Volume 1 (2025) 

The effects of different forest types on the soil organic carbon pool and enzyme activity characteristics in sandy plain areas

Juying Ma, Lifang Xu, Shuangshuang Li

Volume 1 (2025), Article ID: eip1v0830a 

Published: 2025-08-30 (Received: 2025-04-18; Revised: 2025-08-10; Accepted: 2025-08-28)

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17002780     

Citation

Ma J, Xu L, Li S. The effects of different forest types on the soil organic carbon pool and enzyme activity characteristics in sandy plain areas. Engineering Innovation and Practice, 2025, 1, eip1v0830a.

Abstract

The ecosystem in sandy plain areas is fragile, and enhancing the soil organic carbon pool is crucial for improving ecosystem functions and carbon sequestration. This study investigated sandy soils in a plain area of Zhejiang Province, examining four forest types: pure poplar forest, pure willow forest, mixed poplar-willow forest, and abandoned land (control). By collecting soil samples from 0–100 cm, the study systematically analyzed soil organic carbon content, active carbon components (easily oxidizable organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and microbial biomass carbon), and soil enzyme activities (invertase, polyphenol oxidase, β-glucosidase, and peroxidase), as well as their interrelationships. Results showed that different forest types significantly influenced soil organic carbon content and stock. Compared to abandoned land, afforestation significantly increased soil organic carbon stock, with the highest levels observed in pure poplar forests, where soil organic carbon content in the 0–100 cm layer increased by 45.4%–82.6%, and stock increased by 1.2–1.9 times. Active carbon components and soil enzyme activities varied significantly among forest types, with mixed poplar-willow forests showing the greatest increase in active carbon components, while enzyme activities in pure poplar and mixed poplar-willow forests were significantly higher than in abandoned land. Correlation analysis indicated that polyphenol oxidase and β-glucosidase played important roles in the formation of active carbon components, whereas invertase and peroxidase were key to organic carbon accumulation and stock. Redundancy analysis revealed that soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and fine root biomass were the primary driving factors of forest-type effects on soil organic carbon pool characteristics. This study provides an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms by which different forest types affect the soil organic carbon pool and active components in sandy plain areas, offering practical insights for ecosystem restoration and carbon sequestration.

Keywords

soil organic carbon, sandy plain areas, forest types, carbon sequestration, soil enzyme activities

References

[1] Lal R. Soil organic carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation and food security. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 204, 104-115.

[2] Crowther T W, Maynard D S, Leff J W, et al. Soil carbon storage in global grasslands and forests depends on plant–fungal symbiosis. Nature Communications, 2021, 12, 5077.

[3] Deng L, Wang G, Liu G B, et al. Effects of land use changes on soil carbon storage in China: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(9), 4822-4835.

[4] Yan D, Wang G, Sun B, et al. Vegetation restoration increases soil organic carbon by changing the soil microbial community in semiarid regions. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 822, 153548.

[5] Xu X, Liu W, Zhang C, et al. Forest type regulates soil organic carbon and enzyme activity in temperate ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 496, 119420.

[6] Jian S, Zhao C, Fang S, et al. Soil extracellular enzyme activity and stoichiometry respond to vegetation type and climate across temperate ecosystems. Catena, 2023, 222, 106813.

[7] Zhang Y, Zhao W, Guo Y, et al. Effects of forest type on soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in northern China. Catena, 2020, 195, 104739.

[8] Wang C, Wang X, Guo L, et al. Mixed plantations enhance soil carbon storage compared with monocultures in subtropical China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 482, 118855.

[9] Lv X T, Reed S, Yu Q, et al. Long-term land abandonment and vegetation restoration alter soil carbon pools in temperate grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 151, 108021.

[10] Shi S, Zhang W, Zhang P, et al. Depth distribution of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors across Chinese forests. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8(1), 38.

[11] Chen D, Zhang Y, Lin Y, et al. Forest management impacts on soil organic carbon stocks and dynamics: A meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 520, 120401.

[12] Ma Q, Chen L, Liu Y, et al. Effects of poplar plantations on soil organic carbon sequestration in the North China Plain. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20(5), 2521-2532.

[13] Li Y, He N, Xu L, et al. Mixed versus monoculture forests: Effects on soil carbon storage in temperate regions. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 857, 159463.

[14] Wang Y, Li N, Zhao H, et al. Effects of forest type on the distribution of easily oxidized organic carbon in soil. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(7), 1123-1133.

[15] Wang Z W, Liu J, Zhang X F, et al. Effects of forest community characteristics on soil active organic carbon. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(14), 4827-4837.

[16] Li J H, Zhang W, Zhu H W, et al. Effects of poplar plantation on soil organic carbon and nutrient distribution. Forest Research, 2021, 34(2), 222-229.

[17] Lv X, Zhang S T, Wang L, et al. Soil microbial community structure and carbon cycling functional characteristics in mixed forests. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(6), 1153-1162.

[18] Zhao J H, Liu C J, Sun H, et al. Effects of different forest configurations on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. Journal of Forest Ecology, 2019, 39(11), 1521-1530.

[19] Chen F, Zhou X, Li F, et al. Effects of willow plantation on soil microbial community composition and diversity. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(5), 1154-1164.

[20] Liu B, Li C, Guo P, et al. Comparison of soil microbial community characteristics between a pure willow forest and a mixed forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2019, 43(12), 1213-1224.

[21] Wu T C, Zhou L, Zhao Y, et al. Effects of different forest types on soil microbial community structure and function. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4), 1347-1356.

[22] Wang Y, Huang T T, Ma Q, et al. Effects of forest type on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10), 3569-3579.

[23] Zhang H W, Liu J, He Z Q, et al. Effects of monoculture and mixed forests on soil carbon pools and nutrient status. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(9), 18-27.

[24] Ma Q, Chen L, Liu Y, et al. Effects of poplar plantation on soil enzyme activity and organic carbon distribution. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(9), 1-11.

[25] Zhou Z, Wang C, Luo Y, et al. Regulatory role of soil enzyme activity on carbon cycling processes: Evidence from global forests. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(2), 281-293.

[26] Zhao Y, Wang L, Yang J, et al. Effects of mixed forests on soil enzyme activity and microbial community diversity. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(12), 1243-1256.

[27] Li J, Chen H, Peng Y, et al. Coupling relationship between invertase and soil microbial biomass and its significance for carbon cycling. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(8), 2984-2996.

[28] Wang X, Fang J, Sun Q, et al. Interactions of soil invertase activity with organic carbon fractions and microbial biomass. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(4), 877-888.

[29] Zhang H, Liu W, Xu X, et al. Relationship between soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and its environmental driving mechanisms. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(5), 965-976.

[30] Yu G, Chen Y, Wang Q, et al. Regulatory role of soil nitrogen content on enzyme activity and carbon cycling. Forest Research, 2022, 35(6), 12-22.

[31] Lv X, Zhang S, He N, et al. Effects of fine root biomass on soil enzyme activity and organic carbon stability. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(11), 3891-3902.

[32] Gao P, Li H, Chen D, et al. Forest type regulates soil enzyme activity and microbial community structure: Evidence from long-term monitoring. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(10), 2075-2086.

[33] Wang Y, Li J, Sun Z, et al. Effects of forest structure on soil carbon and nitrogen cycling processes and their ecological significance. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(6), 612-624.

[34] Chen C, Wang K L, Zhang W, et al. Contribution of fine root turnover to soil organic carbon accumulation in karst regions. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(3), 524-532.

[35] Wang P Y, Zhou Z C, Jin G Q, et al. Soil organic carbon fractions and their influencing factors in poplar plantations. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2019, 43(7), 846-854.

[36] Zhang H, Wang Y H, Xu L H, et al. Differences in soil carbon storage and its components between mixed forests and pure forests in the rocky mountainous areas of North China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(5), 1576-1584.

[37] Wang X, Zhao S W, Liu Z F, et al. Effects of long-term abandonment on soil organic carbon and microbial community structure in loess regions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(4), 1181-1189.

[38] Li T, Wang X G, Zhu B, et al. Research progress on microbial mechanisms of enhanced soil carbon sequestration in mixed forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(6), 2105-2114.