Search this site
Embedded Files
Engineering Innovation and Practice
  • Home
  • Volume 2 (2026)
  • Volume 1 (2025)
    • EIP 1_1
    • EIP 1_2
    • EIP 1_3
    • EIP 1_4
    • EIP 1_5
    • EIP 1_6
    • EIP 1_7
    • EIP 1_8
    • EIP 1_9
    • EIP 1_10
    • EIP 1_11
    • EIP 1_12
    • EIP 1_13
    • EIP 1_14
    • EIP 1_15
    • EIP 1_16
    • EIP 1_17
    • EIP 1_18
    • EIP 1_19
    • EIP 1_20
    • EIP 1_21
    • EIP 1_22
    • EIP 1_23
    • EIP 1_24
    • EIP 1_25
    • EIP 1_26
    • EIP 1_27
    • EIP 1_28
    • EIP 1_29
    • EIP 1_30
  • Instructions for Authors
Engineering Innovation and Practice

Download PDF

Volume 1 (2025) 

Spatial variation of soil organic carbon fractions and decomposition rates in temperate grasslands and their multi-factor driving mechanisms

Yizhi Hu, Zhenli Su

Volume 1 (2025), Article ID: eip1v1121a 

Published: 2025-11-21 (Received: 2025-09-02; Revised: 2025-11-10; Accepted: 2025-11-19)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17667134        

Citation

Hu Y, Su Z. Spatial variation of soil organic carbon fractions and decomposition rates in temperate grasslands and their multi-factor driving mechanisms. Engineering Innovation and Practice, 2025, 1, eip1v1121a. 

Abstract

Temperate grasslands represent a significant component of the global terrestrial carbon pool, and the spatial patterns and decomposition dynamics of their soil organic carbon fractions are directly linked to ecosystem carbon stability and climate change feedbacks; thus, clarifying the mechanisms underlying these variations is of substantial scientific importance. This study aims to identify how diverse environmental factors regulate the contents and standardized decomposition rates of major soil organic carbon fractions and to characterize their spatial differentiation at the regional scale. Based on transects established along typical environmental gradients in temperate grasslands, combined with soil particle-size fractionation, controlled laboratory incubation experiments, and a multifactor variance decomposition model, this study systematically evaluates the influences of climate, vegetation, soil physicochemical properties, and mineral composition on the behavior of distinct carbon fractions. The results reveal pronounced spatial heterogeneity in the contents of various organic carbon fractions along regional gradients, with clear differences among grassland types. In contrast, their standardized decomposition rates generally exhibit opposing spatial trends, characterized by lower decomposition rates in areas with higher carbon contents. Mechanistic analyses further indicate that climate and mineralogical factors are the dominant variables governing the distribution of carbon-fraction contents, with mineral effects particularly evident in fine particle-associated fractions, whereas decomposition rates are jointly regulated by mineralogy, soil physicochemical attributes, and climatic conditions. Overall, the study uncovers significant heterogeneity in the spatial patterns and process controls of soil organic carbon fractions in temperate grasslands, providing essential parameters for improving the representation of soil-carbon dynamics in Earth system models and offering important scientific support for carbon-sink assessment and ecological management in temperate grassland ecosystems.

Keywords

soil organic carbon fractions, decomposition rate, mineral protection, environmental gradients, Earth system models, Temperate Grasslands

References

[1] Bai Y, Cotrufo M F. Grassland soil carbon sequestration: Current understanding, challenges, and solutions. Science, 2022, 377(6606), 603-608.

[2] Yang Y, Tilman D, Furey G, et al. Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1), 718. 

[3] Crowther T W, Todd-Brown K E O, Rowe C W, et al. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature, 2016, 540(7631), 104-108. 

[4] Lavallee J M, Soong J L, Cotrufo M F, et al. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(1), 261-273. 

[5] Liang C, Schimel J P, Jastrow J D, et al. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017, 2, 17105. 

[6] Wang G, Mayes M A, Gu L, et al. Soil carbon loss due to warming in Earth system models constrained by microbial carbon use efficiency. Nature Communications, 2024, 15, 3258. 

[7] Lugato E, Lavallee J M, Haddix M L, et al. Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14(5), 295-300. 

[8] Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 2015, 528(7580), 60-68. 

[9] Bardgett R D, Bullock J M, Lavorel S, et al. Combatting global grassland degradation. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2021, 2(10), 720-735. 

[10] He N P, Yu G R, Wang Q F, et al. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in Chinese grasslands: Patterns and controlling factors. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 153, 103-110. 

[11] Chen S, Wang W, Xu W, et al. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem productivity and soil carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(16), 4027-4032. 

[12] Xin X, Schaeppman-Strub G, Zhang B, et al. Climate change dominated long-term soil carbon losses of Inner Mongolian grasslands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2020, 34(11), e2020GB006559. 

[13] Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra C A, et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nature Communications, 2015, 6, 6707. 

[14] Cotrufo M F, Wallenstein M D, Boot C M, et al. The M icrobial E fficiency‐M atrix S tabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(4), 988-995. 

[15] Angst G, Mueller K E, Nierop K G J, et al. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 156, 108189. 

[16] Kögel-Knabner I, Guggenberger G, Kleber M, et al. Organo-mineral associations in temperate soils: Integrating biology, mineralogy, and organic matter chemistry. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2008, 171(1), 61-82. 

[17] Doetterl S, Stevens A, Six J, et al. Soil carbon storage controlled by interactions between geochemistry and climate. Nature Geoscience, 2015, 8(9), 780-783. 

[18] Georgiou K, Jackson R B, Vindušková O, et al. Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nature Communications, 2022, 13, 3797. 

[19] Angst G, Mueller C W, Prater I, et al. Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key. Nature Communications, 2023, 14, 2967. 

[20] Conant R T, Ryan M G, Ågren G I, et al. Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates–synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward. Global change biology, 2011, 17(11), 3392-3404. 

[21] Fanin N, Fromin N, Barantal S, et al. Habitat filtering is the major driver of assemblage patterns in alpine meadow soil microbiomes under global change. Nature Communications, 2022, 13, 2968. 

[22] Cotrufo M F, Haddix M L, Kroeger M E, et al. The role of plant input physical-chemical properties, and microbial and soil chemical diversity on the formation of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 168, 108648. 

[23] Lutzow M V, Kogel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, et al. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions: A review. European Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 57(4), 426-445. 

[24] Kleber M, Bourg I C, Coward E K, et al. Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2021, 2(6), 402-421. 

[25] Sokol N W, Kuebbing S E, KarlSEN-Ayala E, et al. Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(1), 233-246. 

[26] Huang Y, Zhang W, Sun W, et al. Net primary production of Chinese croplands from 1950 to 1999. Ecological Applications, 2007, 17(3), 692-701. 

[27] Six J, Conant R T, Paul E A, et al. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil, 2002, 241(2), 155-176. 

[28] Davidson E A, Janssens I A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 2006, 440(7081), 165-173. 

[29] Luo Z, Feng W, Luo Y, et al. Global turnover times of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nature Communications, 2024, 15, 4857. 

[30] Bradford M A, Wieder W R, Bonan G B, et al. Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(8), 751-758.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Copyright © Engineering Innovation and Practice. All Rights Reserved.


Google Sites
Report abuse
Google Sites
Report abuse