As mentioned in the observations, the curriculum of Indonesia, at least in the school that I am designated to is anchored on the 4C's of learning namely, critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity. For SMAN 10 Samarinda, they usually utilize the independent curriculum for grades 10-11 while Grade 12 uses the 2013 Curriculum as presented alongside.
It was suggested by my cooperating teacher that I use the curriculum from the Philippines for my lesson implementations. Hence, I have made use of an Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) approach. Inquiry-based learning is an unorthodox method of learning that incorporates the active participation of students by involving them in posing questions and bringing real-life experiences to them. The basis of this method is to channel the thought process of the students through queries and help them with “how to think" instead of “what to think". It is also worth taking note that IBLKs are using the 5E's or 7Es of Learning. Thus, in my teaching plan, the 5E Learning Process is used.
Moreover, I made a pre-lesson implementation, to have a firm grasp of the plan, an inquiry-Based Learning Kit (IBLK) about the content topic, an instructional plan which laid out the sequence of my implementation, and lastly, a PowerPoint presentation that guided me in my demo teaching.
A pre-lesson implementation in constructing a lesson plan serves as a vital preparatory phase, allowing me to align their instructional goals with students' needs and interests. I find this phase invaluable as it enables me to assess the learners' prior knowledge, identify potential challenges, and tailor my teaching strategies accordingly. By taking the time to understand my students' backgrounds and experiences before the lesson, I can create a more engaging and effective learning environment. This proactive approach not only fosters a sense of connection with my students but also ensures that the lesson content is meaningful and accessible, promoting a more successful and enjoyable learning experience for everyone involved.
The lesson implementation proceeded as it should be based on the lesson plan. The YouTube short attached here shows a sneak peek at the lesson implementation for the topic of Period 4 of the Periodic Table of Elements on Transition metals. The implementation was done on Grade 12 MIPA 2 and Grade 12 MIPA 1 of SMAN 10 Samarinda.
This is the teacher-made Inquiry-Based Learning Kit (IBLK) entitled, Period 4 Transition Metals Inquiry-Based Learning Kit. This particular IBLK has a Primary Inquiry Question that is: Why is Titanium, a better material for the iPhone 15? The instructional segments are: 1) Engage Card: Article Analysis, 2) Explore Card: Period 4 (Transition Metals) on ChemSketch, 3) Explain Card: Making Sense of Period 4 – Transition Metals, 4) Elaborate Card: Digging Deeper (a) Complex Ions (b) Hybridization, and 5) Evaluate Card: Two-Tiered Multiple Choice.
This is the Instructional Plan or the Lesson Plan constructed for the implementation. The Instructional Segments are divided into five sections. The learning objectives of the Lesson are to investigate the physical and chemical properties of Period 4 in the Periodic Table of Elements particularly Transition metals using ChemSketch, analyze the implications of the physical and chemical properties to the benefits and processes of these elements in everyday life, and cite the benefits, impacts, and processes of Period 4 of the Periodic Table of Elements (Transition metals).
I have made use of a PowerPoint presentation to assist me in the lesson implementation. Although I mainly used the teacher-made learning kit, The presentation was quite helpful in the classroom as it allowed me to have a systematic flow, diminishing possible constraints. In the presentation, I have included, countdown timers so that the students will be able to work as efficient as they can.
The post-lesson implementation report serves as a reflective tool and a roadmap for continuous improvement in my teaching practice. It allows me to critically assess the effectiveness of the lesson, identifying both successful strategies and areas for refinement. Through this process, I gained valuable insights into student engagement, comprehension, and overall learning outcomes. By documenting my observations and experiences, I not only solidify my understanding of what worked well but also pinpoint specific areas that require adjustment or innovation in future lessons. This personalized report becomes a dynamic resource, shaping my instructional approach and fostering a continuous cycle of growth and development in my role as an educator.