Students' project evaluation

This questionnaire was made at the end of the project. It was filled out by 31 students who were still active at that time.

Some other students, who had taken part in the project earlier, had left the school or given up after the first part (magazine).

You can find the students’ responses here. Here are some graphs from the Google Form:

For most students, this Erasmus+ project was their first experience with the programme.

The students enjoyed the activities that were offered during the project. The most popular activities were the mobilities, shooting videos and working with international partners. On the contrary, using the Twinspace Forum was not popular at all. Zoom had barely better results. It seems that students prefer to communicate in person rather than remotely.

Which group activity did you like the most? Explain why.

Selected answers:

“Making videos during the mobilities, create something with a clear purpose.”

“Participating in person in the third mobility in Bordeaux, because we got to explore Bordeaux as

well as have fun together”

“Probably the mobility, because we were able to discover new ways of living, and we were able to

connect with new people in person which allow us to understand things better”

“Working on article because we had different point of view, ideas. We had to debate about it, to

decide which are the best”

“Filming, it was fun going around the city interviewing people”

“ What I like it the most was participating in person in the third mobility in Bordeaux, because it

was funny and the places that we went were so beautiful.”

“I liked our online meetings. It was nice meeting everyone!”

How did the COVID-19 pandemic impact your work on this project?

Selected answers:

“The COVID-19 had an impact on our classes because we had to wear the masks all day and we

coudn't comunicate between us properly.”

“The COVID-19 pandemic outbreaks have had an impact on the German mobility because they

couldn't travel”

“I am really sad for all the cancelled mobilities”

“We couldn’t go to our mobility in Spain which was a little disappointing but me managed to do

other things that were very great”

“It really impacted the project because the exchanges were more difficult”

“ Our mobility was cancelled :( The work was online though, so at all the impacts werent that bad”

As the two questions above show, visits and communication with partners were both quite to

very good, according to the students.

Students prefer in-person interaction to virtual meetings by far.

We can also see that students naturally used their own devices and social media to

communicate with each other.

This graph shows that most students consider they have made some progress during the project. About 5 to 7 students out of 31 consider they have not made any progress. The speaking and listening skills seem to be those that improved the most during the project. The slightly inferior results in “writing” can be explained by the fact that the “writing” part of the project had taken part at the beginning, and had ended more than a year before this

questionnaire was submitted.

These three graphs show us that students do not necessarily feel that they have improved their ICT skills, although they have learned to use new digital tools. However, the increase in media literacy skills and intercultural knowledge is unanimous.