Works and Projects
Below are examples of projects that The PRIME Collective, LLC or its members have worked on.
Recruitment of Low-wage Workers for a Time-sensitive Natural Experiment to Evaluate a Minimum Wage Policy: Challenges and Lessons LearnedNatural experiments are often used for answering research questions in which randomization is implausible. Effective recruitment strategies are well documented for observational cohort studies and clinical trials, unlike recruitment methods for time-sensitive natural experiments. In this time-sensitive study of the impact of a minimum wage policy, we aimed to recruit 900 low-wage workers in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Raleigh, North Carolina. We present our recruitment strategies, challenges, and successes for participant screening and enrollment of a difficult-to-reach population.
Melvin Jackson & The PRIME Collective, LLC, January 20, 2021 - Collaboration with University of Minnesota, Appetite for Change, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Partners Three Consulting Company, and the Rudd Center at Unviersity of Connecticut
The PRIME Collective, LLC, November 2, 2016 - Collaboration with University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Stakeholder-driven, consensus development methods to design an ethical framework and guidelines for engaged researchIncreasingly, researchers seek to engage communities, patients, and stakeholders as partners in the process and products of health research. However, there is no existing stakeholder-driven ethical framework for such engaged scholarship. We employed an iterative, stakeholder-engaged method to develop a data-driven framework for the ethical review and conduct of engaged scholarship. We used consensus development conference methods and a modified Delphi survey to engage 240 community members, ethicists, and academic researchers. This multi-staged process produced a framework with 4 domains: vision of equitable and just research, relationship dynamics, community-informed risk/benefits assessment, and accountability. Within the framework, 4 cross-cutting considerations and 15 statements explicate the stakeholders’ priorities for the ethical review and conduct of engaged scholarship. Though the findings are promising, the study is limited in that it focuses on stakeholder perspectives, but does not actually evaluate or apply the findings in the field. The stakeholder-engaged framework provides a platform for further articulation of ethical practices and policy for engaged scholarship.
Mysha Wynn, June 21, 2018 - Collaboration with University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill School of Medicine, and Community Campus Partnerships for Health
Reverend William Kearney, 2018 - Collaboration with Michael Pearce and Warren County, NC