The topic of UFO's or UAP's is high interest ...
but actually quite low value.
How so?
How so?
47% Orbs. Round. Spheres
1% Tic Tac's
1% Polygon
1% Square
1% Rectangle
2% Triangle
2% Discs
2% Cylinders
3% Oval
16% Lights
19% Ambiguous Sensor Contact
7% Other
(Yeah, they add up to 102%. I can only surmise that some sightings fall into more than one category.)
Sighting hot spots.
The above graphics are from the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO')s home page.
Craft Identified by Dante
Kumamoto UFO August 2018
👈 Spotter's guide to UFOs, 1967
👇 A spot of fun
Even IF many sightings can be discounted as human (define Human), natural, or misidentified phenomena, or as manufactured pieces of mischief, there remain those sightings which are NOT able to be identified as such.
So the main implication with these remaining UFO's is that, we are, without doubt, part of a much larger neighbourhood than we have culturally believed ourselves to be. Be it galactic or dimensional or both.
However, these craft are, in the end, just transport vehicles ... of either beings and/or resources. I'm including surveillance information as a resource, because a hefty percentage of sighted craft are indeed intended for this function.
Like trains, planes, and automobiles.
Like motorcycles, sedans, troop carriers, long haul freighters, and so on.
Identifying the vehicle you come across gives you minimal clues about the occupants and only the slightest clue as to their purpose. And it's not like they're going to have number plates or corporate insignias. What ... You don't think there's not galactic trade in such vehicles? The dynamics of supply and demand extend well beyond our terrestrial horizons.
This site focuses on collecting captured sightings of various vehicles. I have another site that focuses on the visitors.
I have no interest in mainstream UFO research or investigations.
I have no interest in any disclosure discussions. For me, their presence and involvement here is a given.
I have no interest in what 'leading' UFO 'researchers' are espousing. As far as I'm concerned, they all have either a very limited frame of reference, or they are actively involved in disseminating misinformation or disinformation.
My intention is to impartially collect craft footage in one place - mainly for my own reference.
There are many more visitors than you dare imagine, with a multiplicity of intentions.
Most likely, you won't get too close to a craft. Or an alien in their true form.
If you do ... there's always this! 🙂
To learn about some of the races who you might come across, visit this sister-site to Sky Craft Spotting.
👆My little dig at all the red-pillers who accuse the Anunnaki of being behind everything nefarious on this planet!
And for the record, Sitchin was, without doubt, a disinformation agent.
Nibiru was NEVER mentioned in any cuneiform tablets that can be confirmed by scholars.
So IF such a tablet did exist, that scholars do not have access to, who allowed Sitchin to access it, hmmm?
Ergo, Sitchin was NOT a recreational scholar of Sumerian history, but was provided with information to circulate to the public.