Creative Stream Feedback/Voting Form
Scientific Stream Feedback/Voting Form
1. Communication of Research
· Did the presentation have a logical flow?
· Was there a clear understanding of the work presented?
· Was the research propagated in appropriate terms so as any divisions of MSD could understand the work?
2. Scientific Content
· Did the presentation clearly show results gained to date and the conclusions from them
· Was the content well explained?
3. Impact of Work
· Did they convey the significance of their work successfully?
· Could include relevance to further research in the field or wider applications
4. Layout
· Did any background information e.g. PowerPoint/poster, enhance the presentation?
· Were they of a good standard?
· Were they creative?
5. Enthusiasm and Engagement
· Did they engage the audience and maintain their attention?
· Did it make the audience want to know more?
· Did they convey enthusiasm for their research?
6. Ability to Handle Questions
· Did the presenter successfully handle questions?
· Perhaps this allowed them to elaborate or bring new things not discussed in the original 2-5 minutes
1. Communication of Research
· Did the presentation have a logical flow?
· Was there a clear understanding of the work presented?
· Was the research propagated in appropriate terms so as any divisions of MSD could understand the work?
2. Scientific Content
· Did the presentation clearly show results gained to date and the conclusions from them
· Was the content well explained?
3. Impact of Work
· Did they convey the significance of their work successfully?
· Could include relevance to further research in the field or wider applications
4. Originality
· Was the presentation novel/contain novel ideas?
· Did it still successfully convey the topic of the DPhil?
· Did any props etc. enhance the presentation of the work?
· Was it easy to follow?
5. Enthusiasm and Engagement
· Did they engage the audience and maintain their attention?
· Did it make the audience want to know more?
· Did they convey enthusiasm for their research?
6. Ability to Handle Questions
· Did the presenter successfully handle questions?
· Perhaps this allowed them to elaborate or bring new things not discussed in the original 2-5 minutes