JUN'S
COLUMN
English blog・Jpanese blog ・Web・Philosophy
JUN'S
COLUMN
I previously wrote a blog post expressing a skeptical view on the impact of CO2. I’ve since reviewed this through generative AI and will continue to verify it.
[1]. Skeptical View
The theory that increasing CO2 causes global warming is based on a correlation between rising CO2 and global warming. However, there’s no scientific evidence demonstrating that CO2 hinders the radiation of Earth’s temperature.
If CO2 were to hinder the radiation of temperature into space, it would also impede incoming radiation, creating a contradiction. Analysis of CO2 concentrations from sources like fossils indeed shows an increase in CO2 since ancient times. However, the idea that a 2-degree Celsius change in Earth’s temperature could be caused by variations in the Earth’s distance from the 5,700°C sun or changes in the Earth’s axial tilt is persuasive.
Increased human activity (population growth, economic activity, etc.) leads to increased energy consumption. In other words, heat consumption rises. Heat transfer occurs through conduction and radiation, and Earth’s heat radiates into space through the atmosphere. However, the increased heat is not released all at once. It accumulates on the Earth’s surface and is slowly released, causing the Earth’s temperature to rise.
Heat is primarily generated by combustion, which produces CO2. Therefore, it’s natural for CO2 to increase if Earth’s temperature rises. It’s not that increased CO2 caused global warming; rather, global warming caused CO2 to increase.
Other energy sources include nuclear power and solar power, which also contribute to global warming (hydroelectric, tidal, and wind power, being conversions of solar energy, do not cause global warming). Therefore, as human activity increases, global warming will progress regardless of CO2. However, this may not be the only cause. An ice age would be a different story (in the past, volcanic ash caused cooling).
[2]. Verification of the Skeptical Argument
The presented text puts forth claims about the relationship between CO2 and global warming that differ from general scientific consensus. Below is a verification of each claim based on scientific evidence.
“There’s no scientific evidence demonstrating that CO2 hinders the radiation of Earth’s temperature.”
This is incorrect. CO2 (carbon dioxide) is one of the primary greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere and has the property of absorbing and re-emitting heat (longwave radiation) from the Earth. This property is based on the physical principles of molecular vibrational-rotational spectra and has been confirmed through laboratory measurements and satellite observations. The scientific consensus on global warming is based on this greenhouse effect of CO2.
“If CO2 were to hinder the radiation of temperature into space, it would also impede incoming radiation, creating a contradiction.”
This is based on a misunderstanding. CO2 absorbs very little shortwave radiation (like visible light) from the sun but absorbs longwave radiation (infrared) emitted from the Earth. This is because CO2 molecules have different absorption characteristics for different wavelengths of light. Therefore, showing different behavior for incoming (solar radiation) and outgoing (heat from Earth) radiation is not a contradiction. Earth’s “greenhouse effect” relies on this selective absorption.
“Analysis of CO2 concentrations from sources like fossils indeed shows an increase in CO2 since ancient times. However, the idea that a 2-degree Celsius change in Earth’s temperature could be caused by variations in the Earth’s distance from the 5,700°C sun or changes in the Earth’s axial tilt is persuasive.”
It’s true that ancient CO2 concentrations fluctuated, which suggests that changes in Earth’s orbital parameters (variations in distance from the sun, axial tilt, and orbital eccentricity), known as Milankovitch cycles, have influenced past climate change. However, current global warming cannot be explained by these natural factors alone. The rapid increase in CO2 concentrations over the past few decades is clearly attributable to human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, as evidenced by carbon isotope ratio analysis. Many studies have shown that the impact of solar activity changes on Earth’s temperature is too small to explain the scale of current warming.
“Increased human activity (population growth, economic activity, etc.) leads to increased energy consumption. In other words, heat consumption rises. Heat is primarily generated by combustion, which produces CO2. Therefore, it’s natural for CO2 to increase if Earth’s temperature rises. It’s not that increased CO2 caused global warming; rather, global warming caused CO2 to increase.”
This argument presents two theories: that “global warming is caused by direct heat release from human activity, not CO2,” and that “global warming causes CO2 to increase.” Both lack strong scientific basis.
Regarding direct heat release: While heat released by human activities (e.g., waste heat from buildings and factories) can cause localized urban heat island effects, the amount of heat contributed to global warming compared to heat trapped by greenhouse gases is shown to be very small.
Regarding “global warming caused CO2 to increase”: In past climate changes, there have indeed been cases where CO2 concentrations rose during warming periods. This is thought to be due to feedback mechanisms, such as CO2 release from oceans, where warming triggered further increases in CO2 concentration. However, the current increase in CO2 concentration is primarily due to human-caused CO2 emissions far exceeding natural CO2 absorption. Graphs of CO2 concentration and temperature rise since industrialization suggest that the increase in CO2 concentration has preceded the temperature rise.
“Other energy sources include nuclear power and solar power, which also contribute to global warming (hydroelectric, tidal, and wind power, being conversions of solar energy, do not cause global warming). Therefore, as human activity increases, global warming will progress regardless of CO2.”
Regarding nuclear power generation: Nuclear power generation does not directly emit CO2, making it attractive for global warming countermeasures. However, it does release heat through cooling water discharge. There is no scientific evidence that this heat release is a primary cause of global warming.
Regarding solar power generation: Solar power is considered a clean energy source that does not emit CO2. While CO2 is emitted during the manufacturing process of solar panels, the emissions during power generation and over the entire lifecycle are significantly lower compared to fossil fuel power generation. There is no scientific basis for the claim that solar panels themselves “cause global warming.”
“However, this may not be the only cause. An ice age would be a different story (in the past, volcanic ash caused cooling).”
Earth’s climate is complex, and various natural factors (volcanic activity, solar activity, ocean circulation, etc.) contribute to its fluctuations. Large amounts of aerosols (fine particles) from volcanic activity can block sunlight and cause temporary cooling. Also, Earth has experienced multiple ice ages and interglacial periods in the past. While these natural factors are essential for understanding climate change, the current rapid warming deviates from the range of past natural variations, and there is a scientific consensus that human activities are the primary cause.
Summary
The presented text largely deviates from the mainstream scientific understanding of current global warming. In particular, denying the greenhouse effect of CO2, attributing the primary cause to direct heat release from human activities, and claiming that CO2 increase is a result of warming, are either scientifically unsubstantiated or based on misunderstandings.
Scientific understanding of global warming is thoroughly assessed by international organizations like the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), which regularly publish reports. These reports reflect a broad scientific consensus based on numerous scientific papers.
[3]. Supplement
To what extent has the impact of global warming gas concentrations on global warming been scientifically demonstrated?
The impact of global warming gases (greenhouse gases) on global warming has been extensively scientifically demonstrated, and its mechanisms are well-understood. This understanding is based on years of research and consensus among scientists worldwide, including those affiliated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Scientific Evidence
Physical Properties of Greenhouse Gases:
Greenhouse gases such as CO2 (carbon dioxide), CH4 (methane), N2O (nitrous oxide), and CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) have the property of absorbing and re-emitting infrared radiation (heat) emitted from the Earth’s surface. This property is based on molecular structure and quantum mechanics and has been confirmed through laboratory measurements.
Without these gases, Earth’s average temperature is calculated to be around -18°C. The current average temperature of about 15°C is due to the natural greenhouse effect. As the concentration of greenhouse gases increases, this heat-trapping effect strengthens, leading to a rise in surface temperature.
Correlation with Observational Data:
Simultaneous rise of CO2 concentration and temperature: Since the Industrial Revolution, atmospheric CO2 concentrations have increased rapidly, and Earth’s average temperature has risen almost concurrently. In particular, the rapid warming over the past few decades cannot be explained by natural climate variability alone.
Carbon isotope ratio analysis: Analysis of carbon isotope ratios in atmospheric CO2 shows an increasing proportion of CO2 originating from human activities (such as the burning of fossil fuels). Fossil fuels have a specific carbon isotopic composition, and their “fingerprint” is visible in atmospheric CO2.
Comparison with past climate changes: Paleoclimate data from ice cores, for example, show a close correlation between temperature changes and CO2 concentration changes during past glacial and interglacial cycles. However, the current rate of CO2 concentration increase is abnormally fast, unprecedented in past natural fluctuations.
Climate Model Predictions and Verification:
Climate models, developed based on the physical properties of greenhouse gases and past observational data, predict that rising greenhouse gas concentrations will cause global warming. These models have been shown to reproduce past climate changes quite accurately, which validates their predictive reliability.
IPCC reports present future temperature rise predictions based on various emission scenarios, indicating that higher greenhouse gas emissions lead to greater temperature increases.
Contribution of Each Greenhouse Gas
According to IPCC reports, the majority of the impact of anthropogenic greenhouse gases on global warming comes from the following gases (contribution percentages may vary slightly depending on the report and period):
Carbon Dioxide (CO2): It is the most abundantly emitted gas and has the largest contribution to warming, about 76%. It is primarily emitted through the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.
Methane (CH4): While its warming potential is about 25 times stronger than CO2, its atmospheric lifetime is shorter than CO2. It is emitted from agriculture (livestock, rice cultivation), fossil fuel extraction, landfills, and other sources. Its contribution to warming is about 14%.
Nitrous Oxide (N2O): Its warming potential is very strong, about 300 times that of CO2. It is emitted from agriculture (fertilizers), industrial processes, and other sources. Its contribution to warming is about 8%.
Fluorinated Gases (CFCs, HCFCs, etc.): These are ozone-depleting substances and also very potent greenhouse gases. They were formerly used as refrigerants in refrigerators and air conditioners, but emissions are declining due to international regulations.
Conclusion
The rise in greenhouse gas concentrations being the primary cause of global warming is a scientifically established view, supported by physical principles, extensive observational data, and sophisticated climate model simulations. This evidence clearly indicates that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are significantly impacting Earth’s climate system.
To be continued.
According to the Nihon Shoki (which is considered more historically reliable than the Kojiki), Japan’s imperial system has an unbroken lineage stretching back approximately 1,470 years, making it truly unique in the world. I’m struck by both surprise and pride as I reflect on this now.
Having been born after the war, I grew up without my father instilling in me a special awareness of the Emperor. However, as I’ve gotten older and looked back at the 125 emperors throughout history, I’ve come to deeply feel the weight and significance of their role. I can’t help but feel a profound reverence that transcends mere power. This is clearly evident when observing the current Emperor Emeritus and His Majesty the Emperor.
While ordinary people openly express their “anger,” Their Majesties the Emperor and Empress maintain strict self-control, gently offering solace and comfort to war dead, their bereaved families, and those affected by disasters overseas. This level of compassion goes beyond what one typically sees in the general public.
His Majesty embodies the symbolic emperor, and this is a source of pride for Japanese people who bear the negative legacy of war.
During the Meiji Restoration, Choshu and Satsuma used the Emperor as their symbolic banner to modernize Japan. Former Prime Minister Abe, who hailed from Yamaguchi (Choshu), harbored a desire to establish an autonomous constitution, moving away from the one drafted under American guidance. He inherited this aspiration from his grandfathers, former Prime Minister Kishi and former Prime Minister Sato. Japan has maintained peace since World War II. Is a constitutional amendment truly necessary?
Japan’s post-war constitution is unique in its longevity and lack of amendment, having been reinterpreted to adapt to changing circumstances. Interpreted literally, it could suggest Japan cannot possess military force for conflict resolution. However, the Self-Defense Forces exist under the right to self-defense, which is recognized by international law. It’s undeniable that Japan’s post-war economic development relied on U.S. defense, but it was the Emperor’s presence that brought stability to a defeated nation. While an autonomous constitution is a worthy goal, the current constitution’s strength lies in its difficulty to amend. This very difficulty allows for thorough debate. The dignity of an independent nation is important, but before considering constitutional amendment, shouldn’t we engage in a deeper discussion about what true happiness means for the Japanese people?
All living things, including humans, are not immune to death. Yet, we are driven by instinct to live. The genes inherited from our ancestors have evolved to ensure the continuation of life. This is a fundamental survival instinct. The urge to protect children and grandchildren stems from this deeply rooted genetic imperative. Our brains consist of the instinctive brainstem and the rational cerebral cortex. The brainstem's survival function dictates that the strong survive by defeating their enemies. As humans settled and developed agriculture, the cerebral cortex promoted the formation of larger groups for defense. In this way, surviving groups evolved into regions, societies, and eventually nations, which then began to contend with each other.
While large-scale wars like World War II have diminished, regional conflicts such as those in Russia-Ukraine and the Middle East persist. Despite human evolution, violence like religious conflicts and terrorism continues unabated. Although these acts often arise from feelings of inferiority, the exclusion of different faiths, and poverty, paradoxically, even wealthy and highly educated individuals can become perpetrators of terrorism. Is this an outcome of human evolution? Does it truly aid human survival? Are we heading towards an era of decline and chaos? Current trends, such as declining birth rates and aging populations, and the blurring of gender roles, suggest a worrying situation.
The invention of tools by humankind led to a significant increase in population. The subsequent invention of machinery further accelerated this growth. However, with the global population now exceeding 7 billion, the Earth's resources are strained. There aren't enough resources to equally support all of humanity and eliminate hunger. Will humanity follow a cyclical pattern of prosperity and decline, much like the predator-prey relationship between rabbits and wolves?
Will humanity, which has championed the shared values of freedom and equality, ultimately succumb to the natural order? Perhaps Japan's unique philosophy and values could contribute to this process. Furthermore, does the vastness of outer space hold untapped potential for humanity's future?
Recent years have seen the unearthing of what is believed to be the ruins of China’s first dynasty, the legendary Xia Dynasty, dating back to around 2000 BC. This dynasty represents a political organization where a king unified various tribes. The dynasty’s emergence signified the culmination of tribal warfare, with the victorious tribe expanding its influence and its leader becoming king. Although the unification process was likely gradual and interspersed with continued conflict, the dynasty solidified its power through consolidation.
What constituted the king’s authority? Initially, it stemmed from military prowess—the power to win battles. As intertribal conflict subsided and the unifying force of military strength diminished, the king sought other means of legitimizing his rule. He turned to shamanism and divination. By interpreting celestial phenomena, such as the lunar calendar, they determined the optimal times for planting and harvesting, predicted rainfall, observed the phases of the moon, and identified auspicious days. This knowledge, kept secret within the royal family, allowed the king to exert control over the tribe, who revered and obeyed his perceived divine pronouncements. This became a key component of his authority.
Over time, these divinatory practices evolved into formalized rituals. Ceremonial objects were crafted, and the king’s performance of these rituals became a powerful symbol of his authority, elevating him to a quasi-divine status. This was the Xia Dynasty. The legendary dragon, adopted as a symbol of royal power during the Xia Dynasty, continued to be associated with Chinese authority for millennia. Such connections between ritual, authority, and symbolism are not unique to China. Western traditions, such as the Catholic Church with its elaborate rituals, also demonstrate this link.
Confucianism can be understood as a systematized collection of rituals designed to reinforce and legitimize authority. It became essential for maintaining the king’s power, eventually shaping social norms and defining the structure of the state. Today, we no longer equate “authority” solely with political power. We use the term to describe individuals with expertise in a particular field—scholars whose theories and knowledge are considered close to the truth. The Nobel Prize, awarded by such experts, is regarded as the world’s most prestigious recognition of achievement. However, the Nobel Peace Prize and the Nobel Prize in Literature, due to their inherent political dimensions, sometimes raise questions about the objectivity and authority of the selection process.
Why was Asia colonized? May 10.2025
The question of why Asia was colonized is a very complex one, involving a multitude of intertwined factors. Below, I will delve into this issue from a multifaceted perspective, based on your considerations.
1. Geographical and Climatic Factors
Development of Civilization: Ancient civilizations developed in the large river basins of the Northern Hemisphere. Fertile land and a warm climate stabilized agricultural production and promoted population growth and social complexity. This is thought to have made it easier for states and civilizations to form.
Development of Rationalism: There were also differences in development between the north and south. In the north, climatic conditions were harsh, and a rational way of thinking may have developed more easily for the sake of survival. On the other hand, it can be argued that the south was blessed with abundant nature and had a stronger tendency to seek spiritual fulfillment.
European Advantage: Europe faces the Mediterranean Sea, a sea area suitable for trade, where various cultures and technologies were exchanged. In addition, Europe was divided into many countries, which promoted technological innovation through competition between nations.
2. Ideological and Cultural Factors
Influence of Greek Philosophy: Greek philosophy emphasized rational thought and logical debate. Philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle deeply considered nature and humanity, and their ideas formed the basis of Europe’s intellectual tradition.
Influence of Christianity: Christianity had a great influence on European society. In medieval Europe, the church controlled politics and culture and regulated people’s lives. However, after the Renaissance and the Reformation, there was a growing movement to break away from the church, and rationalism came to the fore.
Influence of Enlightenment Thought: In the 18th century, Enlightenment thought spread throughout Europe. Enlightenment thinkers believed in the power of reason and science and criticized superstition and prejudice. Their ideas became the driving force behind social transformations such as the bourgeois revolution and the industrial revolution.
3. Technological Factors
Development of Navigation: Europe has been a maritime people since ancient times, and navigation technology has developed. During the Age of Discovery, the compass and celestial observation technology improved, making long-distance voyages possible. This allowed Europeans to advance around the world and build colonial empires.
Industrial Revolution: From the late 18th to the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution occurred in Europe. The invention of the steam engine and machinery enabled mass production, dramatically improving economic and military power. This allowed Europe to colonize Asia and Africa with overwhelming force.
4. The Situation in Asia
Delay in Unification: In many parts of Asia, unified states like those in Europe were not formed, and they remained divided. This made it impossible to effectively resist European invasion.
Technological Lag: Technological innovation in Asia lagged behind Europe. In particular, the difference in navigation and military technology was significant and determined Europe’s superiority.
Conclusion
Asia’s colonization was the result of a complex interplay of geographical, climatic, ideological, cultural, technological factors, and the situation in Asia itself. Europe’s superiority was by no means accidental, but rather the result of historical accumulation and social development.
However, Asia was by no means a passive entity. Many countries resisted colonial rule and won independence. Today, Asian countries have achieved economic development and play an important role in the international community.
Deeply considering this issue is of great significance when thinking about international relations and multicultural coexistence in modern society.
Simone Weil – Thinker, Activist, and Saint – April 25, 2025
Simone Weil, who led a tragically intense life worthy of being called a “saint” and died young at the age of 34. It is said that her ideas continue to influence many people even now.
Early Life and Family
Born in Paris in 1909, Simone Weil grew up in a wealthy Jewish family. Her father, a doctor, provided her with a strict education and gave her opportunities to discuss philosophy and politics.
Her mother raised her with an almost overprotective nervousness, fearing that her daughter would become ill. Her mother, who suffered from germophobia, disinfected everything her daughter touched and even forbade kissing. It is said that this led to Weil’s distrust of men.
Her older brother André, who later became a mathematician, had a significant influence on Weil. Discussions with her brother about philosophy, politics, and thought played a major role in the formation of her ideas.
Anorexia, Communism, and Labor
Her germophobia worsened, and Weil gradually began to suffer from anorexia. She also became inclined towards communism but felt disgusted by the authoritarian leaders who were detached from the workers.
To understand the suffering of laborers, she worked in exploitative production sites, experiencing firsthand the subservient position of workers. This experience led to her later principle of action: “self-sacrifice.”
Encounter and Conflict with Christianity
Weil, believing that her own actions were not mere self-satisfaction, was deeply moved by Christ’s sacrificial crucifixion and sought salvation in Catholicism. However, she could not fully align herself with Catholic dogma and did not convert.
Her religious views after encountering Catholic thought remain shrouded in mystery, but her ideas influenced many thinkers.
Love and Death
Weil sometimes felt affection for male activists who shared her views, but it was different from romantic love. Her disheveled hair, lack of makeup, and emaciated, plain appearance worried those around her.
Her parents always watched over her, but she was stubborn and did not listen. She died of anorexia at the young age of 34.
Legacy
After her death, her parents spent over ten years compiling and publishing her writings, leaving her ideas to the world.
Supplement (from commentary)
・Simone Weil had many facets: thinker, philosopher, mystic, and political activist.
・Her ideas have influenced a wide range of fields, including politics, philosophy, and religion.
・Her works continue to be read and studied by many people today.
"The Desire for Posterity: Is it Good?" April 4. 2025
Why do people cherish, love, and dote on their children and grandchildren? It's a natural thing, everyone says it's because they are parents or because their grandchildren are adorable. Is it because they share the same blood? But where does this feeling of affection and love come from? We don't usually think about it.
Korean dramas often depict the struggles between family members for control of conglomerates, or the factional strife among senior vassals in historical dramas. The catchphrase is, "The strong don't win; the winners are the strong!" It's saying that those who win, by any means, are the strong ones. However, this captures a certain aspect of the truth.
In ancient times, mighty dinosaurs went extinct, while small mammals survived. Strength doesn't guarantee survival. The ability to adapt to the environment, by any means necessary, is what allows survival. The prime example of this is humanity. We not only adapt to the environment, but we also manipulate it to our own advantage.
I've written negatively about humanity, but since ancient times, we have learned to survive and leave descendants. It's as if we were programmed with genes from God. What are genes? They are love, affection, joy, and the emotions that well up within us. That's how we protect our children and grandchildren from danger. People who abuse children are not human; they are demons destroying the genes that humans inherently possess. Suicide and homicide are also unacceptable; they go against our genes.
Humans must skillfully manage their genes with love and affection; I believe this is the heart of goodness. Before and during the war, it was a competition for survival, but now it's different; we must coexist.
Additional Notes:
I have tried to maintain the original tone and style of the writing while translating it into English.
Some phrases may have slightly different connotations in English, but I have aimed to convey the closest possible meaning.
The title has been translated as "The Desire for Posterity: Is it Good?" to reflect the central theme of the text.
I have also provided some additional notes on the translation to help the reader understand the nuances of the language.
The Chinese people depicted by Nobel laureate Pearl S. Buck, influenced by her father's missionary work and her own later, albeit excommunicated, missionary experiences, are portrayed as self-disciplined individuals rooted in old Chinese traditions, yet also influenced by Christian values that forbade premarital physical contact between men and women. The era was one of national transformation under the pressure of Western colonial powers, including Japan.
The story unfolds with Wang Lung (the protagonist of Part 1, "The Good Earth"), a hardworking, land-loving farmer; his dissolute eldest son; his shrewd merchant second son; his military third son, who shows no interest in women (the protagonist brothers of Part 2, "Sons"); and Wang Yuan (the protagonist of Part 3, "A House Divided"), the military man's son by his second wife, who is torn between traditional values rooted in the land and Westernization.
The military man's first wife, highly educated as a doctor's daughter, married him at the age of 30. Her daughter (Yuan's sister) is spoiled, flamboyant, and ultimately marries her lover after becoming pregnant. The wavering Yuan of Part 3, disillusioned after studying abroad, turns for support not to his flamboyant biological mother, but to his refined first stepmother, who lives separately from his father.
His study abroad was cut short when a female revolutionary comrade, to whom he was close but never physically intimate and who harbored feelings for him, betrayed him during a police interrogation, forcing him to flee the country. While in America, he was impressed by the wonders of modernization, but was also bewildered when the daughter of his Christian mentor, a professor who loved learning and debate, suddenly kissed him on the lips.
He had imagined America as a modernized country without slums, but found that it, too, had its share of poverty, like his homeland. Disgusted by the rampant physical contact between men and women, he decided to leave.
The first wife had an adopted daughter, Mayling, who grew up to be a serious and diligent young woman. Dreaming of becoming a doctor, she devoted herself to her studies while caring for Ailan, the first wife's biological daughter. Yuan is drawn to Mayling's intellectual and reserved demeanor, but she, always engaged in debates with him, shows no hint of reciprocation to his affections. When Yuan proposes marriage, she rejects him, citing her ambition to become a doctor.
Despondent and half in despair, he agrees to attend a dance party. Upon learning of this, Mayling displays an attitude that could be interpreted as either disdain or jealousy, and refuses to speak to him.
Yuan had a strained relationship with his father, who had encouraged him to pursue a military career rather than academics, but his father had still managed to finance his studies abroad. He and Mayling go together to care for his ailing father, and as his father passes away, his final words, "You have done well," bring tears to Yuan's eyes. He exchanges a glance and a nod with Mayling, and in that moment, their hearts connect. The story concludes, leaving a lingering sense of this connection.
The end.
In the past, we were taught that men should be masculine and women feminine, with men bearing the hardships of work and women the pains of childbirth, each fulfilling their respective roles. In ancient times, the roles of men as hunters and women as child-rearers were considered divinely ordained. Men needed roughness, and women gentleness towards children, and their physiques reflected these needs.
When expectations for women's active participation in the workforce began during my working years, I offered a female employee a responsible position, but she declined, stating she had no such aspirations. My wife and daughters also disliked the idea of working like men. The reason was simply that they had not been raised with that mindset.
Recent foreign studies have shed light on the differences between men and women. An experiment where 2- and 3-year-old children were given toys revealed that boys mostly played with cars, and girls with dolls. Upon investigation, it was found that parents provided different toys for boys and girls. Children who showed no preference had parents who did not differentiate toys. This indicates that differences in children's consciousness arise from their upbringing, not genetics.
In the past, men were expected to bear the responsibility of providing for their families, and fleeing from this was considered shameful, while women were not held to the same standard. There was a prevailing attitude that it was acceptable for women to avoid work. Those who are currently successful likely had different environments, including their parents.
The reason there are few women in important positions in Japan is due to their upbringing. Even if goals are set to increase the proportion of women in positions like legislators, it is understandable why progress is slow. In addition to improving the working environment for women, it is necessary to change the nurturing environment during childhood to alter women's consciousness.
Nevertheless, the mystique of womanhood remains unchanged. The pain and joy of childbirth, the wonder of why such suffering is endured, and the involvement in the miracle of life's birth compel us to respect these mysterious women.
To be continued.
Reading Pearl S. Buck's "The Good Earth" (Part 2)- March 6, 2025
During my student days, I was a naive student who struggled to talk to women. Perhaps it stemmed from feelings of inferiority about my appearance. My mother, who was taciturn and quietly handled housework, had grown up as the daughter of a pre-war factory owner. Maybe it was due to that influence, but I idealized women as mysterious beings.
As I entered the workforce and had more opportunities to interact with women, my naivety faded, but I never felt comfortable in a secular society that commercialized the secrets of men and women, including their visual aspects. It reminded me of the story of a young European priest who, in the past, bound his hands before going to bed to discipline himself. I believe this was a trial given by God, and conversely, God gave it to young people.
A part of me still holds onto the idea of pure womanhood. The abuse women suffer in conflicts and wars triggers a strong physiological reaction of "why?" It feels more like a desecration than mere cruelty. The abuse of children is also horrific.
My view of love is the same as that of an ordinary person: to be granted the inviolable secrets by an ideal woman. However, I feel this very strongly. In my junior high school days, I remember being moved by the beauty of a young housewife in an apron in an old concrete apartment. She wasn't conventionally beautiful, but she was pure, her eyes shone, and she seemed to have a halo. That image remains a powerful impression. Thinking about it now, perhaps my ideal image of a woman was my mother, who passed away long ago.
To be continued...
Although the writer Pearl S. Buck is American, she has an extremely detailed knowledge of China. I haven't read many female authors until now, but I've recently become interested in women's perspectives through their writing, and I've been actively reading their works.
My wife, who is the same age as me and will be celebrating our 50th wedding anniversary this year (three years from now), treats me like a peer. I'm sorry to say that, unlike when we first got married, she feels more like the mother of our children and my partner. However, since retiring, I've spent more time with my wife, and there are many women in the English conversation class I attend. Partly due to my childhood experiences, I've once again become interested in women's thoughts and perspectives.
Recently, I had the opportunity to listen to lectures by Tomiko Miyamoto and Toyoko Yamazaki online, and they made a strong impression on me. Tomiko Miyamoto is a repatriate from Manchuria, and she talked about being in a life-or-death situation where she had to decide whether to trade food for her young daughter. She somehow survived and, based on this experience, became a novelist while working as a housewife. She has a refined demeanor, but her father's job was as a brothel owner, and she has something hidden in her heart. I read her work a long time ago, and she was a writer who constantly questioned women's way of life.
Toyoko Yamazaki, the author of "Children of the Land," spoke with great intensity about the tragic experiences of the abandoned children in China and the Ministry of Health and Welfare's sloppy response to the repatriation project.
Recently, women have been remarkably active in various fields, and I'm overwhelmed by university professors who talk about the situation in Ukraine on TV and by conservative figures like Yoshiko Sakurai.
Regarding Pearl S. Buck's "The Good Earth," the author lived in China for 18 years, starting at the age of three months, when her missionary father took her there. She became more assimilated into Chinese culture than the Japanese people at that time. She continued to visit China frequently and also came to Japan. In any case, she is very knowledgeable about China and excels at depicting the psychology of Chinese men and women, and she is well versed in Eastern ways of thinking.
The trilogy is a long work of over 800 pages, but I found it very interesting. With a man as the protagonist, it spans three generations, depicting how he goes from being a poor tenant farmer to a wealthy landowner, and how his children and grandchildren become landlords, merchants, soldiers, and officials who have returned from studying in the United States. It portrays the Eastern human drama that unfolds with women on the stage of the earth.
At the end of the third part, "A House Divided," there is a passage that I particularly liked, and I'm wondering how to convey this emotion. It seems like it will be a long story, so I'll leave it for next time.
To be continued...
「Human Dignity」February 22,2025
This is a story about a mother who tried to escape with her four children from the fierce battle raging in Okinawa. While being pursued by American soldiers brandishing guns, they reached a shelter. Japanese soldiers and other residents were already hiding there, holding their breath. The mother placed her two elementary school-aged children in the shelter, then led her two younger, crying children away to a more distant spot and left them there.
She returned to the shelter alone, but the younger children, longing for their mother, followed her. She then took them even further away. Leaving the little ones crying for her in that new location, she hid in the grass and returned to the shelter.
The war ended soon after, and we don't know what became of the two young children who were left behind. The mother raised the two children she had initially placed in the shelter and died at the age of 40. I can only imagine what her life must have been like.
Life encompasses both sadness and joy; this is what makes us human. If life were perfect, it would lack flavor and humor. It is a uniquely human privilege to experience nature, be moved by art, read novels with enthusiasm, perceive subtleties, and be deeply impressed by the world around us. AI cannot replicate these experiences. War is undeniably evil, and the reason the idea of autonomous killing robots is so disturbing is precisely because they are inhuman.
What will the future hold? Will we embrace a slower pace of life? Everyone is currently exhausted by constant competition. I imagine that in the future, work will be largely computerized, allowing for a more relaxed rhythm of life. Rural living may become more appealing.
What is time? For the moment, we define it as the movement of energy and light. From God's perspective, it might be a fleeting instant. Perhaps even the beginning and the end are simultaneous, momentary events in the divine view. What does it mean to exist? The concept of "being" is understood through its contrast with "non-being." In this world, "absence" and "presence" are intertwined, transcending time. The beginning and the end coexist.
Philosophy has long sought to define a human way of life and a moral code. I believe this involves living in harmony with the natural order. The natural order, as evidenced by the evolutionary process, is the continuation of life through offspring. This drive to procreate gives rise to our moral compass: we should love others, be kind to children, avoid harming others, and protect the Earth.
Peaceful: Free from war and conflict.
Compassionate: Where people readily help those in need.
Life-affirming: Where human life is highly valued.
Respectful: Where all people are treated with dignity.
Just: Where right is right, and wrong is wrong, and people are free to say so.
Tolerant: Where diverse opinions are respected.
Inclusive: Where discrimination is absent, and everyone is cared for.
Materially balanced: Where material wealth isn't the sole focus.
Healthy: Where citizens enjoy good physical and mental well-being.
Environmentally conscious: Where nature is valued and protected.
Industrious: Where people are diligent and strive for improvement.
Culturally rich: Where art and traditions are cherished.
Stable: Where people can live normal, predictable lives.
Nurturing: Where children can grow freely and safely.
Empowering: Where women can actively participate in all aspects of society.
Educated: Where learning is valued, and higher education is accessible.
Role-model driven: Where adults serve as positive examples for children.
Content: Where people are grateful and happy to be part of their country.
Community-minded: Where volunteerism is widespread.
Joyful: Where smiles and laughter are common.
Erratic Leadership: Ruled by unpredictable and eccentric leaders.
Aggressive Foreign Policy: Engages in covert operations and seeks to dominate other nations.
Dishonest and Unreliable: Disregards international agreements and manipulates information for its own benefit.
Uncaring and Discriminatory: Disregards the well-being of its citizens and practices discrimination.
Victim-Playing: Focuses on past grievances and seeks sympathy rather than solutions.
Coercive: Uses threats, intimidation, and bribery to achieve its goals.
Belligerent: Prone to aggressive rhetoric and actions.
Slanderous: Where people spread misinformation and engage in character assassination.
Stuck in the Past: Clings to outdated notions of glory and resists progress.
Exploitative: Where individuals profit from charitable donations.
Abusive: Mistreats and oppresses its own people.
Conformist: Where "sontaku" (blindly following superiors' wishes) stifles independent thought.
Egocentric Leadership: Where leaders believe they single-handedly control the nation's destiny.
Corrupt: Where coups are instigated for financial gain.
Deceptive: Where leaders readily lie and deceive.
Militaristic: Quick to resort to military force.
Violent: Where human life is easily taken.
Inquisitive: Where pointless and time-wasting questions are asked.
Inconsistent: Where principles are easily abandoned.
Corporatocracy: Where private companies exert undue influence over the government.
Last year, I reflected on my life. Perhaps it was influenced by the pandemic. Until now, I was satisfied with my life and thought it would be good if I could live peacefully. However, the pandemic changed my way of thinking. I was deeply impressed by the way of life of Dr. Tetsu Nakamura, who dedicated 33 years of his life to the people of Pakistan and Afghanistan. In the past, I just thought of him as an eccentric person.
I wonder why?
From this year on, I want to accomplish something instead of being buried in something.
Let me know if you'd like me to translate anything else!
The other day, I attended the memorial service for a deceased colleague. At the service, the monk chanted sutras and gave a sermon to the attendees. The content was about how "the luxury of food destroys people, luxury is not good." After that, a meal with the attendees began. The relatives prepared a sumptuous meal, and I watched closely to see if the monk would eat it. As expected, the monk began to eat with a smirk on his face. I couldn't help but laugh.
In the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, there was a young monk who continued to pray with his hands clasped together in the disaster area while it was snowing. He asked himself, "What can I do?" and offered prayers for the deceased and the victims. This spirit has been rooted in the hearts of Japanese people since ancient times.
Last year, Dr. Nakamura, who was shot down by a gunman in Afghanistan, was more than just a Japanese person. He was also a Christian. I was reminded of the hidden Christians in Nagasaki, the Japanese people and Christians. During his lifetime, he said, "What saves a country is not weapons, but a shovel." His figure was truly life-threatening, and he was personally devoted to the people of Afghanistan.
Greedy people believe that "the group exists for the individual." What is dangerous about them is Xi Jinping and Trump.
I also talked about the relationship between the individual and the group last time. The idea that the individual exists for the group is a Japanese way of thinking, but in the corona disaster, this self-sacrifice is leading to saving the country in a good way.
”The Balance of Mind ”
December 2, 2020
The Pain and Recovery of Life, and the Importance of Balance
Life inevitably involves pain as well as joy. In difficult times, people try to heal their hearts in their own ways. Some think about fun things, others drink alcohol, go on dates with their lovers, or rely on their faith. These are all natural human functions to maintain the balance of the mind.
Imbalance of the Mind and Its Repair Mechanisms
When a person's mental balance is disrupted, they try to repair it. The mind works to adjust the imbalance, and sometimes it can even harm the body. Excessive suffering can create the option of death to escape from it.
However, death is never the solution. The important thing is to find balance in other ways. To do this, it is necessary to consciously incorporate enjoyable things. People who try to solve it in the wrong way can be said to be misjudging how to strike this balance.
Positive Thinking and Future Dreams
If there are negative events, there are always positive events as well. If there are painful things, there are also fun things. In difficult times, you can maintain your mental balance by actively thinking about fun things and future dreams.
The Importance of Balance: Politics, Economy, and Life
Maintaining the balance of the mind is very important in life. This concept of balance applies to various fields such as politics and economics. If you look at the movements of the world from the perspective of balance, you may discover new things.
Specific Ways to Achieve Balance
1. Engage in activities that you like and find enjoyable. It is important to incorporate activities that refresh your mind, such as interacting with friends, hobbies, and travel.
2. Even in difficult times, be conscious of positive thinking. You can have hope by remembering past successes and thinking about future goals.
3. Healthy eating, sufficient sleep, and moderate exercise are essential for maintaining the balance of mind and body. If your mind and body are healthy, you will be more able to face negative emotions.
4. It is also effective to confide your worries to someone you trust or get their advice. It is important not to keep things to yourself, but to rely on people around you.
5. If you are unable to maintain your mental balance, you may need professional support. Consider consulting a psychiatrist or counselor and receiving appropriate advice and treatment.
Summary
Life is not always smooth. Joy and sorrow, success and failure alternate. The important thing is to overcome the waves of life while maintaining the balance of your mind. The key to maintaining a healthy mental balance is to consciously incorporate enjoyable things, not be too caught up in negative emotions, and live positively.
”Things that Words Cannot Express”
October 12, 2020
Words are indispensable tools for us humans to think and communicate. However, there are many things in this world that cannot be fully expressed in words. For example, the emotion you feel when you see a beautiful landscape, the feeling of love for someone, or the anxieties and pains that cannot be put into words, are emotions and sensations that are deeply etched in our hearts but cannot be completely captured by words.
Art is one way to express what cannot be expressed in words. Various forms of art, such as music, painting, sculpture, and theater, stir people's hearts and convey emotions and ideas that cannot be conveyed through words. When we are moved to tears by listening to music or feel at peace when looking at a painting, it is because art touches the depths of our hearts.
By experiencing art, we can share emotions and sensations that cannot be expressed in words and deepen our empathy with others. Art also has the power to liberate our hearts and stimulate our creativity. By expressing emotions and sensations that cannot be expressed in words, we can deepen our self-understanding and live richer lives.
Nature also gives us things that cannot be expressed in words. By placing ourselves in nature, such as majestic mountains, vast oceans, or quiet forests, we experience a sense of peace and wonder that cannot be put into words. The blessings of nature that we feel through our five senses, such as the sounds, light, scents, temperature, and textures of nature, heal our minds and bodies and help us regain harmony.
Things that cannot be expressed in words are very important to us humans. By experiencing art and nature, we can experience emotions and sensations that cannot be expressed in words and cultivate a rich heart. Knowing the limits of words and cherishing what cannot be expressed in words is what leads to humanity, richness, and the joy of living.
The Drawbacks of Frequent Policy Changes
Decisions made in the morning are often changed by the evening. This is a common sight in many companies in modern society.
The Acceleration of Change
Fifty years ago, things moved at a slower pace than they do today. Management could establish long-term goals and pursue them steadily. However, since 30 years ago, it has become commonplace to change decisions quickly, moving forward while constantly gauging people's reactions. Under the recession after the collapse of the bubble economy, everyone had no choice but to be sensitive to economic trends. This is in stark contrast to the era before, when economic growth continued and it was easier to set long-term goals.
The Drawbacks of Financial Engineering and Social Media
In the United States at that time, financial engineering accelerated. As engineers shifted to financial engineering due to the reduction in space development, money moved instantaneously, and the economy was swayed by it, intensifying the "swinging between joy and worry" of management. Furthermore, with the spread of social media and the proliferation of information, there is now fake news, and the situation has worsened, with even politicians using social media to spread such news. Indeed, the economy has lost its moderation, and every move is attracting attention.
Media and the Flood of Information
In Japan, there is an old saying, "Even if a samurai is hungry, he acts as if he has eaten (Bushi ha kuwazu tomo taka youji)." It means that even if you are poor and cannot eat, you should pretend that you have eaten. The media tries to make a profit by selling information in an interesting way. Buyers are also hungry for information and are swayed by everything.
What is Truly Important in Life
In life, are money and information truly valuable? I do not think so. What is important is how to live as a person.
”On the Nation”
September 19,20, 2020
Lately, as I've been studying English, I've started to compare the United States and Japan. In my previous column, I described how American rationalism developed due to historical circumstances. Because of the deceit of the medieval Catholic Church, Puritans emerged, especially in England, and many Puritans and Protestants crossed over to America, making it a country with advanced rationalism.
Rationalism means thinking and acting rationally without being bound by convention, and it can be said that rationalism is when the power of the individual is stronger than the group. Countries with a long history are more bound by tradition and convention, and they act in groups. In Europe, the Renaissance was born in opposition to Catholicism, where the individual was respected, and in recent years, influenced by the United States, this tendency has become stronger.
The United States is a nation of immigrants, with a diverse population of races and religions, and there are many people with different ways of thinking, making it inherently difficult to act in groups. However, in the past, when they had a common goal, they took collective action that was comparable to Japan. For example, in war. In World War II, they demonstrated remarkable power. The influence of racial discrimination was also significant in the exertion of this power, as they suppressed and excluded racially different people and took collective action.
That America is now fragmented. The rise of developing countries, especially China, and in the past, the rise of exhausted Europe and Japan, has diminished its national power. On top of that, the gathering of different races who have gained power lacks unity, and the class society that inevitably arises from individualism frequently creates violence for the sake of living, and it has become impossible to talk about etiquette.
Children grow up seeing the 모습 of their parents, and as a result, they grow up without even understanding the meaning of etiquette, and many unbelievable incidents are happening by these children from the Japanese point of view. America is now ailing.
For postwar Japan, America was a country of admiration. Japan, which looked at America's back and chased after it, received a lot of influence from America in terms of lifestyle and culture, including entertainment. Also, they accepted individualism as a matter of course.
The United States is a country where individuals are respected, where they are not bound by ties, and where individuals can achieve great success. It is outstanding in every way, including culture, science, medicine, and economy. I am particularly impressed by the world of entertainment. They are good at making people happy. This is because the country is rich, and people from all over the world gather in search of wealth, and it is an active society where they work hard dreaming of success, truly the American Dream. This is a digression, but there are many actors whose acting is wonderful, realistic, and not artificial.
What happens when this America takes collective action? Will they become small and lose their vitality? No, even if the country is divided by Democrats and Republicans, if they face a national crisis, they will have the same purpose and their collective action will become a great force.
What is etiquette? In Japan, since ancient times, the individual existed for the sake of the group, and it was not like America where the group existed for the sake of the individual. In a small island nation with few resources and many disasters, they could not survive unless they acted in groups. Those who left the group were ostracized. In this way, rules were born in Japan, and the vertical relationships and consideration for others necessary for group action were passed down from parents to children, and this became etiquette and regulated people's behavior. During the war, it became a disadvantage, and postwar individualism destroyed etiquette, but in ancient times, there was a culture of "seppuku" and "shame" where people valued honor without changing their beliefs for the sake of living.
In America, what regulates individual behavior is religion and law. In a good or bad way, the unconventional America had vitality and has led the world.
Is there such a thing as a moral code at the national level? Let's take war as an example. People have fought wars for hegemony, whether to eat or be eaten. Even if there are treaties between nations in war, there is almost no moral code. There are all sorts of things: scheming, espionage, outrage, massacre. In the end, the winner becomes justice and judges the loser. In the first place, is there justice in war that kills people, and can the loser be judged for crimes against humanity? Normal people cannot kill. Nations brainwash their people and kill each other by portraying different ethnic groups and races as devils. War requires violent people who can commit murder without hesitation, and violence against children and women always occurs.
Nations accuse each other of being inhumane and cannot resolve the situation. The spirit of self-sacrifice may ruin a nation in a nation. It may not be possible to talk about moral codes, but there are aggressive tyrants who confuse the world, who are aggressive both at home and abroad, and who have become more and more dangerous as they have been exposed by the coronavirus.
Japan before the war was terrible. Individuals were sacrificed and many people died needlessly. Moral codes created collectivism and created fascism. The current Japanese Constitution renounces war. The interpretation makes it constitutional to have the means for self-defense, but the Constitution restrains the country from going in the wrong direction. Japan is peaceful, and due to its national character, democratic politics are stable in many ways compared to other countries. However, if the world becomes unstable, Japan may also be confused.
China is acting recklessly to feed its 1.4 billion people, causing confusion around the world, and the United States is being swayed by it. China's ambition for hegemony has been expected for a long time, and the world's economic dependence on China has caused confusion. As developed countries try to catch up in a short period of time with what they have done over a long period of time, unreasonable demands have begun to stand out in the world, creating friction.
The story has not been put together and has gone astray, but if the leader is decent and the country is stable, groupism that values etiquette will function effectively, but its abuse will cause confusion. In countries with strong individualism, the country will not be united and will be confused and continue to be disordered. China is suppressing its people with strong power, but the United States is confused. It has become clear with the coronavirus.
Reflections on Western Civilization
Ancient civilizations are represented by the four major civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley, and China. These civilizations all developed through the development of agriculture in the fertile basins of major rivers, which led to a settled lifestyle.
The Mesopotamian civilization flourished in the Tigris-Euphrates river basin, but it was poor in mineral resources and mainly traded the grain it produced with China. Trade was conducted by land, using lunar and solar calendars, and knowledge of constellations deepened from the search for sea routes by stars. However, desertification due to deforestation progressed, and the number of nomads and residents of oasis cities increased, deepening their dependence on East-West trade. The Sogdians, nomadic people of the Middle East, gradually moved east, transmitting many cultural items to China, and settled in China during the Tang Dynasty, taking up official positions. It is highly probable that the compass, gunpowder, and printing technology were invented by the Sogdians.
In the Middle East, rulers frequently changed, but East-West exchange was active, and different civilizations intersected, fostering rich civilizations and cultures. Many of these were also transmitted to the West.
In Greece, in the Neolithic Age around 7000 BC, civilizations and cultures such as pottery were transmitted from West Asia, and the cultivation of grains such as barley and wheat, and the domestication of livestock such as goats, sheep, pigs, cattle, and dogs began. Northern Greece, blessed with water and fertile soil, became an advanced region, but the center of civilization soon shifted from the north to the south. Olives and grapes, the "three major crops of the Mediterranean," were suitable for cultivation in the hilly areas of southern Greece, and olive oil and wine had high value as trade goods, becoming important resources for Greece to trade with various parts of the Mediterranean.
During the transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age, Greece entered a dark age, and the developed Mycenaean civilization declined around 1200 BC. In the 8th century BC, city-states were born in various parts of Greece, and Homer's epic poem "The Iliad" became popular, serving as a basis for the national consciousness and ethical norms of the Greeks. People who lost in factional strife in the city-states moved to the Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts with lax regulations, promoted colonization activities, and increased the number of free citizens.
In Greece, many civilizations and cultures were transmitted, people's exchanges became active, and the number of people with diverse ideas increased. The Greek freeman Socrates actively discussed with people about "what is a good deed?" This led to Plato's dialectic, which developed into a philosophy of examining the essence of things, and eventually the idea of rationality and causality spread to Europe.
In medieval Europe, they made huge profits from the Indian spice trade and entered the Age of Discovery. The navigation techniques were transmitted from the Middle East to Greece and Italy, and the compass is thought to have been invented by the Sogdians of China. In Europe, maritime trade became active centering on the Mediterranean Sea, and Spain, which became rich from gold mining in Africa, was unable to enjoy the benefits of Mediterranean trade after the exclusion of Islamic forces. In addition, in response to the blockade of the Mediterranean route by the Ottoman Empire, Spain aimed for Asia by going west, using Italian navigators and their navigation techniques. As a result, the American continent was discovered, and competition with Portugal began.
In Japan, technology was mainly transmitted from Spain, Portugal, and the Netherlands, and Japanese pirates and merchants traveled to trade in Macau and Luzon. However, navigation technology did not develop due to the subsequent national isolation policy of the Tokugawa shogunate.
In Europe, astronomical observation progressed due to improved navigation technology, and it was found that the earth was spherical from the shadow reflected on the moon. Newton discovered universal gravitation from the question, "Why does an apple fall to the round earth?" After that, scientific discoveries and analysis progressed, and the conflict with the dogmatic church (Catholic Church) deepened. Europe had limited fertile land, and farmers were impoverished by epidemics and crop failures, and they could not maintain their lives with the old teachings of the church. Eventually, knowledge spread to the people through Chinese printing technology and the Renaissance, and the deceptiveness of the church seeking profits became clear. Rationalism progressed through the Reformation by Luther, Protestantism was born, and a large-scale migration to America began due to the Puritan Revolution. The Catholic Jesuit order, feeling a sense of crisis in the expansion of Protestantism, aimed to gain believers in Asia and South America, and supported the colonial rule of merchants and the military with the cooperation of powerful people.
As a result of the discovery of the American continent, the Puritan Revolution, etc., poor farmers and Puritans (the current US Evangelical group) migrated to North America in large numbers, and the United States became the largest rationalist country. Furthermore, the United States experienced the Great Depression and wars, and has never been attacked domestically except for Pearl Harbor. After World War II, its own factories were in full operation due to support for Europe and Japan, and it gained enormous wealth, becoming the great power it is today.
How far does the universe extend? Is there a wall at the edge of the universe? This question never leaves my mind. If there is a wall, what lies beyond it? Science has developed based on the law of causality. In a world where there is nothing, or even something, beyond the wall, the law of causality does not hold. Is it the realm of God, beyond human comprehension? Human perception involves repeated cycles of seeing, communicating, comparing, and judging, with a beginning and an end. We cannot conceive of a world without a beginning or an end.
What is time? The movement of energy and light is what humans tentatively call time. It may be an instant from God's perspective. Both the beginning and the end may be an instant from God's perspective. What does it mean for something to exist? "Being" exists because there is "non-being," and existence can be understood. In this world, "non-being" and "being" coexist regardless of time. The beginning and the end coexist simultaneously.
The universe is filled with dark matter and dark energy in addition to atoms, and it is expanding at an incredible rate. The vast world beyond, where there is no energy or matter and light cannot reach, is not beyond the wall. It is a world of nothingness, not space. Space, like time, is something that humans have conceived. I believe this in order to understand the wall.
”The Heart”
July 10, 2020
The Mystery of the Heart: A uniquely human function that AI lacks.
Unlike animals, the human heart possesses a will accompanied by thought, and the number and structure of the nerve cells that form its foundation are vastly different. The brain has 100 billion neurons forming a complex network, with each cell connected to thousands to tens of thousands of neurons, functioning as a massive information processing system.
This vast number of neurons constantly changes and forms complex circuits over a long lifespan that is beyond the reach of computers, efficiently processing vast amounts of information. This complex network is what supports the rich workings of the human heart.
Humans not only dream and have illusions, but also sometimes have delusions. Phenomena such as déjà vu, preconceptions, and imprints of past memories are also caused by the complexity of the brain and instincts. These phenomena can be said to be prominent features of the human brain, which has a brainstem.
The heart is closely connected to the body and cannot be separated. This unity of mind and body is the reason why humans have a heart, which AI lacks, and sometimes exhibits mysterious movements, as if affirming the existence of God.
Elements that characterize the human heart
Thought and Will: Humans are capable of thinking and acting on their own will, rather than simply reacting to stimuli.
Complex Neural Network: The complex network of 100 billion neurons enables advanced information processing and generates rich emotions and thoughts.
Plasticity: The brain can continue to change throughout life, forming new circuits through experience and learning.
Consciousness and Self-Awareness: Humans can recognize themselves and have consciousness.
Emotions: Various emotions such as joy, anger, sorrow, and pleasure have a great influence on human behavior and decision-making.
Creativity: Humans can create new things.
Sociability: Humans can communicate with others and cooperate.
Differences between AI and Humans
AI can process large amounts of data at high speed, but it cannot have the complex functions of the human heart. AI lacks uniquely human elements such as consciousness, emotions, creativity, and sociability, so it is difficult to replace humans.
The Mystery of the Heart
The workings of the heart are still shrouded in many mysteries. As research in brain science progresses, the mechanisms of the heart are gradually being elucidated, but many parts of complex phenomena such as consciousness and emotions remain unexplained.
In conclusion
The heart is the most important thing for humans and enriches our lives. Exploring the mystery and depth of the heart is very important for understanding ourselves.
The Japanese language is rich in vocabulary, allowing for nuanced expressions of subtle colors. The kanji culture, originating in China, was introduced to Japan via the Korean Peninsula. However, at that time, the Japanese people did not understand the meaning of kanji as ideograms. It was probably through exchanges with the Korean Peninsula, along with Buddhism, that they learned the ideograms. The abundant kanji culture, along with the development of the Japanese nation, spread with the arrival of the Baekje people who fled their collapsing kingdom. Today, China and Korea have shifted to simplified characters and the Hangul alphabet, respectively, which may have resulted in a loss of richness in expression.
For us ordinary people, it is questionable whether the lack of richness in words and characters is significant enough to affect our lives. However, while Westerners express themselves with a clear "YES or NO," the Japanese have moderate expressions, such as the ambiguous "ee, maa" (well, sort of) and the word "kibi," which expresses subtle emotional nuances. There is also the expression "to touch the folds of a person's heart." Whether the other person understands the speaker's intentions and judges the situation appropriately is a separate matter.
People sometimes reach a dead end or worry, and when thoughts and considerations cannot be fully expressed in words, they manifest as emotions. If words had no "ambiguity" and could express "kibi" in concrete terms, there would be little to worry about.
Philosophical books are sometimes so verbose that they are baffling, and there are many things that I cannot understand. Experts may understand them. They probably interpret ambiguous expressions in their own way.
In order to understand, people analyze phenomena, categorize them by color, and define them. They also sometimes group detailed phenomena together for analysis. People with rich expressive power do not categorize or group things together; rather, they are indifferent to the details of the phenomena, even if they understand them. People who cannot remain indifferent may be somewhat dangerous. "Understanding phenomena with the vocabulary of words" varies depending on individual ways of thinking, making mutual understanding difficult. The same is true on a national level.
Why has natural science developed so far and given so much benefit to mankind? Is it because the expression of words has become richer and mutual understanding has deepened? No. It is because scientific phenomena are expressed not in words but in mathematical formulas. Even if the expression of words degenerates, the development of science does not stop.
When we are children, we learn the concept of "number" with digits, and as we progress through school, we learn continuity using symbols. People can understand discontinuity, but they cannot understand continuity. We can understand "not being" because there "is" something. We cannot understand either one alone forever. Mathematics can express the eternal "being" and "non-being." "Nothingness" = "0" (zero) will never become "1" forever. Even imaginary numbers, which we learn in high school, cannot be understood, but the world of imaginary numbers is expressed in numbers and symbols. Special relativity theory and the distortion of space-time are incomprehensible to ordinary people, but they can be expressed in mathematical formulas. Physicists are geniuses and brilliant people, so they understand them. Ordinary people understand them not by reason but by definition.
I wrote earlier that we can only understand with discontinuity, but cause and effect, beginning and end, existence and nothingness are all discontinuous, and we understand them. Space can be recognized because there are things that exist. If there were no existing things, space would be nothingness. Beyond the wall at the edge of the universe, there is nothing that exists, so it is nothingness. People recognize nothingness as space.
To get back to the point, even phenomena that ordinary people cannot understand can be expressed in mathematical formulas. Science has developed through mathematical expression. However, God understands the eternal "being" and "non-being." He lives in a world beyond human knowledge.
I am an atheist, yet I am interested in religion. Christianity, which I encountered during my student days, holds a particular fascination for me.
Why am I an atheist? My father's influence played a part, but ultimately, I find it difficult to entrust my life to something beyond myself.
Many major historical events involving religion, particularly across various faiths, have centered around war. The religions of the past, with their intolerance of heresy, were truly... religious? This raises questions. We also cannot ignore the Catholic Church's scandals and the persistence of secularized religion within closed communities. The Middle Ages saw religious reforms and the Puritan Revolution, with immigrants seeking freedom from the constraints of Catholicism in the United States and elsewhere. Religion at that time often served as a tool for governance and profit.
While concepts like ethics and morality exist, in Europe and America, the belief in inherent human sinfulness led to the establishment of religion as a guiding norm. People participated in religious ceremonies, listened to the priest's sermons, and adhered to the language of the Bible in their daily lives. Though Westerners might disagree, Christianity remains the world's largest religion, deeply rooted in their daily lives, influencing their actions, much like Japanese people's unconscious connection to Shinto and Buddhist beliefs. I appreciate the novels of Shusaku Endo, and "Silence" is a particular favorite. Endo, a Catholic himself, explores his doubts about the faith in his writing. My interpretation is that Christianity is paternalistic, something given by God, rather than something we actively seek.
In Japan, Christianity faced severe persecution. Were the believers truly saved? After sacrificing their lives to maintain their faith, they were later celebrated by the world and used to promote Catholicism. Endo's novel questions whether God's inaction towards the oppressed peasants, simply because they suffered, equates to salvation through religious ceremonies.
The central theme of the novel is "silence." At the climax, God's voice whispers to the protagonist, Father Rodrigues, "I am not silent. I suffer with you." Through this image of a maternal God, Endo expresses his own yearning for a different kind of Christianity: "I am on your side, suffering and rejoicing with you." This resonates deeply with me.
I've been spending more time at home due to the pandemic, and I've been indulging in reading. I've started to pick up masterpieces that I never would have touched before, and recently I finished reading "An'ya Kōro" (A Dark Night's Passing) by Naoya Shiga. It's a story that depicts the inner turmoil of a human being, with the protagonist reflecting himself.
In my company employee days, I had no interest in personal novels at all, and I only read practical books, war stories, and Seicho Matsumoto's works. However, as I get older, I have more opportunities to look back on the past, and I began to think that my life was full of failures. Age and times have an influence, and I have more opportunities to look back on myself.
Before the pandemic, when I had free time, I often went out alone without thinking about anything, but the pandemic made me start reading personal novels that I had avoided until then. I was deeply moved by the climax of "An'ya Kōro", the last scene. I was a little surprised to find myself, who is getting older, being moved by an old personal novel.
The story closes with a scene where the wife, who was raped by her close cousin without resistance and felt a distance from her husband who knew everything, was struck by her husband's gentle sleeping face as he lay ill, and decided, "I will follow this person for the rest of my life." It seems that it took seven years to complete this novel. It seems that Naoya Shiga himself had struggles while writing it, and this ending can be said to be a conclusion to his own life.
I am not attracted to Rolex watches now, and I feel that a mini car is enough for a car.