Instructional Activities are purposefully-designed interactions among teachers and students that are driven by student's ideas and contributions as they build deep content understanding and classroom community. We leverage IAs as a productive space to simultaneously work on content and pedagogy in integrated ways embedded within interactions with children.
Choosing an intentional, comprehensive suite of IAs is a major part of the planning of our field-based methods course. Here we discuss some some guiding principles that have supported our decision-making process.
As we engage novice teachers, we find it critical to engage them with IAs that they can readily take up in their student teaching and classrooms. Choosing IAs that are purposefully-bounded, such as a math number sense warm-up or an interactive read-aloud, provides a entry point for novices to not feel like they need to re-invent entire instructional blocks (a daunting task for any educator trying something new) but rather work on getting better at practice within a focused portion of their teaching. An important part of accessibility for novice teachers is how accessible the IA is for students; we select IAs that we find to be engaging and inviting to students and support a range of participation.
Especially in schools that serve marginalized communities, it is common that math and reading instruction are set up with narrow expectations of participation and success. This has historically led to deficit narratives that students of color lack the knowledge and skill to succeed academically. Our IAs seek to disrupt these deficit narratives in two ways – by providing multiple entry points for students to participate and by helping teachers prioritize focus on what children know and can do.
We know that the goal of our methods courses is not to teach novices everything that they will need to know, but rather to set them up on a long-term journey where they learn from their students and further their own content knowledge by attending to the details of children’s thinking. Our IAs are designed to support NTs to elicit to and respond to children’s thinking, such that each enactment of an IA provides a new, rich opportunity for novices to attend to and learn about children’s thinking.
We focus a portion of our methods courses on a subset of IAs that serve as a bridge between mathematics and reading instruction. That is, we use the same IA across math and reading and organize our courses to help novices see where they might draw from their content expertise in another area. Read more about this here.
What Do You Notice?
Small-Group Reading
Word Work
Close Reading
Conferring (Reading/Writing)
Interactive Read-Aloud (Fiction/Non-Fiction)
What Do You Notice?
Choral Counting
True/False Number Sentences
How many ways to make ___?
Launching a Story Problem
Strategy Sharing
Conferring
Interactive Read-Aloud
Note: This is just a brief list of Instructional Activities we used in our most recent year. For more information about these IAs, visit our content-specific pages -- Reading Methods and Math Methods -- and Shared IAs Across Math and Literacy.
As we're working on IAs of course we're trying to help them take up lots different teacher moves. But in rehearsal or the debrief it’s important to try and highlight that there’s not one right move to make, but that there are so many things to consider—young people’s attempts at language, issues around a student's participation, so many things come up. I want to help them see that while there's no one right solution, it’s about thinking about all these things along with the math. It's about the range of things not the one right thing to do in a given moment. I'm trying to strike a balance between having students feel like they are making progress in what to do with teaching but also to be okay in the complexities and not to close off the range of things that they could do to respond. The bounded context of the IAs allows them to work on managing the complexities of learning to teach without making things too mechanical.