Individuals from public, private, or university settings (including but not limited to Local School Staff, District Level Staff, Students, University Staff, Businesses, Community Members, Local or State Leadership, Caretaker/Parent Organizations, etc.) whose work and contributions have significantly impacted multiple local school systems or the entire State of Maryland.
Provide a brief explanation of how the nominee meets at least one criterion. A detailed explanation of the impact with multiple artifacts/evidence must be provided to support the nomination. The nomination must include an explanation of how this change will impact underserved/special populations.
The "Considerations" section offers examples to guide nominators but does not require nominees to meet every listed example. Where applicable, consider submitting artifacts in place of lengthy descriptions.
The nominee has made significant contributions to delivering and improving programs and services for gifted and talented students in the State of Maryland.
Considerations:
Developed or enhanced programs that address the needs of gifted and talented students in Maryland, showcasing creativity and a commitment to excellence.
Expands access to gifted programs for diverse and underserved student populations, ensuring all have opportunities for advancement.
Advocates for gifted education at local, district, and state levels, working with policymakers, educators, and community stakeholders to drive improvements.
List and describe how the nominee performs beyond job expectations to support gifted and talented education across the state.
Possible Evidence:
Share 4-5 examples showcasing how the nominee made significant contributions to delivering and improving programs and services for gifted and talented students across the State of Maryland.
(Including current teachers, pre-service teachers, parents/caregivers, etc.)
The program, institution, business, or individual provides resources, including time, to support the education of teachers of gifted students including current teachers, pre-service teachers, non-classroom-based educators, parents/caregivers, etc.
Considerations:
The program, institution, business, or individual advocates for the expansion and improvement of programs, services, and/or teacher training to meet the academic, creative, or social and emotional needs of gifted and talented students.
Describe or provide artifacts of the actionable work the nominee led or supported by coordinating or managing an educational program that meets the needs of the educators of gifted and talented students.
Describe how the nominee displays leadership at the state or national level by supporting professional development in the field of gifted and talented education, which goes beyond job requirements.
List and describe how nominee leads/coordinates/supports gifted and talented professional development opportunities for the state or nation
Possible Evidence:
Share 4-5 examples showcasing how the nominee has made significant contributions to support the education of teachers of gifted students, pre-service teachers, non-classroom-based educators, parents/caregivers, etc. across the State of Maryland.
The nominee advocates for State or National policies and practices in gifted and talented education.
Considerations:
Advocates for expansion and improvement of programs
Describe or list the actionable work the nominee led or supported
Describe how the nominee publicly promotes gifted and talented education
List or provide artifacts for how the nominee advocates for funding, scholarships, mentorships, etc.
List and describe how the nominee participates in and/or coordinates advocacy programs
Describe how the nominee contributes to policy-making.
Possible Evidence:
Share 4-5 examples of how the nominee has advocated for state and national policies and practices in gifted and talented education, demonstrating significant impact the entire State of Maryland or nationally.
Meet Some of the 2025 Individual and Team Winners!