The Mind in the Braincase

Any honest account of the arctic tiko has to start with the brain because the brain is the part people most want to argue around. It's easier to grant a clever behaviour here and a clever behaviour there than to look at the organ producing them and say what it plainly is. The arctic tiko has an encephalisation quotient of roughly 6.5 to 7. Encephalisation quotient measures brain mass against the brain mass expected for an animal of that body size and the figure for the arctic tiko sits just below the human range of about 7.4 to 7.8. The comparison isn't perfect, since the measure was built with mammals in mind and the arctic tiko is no more a mammal than it is a reptile or a bird, but the imperfection cuts a narrow margin and the arctic tiko lands inside it. The braincase tells the same story without the arithmetic. Set beside a human skull, the rounded cranial vault behind the eye holds a brain easily compared to ours and is carried in an animal many times our own size and the architecture inside it is its own. Cetocollian brains run on the nucleopallium, a densely clustered processing tissue where neurons crowd far more tightly than they do in a layered mammalian cortex and that density is what lets a braincase of this size hold what it holds. The same packing is seen in corvids and parrots which reach the problem-solving of apes on compact nuclear tissue and no layered cortex at all. The arctic tiko works the principle at a far greater scale. Surrounding the nucleopallium are broad integrative zones comparable in role to how things work in mammals, which draw the separate streams of sense and memory into one working picture of the world. The structure that sets cetocollians apart from both birds and mammals is the cohorial body. It is a large, distinct mass given over entirely to social intelligence and thinking and is present across the whole class. It's enlarged in the arctic tiko past anything else in Cetocollia. The cohorial body models other individuals, holds relationships steady across years, reads emotional and social states, and carries the running coordination that fleet life asks for without pause. A human brain handles that work steadily and across regions on loan from other tasks. An arctic tiko has a specific organ for it and the rest of the brain is arranged around that organ. Their intelligence is social to its foundation which is why an arctic tiko held apart from others is a mind kept from the work it was built to do. The herou kept close, the fleet that closes around a frightened adolescent, the plain decline of an individual cut off from its companions, all of it follows from the cohorial body and the life it demands.

A brain on this scale is expensive and the rest of arctic tiko biology is the bill. The long years of buccolactation, the slow dependency of the pup, the decades before an arctic tiko is socially adult, the two-century lifespan, every part of it serves a brain built to gather a lifetime of social and ecological knowledge and needing the years to gather it in. Studying that brain is harder than studying most, and the difficulty is ethical before it's ever reaching the technical status. There is no dissecting a path through the neuroanatomy of an animal the field has already concluded is a person and so modern arctic tiko neuroscience rests on three narrow sources. The first is old data, decades of specimen records and dissections from a less careful era. The second is natural death, the rare specimen the field is permitted to recover. The third, and the only living source, is the arctic tikos themselves. A curious fleet member or a fleet that meets a research team in open water and stays will sometimes allow scanning equipment to be set on the head of a willing individual for as long as the tiko is willing to. The tiko can refuse and a lot do, so the science moves at a slower rate.And while this work is a largely global affair, most of it can be traced back to a small institution in Delaware, the Atlantic Institute for Marine Cognition. The research is conducted by a sizable team of thirty people, but it is spearheaded and lead by Dr. Keiko Takahashi as the neuroscientist who reads the scans, maps the cohorial body and the nucleopallium, and has done more than anyone to set down what the arctic tiko brain is. Her wife, Dr. Amanda Takahashi, does the fieldwork that lets Keiko's work happen at all and she has spent years in the water earning the trust of particular fleets that allow the in person brain scan study to happen in the first place. The scanning sessions happen because specific arctic tikos know Amanda and choose to stay near her team out of carefully built trust.

Constructing How Arctic Tikos Think

The clearest way into the arctic tiko mind isn't a laboratory result but a habit the tikos have where they study us back. Dr. Amanda Takahashi, a fieldwork cetophiologist off the northern coast of Maine, has been in close contact with many different fleets. Her work across almost three decades of research have allowed her to form close social connections with many individual arctic tikos. Amanda has written a paper on a behaviour she didn't expect to be writing about. The arctic tikos of a fleet Amanda and her team have named the Teresa fleet bring her various items from food, human objects, rocks, strange constructions the tikos have made, etc. The fleet will surface beside her with an object held in the lower jaw, something lifted from a wreck or a harbour or just something from the seabed they like, a dead pufferfish, an oyster still shut in its shell, and they'll give it to her. For a long time, the obvious reading was that these were gifts but Amanda's paper argues the obvious reading is wrong. The tikos aren't watching the object once it's in her hands, they're watching her. What they want is to see how she handles it, what she does with a thing, how her mind closes around a problem they've handed her. The giving is a setup and they are running the study with her as the subject, and once you've seen it described you can't unsee it in the footage. The most telling session came when Amanda brought them something of her own, a Rubik's cube. Three members of the fleet were taken with it immediately, not with the colours but with the mechanism. The way the parts turned against each other and how the object worked itself caught their attention. They worked at it the way they work at anything, pinning it to the seafloor and using the lower jaw to shift the faces of the cube. They never once tried to bring a side to a single colour as while Arctic tikos see colour, they don't see it the way we do. Their range runs shifted and narrowed toward the blues and greens of the water they live in and the cube's whole purpose, six faces each made uniform, is a purpose pitched at an eye they don't have. So they did something more interesting than just fail. They brought it back to Amanda and she solved it in front of them, turned the faces until each was clean, and the tikos understood that she had done something and that there was an order in the cube she had acted on that they could not see. They couldn't perceive the pattern and they knew that. They knew that they had lacked something to help them solve it that Amanda didn't. Amanda's team had the behavioural read first, the way the tikos shifted from working the cube to watching her work it, and then turned to study her with the same attention they'd given the object and the scan work confirmed it. An arctic tiko fitted for a brain scan and shown Amanda handling the cube lit up in the same region that fires when a tiko hears the recorded call of a fleet member it knows. They had stopped treating the cube as a thing to solve and started treating it as a window onto Amanda. A mind that can recognise the edge of its own perception and recognise that another mind sees past that edge which is something almost no other animal does.

That same reach toward other minds turns up wherever arctic tikos are watched closely and it doesn't confine itself to play. Dr. Keiko Takahashi was fishing off a research boat when two members of a local group, the Francine Fleet, came to observe her. They had held back at a distance with their necks above the water, heads tilting, clicking and hissing, not taking their eyes off her. Keiko's note from that day says she felt studied. When she finally landed a fish the two tikos, adolescent males she later named Billy and Lee, came in to the boat and examined the catch. The footage she had showed the tikos sniffing the fish she caught, lifting it in the jaw, and setting it down a few times. Then they left and came back with a larger fish. They took Keiko's fish and cached it in a shelter, which the underwater cameras later confirmed, and they gave her the bigger one. The larger of the two tikos, Billy, had used his tooth to cut open the fish for Keiko because it seemed to recognise that Keiko had no way to do that herself. Now read that sequence slowly. The tikos worked out that Keiko was hunting, judged her catch as poor, replaced it on terms they considered fair since they left their own fish behind in exchange, and then solved a problem they had correctly identified as specific to her, that she lacked the tooth and the jaw to get into a fish. They had built a working model of a particular human being, including what she could and could not do, and they acted on it. The same modelling shows in an account from the mid-Atlantic where fishermen watched an arctic tiko attend to a loggerhead turtle tangled in their net. The tiko called to the turtle, then surfaced and directed clicks and chirps at the fishermen, dived, surfaced, chirped again. It was working two minds at once, the turtle's and the crew's, and its first effort was to recruit the humans because the net was a human thing and the humans were the ones positioned to solve the issue. Only when the fishermen did nothing did the tiko break the net itself and guide the turtle clear. It had modelled the crew as agents who could help, tried to communicate with them, and fell back on its own solution when the model came up empty. And the modelling runs the other direction too, into deception. Amanda recorded an incident at a rocky outcrop where a hook-finned Atlantic shark had drifted into position over an infant tiko, pinning it in the rocks, the shark most likely was unaware the infant was even there. An older arctic tiko swam in near the shark with its left pectoral fin held limp, moving wrong, performing an injury it didn't have. The shark followed the easy target and as it drew off, a second tiko moved in to bring the infant out. The lure worked because the older tiko knew what a shark believes when it sees an injured animal and knew what a shark will do about that belief and then it fed the shark exactly that while a second tiko ran the other half of a plan the two of them shared. To deceive an animal you have to model its mind well enough to predict it and then you have to be willing to manage it. The arctic tiko did both and did it for a child that was not its own.

That last point is worth staying with because the care arctic tikos extend to others is structural and the clearest case the field has is one Amanda has tracked for thirteen years. The fleet she calls the Juliana Fleet, named for its matriarch Juliana, a female of a hundred and eighty-five years, ranges between Greenland and Nova Scotia and at some point, Amanda found among them an infant bumphead tiko that she later named Roko. How it came to be orphaned isn't known but what is known is what the Juliana Fleet did with it. Roko was recorded buccolactating from the fleet's nursing mothers, sleeping with the fleet, playing with it, hunting with it, and it formed a particular bond with a middle-aged female called Samantha who has done the most of the fleet's tending to it. It rests and plays with the fleet's arctic diver herous as readily as a tiko pup would and thirteen years of observing this strange adoption and the bumphead is still treated as a member of the fleet. The reading the researchers settled on is that Samantha found the lost infant and took it in and the fleet accepted her decision and made the bumphead one of theirs, a different species raised whole inside an arctic tiko society. A fleet that has a place to put a found and orphaned child, even one not of its kind, is a fleet operating a custom and not an instinct. That custom rests on the everyday shape of arctic tiko life and gives a clear idea of the kind of mental and cultural values the arctic tikos have. They live in large family fleets in shelter grounds they have either claimed or built, generations together in one place, and within that life the herous are not livestock. The herous are kept close and tended with real attention and the attention answers a need on both sides. The herou was bred over a long history into a creature that needs its tiko and the tiko built by its own brain into a creature that needs company to think with. The arctic tiko keeping its herou near and stimulated is doing for the herou something close to what it needs done for itself. What researchers across the field have built from all of this, and it is a broad agreement now and not the position of any single institute, is a working profile of how the arctic tiko mind operates. They think literally in the plain sense of solving problems, tracking cause to effect, planning across spans of time, and they put themselves in the mind of another creature. They think abstractly and hold a concept across years that no single moment contains. The clearest proof of this being the herous themselves since you can't breed a creature toward a type across generations without carrying the idea of that type in your head the whole way. They know themselves, recognising their own faces in a mirror and their own recorded voices well enough to be annoyed by them. But the centre of the profile, the thing the brain scans and the decades of watching have converged on together, is that the native activity of the arctic tiko mind is the modelling of other minds. The structure Keiko maps as the cohorial body fires for a fleet member's call and fires the same way for a fish, a boat, a human, a turtle, a passing plane. The arctic tiko doesn't have one mind for company and another for the world. It meets the world the way it meets a person, by building a model of the thing in front of it and asking what that thing perceives, intends, and will do. This is why an arctic tiko can study a researcher, help a hunter it has judged as struggling, recruit one species to save another, deceive a predator, and raise an orphan of a different kind.

Arctic Tiko Language

Arctic tikos are loud and expressive animals that talk constantly. The type of noise they make is shared across pescanguids as a whole from clicks, hisses, whistles, and chirps, carried over short range with low infrasonic calls that move between fleets across open water. Sound is only half of it as an arctic tiko speaks with its body at the same time with the set of the neck, the angle of the head, the way it holds itself toward or away from the animal it's addressing, and the body and the voice work as one signal. The communication does real work and fleets coordinate hunts with it, warn each other with it, hold themselves together with it across distances where no one can see anyone else. Many people with a lack of bias have stopped asking whether this is a communication system (which it obviously is) and most researchers will go further and say it is a language definitively. The real issue and confusion instead comes from trying to actually decipher the language.

The institute that has tried hardest is the Hawick Centre for Cetocollian Linguistics in the Scottish Borders and the work there is led by Dr. Trinston Hordin. Hordin came to arctic tikos from human linguistics and that background is exactly why his findings are so unsettled. He knows what language looks like from the inside, he knows the joineries to look for, and yet the arctic tiko system keeps not having them where he expects them. A call that behaves like a unit of meaning doesn't take the things a word takes. Nothing follows it the way grammar follows a word, no ordered structure binds the calls into strings, and no syntax surfaces under any analysis he has run. A sound will seem to be attached and fixed to something but then a season of further recordings will show the sound being used for something else in a completely different context. Hordin's papers are honest that all his research does is arriving at the same repeated conclusion that the system is too consistent to be noise and too elusive to be parsed. The names show the problem in miniature. Some arctic tikos plainly have a personal call, a specific sound that belongs to them, that other members of the fleet use to mean that individual and no other. That looks like a name and a name is a real thing for a linguist to find as it's a sound standing in for a someone. But then the confidence in that assessment is immediately proven wrong. Sometimes the call Hordin took for a name turns out to be near-uniform across many individuals and can't be a name at all because while it is used for one individual, it might also be used for a shell or a boot that was stolen. Sometimes a single tiko is addressed by one particular other tiko with a call that no one else uses for it which looks like a nickname, except that Hordin can't confirm it is a nickname instead of the context he is misreading or a meaning he has no access to.

The hardest single case involves the herous. Arctic tikos use a set of six distinct vocalisations that their herous understand and respond to and that most other birds and animals don't react to at all. Six discrete signals understood by the domesticated penguins and by almost nothing else has the clean finite look of a command set and a researcher could simply stop there. Six calls, six functions, a small working vocabulary built for working with the herous. But the same six calls appear elsewhere. The fleet known as the Cathy Fleet off the western coast of Wales uses those identical six calls between tikos, to summon fleet members and to draw one another's attention and the tidy reading then immediately falls apart. If the six are herou commands, there is no reason for them to pass between tikos. If they are an attention call between tikos, there is no reason for there to be six of them because attention is one errand and one errand rarely needs six forms. Either the six calls carry something far more specific than attention and the six-way split is freighted with information no one can yet recover, or they belong to a larger structure that has not been deciphered and may be the very language Hordin has spent his career failing to catch hold of. I myself am not equipped to settle the answer and neither is Hordin by his own account. What can be passed along, however, is the shape of the problem as the people closest to it have described it. Arctic tikos are speaking. The sounds are ordered by something. And the order belongs, for now, to them.

Arctic Tiko Language

The Shape of a Fleet

An arctic tiko fleet takes its name from its matriarch. She is the oldest female and the one researchers track most closely. Tikonologists use this naming pattern for fleets because the matriarch is the fixed point the rest of it moves around and, by all accounts of nearly four decades of research, she leads and makes every meaningful decision within the fleet whether pups, adolescents, young adults, and even older individuals. When a matriarch dies, some fleets keep the old name out of the researchers' habit and convenience but sometimes, others are renamed for the female who takes the central place and the handover gets logged as an event in the fleet's record. Fleet sizes run from eighteen to sixty individuals across the world with most fleets sitting in the lower middle of that range and the largest being rare enough to be notable on their own. Tikonology has built a working classification out of decades of this tracking. Fleets are sorted by composition, blood-only against adoptive against merged, and by how they stand toward their neighbours, isolated against friendly against hostile. The tracking is close enough and old enough now that researchers can predict what a given fleet will do and out of that grew the Tiko Pool. The Tiko Pool is a game Tikonologists play against each other where they place predictions on fleet movements and behaviours by drawing on the recorded data and researchers across different institutions bet on which fleet will do what and when it will happen. No money changes hands and there is only a scoreboard that's shared between institutions through meetings and video calls. The Arctic Tiko Behavioural Institute for Study in Paamiut, Greenland is credited with starting it in 2015 when the head researcher there, Dr. Pipaluk Lynge, began playing a version of it alone against herself. A friend of hers at the Pescanguid Research Institution noticed the game and from there it spread through the field. The Pool is treated as a bit of fun among the people who study arctic tikos and is also a quiet admission that you can't run a prediction game on a creature that has no consistent character to predict. There are at least ninety four confirmed and documented fleets in total and the top ten most documented of all of them are as follows:

The Juliana Fleet found primarily between Greenland and Nova Scotia is the most documented fleet in the world and the largest fleet at an estimated fifty eight individuals as of April 17, 2026
The Temitope Fleet found primarily off the coasts of Nigeria has an estimated fifty four members in her fleet as of March 20, 2026
The Francine Fleet found primarily off the coast of Delaware and much of the northeastern US coast has an estimated forty nine members recorded as of June 6, 2026
The Lainey Fleet found off the coast of Nova Scotia has an estimated fifty one individuals recorded as of May 12, 2026
The Kpelle Fleet found off the coast of Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Cote D'ivoire has an estimated forty seven individuals as of July 6, 2026
The Briet Fleet found all around Iceland has an estimated forty one members recorded as of May 23, 2026
The Teresa Fleet found primarily between Northern Maine and most of Scotland has an estimated twenty six members as of February 23, 2026
The Cathy Fleet found all around the United Kingdom but frequents Wales has an estimated twenty three members as of April 2, 2026
The Lucia FLeet found off the coast of Argentina and most of the South Atlantic Ocean has an estimated thirty three members as of May 18, 2026
The Sofia Fleet found off the coast of the Falkland Islands, the shores of South Africa, and the shores near SUmatra has an estimated twenty nine members as of February 11, 2026

A fleet is not just a bloodline and this is the part of tikonology that took longest to settle because the early assumption was that a fleet was one extended family and nothing more, but this isn't the case. Some fleets are mergers of two or more separate fleets and these carry dual matriarchs where two central females sharing the authority that a single matriarch holds in other fleets. Some fleets hold members who share no blood with the rest at all and are instead a collection of individuals who joined or were taken in, like the bumphead Roko that was adopted into the Juliana Fleet. This is the most documented case of a much wider pattern as there have been at least 140 recorded cases from fleets all around the world where adoption is present in varying numbers. What this shows both tikonologists and the wider community is that for arctic tikos, a fleet is closer to a chosen society than to a family tree. The decisions a fleet makes are negotiated among the members, presumably, and the matriarch doesn't always have the entire definitive word as many instances of tikonologists have recorded a fleet matriarch swimming alongside and clicking amongst members of her fleet and researchers have recorded this most clearly in how a fleet handles the choice to explore new range. From what can be observed, an exploration isn't ordered down from the matriarch and as few as two members of a fleet show a settled wish to stay where they are, the fleet's plans bend around them and the movement is reworked or delayed or split. A society that reshapes its own plans around the wishes of two of its members is doing something a human observer has a ready word for and the word is politics. The only hope is that these politics aren't as difficult or ornery as human politics.

The clearest proof that fleets carry culture is that fleet culture changes with geography and the contrast between two of the best-recorded fleets shows it plainly. The Lainey Fleet ranges off Nova Scotia in the cold North Atlantic and the Kpelle Fleet lives in the warm water off Liberia. Set side by side, they live differently in ways that have nothing to do with what the water forces on them. The Lainey Fleet keeps few ornaments like seaweed wrapped around necks, human nets repurposed as decoration. SOme will carry objects from the sea or from humans in their mouth pouches that they trade with other tikos. One case is a member of the Lainey fleet named Ricardo who is known to frequently offer items with other members of his fleet and in many cases, the other individual will give him something in return.And while this is something many different fleets do, it's worth noting regardless. The Lainey fleet iself usually doesn't carry much ornamentation as individuals are more focused on objects. The Kpelle Fleet, in contrast, is heavy with ornaments such as crab carapaces, urchin quills, bones, shells, and even dead fish. Found human objects are also worked into shelters and carried in mouth pouches and the difference is not a difference of what is available but of what each fleet has decided is worth keeping. They eat differently in ways that go past the local menu too. Reef-adjacent fleets like Kpelle pair certain sea plants with a fresh kill and eat the two together in a settled combination that has no simple explanation for nutrition, but instead it's something more akin to a cuisine. Some fleets even communicate differently. Take the Juliana fleet for example. Members of this fleet tend to lean far more on the flippers when they signal to each other and gesture more which, compared to the Temitope Fleet which tends to use clicks and hisses more. All of this appears to be learned by the young across the long years of dependency and it can travel between fleets.

Fleets have relationships with each other and tikonologists have recorded the full range of them. At the hardest end is real violence although it's worth being precise about who does it. Off the southern coast of Ireland in 2005, three individuals of the Leshy Fleet set on two individuals of the Briet Fleet, wounding them, scraping them with teeth, ramming them, and stealing their ornamentation. Every tiko involved was an adolescent and estimated at roughly sixty years of age. This is the most violent interfleet incident the field has on record and it was a brawl among youths. Mature fleets don't seem to meet like that. The Juliana Fleet and the Francine Fleet have an old and difficult relationship and researchers have watched it for years without seeing it turn into anything like the Leshy attack. A Francine member will sometimes be seen swimming slow circles around the Juliana Fleet which tikonologists have recorded as a low watching behaviour that never escalates. In March of 2015, the tikonologist Dr. Garrett Blake caught video and radio evidence of the two matriarchs themselves meeting. Both Juliana and Francine passed close by one another, rubbed their sides together as they swam alongside one another, and only made two mock bites between them. After this exchange, the members of each fleet then followed their own matriarch away from the other. This has been categorised as two fleets with a wary history meeting in person and managing it with ritual and restraint which is as hostile as mature arctic tikos have been recorded getting between different fleets and the rest of what passes between fleets is cooperative. An example woul be the exchange between the smaller Hannah Fleet and the larger Lainey Fleet on AUgust 14 of 2013 in which the Hannah Fleet had shed roughly twelve individuals one-directionally into the larger Lainey Fleet that tikonologists have recorded as a major interfleet absorption. Fleets hold long friendships across enormous distance and a perfect example would be the Juliana Fleet that travels the length of the Atlantic to visit the Lucia Fleet near Argentina and the Lucia members share ornaments with their northern visitors like crab carapaces and urchin quills and found human objects like clothes, bags, bottles, etc. ANd what tikonologists find fascinating is that some interfleet visitiations seem to be part of a larger schedule. The Sigrid Fleet and the Ylva Fleet, for example, are both found off western Norway and travel together as a standing pair and every two years or so, the two of them make the journey down to the Alita Fleet off northern Maine to stay through Maine's spring. Victor Hammond of the Maria Institute of Tiko Studies in east Maine has tracked the visit happening approximately on that biennial cycle at the same season each time. Two fleets that are bonded to each other visiting a third on a calendar is a tradition by any plain meaning of the word. The fleets of the arctic tiko have numerous cases of inter-group politics so distinct that they stop being regional populations and start being easily recognised as distinct cultural groups that interact with each other and conflict with each other the same way any human nation would interact with another human nation. To brush this behaviour off is setting the bar higher yet again when evidence proves the arctic tiko has long since been able to reach that bar.

What the Arctic Tiko Builds

It's tempting when you look at an arctic tiko settlement to call the place inherited, to say a fleet has passed it down or that it's a place of history and depth from multiple tiko generations. And in a lot of ways, this is a very comfortable thought to imagine an animal other than a human inheriting a property from their great grandmother with the scale of nearly two centuries, but Tikonologists are careful not to fall into the trap of conflating human assumptions on people that are not human. Inheritance is a claim about how the tikos themselves understand a place. It's about ownership, intent, and handing-on and that is the inside of a culture no human observer can see. What researchers can do instead is study the structures as physical things. They can read age in worked rock and carved ice, the weathering and the wear that mark long use, and through the data collected about which fleet was present when which shelter or settlement was discovered. So when the field talks about a shelter being used across generations, it's talking about something measured like the age of the stone and the long run of the records.

Arctic tikos obviously don't have hands and the work of building is done with the lower jaw and the long tongue. The jaw is as flexible and articulate as a moose is with its snout or an octopus is with a tentacle and the jaw and tongue work in tandem The jaw is used for grip and force while the tongue is used for the fine work. In ice, a fleet carves their shelter by holding rocks and sharp seashells in the mouth and using them as cutting tools. And depending on the members involved, work is rotated through the labour in shifts so that no individual carries all of it. In rock and seabed, the fleet excavates and modifies instead by widening and shaping the cavities the local stone already offers. A large settlement is plainly the work of many tikos over a long time and that scale is part of why researchers study these grounds for signs of generational use. A settlement is a built and ordered place and a researcher diving one can see how it's zoned. The shelters aren't like the houses we imagine for humans where every member has a house of their own. Instead, there are larger shelters like one big enough for the matriarch alone and smaller ones that hold more than a single tiko but not many since the animals are massive to begin with. Around these are the dig-outs which are the modified spaces given over to stored food, to kept objects, and to the herous. The fleet can't all fit inside the shelters so most of its members sleep in groups on the ground around them, close to one another, and there are always at least two individuals awake and circling the territory as sentries while the rest rest. What a fleet leaves in those dig-outs is varied and depends entirely on the preference of the fleet and even the specific preferences of the members in the fleet.

Material culture differs from fleet to fleet and from individual to individual. The tiko called Diego was recorded trying crabs on his head one after another and admiring himself in a mirror placed by tinologists. Another tiko named Stuart knew his own recorded voice well enough to be annoyed by it and to break the speaker that played it after he had eventually had gotten enough of it. Ricardo of the Lainey Fleet keeps objects to trade with his fleetmates and is rarely without something to offer. Across the world, the kept objects run from urchin quills, crab carapaces, shells, and bones to clothes, bags, and bottles lifted from human waters and a fleet usually keeps whatever particular indivudals prefer to keep. When a fleet leaves a settlement, whether for exploration or a visit or some type of confrontation with another fleet, it usually leaves behind the food stored and members will take whatevr stored objects they desire to take and leave everything else. The tikonologist Aliyah Terrence, in a paper drawn from seven years of fieldwork called Abandonment and Return in Arctic Tiko Settlement Use, has proposed that the stored food is left behind on purpose since a fleet that hunts as it travels has no reason to carry dead weight and that individual members take only the few objects each one chooses to bring. Terrence also notes that an abandoned settlement with its leftover food, objects, and general territory becomes a temporary home for other animals and that the returning fleet drives them out to take the ground back when they return. These absences are long, up to two years depending on the fleet, what they left for, and the season and the fleet returns to the same place each time. The most striking thing the arctic tiko makes is not a structure at all. Adults and adolescents wear patterns of urchin spine pressed into the skin that are set in deliberate arrangements. This is a practice close to tattooing and it's done with the same care as everything else the jaw and tongue accomplish, but it's primarily a cooperative work. One tiko holds the urchin steady in its mouth while the other lies still to receive the spines and both eat certain plants before and after that blunt the urchin's toxins. Researchers can film the act and map where on the body the spines are set and the results show that areas near the side of the head, the underside of the jaw, and the areas where the neck meets the back of the head are the most common areas to find these markings. What the patterns mean, whether they mark age or fleet or a life lived, still leaves many tikonologists uncertain. An interesting note, however, is that more and more fleets not just in the tropical waters in the past sixteen years have been observed with spine tattoos where before 2010, these tattoos were only found in the tropical fleets. This has given tikonologists the possibility that there may have been some cultural movement in arctic tiko culture that caused more fleets to begin this tattooing practice.

An Arctic Tiko about to throw a strick for its Coastal Shrieker Herou to retrieve

The Herous

No single fact about the arctic tiko says more than the fact that they keep another species. The herous are domesticated penguins, bred and raised and depended upon by arctic tikos and they are the clearest thing the page can point to because domestication is a relationship held steady across thousands of years and involves a meticulous and purposeful action of selecting traits that are desirable across generations. Early explorers who watched arctic tikos moving their penguins from place to place called the birds herous after an old word for a herd, and the name stuck. The animal underneath the name is Aptenodytes forsteri familiaris, the domesticated form of the emperor penguin and all three of the herou breeds trace back to that single wild ancestor. How the relationship began is something cetophiologists and tikonologists can construct. And that reconstruction involves them proposing that ancestral arctic tikos crossed paths with emperor penguins somewhere in the deep past and instead of preying on them or treating them like any other animal, the tikos stayed near them. Maybe it was how they hunted or how they looked that caught their attention. The tikos who travelled stayed with the penguins, maybe observing them from a distance and studying them. Maybe they occasionally helped with offering fish to the penguins. Then over time, the penguins began to travel with the tikos and the tikos began to manage them. The speculative detail that researchers lean on most is the egg since arctic tikos carry objects in the flexible lower jaw with great care and an ancestral tiko carrying and warming a penguin egg is the simplest picture of how a wild bird's reproduction passed into a tiko's keeping. Once reproduction is managed, domestication follows. As for when, the field's estimate is roughly seventeen thousand years and the number is built from what can be measured. Herous have drifted a long way from wild emperor penguins in body and behaviour and the rate of that drift gives us one estimate while the oldest herou remains that already show clear signs of domestication give another and the two together point to something close to seventeen thousand years. Both through genetic evidence and possible ancient cetophian archaeological sites in the water near Antarctica may hint that these areas were where ancient tikos first stayed. Although there is little clear evidence aside from strangely shaped ice formations underwater and a few scattered fragments from shells. But it's important to note that these examples aren't conclusive and could be explained by many other natural phenomena. But what a herou is to a tiko now is, above everything else, company. The breeds were shaped long ago around particular kinds of work and their bodies still carry the marks of that shaping, but a herou today is kept and tended to by their tikos owners as emotional and social companions. The bond between a herou and their tiko is constant and physical and that's clear and visible when you note that arctic tikos nuzzle their herous, rub their snouts against them, and lick them. The licking is interesting to Tikonologists because licking is something arctic tikos otherwise reserve for close affection and the greeting of family, but they extend this behaviour to their herous. The herous return the bond as total dependence and they have been bred across those seventeen thousand years into animals that need their tikos completely. A herou taken from its tiko falls into distress and often into illness. That dependence is itself the product of long and deliberate breeding that runs further than anything in our own domesticated animals. There is one matter the field has watched closely in that arctic tikos weren't always guarded about their herous. The records suggest that tikos once let their herous range freely and kept them near but not closely watched and that this changed because of us. Through the 1700s and 1800s, herous were hunted and killed for their pelts and their strange bodies and cross referencing with several historical notes that tikos had gotten notably more aggressive when it came to defending herous. Because an arctic tiko can live past a hundred years, there are tikos alive now that remember the hunting or that learned their wariness directly from tikos who did and the guardedness that surrounds herous today is most clearly something of memory.

The herous have been observed having a regular day to day behaviour in a fleet. They are known to chase off smaller predators and smaller pests like crabs or small fish that enter and or disrupt the arctic tiko territory. An interesting trait noted by tikonologists is that the three breeds have been bred to hold their breath for long stretches underwater so that none of them is left behind in a life lived mostly in the sea. One feature runs across every breed and is worth its own attention. All three carry spotting or mottling somewhere in their patterns and the explanation researchers favour is a recognition bias. Arctic tikos are themselves spotted and mottled animals and an animal's eye tends to favour the markings of its own kind. So a spotted creature reads to a tiko as something close and appealing the way a human eye is pulled toward the round-headed, large-eyed proportions of an infant. Across thousands of years of choosing which herous to breed, that pull toward familiar markings has shaped all three breeds toward spots. The hardest practical problem the relationship poses is the egg because a bird's egg has to incubate in air and an arctic tiko fleet lives in open ocean where solid ground is rarely accessible unless the fleet lives near a shore or an ice sheet. The tikos have solved this, remarkably, by forming floating nests from driftwood and sticks and whatever buoyant debris will hold together that are then worked into a raft with their flexible lower jaw and tongue and the herou broods its egg on the platform above the water. Arctic tikos usually help with the incubation by banking the nests with fresh kills and refuse so that the heat of a recent kill holds around the egg through the cold. A diving researcher can find these nests at a settlement and watch the tikos tend and warm them. The sheer presence of an animal making a nest for another animal subservient to them is as clear enough evidence of a thinking mind. The purpose of this page isn't to argue for the tikos, but to show the clear evidence of the tikos being intelligent, sapient beings. Sophonts alongside humans.

The Breeds

There are three herou breeds and they share more than they differ. Every breed descends from the emperor penguin, every breed is spotted, every breed is bred to hold its breath long and to need its tiko and across all three the breed most often seen working alongside tikos in a hunt is the Arctic Diver. What separates them is the shape each was given by the old work it was bred for. The Eastport Swiper is the smallest and stands only 51.8 to 61 centimetres and it's built for land. It is quick and agile on solid ground in a way no other herou is with longer, thicker legs for sure footing and a long hooked beak that grips hard. They are brownish-grey with black spotting and a head of fiery orange and most often seen on northern coasts, hurrying about with objects held in the beak. The Swiper is also the one break in the timid herou temperament. Where the other breeds are shy, the Swiper is bold enough that coastal communities know it as a pest since a Swiper will help itself to objects from boats and shorelines with no particular shame about it. The Arctic Diver is the largest herou and one of the largest penguins alive, standing 165 to 180 centimetres and it's built for deep water. It has a barrel chest housing powerful lungs that let it stay under for as long as two hours, a body shaped for hydrodynamic ease, and it spends almost its whole life in the water, coming onto the surface mostly to brood. Its beak is lined with serrated edges that look like teeth from a distance and the inside of its mouth is set with sharp, gnarled papillae which makes the Diver a capable hunter and the strongest protector of tikos and their pups. It is the most valued of the breeds and the most common, and most closely bonded to its tiko for its loyalty and companionship. Studies show that Arctic Divers will regularly surround an infant tiko to ensure its safety, often nipping or biting at any animals that nay get too close. The Coastal Shrieker is the mid-sized breed at 94 to 100 centimetres and is the most striking to look at. They were bred over a long time toward colour and pattern and a soft, full coat. Shriekers run from fiery orange to mustard yellow and are patterned in everything from broad giraffe-like blotches and wavy lines to plain coats flecked with small white or black spots and whatever the colouring, every Shrieker keeps the puffy coat of a fledgling into adulthood as a juvenile trait bred to stay. The name comes from the voice. A Shrieker is loud and its calls are sharp and carrying. Many tikonologists note that the breed appears to have been shaped as a living alarm, raising a cry at terrestrial danger to warn the tikos or drive a threat off. The size alone deters little, but the noise does real work and the fledgling look may add to it since a predator faced with what seems to be a loud penguin chick may hesitate, wary that so much noise will bring something far larger than itself. The puffy coat costs the Shrieker speed in the water, but it costs the breed little in practice since the tikos that keep Shriekers tend to be the less restless swimmers, content with the company of a slower, louder, and feistier herou.

Eastport Swiper

Arctic Diver

Coastal Shrieker

Recognising Another Race

This page has gone through the brain in the braincase, the way arctic tikos think and model the minds around them, the language no one has yet deciphered, the fleets and their cultures, the things the tikos build, and the herous they have kept and bred for seventeen thousand years. None of it stands alone, nor is any of it something to shrug off or take lightly in any way. Regardless of political view, religious view, or even biological view, these animals should be taken together as a people and a culture. The arctic tiko is a sophont, a thinking mind, and the honest reading of everything assembled here is that humans are not the only people on this planet and have not been for a very long time. Recognising that carries a cost, because humans have a bad track record when we meet those who are other. Even when the others involved look more like humans than tikos do. Genocide, slavery, conversion, racism, homophobia, any form of discrimination. Humans by record have always had a fear and therefore a dislike of what we call the "Other". The person or thing we think is not like us or not how they should be. Most of modern day society is built entirely off of conlfict with the "Other". And even with pescanguids in general, we have shown this. The hemoling era itself was one of the darkest moments of human history in terms of how we treat the other animals we live alongside. Humans are responsible for nearly every single cetocollian species described as endangered, critically endangered, extinct, and under watch. A big thing with weird traits is almost always hunted or killed. The history and culture we as a species have violated with the capturing of individuals for entertainment, the killing of their pets for skin, the destruction of their homes for overfishing, the boats that damage and kill, all of it is at our hands.

What we owe them isn't that complicated to name even if it's hard to do because it means reconciling with the actions of those before that we are always so ready to brush away as being part of a different time. We owe it to ourselves and to the tikos, beings who live impossibly long beside our own short lives, to respect and honour the lives we can live alongside once we learn to accept that we aren't alone. The answer was never out in space. It's here, in our own water. Evolution has handed us a partner for understanding the world we share and it's imperative that we set aside the pride of our species and acknowledge that there are two, and possibly three, thinking minds on this planet together. This isn't naïveté. Change is slow, human politics are every bit as chaotic as the natural world and no single revelation rearranges things overnight. Humans have had centuries to recognise another race and have shrugged it off for centuries. But if we lift the hubris from our eyes even for a moment, we open a possibility worth more than the comfort of believing ourselves alone. There are already people working toward it, in groups online and in person, in forums and in the slow machinery of law, arguing for the personhood that these remarkable people are owed. I'll be plain, because there's no use pretending I'm neutral after all of this. I believe they are people. I have spent this whole site, my whole life, believing it. And I think the day humans say so plainly and mean it will be one of the first days to a truly multispecies revolution.

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse