experiment,” where we could see the dangers of living near the sea or river, as during earthquakes, water comes up, which could allow the houses to sink and collapse if not held up correctly. The other one was where there were four displays of different structured houses, and we would see which structures would hold better during an earthquake based on their foundations.
After the two experiments, we walked out and saw the display of the North classroom of the Kuang-Fu Junior High School. The tour guide described it looking like a “pancake,” and explained how the collapse was due to weak column structures. We further learned that on the left, was actually the gym of the junior high school, but now it’s become a gallery where you could watch a quick cartoon clip in the theater, or experience the earthquake simulation. Unfortunately, we were not able to experience the earthquake simulation because all the seats were already filled up, but it was an awesome tour.
Overall, we feel like this trip to the museum was really cool to see and experience because there were the actual buildings preserved there. Not only that, but this place creates a great place for education and awareness. we think the way it’s set up is really good for people to learn about not only earthquakes, but the considerations of where or how your house is built from doing the interactive experiments at the Engineering Hall. This earthquake was an unfortunate situation that of course can’t be prevented, but created a way to learn from it. This allowed us to see how Taiwan had used this earthquake as a learning experience, which further allows for future structural engineering designs, emergency preparations and responses.
First room exhibition showing a simulation of what a room would look like after the earthquake.