Volume 1 (2025) 

The regulatory effects of sweet potato rotation patterns on soil organic carbon components and carbon-transforming enzyme activities

Weibin Li, Xueqing Mo

Volume 1 (2025), Article ID: eip1v0830b 

Published: 2025-08-30 (Received: 2025-03-12; Revised: 2025-08-11; Accepted: 2025-08-28)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17003459     

Citation

Li W, Mo X. The regulatory effects of sweet potato rotation patterns on soil organic carbon components and carbon-transforming enzyme activities. Engineering Innovation and Practice, 2025, 1, eip1v0830b.

Abstract

This study systematically evaluated the effects of different sweet potato rotation patterns on soil organic carbon components and carbon-transforming enzyme activities to reveal the regulatory mechanisms of crop rotation on soil carbon cycling. The experiment included continuous sweet potato–wheat cropping (SWS) and three rotation patterns: sweet potato–wheat/sweet potato–rapeseed (SWR), sweet potato–wheat/maize–wheat (SWC), and sweet potato–wheat/peanut–wheat (SWP). Soil samples were collected from 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm layers to determine soil organic carbon (SOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), readily oxidizable organic carbon (ROC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and the activities of related carbon-transforming enzymes (sucrase, cellulase, polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase). The results showed that crop rotation significantly increased the contents of soil organic carbon components and enzyme activities, with notable differences among rotation patterns; SWC and SWP exhibited stronger promoting effects than SWR. Further analysis revealed significant correlations between soil organic carbon components and carbon-transforming enzyme activities, suggesting their synergistic roles in carbon cycling. This study innovatively compared multiple sweet potato rotation patterns and, for the first time, systematically revealed the differential responses of soil layers to rotation, thereby expanding the research perspective on the biochemical mechanisms of soil carbon cycling. The findings provide theoretical support for optimizing sweet potato rotation systems and managing soil health, offering important implications for promoting sustainable agricultural development.

Keywords

sweet potato rotation, soil organic carbon, carbon-transforming enzymes, soil carbon cycling, soil health

References

[1] Nawaz A, Farooq M, Ul-Allah S, et al. Sustainable soil management for food security in South Asia. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2021, 21(1), 258-275.

[2] Smith P, Soussana J F, Angers D, et al. How to measure, report, and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(1), 219-241.

[3] Chenu C, Angers D A, Barre P, et al. Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: Knowledge gaps and potential innovations. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022, 218, 105298.

[4] Cong W F, van der Werf W, Hoffland E. Crop rotation and soil carbon sequestration: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 302, 107105.

[5] Blanco-Canqui H, Ruis S J. Cover crop impacts on soil physical properties: A review. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2020, 84(5), 1527-1576.

[6] Liu Y, Li H, He J, et al. Crop rotation enhances soil microbial diversity and accelerates soil organic carbon accumulation in agroecosystems. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12, 719282.

[7] Zheng H, Chen L, Han X, et al. Crop rotation impacts on soil organic carbon fractions and microbial community composition. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 164, 103941.

[8] Burns R G, DeForest J L, Marxsen J, et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 172, 108834.

[9] Zhang H, Liu Q, Chen Z, et al. Sweet potato for food security and sustainable agriculture: A review. Field Crops Research, 2022, 287, 108645.

[10] Sun F, Wang C, Lin Y. Sweet potato gene editing and breeding technologies: Research progress and prospects. Advances in Resources Research, 2025, 5(2), 852-871.

[11] Cong W F, Hoffland E, Li L, et al. Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(4), 1715-1726.

[12] Fan R, Li X, Chen Q, et al. Crop rotation enhances soil microbial diversity and maintains soil fertility. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 149, 107943.

[13] Hu T, Sorensen P, Wahlstrom E M, et al. Root biomass and soil carbon storage under different crop rotations in European long-term experiments. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2021, 36(2), 104-115.

[14] Liu Y, Wang J, Gao J, et al. Long-term crop rotation enhances soil organic carbon sequestration and improves soil quality in the North China Plain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022, 340, 108162.

[15] Zhao M, Chen Q, Feng J, et al. Crop rotation systems drive soil organic carbon stabilization and microbial carbon use efficiency. Geoderma, 2025, 440, 116889.

[16] Chen J, Zhou W. Variation patterns of soil water-soluble organic carbon under different crop rotations. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(3), 734-743.

[17] Wang C, Yang J, Zhang X, et al. Sweet potato-based crop rotations improve soil organic carbon fractions and microbial activity in subtropical farmland. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 889, 164270.

[18] Zhang H, Yu P, Yang X, et al. Effects of legume-based rotations on soil carbon dynamics and microbial communities. Applied Soil Ecology, 2024, 196, 104066.

[19] Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y. Root traits regulate soil organic carbon stabilization under diverse cropping systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 148, 107874.

[20] Chen S, Lin G, Huang Q, et al. Crop residue quality drives soil carbon sequestration and microbial carbon use efficiency under crop rotations. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 314, 107406.

[21] Li Y, Wang C, Zhou J, et al. Crop rotation enhances soil enzyme activities and microbial functions in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2020, 379, 114634.

[22] Wang J, Li Y, Xu M, et al. Crop rotations enhance soil enzyme activities and microbial metabolism across depths: A meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2020, 377, 114576.

[23] Guo L, Wang C, Li Y, et al. Depth-dependent responses of soil enzyme activities and microbial communities to crop rotations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 159, 108309.

[24] Chen J, Guo L, Wang C, et al. Crop rotations improve soil organic carbon and enzyme activities across soil depths: A meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2020, 370, 114366.

[25] Liang C, Schimel J P, Jastrow J D. The importance of microbial biomass carbon for soil enzyme activities and carbon cycling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2021, 156, 108223.

[26] Wang J, Zhang H, Xu M, et al. Depth-dependent associations between organic carbon fractions and enzyme activities under different crop rotations. Soil & Tillage Research, 2022, 218, 105311.

[27] Sun J, Liu Y, Wu H, et al. Crop residue inputs and root traits regulate soil enzyme activity and organic carbon turnover across soil profiles. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023, 345, 108292.

[28] Zhao X, He P, Zhang Y, et al. Differential responses of soil carbon-transforming enzymes to residue and root inputs in deep soils under rotations. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2024, 15, 1347721.

[29] Gao L, Hu T, Wang J, et al. Long-term sweet potato rotations regulate stratified soil enzyme activities and carbon cycling efficiency. Science of the Total Environment, 2025, 905, 167421.

[30] Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu X, et al. Organic carbon fractions mediate the links between microbial biomass and enzyme activity in rotational agroecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology, 2025, 191, 104934.

[31] Li G, Yu C, Shen P, et al. Crop diversification promotes soil aggregation and carbon accumulation in global agroecosystems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 350, 119661.

[32] Zhang Y, Chen J, Du M, et al. Metagenomic insights into microbial variation and carbon cycling function in crop rotation systems. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 947, 174529.

[33] Singh G, Bhattacharyya R, Das T K, et al. Crop rotation and residue management effects on soil enzyme activities, glomalin, and aggregate stability under zero tillage in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 184, 291-300.

[34] Sun Q, Zheng Y, Li S, et al. Diversified crop rotation: Synergistically enhancing peanut yield and soil organic carbon stability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2025, 382, 109497.

[35] Kuzyakov Y, Blagodatskaya E. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 135, 108513.

[36] Li J, Wang G, Mayes M A, et al. Microbial regulation of soil carbon dynamics under crop rotation: Mechanisms and implications. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 156, 108210.

[37] Zhang L, Ding X, He Y, et al. Crop residues and root exudates regulate soil enzyme activities and carbon stabilization under rotation systems. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 838, 156013.

[38] Chen X, Liu D, Xu H, et al. Linking crop rotation, microbial community assembly, and soil carbon cycling. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14, 1162287.