You can find the opinion piece, co-authored with Harvard Kennedy School's computer science associate professor Stephen Casper, here.
Provided commentary to Xinmei Shen at the South China Morning Post on how U.S. and Chinese governmental approaches to AI governance differ but could converge post-Mythos. You can find the article here.
Interviewed by Rachel Cheung at The Wire China about how China's central and local governments are dealing with the security ramifications of OpenClaw. You can find the article here.
Interviewed by tech and climate journalist Vanessa Bates Ramirez on the topic of China's AI strategy, where we discussed China's distinct four-pronged S&T goals and its S&T reform drive to balance private sector and national needs. We also discussed the roots of Chinese leaders' AGI disinterest and long-held excitement over AI diffusion, and the implications for AI governance in China. You can find the article here.
Professor Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh (Cambridge) and I argued that the U.S. and China are pursuing two different AI strategies, and that the A.G.I.-race narrative is misleading and unnecessarily constrains the space for meaningful U.S.-Chinese cooperation in AI governance. You can read our analysis in full here (subscription required).
Alongside notable China AI experts, such as Helen Toner (CSET) and Paul Triolo (Asia Society), I decoded the key messages from Chinese leaders' April 2025 study session on AI. See our commentaries here.
I shared with journalist Zeyi Yang what we ought to expect from the China's evolving AI regulatory approach and ongoing AI legislative efforts. See his reporting here.