Community college students are more likely to come from underserved populations and are inclined to feelings of self-doubt in academic settings. When learning online, our students need to know they have an instructor who cares and is there to support them, and that they are part of a vibrant learning community. Effective online teachers mindfully cultivate their presence at the course level and one-on-one with students. These interactions foster a relationship based on trust, which is the foundation of a learning community.
For me, equity is coming alongside a student where they are at and helping them get to where they want/need to be.
I do cover some of this information from the equity course (in a student lens) for my race and ethnicity lecture in my Introduction to Sociology class, but I really enjoyed how detailed the course was, particularly looking at implicit bias, stereotype threat, and microaggressions. As I read through the examples, I realized that I was definitely a perpetrator. One in particular that I have said to students with an accent is “where are you from?”. After looking at this interaction through the CRTL lens, I know this creates an “alien” or “second class” citizen feeling. I never meant it in a negative way, but I see how these subtle questions can lead to feelings of “othering.”
I often use PowerPoints to guide the main lecture for the week and then I have some type of application and analysis activity to further understand the concepts (on-campus classes). I know that I could cater to different learning styles better in my overall delivery of the course materials, both in the online and on-campus environments.
In reflecting on the material covered in this course, I feel that I do have implicit bias towards certain students. I am sure the stereotype threat is at play here too for them. I tend to be a faster talker and I know this can be difficult for those in this group. Allowing students, such as ESL ones, to use recording devices if they ask me is one way I can accommodate this
As a sociologist, in theory, I should be very aware of all of the ideas presented in the equity course; however, I am human and we all have implicit biases. It often isn’t until we stop and think about these in our daily practices that we can find new, culturally responsive ways to interact with our students.
Currently, in order to help my students feel connected I participate in WOW (Week of Workshops) on campus the week before the semester begins. All students can come and meet me beforehand and I provide an overview of Canvas, the course navigation, and other campus resources to get them started on a successful track. I also feel that I do a great job with communicating to my students through email/announcements and ensure they are welcomed to the class in multiple ways. Furthermore, I am very active on the discussions in Canvas and provide feedback to students through responses, weekly wrap-ups, food for thought questions, and grading rubrics. I am prompt in responding to emails, as well as grade work within 72 hours.
I also incorporate some low-stakes group work (what I call “sharing with your elbow” partner) that I have learned through the AVID program on campus. Finally, I encourage students to attend events on campus and utilize the resources, such as the library and learning resource center.
I plan to update my online Introduction to Sociology class over the next academic year and this will be a perfect opportunity to embed equity and the CRTL practices that I have been learning through this class. I now can have an equity-lens as I am going through my material that I want to modify- yeah!
I also plan to incorporate various tools in Canvas that can facilitate connection. These include: peer reviews, reflections, self-assessments, group discussions, and maybe even Flipgrid to add a more personal touch to the online environment! I am reevaluating my preconceived notions of group work. Interacting with students through these tools can help me better identify how they learn (self-assessments), and also gain more empathy in terms of their responses to reflection assignments, for example. Careful consideration will be used when evaluating the language that I use in modifying my lectures, policies, and assignments. This is definitely something that can be refreshed on my end.
The strategies recommend that we ignite, chunk, chew, and review to create more equity-minded instructional designs. I think I can work on the “chew” part in that I can help their brains process the content better by adding breathing moments or other elements to break up the material. In addition, the “review” recommendation to use digital storytelling is something that I would like to look into, especially for our culture and/or race and ethnicity modules.
After taking the equity course, I redesigned my syllabus to be more equity-minded. After careful review, I realized that many of my policies, such as the late policy, as well as the overall tone could be improved. I also added an inclusivity statement and welcome blurb on the first page.
In my on-campus classes, I have students work in groups to assess the culture of the Saddleback community and create a statement using our course concepts. We share these in class and also provide ideas for change.
I have a variation of this activity for my online students, which is then shared via the discussion tool in Canvas. Learning about other cultures' values, norms, beliefs, and practices is a first step in becoming more culturally relative.
A colleague of mine shared this Show and Tell activity with me and I now use it in my on-campus classes after we finish the section on Race and Ethnicity in the U.S. I have modified the assignment to have a pair-share activity where students bring in an object that represents his/her racial-ethnic background and then we all later discuss color conscious vs. color blindness, as well as critical race theory. Students tell me that this was their favorite activity of the semester. I now try to approach the topic of privilege to be inclusive of everyone.
Geneva Gay’s (2010) work on designing cultural responsive learning environments is now considered in my course designs, as well as her ideas to “cultivate a cooperative learning environment…specifically, allowing time and provide opportunities for students and the instructor to become comfortable and skilled with cooperative learning.”
I attempt to cultivate independent learners (vs. dependent) through practices of developing a growth mindset (vs. fixed). I carry a friendly tone and reach out individually to students, while also allowing them the freedom to learn through their peers and experiences in the larger college community.
I integrate some of our course work around attending college events so students can meet other peers, staff, and faculty and feel that sense of community. For example, our College has a shared college read program called One Book, One College every Spring. It is "designed to promote discussion and understanding of the broader issues we face, both locally and globally. The program aims to create a community of readers and to engender a vibrant and engaging dialogue on campus and beyond" (OB1C). All students receive the books for free and have an assignment focused around the readings. In addition, they are encouraged to attend college-wide events surrounding the book topics.