Setting

impulse

Be able to see needs

For what reason should a person not be able to carry an actual standard with him? - After all, such a standard is sometimes needed in life. 1: 1: 1 = 100 %' is how Schneider assembles his things into actual works and prefers to preserve himself what has value and what lacks such value.

Alone only where he may admit that he has to do something himself to understand the things that occur correctly, Schneider will also sufficiently exist with his things.

If you don't know the actual standard and therefore don't need one for your things, you'll miss something. What should Schneider's opinion also be able to interest? - After all, it certainly doesn't fit so well with his idea of the given things.

speech formation

Thoughts and their assignment

The attitude of a human being is composed of certain aspects, which Schneider wants to summarize in his spectrum, so as not to have to unravel in detail what constitutes him. This spectrum would be one which is truly given in 'own frequencies', i.e. spontaneously, and can also occur in this way. Everything that a person has, does and is can flow into such a contemplation.

We see these things because they are given. We can also describe that. What is true of it and what that would not be is to be expressed. It would be good there to correspond completely to one's real ability with one's own being, where that is possible.

Something should be done to preserve the actual knowledge about this existence. For this purpose one should describe it. There it can finally be clarified and then also finally evaluated.

It would be to preserve this good in such a way that it can be recognized as true by itself. That will be something consistent or it is to be rejected. So he cleans up his writings. And it is really important to the author Schneider that these appear in a clear manner and can also be heard in this way.

If man will first of all prove himself with his things, then he will also be able to credit it. He is really involved in it.

Phenomena

Gariman

A technique from those writings on India which Schneider considers and reads from time to time is called 'gariman'. It is this 'making oneself more' without aids.

Schneider has at times already tried to deal with this technique. Due to a certain melancholy of his mind, which sometimes occurs with him, this form corresponds well to him.

idea

With a small wish

Schneider has been able to experience several times in competitions in chess that he himself is not a winner per se. Often, mostly when he means that he is on the road to happiness in a tournament game, he has lost his real concentration. Then he was already sure of victory during these games, but proceeded very carelessly in the further course of the same. It will only be a matter of luck whether such a game can still be won at all.

The author already knows about this weakness from himself quite well. He already knows himself in this respect well with his human existence. He hardly wins a game if he feels too early as the winner of it. Such a game is then bland. The loss of such games is inevitable. So that would be nothing good.

speech formation

An instructive writing style

Mathias Schneider often uses such a writing style in his announcements and speeches, which prefers clear statements and understandable hints. So he himself would like to acknowledge that his writing style is at times instructive, that is to say, determinant of things.

Why is it that the author of these writings expresses this so clearly? - Well, it would be to say that he names his things according to his guidelines for it. He once set these up for himself and his work. His system for finding such words in thought protocols is that of a 'naming of things'. This is the reason why he depicts his writings and works in this way.

For Schneider there is no doubt about the respective thing if it is of a trivial nature. Then it can be well described by him. True to this idea, he paid attention to the simplicity of his thoughts and ideas. The words spoken and written down should suffice.

idealism

Maintain 10 percent restraint

Man has his own appearance. This makes a difference for him.

He is conditioned by the fact that he awakens something in other people that can be good or bad, false or wrong of his kind. It also affects itself in the same way as it affects its environment. (Actio equals reactio.) But not everything would already be recognized by other people in the way it is by itself.

In order not to lose one's own skill in dealing with the true circumstances of everyday life, the author has to focus his attention on them. In doing so he perceives something that really happens.

A certain kind of restraint creates a controlling authority on the person himself and makes him appear sovereign before other people.

Phenomena

Silence can awaken inner forces

Some human thing belongs said. Nevertheless, we should still be able to choose. Whether we say something or whether we would not do it should not be decisive for an event.