Supporting Resources

The goal of the supporting resources is to provide the task participants with annotations from state-of-the-art automated tools in order to minimize the time-investment necessary to participate in the shared task and to allow for participants to experiment on how to leverage automated analyses provided by existing Natural Language Processing systems.

Please note that Shared Task organizers are not responsible for the data quality, the resources are presented as provided by the tools. If you have any questions regarding the resources, please post them on the task forum: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/seedev-2019

POS Tagging

genia-tagger-resources

GENIA Tagger is a tool for part-of-speech tagging, shallow parsing, and named entity recognition for biomedical text. If you make use of the tagging from GENIA tagger, please cite: Tsuruoka et al. (2005). Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text. Advances in informatics, 382-392.

Parsing

stanford-parser-resources

Stanford Parser is a widely used statistical parser. If you make use of the parses from the Stanford Parser, please cite: Klein, D. and Manning, C. (2002). Fast Exact Inference with a Factored Model for Natural Language Parsing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

enju-parser-resources

Enju parser is a robust syntactic parser for English, based on a probabilistic HPSG grammar. If you make use of the Enju parses, please cite: Miyao, Y. and Tsujii, J. (2008). Feature forest models for probabilistic HPSG parsing. Computational Linguistics.

ccg-parser-resources

The C&C CCG Parser is a dependency parser. If you make use of the CCG parses, please cite: Clark, S., & Curran, J. R. (2007). Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with CCG and log-linear models. Computational Linguistics, 33(4), 493-552.

Term Extraction

bioyatea-resources

BioYaTeA is an extended version of the YaTeA (Aubin and Hamon, 2006) term extractor adapted to the biomedical domain. If you make use of the BioYaTeA resources, please cite: Golik, W., Bossy, R., Ratkovic, Z., & Nédellec, C. (2013). Improving term extraction with linguistic analysis in the biomedical domain. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing13), Special Issue of the journal Research in Computing Science (pp. 24-30).

Named Entity Recognition

stanford-NER-resources

Stanford NER is a named entity recognition tool for person, organization and location entities. If you make use of the Stanford NER annotations, please cite: Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C. (2005, June). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 363-370). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Stemming, Abbreviation

porter-stemmer-resources

The Porter stemming algorithm is a process for removing the commoner morphological and inflexional endings from words in English. Please cite: Karen Sparck Jones and Peter Willet, 1997, Readings in Information Retrieval, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN 1-55860-454-4.

ab3p-resources

Ab3P is an abbreviation definition detector. A set of rules recognizes simple patterns such as Alpha Beta (AB) as well as more involved cases. The precision of each rule is estimated by applying to randomized data (psuedo-precision). Please cite: Sohn S, Comeau DC, Kim W, Wilbur WJ. (2008) Abbreviation definition identification based on automatic precision estimates. BMC Bioinformatics. 25;9:402. PubMed ID: 1881755

Google Sites

Report abuse