Studying the social lives of stars with 1D models and large surveys
While we tend to think of stars as single, in reality, many have one or more gravitationally-bound stellar companions. The ways in which these companions interact with each other, through mass transfer between stars or merging, alters both the internal structure and the properties of the stars involved. These interactions among stellar friends are what I call the social lives of stars, and the ramifications of such encounters impacts everything from planet formation to galaxy evolution. In my research, I leverage 1D stellar evolution models to probe interior structure with spectroscopic and photometric observations of global stellar properties from large surveys like APOGEE and Gaia to create a more complete picture of the role of binary interaction in shaping stellar evolution.
Compactness parameter measured at core-collapse as a function of carbon-oxygen core mass and carbon-mass fraction set at central carbon ignition. Adapted from fig 2 from Patton & Sukhbold (2020)
Neutron star (NS) birth mass distribution predicted by our core models compared to the Fryer+12 prescription and the observed NS mass distribution. Fig 6 of Patton, Sukhbold, & Eldridge (2022)
Past Work
In the 1D, neutrino-driven explosion paradigm, the final fate of a massive star, implosion or explosion, depends sensitively on its core structure immediately preceding core-collapse. Change the evolutionary history of a star, change its core structure. In Patton & Sukhbold (2020), we created a map between the structure of carbon-oxygen cores at carbon ignition and core-collapse using nearly 4,000 core models run in Kepler and MESA, revealing a complicated landscape of final structures and final fates. These models are agnostic of evolutionary history, thus widely applicable.
In Patton, Sukhbold, & Eldridge (2022), we used single and binary BPASS models to show how the distribution of core properties of stars which had and had not experienced mass transfer and what the implications were for the initial mass distribution of compact objects. We also show how incorporating the core structure improves upon final fate prescriptions commonly adopted by binary population synthesis codes.
Current work
I am now working on the evolution of high-mass stellar merger products, seeing how case B mergers change the core structure at carbon ignition and core-collapse and what the implications are for explodability.
Future work
The nucleosynthetic yields, properties of the resulting compact objects, and properties of supernovae themselves should all change as a result of binary interaction. In the future I would like to quantify those changes.
Past work
Stars born below the Kraft break should be slowly rotating as they become red giants due to magnetic braking and conservation of angular momentum. However, a few percent of these red giants rapidly rotate, likely due to spin-up from merging or tidal synchronization with a companion, stellar or planetary. Identifying rapid rotators usually requires a vsini measurement, but vsini is not included as a free parameter in spectroscopic fitting pipelines for large spectroscopic surveys, like ASPCAP for APOGEE, because it is low for the vast majority of red giants.
In Patton et al. (2024) we developed a set of spectroscopic selection criteria to preferentially identify rapid rotators in APOGEE DR16. We confirmed rapid rotation at the 5 km/s threshold for over 1600 giants, the majority of which were in close binaries. We also discovered several failure modes of ASPCAP. The most surprising result was the surplus of giants with 5 < vsini < 10 km/s. There are 4x as many rapid rotators in that regime than with vsini > 10 km/s, which we means two things: there is a larger population of giants which have experienced some sort of binary interaction than previously thought and in the absence of other defining characteristics, the only way to find this population is by measuring vsini for all giants.
Future work
Patton et al. (2024) and Pinsonneault et al. (2024) describe trends in vsini and binary fraction with evolutionary state and seismic properties, which allows us to piece together the typical evolutionary channels which produce these rapid rotators. This is a rich data, and there is a lot to be done, including probing activity, carrying out detailed studies of the single and binary rapid rotators, and identifying and characterizing sub-subgiants to name a few.
Spectroscopic Log g versus temperature offset for the giants selected via our criteria in APOKASC3. The vast majority of targets elcted by our criteria are rapid rotators. Fig 2 of Patton et al. (2024)
Spectroscopic Log g versus Teff for all rapid rotators with 5 < vsini < 10 km/s in APOKASC3. These rotators are numerous and span the giant branch. Fig 6 of Patton et al. (2024)