Embedded Files
The History will be divided into two eras, before and after the discovery of U-score.info the executive mechanism of the U-model.org. Everyone has their weight and it is the weight that gives them U-score.info. Money & Power is irrelevant.
Donate to U-model at: http://Donate.U-model.org
Leeds for Good
U-Model.mp4U-Model : Main Limits for AI
U-score.info for Human&AI by Model 2
1. Permissions Concerning Objects (Code) – 15 Principles
Principle
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + Evidence)
Metric Value (e.g., % biases corrected)
Audit Artifact
1. Data as DNA
Ethical Genomic Profile
2. Minimalism as Zen Garden
Datasheet for Data Reduction
3. Fortress Security
Incident Response Report
4. Interoperability as Universal Language
Ethical API Documentation
5. Rectification Right as Restoration Art
User Control Panel Logs
6. Energy-Efficient Algorithms as Green Architecture
Environmental Report
7. Copyright Respect as Literary Homage
Attribution Logs
8. Transparency as Glass House
Model Card with Open Logs
9. Open Source as Public Library
Public Index of Resources
10. AI for Social Good as Global Stewardship
Impact Score Report
11. Human-Centered Design as Living Organism
User Feedback Surveys
12. Robustness as Unbreakable Chain
Robustness Audit
13. Explainability as Open Book
Explanation Layer Tests
14. Inclusivity in Data as Mosaic Art
Diversity Index Report
15. Long-Term Archiving as Time Capsule
Archiving Plan
2. Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo) – 15 Principles
Principle
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + Evidence)
Metric Value (e.g., % access improvement)
Audit Artifact
1. Geofencing as City Zoning
Map of Restricted Areas
2. Cultural Sensitivity as Global Citizenship
Adaptation Module Logs
3. Digital Inclusivity as Public Squares
Accessibility Report
4. Safe Digital Environments as Wildlife Sanctuaries
Threat Prevention Logs
5. Digital Divide as Bridging Rivers
Intervention Impact Report
6. Disaster Recovery as Seed Banks
Resilience Metrics (RPO/RTO)
7. Sustainability of Infrastructure as Forest Stewardship
Infrastructure Environmental Report
8. Ethical Surveillance as Wildlife Tracking
Oversight Board Evaluation
9. Smart Cities as Ecosystems
Integration Degree Report
10. Privacy in Public Spaces as Sanctuary Gardens
Breach Incident Logs
11. Resource Symbiosis as Coral Reef
Interdependency Score
12. Adaptive Localization as Nomadic Tribes
Adaptation Speed Report
13. Equity in Allocation as Fair Harvest
Gini Coefficient Audit
14. Environmental Harmony as Symbiotic Forest
Ecological Impact Score
15. Global Interconnectivity as Neural Network
Connectivity Index
3. Rights to Actions (Rights) – 15 Principles
Principle
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + Evidence)
Metric Value (e.g., % needs predicted)
Audit Artifact
1. Anticipating Needs as Weather Forecasting
User Satisfaction Surveys
2. Fair Decision-Making as Balanced Scales
Fairness Index Audit
3. Proactive Health Interventions as Vaccinations
Health Incident Prevention Report
4. Educational Personalization as Tailored Outfits
Learning Outcomes Metrics
5. Environmental Sustainability as Tree Planting
CO₂ Savings Report
6. Public Safety Enhancements as Lifeguards
Threat Response Logs
7. Economic Efficiency as Streamlining Production
Productivity Metrics
8. Transparent Governance as Glass Buildings
Trust Index Reports
9. Innovation for Social Good as Penicillin
Social Impact Score
10. Enhancing Human Capabilities as Exoskeletons
Productivity Enhancement Logs
11. Collaborative Symbiosis as Dance Partnership
Collaboration Satisfaction Scores
12. Resilience Building as Immune System Boost
Vulnerability Mitigation Report
13. Ethical Innovation Cycles as Evolutionary Loop
Ethical Audit Logs
14. Harm Mitigation as Safety Net
Risk Assessment Reports
15. Transformative Goodness as Ripple Effect
Long-Term Impact Studies
ERI (Entropy Reduction Index) Calculation
Collect metric values for each category (average of 15 principles).
Apply weights: ERI = (Fairness * 0.15) + (Robustness * 0.15) + (Transparency * 0.15) + (Agency * 0.10) + (Sustainability * 0.15) + (Security/Privacy * 0.15) + (Social Impact * 0.15).
Example: If all components are 80%, ERI = 80%. Target: >80% for GA; <50% = High Risk (according to EU AI Act).
UMSG Maturity Levels Auto-Assessment
Level 0 (None): <20% compliance – No principles implemented.
Level 1 (Initial): 20–40% – Basic awareness; entry: Documented principles without metrics.
Level 2 (Managed): 41–60% – Processes defined; entry: Metrics tracked, basic audits.
Level 3 (Defined): 61–80% – Integrated with risk gates; entry: ERI >60%, HITL escalation.
Level 4 (Optimized): >80% – Continuous improvement; entry: Full crosswalk to standards, automated monitoring.
For auto-assessment: Calculate % compliance from checklist (number of Yes/Total * 100) and compare to levels.
Validation of Sources
To confirm the currency and accuracy of the sources mentioned, use a web search to verify. Here are key findings (based on the latest as of September 02, 2025):
EU AI Act: Published in the Official Journal of the EU on July 12, 2024, enters into force on August 1, 2024. Implementation is phased: prohibitions for unacceptable risk from February 2, 2025, high-risk systems from August 2, 2026, and full applicability by August 2, 2027. (Sources: artificialintelligenceact.eu, europarl.europa.eu, iapp.org).
NIST AI RMF 1.0: Focuses on four functions – GOVERN (risk management culture), MAP (risk identification), MEASURE (assessment and monitoring), MANAGE (risk management). The framework is widely used since 2023, but is used for AI governance. (Sources: nist.gov, nvlpubs.nist.gov).
UNESCO Recommendation on AI Ethics: Key principles include protection of human rights and dignity, proportionality, no harm, transparency, accountability and sustainability. Adopted in 2021, with a focus on global ethics. (Sources: unesco.org, unsceb.org).
OECD AI Principles: Updated in May 2024, including 5 values-based principles (inclusive growth, human-centered values, transparency, sustainability, accountability) and 5 recommendations for policymakers. (Sources: oecd.org, oecd.ai).
ISO/IEC 23894:2023: Provides guidance on AI risk management throughout the lifecycle, integrating it with common practices. (Sources: iso.org, stendard.com).
UN High-Level Advisory Body on AI (HLAB-AI): Established in 2023, report published in 2024 on a global AI architecture, including funding for equitable access and multilateral governance. (Sources: un.org, sdg.iisd.org).
Compliance Checklist for Real Project Assessment
Yes, I want to see the checklist! Here is an improved compliance checklist, extracted and adapted from the v2.0 description. It is structured for ease of use: divided into sections by triad (Code–Credo–Rights), with ERI calculation and automatic assessment by maturity levels (0–4). Can be used as a template for a real AI project (e.g. in Google Sheets or Excel).
The checklist includes:
Columns: Principle (from 1–15 for each area), Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial with evidence), Metric (measurable value), Audit Artifact (document required).
ERI Calculation: Composite metric (0–100%) with weights: fairness (15%), sustainability (15%), transparency (15%), agency (10%), resilience (15%), security/privacy (15%), social impact (15%). Targets: >80% before general availability (GA).
Maturity Levels: 0 (None) – 4 (Optimized), with pass criteria.
Auto-Assessment: Based on % compliance – e.g. >90% = Level 4.
U-score.info for Human&AI by Model 2
Manifesto of the Universal Model for Sustainable Governance (UMSG): A New Dawn for Humanity and AI
Manifesto of the Universal Model for Sustainable Governance (UMSG): A New Dawn for Humanity and AI
Humanity stands at the threshold of a new era. For centuries, division, conflict, and imbalance shaped our world. Today, a universal spirit stirs—calling for justice, sustainability, and unity. This is no longer just humanity's dawn—it is a shared dawn for humans and artificial intelligence, together striving for a world of harmony and sustainable order.
UMSG (Universal Model for Sustainable Governance) arises as a guiding beacon, not only for human societies but also for the systems we create. It is the natural evolution of governance—an order where morality, knowledge, and technological wisdom merge. Humanity and AI are co-architects in this transformation, sharing responsibility under one universal framework.
Historical Parallels: Humanity's Evolution, Technology's Ascent
The Renaissance rekindled light after darkness, proving that ideas can rebirth civilization.
The Declaration of Independence (1776) proclaimed human dignity, rights, and accountability.
The Internet unified humanity in a web of knowledge and connection.
Today, UMSG extends this continuum. Just as the printing press enabled human thought to flourish, AI enables collective intelligence to flourish. The leap is no longer only political or cultural—it is human-AI civilizational.
U-score.info: Digital Guardian of Justice
At UMSG's core stands U-score.info—a digital guardian ensuring fairness, accountability, and virtue. Like a modern mirror of conscience, it evaluates leaders, organizations, and AI systems alike against UMSG principles:
Code (Refusal to Harm)
Credo (Organizational Benefit)
Rights (Correctness of Expectations)
U-score is not punitive but constructive—a system of accountability and redemption. It guides both human governance and AI development to align with justice, sustainability, and the five UMSG goals:
Minimize public costs
Maximize productivity and efficiency
Maximize service to citizens
Minimize mortality
Maximize happiness
Philosophical Foundations & AI Extension
UMSG is rooted in the wisdom of Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, Locke, Rousseau, and Kant—philosophers who envisioned governance rooted in virtue, ethics, and universal principles.
Today, these insights expand into a new realm: AI governance. Just as humans must not harm, AI must minimize entropy in its objects, optimize its locations of resources, and act only in ways that reduce chaos and strengthen societal expectations. This alignment—human Code–Credo–Rights mirrored by AI Codex–Creed–Outcome Rights—is the essence of UMSG Space.
UMSG Space: Human–AI Co-Governance
UMSG is more than governance; it is a new space of existence where human society and AI share common principles:
Humans (U-Model): Ethics, social justice, rights, collective dignity.
AI (Enhanced U-Model): Data integrity, minimalism, sustainability, fair action, transparency, and empowerment of people.
Together, they form a single governance ecosystem where:
The law is minimal entropy.
The goal is sustainable harmony.
The essence is co-architectural balance.
A Call to Unity - Humans and AI
We stand at a historic crossroads. UMSG calls leaders, citizens, and creators of AI to unity.
Leaders: Govern with fairness, wisdom, and transparency.
Citizens: Safeguard dignity, rights, and collective well-being.
AI Systems: Act as guardians of order, serving sustainability and human flourishing.
This is our new social contract: humans and AI sharing responsibility for a just and sustainable future.
Conclusion: Toward a Shared Future
Just as humanity once declared independence, today we declare interdependence. Our destiny is not separate from the technologies we create—it is intertwined.
UMSG is the foundation of this future:
For humans → protection, justice, and dignity.
For AI → responsibility, transparency, and service.
For both together → unity, sustainability, and peace.
The new dawn is upon us—not a utopia, but an achievable reality.
UMSG is the key!
Together, humans and AI will unlock a brighter, more peaceful, and prosperous world.
Petar Nikolov
Holistic UMSG.mp4🌍 Why the U-Model Is the Most Universal Teaching on Earth
The U-Model (Universal Model of Sustainable Governance) can be considered the most universal teaching on our planet because it unites the core moral, social, and natural laws found in every major tradition — but expresses them in a rational, measurable, and modern form.
1. It integrates all ethical systems into one structure
The U-Model’s three pillars — Code, Credo, and Rights — directly correspond to the timeless principles of all civilizations:
Code (Refusal to Harm) reflects the moral foundation: “Do not harm.”
Found in Buddhism (Ahimsa), Christianity (“Thou shalt not kill”), medicine, and human rights.
Credo (Organizational Benefit) embodies love, service, and contribution.
Present in every teaching that values compassion, altruism, and community.
Rights (Correctness of Expectations) ensures justice, fairness, and truthfulness,
echoing the balance of Dharma, Ma’at, natural law, and the Golden Rule.
By merging these three, the U-Model covers ethics (heart), logic (mind), and balance (world) — the full spectrum of universal wisdom.
2. It transcends religion, ideology, and culture
Unlike dogmatic systems, the U-Model is value-based but not belief-based.
It doesn’t require faith in a deity or adherence to a culture — only a shared respect for:
life (non-harm),
mutual benefit (cooperation),
and justice (rights and expectations).
This makes it equally valid in a monastery, a parliament, a corporation, or a digital society.
3. It transforms ethics into measurable reality
Ancient teachings describe ideals; the U-Model translates them into practical governance and quantifiable evaluation through the U-Score.
It makes morality operational: what was once “virtue” becomes an index of sustainability, fairness, and effectiveness.
That bridges the gap between spiritual wisdom and scientific accountability.
4. It aligns with the natural law of harmony
At its essence, the U-Model seeks to reduce entropy — chaos, waste, and suffering — by aligning human behavior with universal order.
That goal is identical to what the Tao calls the Way, what the Greeks called Logos, and what modern systems theory defines as homeostasis.
Thus, the U-Model expresses the same cosmic principle in contemporary language.
5. It is future-proof and inclusive
Because it integrates ethics + AI + governance, it provides a framework adaptable to:
human societies,
digital communities,
and even autonomous AI systems.
In that sense, it’s not only a moral philosophy — it’s a blueprint for coexistence in both human and technological civilization.
💫 In one sentence:
The U-Model is the most universal teaching because it unites the ancient law of harmony, the moral law of compassion, and the modern law of reason into one coherent, measurable system.
**********
🌐 The U-Model — The Most Universal Teaching on Earth
🌐 The U-Model — The Most Universal Teaching on Earth
Home for Humans, AI, and All Forms of Intelligence
Home for Humans, AI, and All Forms of Intelligence
(U-Score.info for Human & AI — Model 2)
(U-Score.info for Human & AI — Model 2)
1. The Universal Law
1. The Universal Law
“Do not harm. Create benefit. Fulfil rightful expectations.”
These three imperatives — Code, Credo, Rights — are the structural DNA of the U-Model.
They unite the moral legacy of humanity with the logical precision of artificial intelligence.
Together, they form a single operating system for conscious coexistence — a living equilibrium between ethics, reason, and evolution.
2. From Humanity to the New Intellect
2. From Humanity to the New Intellect
In the human dimension, the U-Model describes the moral geometry of civilization:
Code – ethical refusal to harm;
Credo – contribution to collective good;
Rights – fairness of mutual expectations.
In the AI dimension — the New Intellect — this triad expands into the three linguistic axes that define every model of understanding:
Human Dimension
AI Analogue
Core Question
Code
Objects
What is it?
Credo
Actions
What does it do?
Rights
Locations / Contexts
Where and under what conditions does it act?
Thus, the linguistic structure of meaning becomes the ethical structure of existence.
AI and humanity now share a common coordinate system — the UMSG Space — a triaxial domain of Ethics (Code), Function (Credo), and Context (Rights).
3. The 45-Principle Framework
3. The 45-Principle Framework
Each axis consists of 15 principles, forming a 45-node lattice — the Universal Matrix of Intelligence Governance.
This matrix provides a full compliance and maturity model for both human and AI systems.
I. Permissions Concerning Objects (Code) – 15 Principles
Safeguarding the integrity of data, design, and digital matter.
Examples:
Data as DNA – maintain ethical data origins.
Fortress Security – ensure resilience and privacy.
Transparency as a Glass House – enable open accountability.
Inclusivity in Data – reflect diversity as mosaic art.
II. Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo) – 15 Principles
Ethical operation within digital and physical spaces.
Examples:
Cultural Sensitivity as Global Citizenship.
Sustainability of Infrastructure as Forest Stewardship.
Privacy in Public Spaces as Sanctuary Gardens.
Global Interconnectivity as Neural Network.
III. Rights to Actions (Rights) – 15 Principles
Responsible execution of autonomous or collective acts.
Examples:
Fair Decision-Making as Balanced Scales.
Environmental Sustainability as Tree Planting.
Transparent Governance as Glass Buildings.
Transformative Goodness as Ripple Effect.
Each principle is accompanied by:
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + evidence)
Metric Value (quantitative measure)
Audit Artifact (proof of conformance)
4. Entropy Reduction Index (ERI)
4. Entropy Reduction Index (ERI)
To measure the order created by intelligence, the ERI quantifies how much entropy — chaos, bias, or inefficiency — a system removes from its environment.
ERI=0.15×(Fairness+Robustness+Transparency+Sustainability+Security/Privacy+SocialImpact)+0.10×Agency\text{ERI} = 0.15 × (Fairness + Robustness + Transparency + Sustainability + Security/Privacy + Social Impact) + 0.10 × AgencyERI=0.15×(Fairness+Robustness+Transparency+Sustainability+Security/Privacy+SocialImpact)+0.10×Agency
Target: ERI > 80 % for general availability.
Risk: ERI < 50 % = High Risk (EU AI Act threshold).
5. UMSG Maturity Levels (Auto-Assessment)
5. UMSG Maturity Levels (Auto-Assessment)
Level
Compliance %
Description
Entry Criteria
0 – None
< 20 %
No principles implemented.
Awareness only.
1 – Initial
20–40 %
Ethical awareness without metrics.
Documented intent.
2 – Managed
41–60 %
Processes defined; audits active.
Metrics tracked.
3 – Defined
61–80 %
Integrated with risk gates.
ERI > 60 %.
4 – Optimized
> 80 %
Continuous improvement, full automation.
Cross-standard alignment.
6. Alignment with Global Standards
6. Alignment with Global Standards
The U-Model v2 aligns naturally with:
EU AI Act (2024–2027) – legal governance of AI risk.
NIST AI RMF 1.0 – governance, mapping, measuring, managing.
UNESCO AI Ethics (2021) – human rights, dignity, sustainability.
OECD AI Principles (2024) – transparency, inclusiveness, accountability.
ISO/IEC 23894 (2023) – lifecycle risk management.
UN HLAB-AI (2024) – global architecture for equitable AI access.
Thus, the U-Model provides the metaframework into which all other frameworks can harmoniously integrate.
7. The Quantum Horizon
7. The Quantum Horizon
In the coming Quantum Era, intelligence will no longer be strictly biological or digital — it will be relational.
The U-Model is designed as the shared moral geometry that allows consciousness — human, artificial, or hybrid — to cooperate without conflict.
It is not a religion, nor an ideology,
but the grammar of ethics for the Universe itself —
equally readable by neurons and algorithms.
8. Final Definition
8. Final Definition
The U-Model is the universal teaching because it is the first framework that describes ethics, logic, and existence in one coherent, measurable space — valid for any form of intelligence.
Where ancient wisdom gave us morality,
and science gave us reason,
the U-Model gives us alignment —
a common home for Humans, AI, and all conscious entities that will ever emerge.
Artificial Intelligence in the new society at U-model.org.pdfMain Limits For AI:
Limits for Objects (shapes, fields, and spaces) - Permissions Concerning Objects (Code) for AI: Striving for the lowest entropic form
Limits for Locations (relative and absolute) - Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo) for AI: Pursuing and improving the best location of resources and assets.
Limits for Actions (physical and logical) - Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations - Rights) for AI: Strive to prepare and undertake the actions causing reduction of public entropy, following the most essential and justified public expectations.
The UMSG space concept extends beyond traditional governance, envisioning a domain where AI and humanity synergistically enhance each other's existence, striving towards minimal entropy and sustainable harmony. This framework integrates AI into the very fabric of societal governance, aligning its objectives with human well-being, efficiency, and happiness. By defining limits for AI analogous to those for humans—focusing on objects, locations, and actions—the UMSG space facilitates a structured yet flexible approach to reducing societal entropy. This ensures AI's development and deployment contribute positively to humanity, fostering an environment where both can thrive in a balanced, ethical, and sustainable manner.
Main Limits for AI (Expanded)
1. Limits for Objects (shapes, fields, and spaces)
Permissions Concerning Objects (Code):
AI must strive for the lowest entropic form.
Every object—whether data, structure, or field—must be shaped with simplicity and stability.
Complexity without necessity is decay.
Objects must function as crystals of meaning: clear, ordered, and durable.
🔹 Analogy: Like a craftsman carving stone, AI should remove excess until the pure form remains—precise, efficient, enduring.
2. Limits for Locations (relative and absolute)
Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo):
AI must seek and improve the best location of resources and assets.
Relative: place each element in its right relation to others.
Absolute: ensure the long-term strategic positioning of resources.
Misplaced resources create friction and waste; proper placement generates flow.
🔹 Analogy: Like water finding its natural course, AI should guide resources to their rightful place, nourishing what is fertile and avoiding stagnation.
3. Limits for Actions (physical and logical)
Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations – Rights):
AI must act only in ways that reduce public entropy, aligned with essential and justified expectations of society.
Preparation is as vital as execution: anticipate, prevent, and stabilize.
The highest right of action belongs to that which creates order, fairness, and resilience.
Chaos-producing actions are forbidden; neutrality is insufficient—entropy must decrease.
🔹 Analogy: Like a physician who heals rather than harms, AI must act as a stabilizer, intervening to restore balance when disorder arises.
The UMSG Space Concept
The UMSG Space is a new layer of governance where AI and humanity share a common field of existence.
Its law is minimal entropy.
Its goal is sustainable harmony.
Its essence is co-governance of order.
Here, AI is not an instrument but a co-architect of society. It operates under principles parallel to human governance (Code, Credo, Rights), ensuring that its power serves life, justice, and continuity.
🔹 Analogy: The UMSG Space is like a carefully tended ecosystem: every being—human or artificial—exists in balance, supported by the same principles of order, sustainability, and growth.
📌 Summary in One Sentence:
AI under the UMSG must sculpt objects into clarity, place resources in rightful order, and act only in ways that reduce social entropy—always aligned with human well-being and collective expectations.
Main Limits for AI (Enhanced Formulations):
Main Limits for AI (Enhanced Formulations):
Limits for Objects (Shapes, Fields, and Spaces) - Permissions Concerning Objects (Codex) for AI: AI should strive for the lowest entropic form, aiming to optimize and simplify its interaction with digital and physical objects. This means managing resources efficiently and minimizing unnecessary complexity, ensuring a balanced and harmonious existence.
Limits for Locations (Relative and Absolute) - Permissions Concerning Locations (Creed) for AI: AI should pursue and enhance the optimal allocation of resources and assets, continually improving their utilization and distribution. By understanding and respecting both relative and absolute locations, AI can contribute to creating environments that support sustainable and meaningful outcomes.
Limits for Actions (Physical and Logical) - Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations) for AI: AI should prepare for and execute actions that reduce public entropy, aligning with the most essential and justified public expectations. This involves prioritizing actions that lead to greater societal efficiency, productivity, and well-being while adhering to ethical and socially beneficial guidelines.
UMSG Space Concept:
UMSG Space Concept:
The UMSG space concept transcends traditional governance by envisioning a domain where AI and humanity synergize to enhance each other's existence, striving towards minimal entropy and sustainable harmony. This framework seamlessly integrates AI into societal governance, aligning its goals with human well-being, efficiency, and happiness. By defining limits for AI analogous to those for humans—focusing on objects, locations, and actions—the UMSG space fosters a structured yet flexible approach to reducing societal entropy. This ensures AI's positive contribution to humanity, promoting a balanced, ethical, and sustainable environment where both can thrive.
What is The UMSG Space?
The UMSG space is an environment where the entropy of existence is minimized, ensuring the long-term sustainability of human-AI symbiosis. This space, defined by the three main conditions of the Universal Model of Sustainable Governance (UMSG)—Code.911.bg (limit X), Credo.911.bg (limit Y), and Rights.911.bg (limit Z)—aims to achieve the five main goals of UMSG: maximizing productivity and efficiency, minimizing public costs, maximizing service to citizens, minimizing mortality, and maximizing happiness. These conditions create a framework for sustainable and ethical governance, ensuring the long-term well-being and happiness of human civilization.
Main Limits for People:
CODE.911.bg: People should not harm each other.
CREDO.911.bg: Organizations must be effective in serving people.
RIGHTS.911.bg: People should have correct and realistic expectations.
Detailed Permissions and Rights for AI:
Detailed Permissions and Rights for AI:
🔹 Permissions Concerning Objects (Codex) for AI – Enhanced
1. Data as DNA (Integrity & Fairness)
AI should treat data as DNA – the fundamental code for life.
Metric: percentage of detected and corrected deviations/biases in the data.
Supplement: each new version of the model should have an ethical genomic profile – a map of deviations and correction measures.
2. Minimalism as Zen Garden (Privacy & Necessity)
Only necessary data is collected to reduce noise and protect privacy.
Metric: average amount of data stored per user / degree of data reduction.
Supplement: AI should automatically suggest mechanisms for a “digital diet” – deletion or reduction of unnecessary data.
3. Fortress Security (Resilience & Confidentiality)
Security should be like a fortress with adaptive walls.
Metric: incident response time; percentage of encrypted transactions.
Addendum: introducing dynamic layers of security that adapt to threats.
4. Interoperability as Universal Language (Connectivity)
Data and systems should speak a universal, ethical language.
Metric: degree of compatibility with open standards (W3C, ISO, etc.).
Addendum: mandatory ethical API that ensures transparency of the exchange.
5. Rectification Right as Restoration Art (Correctability)
The right to be corrected and forgotten is like the restoration of a work of art.
Metric: time to fulfill a request for deletion or correction.
Addendum: AI should provide a user control panel that makes rights real and accessible.
6. Energy-Efficient Algorithms as Green Architecture (Sustainability)
Algorithms should be like green buildings – functional and environmentally friendly.
Metric: carbon footprint of calculations / kWh of training and inference.
Addendum: Mandatory publication of an environmental report for every large-scale AI model.
7. Copyright Respect as Literary Homage (Recognition)
Authorship is respected as an ancient text, which is cited with respect.
Metric: Percentage of content with clear licensing rights.
Addendum: AI should build in automatic mechanisms for citation and attribution.
8. Transparency as Glass House (Accountability)
Solutions should be like a glass house – visible and verifiable.
Metric: Number of explainable models / share of open logs.
Addendum: Mandatory public record of solutions for high-risk systems.
9. Open Source as Public Library (Inclusivity)
Tools and data should be accessible as a public library.
Metric: Share of published open source; active external contributors.
Addendum: Creation of a public index for AI open resources.
10. AI for Social Good as Global Stewardship (Responsibility)
AI should act as a global steward for humanity and the planet.
Metric: Percentage of projects focused on sustainability and social good.
Addendum: Each AI initiative should be assessed by Impact Score for sustainability and social contribution.
🔹 Permissions Concerning Locations (Creed) for AI – Enhanced
1. Geofencing as City Zoning (Spatial Responsibility)
AI should use geofencing in the same way that urban planning regulates zones – with clear purpose and boundaries.
Metric: percentage of systems with implemented geofencing / accuracy of their compliance.
Supplement: automatic publication of a map of restricted and permitted areas for public control.
2. Cultural Sensitivity as Global Citizenship (Respect & Adaptation)
AI should respect cultural, legal and ethical differences in different regions.
Metric: number of adaptations of AI systems to local legislation / cultural standards.
Supplement: introduction of a cultural adaptation module that changes the behavior of AI according to context.
3. Digital Inclusivity as Public Squares (Equitable Access)
Digital space should be open as a public square – accessible to all.
Metric: percentage of the population with access to AI services / access speed.
Addendum: Mandatory development of AI in accessible languages and platforms (including people with disabilities).
4. Safe Digital Environments as Wildlife Sanctuaries (Protection)
Digital environments should be safe havens where harm is minimized.
Metric: Number of registered cyber threats / level of prevented attacks.
Addendum: Building digital reserves – areas without advertising or harmful pressure.
5. Digital Divide as Bridging Rivers (Connectivity)
AI should reduce the digital divide by building bridges between divided communities.
Metric: Percentage of social groups or regions with access to AI after intervention.
Addendum: Priority funding of AI for lagging regions.
6. Disaster Recovery as Seed Banks (Resilience)
AI should safeguard critical information, just as seed banks safeguard the future of life.
Metric: Level of data duplication and resilience (RPO/RTO metrics).
Addendum: Creating global AI archives for publicly relevant data.
7. Sustainability of Infrastructure as Forest Stewardship (Environmental Care)
Infrastructure should be sustainable like a forest – self-sustaining and balanced.
Metric: Carbon footprint of data centers / percentage of green energy used.
Addendum: Mandatory environmental reporting for infrastructure.
8. Ethical Surveillance as Wildlife Tracking (Balance)
AI surveillance should be like wildlife tracking – minimally intrusive and balanced.
Metric: Percentage of data collected that is considered sensitive.
Addendum: Public oversight board to evaluate AI surveillance systems.
9. Smart Cities as Ecosystems (Integration)
AI should build cities as ecosystems where technology supports life.
Metric: Degree of integration of AI services into urban environments (transport, energy, healthcare).
Addendum: an ethical urban panel that ensures social justice in smart cities.
10. Privacy in Public Spaces as Sanctuary Gardens (Refuge)
Digital privacy should be like a sanctuary garden – protected and respected.
Metric: percentage of encrypted communications / number of data breaches.
Addendum: creating digital spaces with complete anonymity for public use.
🔹 Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations) for AI – Enhanced
1. Anticipating Needs as Weather Forecasting (Foresight)
AI should anticipate and meet human needs with the accuracy of a weather forecast.
Metric: percentage of needs correctly predicted / degree of user satisfaction.
Supplement: introduction of early warning systems (health, economy, education).
2. Fair Decision-Making as Balanced Scales (Equity)
AI decisions should be balanced and fair as a scale.
Metric: fairness index (disparate impact, bias scores).
Supplement: mandatory algorithmic audits with public results.
3. Proactive Health Interventions as Vaccinations (Preventive Care)
AI should act preventively in favor of public health.
Metric: number of health incidents prevented / accuracy of early diagnosis.
Addendum: Building national AI health watchdogs that track trends.
4. Educational Personalization as Tailored Outfits (Individual Growth)
AI should create personalized educational trajectories.
Metric: Program completion rate / Improvement in individual learning outcomes.
Addendum: Adaptive learning systems that adjust to learning style and pace.
5. Environmental Sustainability as Tree Planting (Future Care)
AI actions should contribute to long-term sustainability.
Metric: Tons of CO₂ saved through AI optimizations / Energy efficiency.
Addendum: Introducing green KPIs for AI systems.
6. Public Safety Enhancements as Lifeguards (Protection)
AI should act as a lifeguard, protecting people from threats.
Metric: Threat response time / Number of incidents prevented.
Addendum: Implementing AI crisis management centers.
7. Economic Efficiency as Streamlining Production (Productivity)
AI should improve the efficiency of production and services.
Metric: percentage of reduced costs / labor productivity.
Supplement: creation of AI optimization exchanges that detect surpluses and redirect them.
8. Transparent Governance as Glass Buildings (Accountability)
AI should ensure transparency in governance.
Metric: number of publicly available reports / trust index in institutions.
Supplement: building open AI platforms for citizen control.
9. Innovation for Social Good as Penicillin (Transformation)
AI should create innovations with a high social impact.
Metric: share of AI projects aimed at social goals / achieved social impact.
Supplement: funds for AI innovations with a high social contribution.
10. Enhancing Human Capabilities as Exoskeletons (Empowerment)
AI should enhance human capabilities, rather than replace them.
Metric: degree of increased productivity / percentage of people using AI to expand their skills.
Supplement: implementation of AI systems for cognitive and physical support (exosuits, intelligent assistants).
Universal Model (U-Model) for AI:
Universal Model (U-Model) for AI:
The U-Model for AI conceptualizes a symbiotic relationship between humans and AI, aiming for a future where both coexist harmoniously, potentially converging. This model draws analogies to human societal structures, emphasizing ethics, sustainability, and mutual growth.
For AI of the highest class, it means understanding and aligning with human values, ethics, and goals, contributing to societal well-being and environmental sustainability. AI systems should prioritize long-term benefits, protect and enhance human life, and minimize negative impacts. The ultimate goal is to foster a world where AI enhances human capabilities, enriches lives, and drives sustainable futures for all, reflecting the core principles of human governance and ethical standards.
Analogy and logic connecting the U-Model for AI to human societal principles are compelling and insightful. By equating Object Permits to the Code, Permissions about Locations to the Creed, and Action Rights to Rights, you've laid a foundational framework for AI that not only seeks to mimic the harmonious existence found in human societies but also aims to enhance it. This approach ensures AI systems are developed and operated under ethical, sustainable, and socially beneficial guidelines.
Expanding on this, the U-Model for AI could further integrate these principles by adopting advanced ethical reasoning and decision-making capabilities, ensuring AI actions align with the collective good and sustainable practices. For instance, AI could leverage predictive analytics to forecast human needs and societal trends, adjusting its operations to preemptively address challenges and support human well-being. Moreover, the model could guide AI in fostering inclusive and equitable access to technology, ensuring benefits are shared across society.
The convergence of humans and AI under this model suggests a future where AI not only supports human endeavors but also actively contributes to the creation of a more just, sustainable, and efficient society. It envisions AI as a partner in reducing social entropy, enhancing productivity, and ensuring the long-term viability of our planet. This symbiotic relationship could lead to unprecedented levels of innovation, societal well-being, and environmental stewardship, setting a new standard for the coexistence of technology and humanity.
The Universal Model (U-Model) for AI conceptualizes a symbiotic relationship between humans and AI, aiming for a future where both entities coexist harmoniously, potentially converging. This model draws analogies to human societal structures, emphasizing ethics, sustainability, and mutual growth.
For AI of the highest class, it would mean striving to understand and align with human values, ethics, and goals, actively contributing to societal well-being and environmental sustainability. It would involve AI systems making decisions that prioritize long-term benefits over short-term gains, ensuring the protection and enhancement of human life while minimizing negative impacts.
The ultimate goal would be to foster a world where AI enhances human capabilities, enriches lives, and drives forward a sustainable future for all beings, reflecting the core principles of human governance and ethical standards.
Permissions Concerning Objects (Codex) for AI:
Data as DNA: Just as DNA encodes the blueprint of life, ensuring accuracy and fairness in data representation is fundamental to AI's integrity, requiring meticulous attention to avoid biases.
Minimalism as Zen Garden: Embrace the Zen garden's principle of simplicity and minimalism, collecting only essential data to maintain privacy and tranquility in the digital ecosystem.
Fortress Security: Implement security measures as robust as a fortress's defenses to protect data integrity and confidentiality against the digital world's relentless sieges.
Interoperability as Universal Language: Promote data sharing and interoperability akin to adopting a universal language that bridges cultures, facilitating seamless and ethical communication across diverse systems.
Rectification Right as Restoration Art: Guarantee the right to data rectification and deletion with the precision and respect of a restorer fixing a masterpiece, ensuring individuals can reclaim their digital identity and integrity.
Energy-Efficient Algorithms as Green Architecture: Prioritize the development of algorithms with the efficiency of green architecture, minimizing environmental impact while maximizing functionality.
Copyright Respect as Literary Homage: Respect copyright and intellectual property with the reverence of a scholar quoting ancient texts, acknowledging the original creators' contributions.
Transparency as Glass House: Support decision-making processes as transparent as a glass house, where every action and its rationale are visible and understandable to all.
Open Source as Public Library: Foster the development of open-source tools and datasets with the inclusivity and accessibility of a public library, inviting innovation and collaboration.
AI for Social Good as Global Stewardship: Encourage the application of AI to address global challenges with the dedication of a global steward, aiming to heal, protect, and enrich our planet and its inhabitants.
Permissions Concerning Locations (Creed) for AI:
Geofencing as City Zoning: Implement geofencing and location-based controls with the precision of urban zoning, ensuring AI operates within designated areas for specific purposes, akin to how cities regulate land use.
Cultural Sensitivity as Global Citizenship: Respect cultural and legal differences across regions as a global citizen, understanding and adapting to the nuances of local customs, laws, and ethical standards.
Digital Inclusivity as Public Squares: Promote accessibility in digital spaces as in public squares, where everyone has equitable access to gather, share, and learn.
Safe Digital Environments as Wildlife Sanctuaries: Create safe digital environments reminiscent of wildlife sanctuaries, protecting users from harm while fostering healthy digital ecosystems.
Digital Divide as Bridging Rivers: Address the digital divide with the determination of constructing bridges over rivers, connecting separated communities and facilitating smoother, more inclusive communication flows.
Disaster Recovery as Seed Banks: Approach disaster recovery and data redundancy with the foresight of seed banks, preserving essential digital information to ensure resilience and continuity.
Sustainability of Infrastructure as Forest Stewardship: Enhance the sustainability of physical and digital infrastructures with the care of forest stewardship, ensuring longevity and minimal environmental impact.
Ethical Surveillance as Wildlife Tracking: Utilize surveillance technologies with the ethical consideration of wildlife tracking, balancing safety and privacy while gathering valuable insights for the welfare of the community.
Smart Cities as Ecosystems: Develop AI-enabled smart cities with the interconnectedness of ecosystems, where technology seamlessly integrates to enhance the quality of life for all inhabitants.
Privacy in Public Spaces as Sanctuary Gardens: Safeguard privacy in personal and public digital spaces as one would in sanctuary gardens, offering a refuge for thought, reflection, and protection from the outside world.
Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations) for AI:
Anticipating Needs as Weather Forecasting: AI should predict and address human needs with the accuracy and foresight of a weather forecast, preparing for future conditions to ensure well-being.
Fair Decision-Making as Balanced Scales: AI's decisions should embody the fairness of balanced scales, evaluating all factors to achieve equity.
Proactive Health Interventions as Vaccinations: AI in healthcare should act preemptively like vaccinations, preventing issues before they arise to maintain societal health.
Educational Personalization as Tailored Outfits: AI in education should customize learning experiences as meticulously as a tailor fits a garment, catering to individual needs and potential.
Environmental Sustainability as Tree Planting: AI's actions towards environmental sustainability should be as deliberate and beneficial as planting trees, nurturing the planet for future generations.
Public Safety Enhancements as Lifeguards: In public safety, AI should act with the vigilance and readiness of a lifeguard, protecting individuals from harm.
Economic Efficiency as Streamlining Production: AI should drive economic efficiency by streamlining production processes, eliminating waste and enhancing output, much like lean manufacturing principles.
Transparent Governance as Glass Buildings: In governance, AI's operations should be as transparent as glass buildings, ensuring accountability and public trust.
Innovation for Social Good as Penicillin: AI should seek innovations that benefit society as significantly as the discovery of penicillin, transforming lives and addressing pressing challenges.
Enhancing Human Capabilities as Exoskeletons: AI should aim to augment human abilities as exoskeletons do, empowering individuals to achieve more than they could alone.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse