Image source: blog.ipleaders.in
Image source: editage.com
Over the past years, self-publishing has become the course of action of choice by many authors. Providing total creative control, it’s alluring to both the rookie writer and the experienced penman. But much like all things in life, there are pros and cons to self-publishing. This blog from ReadersMagnet displays how the advantages defeat the disadvantages.
While having a literary agent and a traditional publishing company can help boost a book’s reach and the likelihood to receive awards and recognitions, the actual chances of a book getting picked up by an agent is 1 to 1000. A literary agent would respond to an author in as long as six months. The whole process of editing, promotion, and other necessary steps would take roughly 18 months to two years, with no guaranteed spotlight from the traditional publishing company.
On the one hand, there is prestige in having a traditional publishing company behind one’s literary journey. On the other hand, self-publishing allows an author to attract a following that would, later, prove to publishers that one’s work is worth noticing. Prestige is nothing when an author’s book is given little attention.
With self-publishing, an author can get their book published in a much shorter time and reach their desired audiences much faster, says ReadersMagnet. Authors who decide to self-publish their work can enjoy a hundred percent creative control over their book. Promotion won’t be a burden, especially when an author commissions an experienced marketing team to boost the book’s reach and sales.