Sussex2030
Quality of Life
On this page:
The Quality of Life Act of 1988 - Del Code Title 9, CHAPTER 69. ZONING, Subchapter II.
§ 6956. Required and optional elements of comprehensive plan; studies and surveys.
§ 6961. Information from state and local agencies and school districts.
§ 6951. Short title; intent and purpose.
(a) This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Quality of Life Act of 1988." It is the purpose of this subchapter to utilize and strengthen the existing role, processes and powers of county governments in the establishment and implementation of comprehensive planning programs to guide and control future development. It is the intent of this subchapter to encourage the most appropriate use of land, water and resources consistent with the public interest and to deal effectively with future problems that may result from the use and development of land within their jurisdictions. Through the process of comprehensive planning, it is intended that units of county government can preserve, promote and improve the public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, law enforcement and fire prevention and general welfare; facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing and other requirements and services; and conserve, develop, utilize and protect natural resources within their jurisdictions.
(b) It is also the intent of this subchapter to encourage and assure cooperation between and among municipalities, counties and the State and to encourage and assure coordination of planning and development activities of units of county government, municipalities, regional agencies and state government in accord with applicable provisions of law. A growth management plan or policy plan that meets the standards and requirements of this subchapter shall be an acceptable comprehensive plan. The land use map or map series forming part of the comprehensive plan as required by this subchapter shall have the force of law, and no development, as defined in this subchapter, shall be permitted except in conformity with the land use map or map series and with county land development regulations enacted to implement the other elements of the adopted comprehensive plan.
66 Del. Laws, c. 207, § 1.;
§ 6961. Information from state and local agencies and school districts.
(a) All subdivision plans approved by the county government shall be filed with the Office of the Recorder of Deeds, and with such other state and local agencies as the County may by ordinance require.
(b) As part of its review of a rezoning or subdivision application, the county government through its designated local planning agency shall request and review information from all state and local agencies and local school districts identified on a list prepared by the County and shall file as part of the record any written information provided by such state and local agencies or local school districts with respect to the rezoning or subdivision application. If the planning agency makes recommendations that are in conflict with the information supplied by state and local agencies or local school districts, it must explain its reasons for doing so in writing.
(c) Any state or local agency or local school district which delivers to the head of county government a written request that it be notified of rezoning and subdivision applications shall be included on the County's list of agencies and school districts from which information shall be requested and reviewed in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.
Delaware's 1999 Managing Growth in 21st Century Delaware
Streategies for State Polities and Spending
To determine the best states to retire, WalletHub compared the 50 states across 47 key indicators of retirement-friendliness. The analysis (clipped below for the best 10) examines affordability, health-related factors, and overall quality of life.
Delaware is #6 on Affordability but #35 on Quality of Life!
It still ended up as #4 overall.
Hmmm, affordability over quality of life!
Putting well-being at the heart of local policymaking, urban planning and resource allocation is key to helping communities thrive. But well-being is difficult to measure. And few efforts have measured well-being and integrated those results into policies and programs.
Well-being is more than just physical health. It covers all aspects of a person, including the skills and opportunities he or she needs to live a meaningful life. In urban areas, well-being is more than just the health of a community. It also includes residents’ satisfaction, connectedness and ability to reach full potential. (Other dimensions of well-being include community connections, characteristics of place, learning and economic opportunity.)
The city of Santa Monica, California, wanted to incorporate well-being into city planning, policies and programs. But first, it needed a way to measure community well-being.
Project description
One of five cities to win the Bloomberg Philanthropies’ inaugural Mayors Challenge, Santa Monica used its $1,000,000 award to develop and implement the first local Wellbeing Index. RAND researchers, as part of a team of experts that made up The Wellbeing Project, created the Wellbeing Index.
The Wellbeing Project had three phases:
Define well-being at the community level.
Measure well-being using administrative data, resident surveys, social media data and more.
Help address well-being needs by working with community partners and residents to create effective strategies.
The Wellbeing Index aimed to assess well-being in Santa Monica and create a framework for the city to discuss how government, community partners and residents could work together to help the community thrive.
Research questions
What is the best way to measure community well-being?
What is the state of Santa Monica residents’ well-being?
How can officials integrate well-being into city planning?
How can government, community partners and residents work together to improve well-being?
Key findings
Researchers identified several challenges facing Santa Monica.
Residents were not as healthy as expected.
Many residents lacked strong social connections and a sense of neighborhood cohesion.
Younger residents reported difficulties related to community connection and overall personal outlook or well-being.
Latino residents reported low well-being.
Well-being strengths and needs differed by ZIP code.
Gaps in overall well-being for men in the areas of community, health and learning would benefit from greater attention.
Housing was an issue for 1 in 5 residents.
Almost one-third of residents experienced stress some or all of the time.
Many residents volunteer and vote, but few feel that they have influence in decision-making.
Recommendations
Santa Monica can increase well-being for its residents in the following ways.
Create community spaces for social engagement, particularly spaces that target young and middle-aged people.
Develop programs that help neighbors interact.
Create citywide activities that better use outdoor space.
Explore opportunities to expand the role of residents in shared decision-making.
Explore why Latino residents have low levels of well-being. Partner with Latino-serving agencies to create opportunities to improve well-being.
Create programs to facilitate financial literacy and mitigate financial stress.
Consider how to increase job-placement opportunities.
“These citywide findings help us tailor policies to those who really need help.” — Lisa Parson, Office of Civic Wellbeing, city of Santa Monica
Impact
The Wellbeing Project helped Santa Monica use growing partnerships between government and nongovernmental organizations. The city also used the index to build on established efforts that track progress in environmental health, open space and land use, economic development and housing, and human dignity.
Creating the Wellbeing Index also helped the city of Santa Monica:
Establish the current state of well-being of the city and its residents.
Discover new ways to include city administrative and program data, resident experience data and social media data to better understand well-being.
Use well-being dimensions to frame its strategic plan and to inform all policy and program decisions.
Help other cities integrate well-being into their measurement and planning through the dissemination of Santa Monica’s results and outreach efforts.
Anita Chandra is vice president and director of RAND Social and Economic Well-Being, as well as a senior policy researcher for the RAND Corp., where this was first published.