The central concept regarding the impact of protein intake distribution on muscle protein synthesis (MPS) revolves around the idea of sustaining elevated plasma amino acid concentrations, by minimizing amino acid oxidation.
A study conducted by Witard et al. (2014) and Schoenfeld and Aragon (2018) delved into this notion by investigating the rate of MPS following resistance training, contingent upon the quantity of protein consumption per meal.
This study involved 48 resistance-trained males, who were divided into four groups. Each group received different amounts of whey protein isolate immediately after their resistance training session: 0g, 10g, 20g, or 40g. Subsequently, researchers monitored and compared the rate of postabsorptive myofibrillar MPS, along with whole-body phenylalanine oxidation and ureagenesis, across the groups over a 4-hour period.
Interestingly, doses exceeding 20g led to an increase in amino acid oxidation and ureagenesis, indicating that consuming higher amounts of protein did not confer additional benefits to MPS but instead contributed to the breakdown of amino acids for alternative metabolic processes.
Schoenfeld and Aragon (2018) explored the utilization of protein in meals containing a combination of macronutrients, including carbohydrates, fiber, and fat. The findings revealed that a 20g dose of protein was sufficient to maximize postabsorptive rates of MPS. Based on this collective evidence, Schoenfeld and Aragon proposed a protein intake distribution strategy of 0.4g of protein per kilogram of body weight per meal (g/kg/meal), spread across four meals daily, to meet the recommended daily protein intake range of 1.2-1.7g/kg/day.