Embedded Files
Unit 1 Activity 1
Unit 1 Activity 1
Being an Educational Technology ProfessionalÂ
Unit 2 Activity 1
Unit 2 Activity 1
Technology Certified EducatorsÂ
This infographic explores three technology integration models—SAMR, TPACK, and RAT—and how each framework can support teachers in using digital tools to enhance instruction. After reviewing these models, I concluded that the TPACK framework is the best fit for my school context because it emphasizes the connection between curriculum, instructional strategies, and technology. In my classroom, where structured literacy programs and data-driven instruction are central, TPACK provides a practical way to ensure that technology meaningfully supports student learning rather than simply replacing traditional classroom activities.
This short video explains how the SAMR model helps teachers evaluate levels of technology integration.
This article provides examples of how the TPACK framework connects content, pedagogy, and technology in the classroom.
The video explains the RAT model, which helps teachers evaluate technology use in the classroom by determining whether digital tools are replacing traditional tasks, improving them, or transforming learning experiences.
This video shows an overview of the PICRAT model, which helps teachers evaluate technology use by looking at student engagement and the impact of technology on teaching practices.
My Perspective on These Models
Each of these technology integration models offers a helpful way for teachers to think about how technology fits into instruction. The SAMR model is useful because it provides a simple way to think about how technology can move beyond substitution and support more engaging learning experiences. However, it focuses mostly on the level of technology use rather than how the lesson connects to curriculum and teaching strategies.
The RAT model is helpful for reflecting on whether technology is actually improving instruction or simply replacing traditional classroom activities. I find this framework useful when thinking about whether a digital tool is making learning more efficient or meaningfully changing the learning experience for students.
In my experience, the TPACK framework is the most practical because it focuses on the relationship between curriculum, pedagogy, and technology. In a school like KIPP DC, where instruction is grounded in strong curriculum and structured literacy practices, this model helps ensure that technology supports teaching and learning rather than becoming the focus of the lesson.
Technology integration should support strong teaching and curriculum, not simply introduce digital tools into the classroom.
References
Dearborn Public Schools Technology Coaches. (n.d.). SAMR model resources. https://techcoaches.dearbornschools.org/?s=SAMR
PowerSchool. (2024). The TPACK framework explained with classroom examples. https://www.powerschool.com/blog/the-tpack-framework-explained-with-classroom-examples/
Common Sense Education. (n.d.). What is the SAMR model? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b5yvgKQdqE
Royce Kimmons. (n.d.). RAT model explained [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDGsLoahDDM
Kimmons, R. (2016, April 29). PICRAT for effective technology integration in teaching [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfvuG620Bto
Evaluating Chromebook Integration and Technology Use
Evaluating Chromebook Integration and Technology Use
Technology plays an important role in supporting instruction in today’s classrooms, especially in schools where differentiated instruction and data-driven learning are priorities. At KIPP DC Spring Academy, students in grades 1st through 4th have access to Chromebooks that are used daily to support literacy, mathematics, and independent learning. Programs such as Boost Reading, ST Math, Amplify, Google Classroom (4th grade), and EdPuzzle provide opportunities for students to practice skills, receive targeted support, and engage in structured learning experiences.
As a Literacy Interventionist, I see firsthand how technology supports intervention and small-group instruction. Chromebooks allow students to work independently while teachers focus on targeted instruction, making them an important part of the learning environment.
The purpose of this report is to evaluate how Chromebooks currently support teaching and learning at KIPP DC Spring Academy and identify ways to strengthen technology integration. This report includes findings from interviews with Principal Jovon Taylor and IT Director Brian Jones, as well as survey responses from teachers. Research on educational technology was also reviewed to understand how digital tools impact student learning.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse