Volume 1 (2025) 

Effects of row ratio regulation on growth, yield, and economic benefits in a maize–peanut intercropping system

Jiangtao Wang, Jingjing Meng, Tengfei Wang

Volume 1 (2025), Article ID: eip1v1219b 

Published: 2025-12-19 (Received: 2025-10-06; Revised: 2025-12-05; Accepted: 2025-12-18)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17983808        

Citation

Wang J, Meng J, Wang T. Effects of row ratio regulation on growth, yield, and economic benefits in a maize–peanut intercropping system. Engineering Innovation and Practice, 2025, 1, eip1v1219b. 

Abstract

Intercropping is an important cultivation strategy for improving land-use efficiency and crop productivity, in which row ratio configuration—a key agronomic measure for regulating interspecific interactions—plays a crucial role in optimising resource allocation and enhancing system-level benefits. This study aimed to elucidate the growth dynamics, interspecific competition, and yield formation mechanisms of maize and peanut under different row ratio configurations, thereby providing a theoretical basis for optimising intercropping system design. Field experiments were conducted with multiple maize–peanut row ratio treatments, and crop height, leaf area index, and dry matter accumulation were measured to assess growth performance. Canopy light interception and light-use efficiency were analysed, and indices such as the land equivalent ratio (LER) were used to quantify interspecific competition and complementarity, while economic returns were calculated for each treatment. The results showed that increasing the proportion of peanut rows enhanced the edge-row advantage of maize, significantly increasing dry matter accumulation per plant compared with inner rows; under optimal row ratio treatments, the system LER exceeded 1, demonstrating a clear yield advantage, and economic benefits improved significantly compared with monocultures of both crops. Overall, the study indicates that rational row ratio configuration can promote temporal–spatial niche differentiation, strengthen interspecific resource complementarity, and balance competition with mutualism, ultimately enhancing both yield and profitability of the intercropping system, and providing guidance for optimising maize–peanut intercropping patterns.

Keywords

intercropping system optimisation, row ratio configuration, interspecific competition, land equivalent ratio, crop productivity, Northeast China

References

[1] Li L, Zhang C, Christie P, et al. Maize/legume strip intercropping enhances productivity and resource use efficiency while reducing environmental costs in arid irrigation zones. Nature Food, 2023, 4(10), 875-885. 

[2] Wang R, Li W, Ma W, et al. Effects of intercropping systems on soil properties, crop growth, and water use efficiency in arid areas of northwest China. Field Crops Research, 2022, 286, 108643. 

[3] Brooker R W, Newton A C, Birch P D, et al. Agroecological principles and intercropping—A call for greater collaboration between ecologists and agronomists. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2021, 5, 711284. 

[4] Feng L, Sun M, Xu Y, et al. Yield, resource use efficiency and economic benefits of maize/peanut strip intercropping under varying row ratios and planting densities in dryland conditions. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 161, 113171. 

[5] Liu S, Li L, Dong B, et al. Legume-based intercropping reshapes the rhizosphere microbiome and increases crop resilience to drought stress. Microbiome, 2022, 10, 185. 

[6] Zou J, Zhang X, Zhang X, et al. Border row effects improved the spatial distributions of maize and peanut roots in an intercropping system, associated with improved yield. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15, 1414844. 

[7] Wang R, Wang Y, Li W, et al. Canopy heterogeneity with border-row proportion affects light interception and use efficiency in maize/peanut strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 2021, 273, 108307. 

[8] Yu Y, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. Film-edge cultivation in maize–soybean intercropping restructures soil bacterial networks to improve water productivity and grain yield. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 196, 109520. 

[9] Zhang Y, Yang Y, Wang J, et al. Quantification of spatial-temporal light interception of crops in different configurations of soybean-maize strip intercropping. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15, 1376687. 

[10] Zhao S, Dai Q, Peng S, et al. Intercropping with peanut enhances maize light-use efficiency and optimizes assimilate allocation patterns. Field Crops Research, 2017, 211, 174-185. 

[11] Liu X, Jin S, Wang J, et al. Optimal row ratio must dynamically optimize light interception efficiency, spatial use, and canopy structural stability in intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023, 142, 126666. 

[12] Zhang S, Wei Y, Song X, et al. Optimizing spatial arrangement of maize and peanut to improve light utilization and yield stability in intercropping system. The Crop Journal, 2018, 6(4), 371-381. 

[13] Li C, Gong S, Wang Y, et al. Effects of multi-year maize–peanut intercropping and phosphorus application on rhizosphere soil properties and root morphological and microbial community characteristics. Agronomy, 2024, 15(4), 913. 

[14] Chen J, Wang X, Peng S, et al. Maize/peanut intercropping improves nutrient uptake of side-row maize and system microbial community diversity. European Journal of Agronomy, 2022, 132, 106399. 

[15] Li L, Li C, Wang J, et al. Yield and nitrogen uptake of sole and intercropped maize and peanut in response to N fertilizer input. Field Crops Research, 2019, 243, 107611. 

[16] Shen Q, Gao S, Zhang H, et al. Intercropping with maize improves phosphorus utilization efficiency and uptake in peanut by altering root growth and rhizosphere environment. Plant and Soil, 2017, 410(1-2), 41-52. 

[17] Zhang Y, Sun M, Xu Y, et al. Nitrogen fertilization modulates competitive–complementary interactions and yield formation in maize–peanut intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023, 151, 127031. 

[18] Cui Y, Liu Y, Wang R, et al. Maize–peanut intercropping alters root morphological and physiological characteristics, contributing to improved nutrient-use efficiency and system productivity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14, 1251346. 

[19] Li J, Li C, Wang Y, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of soil nutrients and root foraging strategies drive complementarity in maize–legume intercropping. Plant and Soil, 2024, 498(1-2), 431-449. 

[20] Song X, Zhang C, Sun M, et al. Shade tolerance mechanisms in peanut cultivars: leaf anatomy, photosynthetic acclimation, and hormonal regulation under maize intercropping. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2023, 74(15), 4778-4792. 

[21] Ma W, Wang R, Li W, et al. Shading inhibits branch development and reduces biomass in peanut intercropped with maize. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2023, 200, 107663. 

[22] Tian D, Zhang Y, Sun M, et al. Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 2020, 251, 107802. 

[23] Fan F, Li Z, Li L, et al. Intercropping maize with peanut suppresses excessive elongation growth in maize and improves nitrogen uptake in the late growth stage. European Journal of Agronomy, 2018, 92, 1-8. 

[24] Liu S, Sun M, Wang R, et al. Economic optimization of maize–peanut intercropping: balancing yield gain, input cost, and market risk under climate variability. Agricultural Systems, 2024, 223, 104031. 

[25] Wang Y, Wang R, Ma W, et al. Yield enhancement in the dominant crop can markedly elevate overall system profitability in strip intercropping systems. Agricultural Systems, 2021, 193, 103233. 

[26] Jiao N, Wang R, Li W, et al. Smart agriculture technologies for optimizing resource management in mechanized maize–peanut strip intercropping systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024, 218, 108876. 

[27] Li C, Li H, Zhang R, et al. Mechanization and digitalization of strip intercropping: advances, bottlenecks, and pathways toward sustainable intensification. Global Food Security, 2024, 39, 100732.