In healthcare change initiatives, resistance is often seen as a barrier, but it can also be a powerful source of insight. Rather than dismissing opposition as negativity or noncompliance, effective leaders recognize resistance as valuable feedback that highlights system readiness, communication gaps, or unmet emotional and practical needs (Senge, 2015). When reframed this way, resistance becomes an opportunity for reflection, dialogue, and growth, strengthening both the change process and team cohesion.
From a systems perspective, resistance is a natural response to organizational imbalance. As Senge (2006) explains, every system produces the results it is designed to achieve, so when new initiatives emerge, resistance reveals where structures or values may not align with the desired future state.
By listening to resistance, leaders uncover systemic issues such as workflow inefficiencies, resource shortages, or competing priorities (Willis et al., 2014). For example, when introducing a new palliative documentation system, staff hesitancy revealed underlying concerns about time constraints and digital literacy. This insight prompted leaders to revise rollout plans and increase support, resulting in greater confidence and long-term success.
Transformational and servant leadership styles are especially effective in this context. Leaders who respond to resistance with empathy, curiosity, and respect foster psychological safety and collaboration (Roberts, 2020; Heikkinen et al., 2025).
By acknowledging concerns rather than pushing back, leaders demonstrate that every voice matters. In palliative care, for instance, staff may resist workflow changes out of fear that efficiency initiatives could compromise compassionate care. Engaging in reflective dialogue around these fears ensures that changes remain ethically sound and aligned with shared professional values.
Reframing resistance as feedback is central to creating a learning organization, one that values inquiry, reflection, and continuous improvement (Senge, 2006). Through feedback loops, debriefings, and reflective practice, leaders turn tension into transformation. This approach strengthens implementation outcomes while deepening trust and teamwork.
To put this philosophy into practice, leaders must translate resistance into actionable insight through effective communication.
Open forums and reflective dialogues allow staff to voice challenges in a safe, constructive space.
Shared decision-making meetings encourage collaboration and co-ownership of solutions.
Post-implementation huddles and digital feedback platforms create ongoing channels for input and improvement.
By actively listening, summarizing key insights, and visibly responding to staff input, leaders close the communication loop, showing that feedback isn’t just heard but valued as a driver of organizational learning and growth.
(Weber & Joshi, 2000; Heikkinen et al., 2025)
Sustaining change in healthcare depends on consistent, transparent, and empathetic communication. Beyond information-sharing, communication functions as a relational process that builds trust and shared purpose. As Weber and Joshi (2019) note, clear and consistent communication about the purpose and progress of change reduces uncertainty and strengthens commitment.
Effective leaders don’t just talk, they listen, reflect, and act. Facilitating open discussions, debriefings, and interdisciplinary check-ins allows teams to transform resistance into insight (Heikkinen et al., 2012). In palliative care, regular huddles serve as spaces to celebrate progress, address new challenges, and ensure patient-centered integrity throughout the change journey.
When communication becomes continuous, compassionate, and inclusive, it lays the foundation for resilience and adaptability. Over time, these habits create a culture where feedback fuels innovation, and where change is viewed not as disruption, but as an ongoing process of shared learning and improvement.
Explores common reasons people resist change (fear, uncertainty, lack of clarity) which is foundational for seeing resistance as a signal rather than just opposition.
Gives actionable strategies that align with the idea of using resistance as input (rather than just suppressing it).