A Better Bait Station
Research Project
Research Project
This project aims to assist in the conservation efforts of Predator Free Wellington and other pest control organizations around New Zealand by optimizing the design of poison bait distribution to mustelids such as rats, stoats and weasels.
It will take the challenges of pest control in an urban environment into consideration and the need to limit exposure of non-target species such as our native wildlife to toxins.
Poison bait has been proven to be the most effective and economical way to eradicate predators
in New Zealand wilderness environments. (Bait Stations for Targeting Rats) Over vast areas of our native bush, air drops have primarily been used to distribute bait.
In urban environments where airdrops aren’t an option, poison bait stations become the next
best thing. There is an opportunity to create a bait station that functions just as well in urban environments as it does bush and can help to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of pest
control operations.
1) How to make a bait station appealing to rats?
2) How to make a bait station inaccessible to pets, non-target
animals and children?
3) How can a product save PFW time, manpower and money?
4) What are the unique needs that a bait station has to meet?
Predator Free Wellington was started in 2016 as a part of the Predator Free 2050 project. The goal of PFW was to handle the urban aspects of Predator eradication.
The operation started on the Miramar peninsula due to its nature as a naturally closed area with the ocean and the airport. They are currently moving across the town belt and towards the CBD through Newtown.
Stations like the PelGar feature a key to release the clasp that holds the station closed. This is a good way of keeping a casual passerby from opening the station. However, the mechanism would have to be kept very simple to avoid creating a point of failure.
Deciding on a target environment is important when designing a station. More open stations can’t be placed near residential areas and more closed stations can attract less rats. My design will be a more closed off style of station to make it more suitable for PFW’s urban operation.
Stations with automatic bait dispensers are a growing trend due to their ability to keep bait fresh for long periods of time without servicing. It’s the high price of such devices that stops them from being more practical. A cheaper version of such a device could be good to look into.
A high bait capacity means that a station can stay active and feed rats for longer without a person coming to replenish the store of bait.
Other than the Goodnature with its attachments most stations only have one way of being mounted, either on a flat surface or on a vertical like a tree or post. Allowing for both options could be useful.
Norway rats are typically found more often in urban areas than ship rats, living in very close proximity to human activity. Where ship rats are very good climbers Norway rats are equally as good at burrowing to form their nests. These nests are often found along coastlines where boulders and packet earth can provide better conditions for burrows, or in compost bins where burrowing is also easy and food is plentiful. (Rowell,18)
On the Miramar Peninsula PFW found Protecta Sidekick stations (similar to the PelGar stations, a plastic box with bait inside) to be effective against norway rat populations, perhaps due to them being more used to the style of trap already and therefore being more willing to enter them. This is backed up by a 2006 study conducted by Landcare Research NZ found that 80 percent of Norway rats entered a similar style of trap alongside two other more outdated styles. (plastic tunnel,wooden box) The rate of bait consumption in the plastic version was significantly lower when compared to a similar wooden version however. (Spurr,6)
Ship rats tend to inhabit areas of densely packed vegetation, being excellent climbers and they tend to be found less near humans. The places they like to inhabit can be difficult to reach, often on banks or cliffs covered in close plant shelter. This can make getting bait stations into their home ranges a challenge. A wider range of different trap styles can also be necessary to eliminate Ship rats as they seem less eager to enter the small enclosed devices that Norway rats might. (Practical Guide to Trapping) (Rowell)
The same study was conducted on ship rats with slightly different traps and found that 75 percent of rats entered 3 of the stations tested (plastic tunnel, wooden box and wooden tunnel) and ate from them at the same rate but refused to enter Philproof bait stations. (Spurr,4)
Both types of rats are also known to exhibit hoarding behavior when an excess of food (or bait) is presented to them. The rats will take bait out of stations and store it for later, potentially back to nests that multiple rats inhabit, poisoning more than one.
(Morris et al.1) This makes the use of pellet style bait advantageous as the rats are able to quickly and easily remove a piece of bait compared to block or liquid styles of bait.
There is also a strong precedent for both species of rats willing to climb to reach bait stations. Studies conducted in California, Galapagos islands, and the Channel islands national park investigated whether raising bait stations off the ground could help to exclude certain native species of rats. In the case of these tests the traps were elevated using a pipe wide enough for ship and Norway rats to climb up but too wide for the native rat species to climb up. This means that mounting traps in raised positions could be a viable way to keep non-target species like dogs or children away from bait stations while minimising the compromise to rat accessibility. (Erickson et al.) (Phillips et al.) (Burke et al.)
Traps, bait stations, and tunnels may have to be left out for around 3 weeks before rats will begin to interact with them before their natural neophobia is passed. This is a phase where non-poisoned bait can be used in order to teach the rats that there is food in the bait stations. Rats can also pass on the knowledge of food locations to each other during this time. (Practical Guide to Trapping)
There are many historical instances of kaka eating poison out of bait stations intended for rodents, and in Wellington specifically this is a major issue with some kaka being aware that bait stations can have food in them and regularly investigating them.
In the absence of any studies on the ability of kaka to access different types of bait station I am using Kea as a substitute as the two have similar levels of intelligence and body dimensions. (Holdaway and Worthy) The Kea Conservation Trust offers a safe practice guide to ground based predator control in kea habitat. There are several ways they suggest avoiding kea attention. The first is using bait stations that have darker, less eye-catching colours to hide them from kea and make them less interesting. Another is to avoid placing food in stations 1-2 weeks after placement to allow kea to learn that there isn’t food inside them and to wait out the period where they may be investigating a new object in their environment. The bait stations that they approve for use in kea populated areas are the PhilProof stations with a special kea-proof addition and a steel station that can be staked to the ground. (Balfour)
If a person is determined enough to get into a bait station there isn’t much that can reasonably done to stop them. The most common measures against human interference in public spaces like the bush are placing the station off track and making them dark colours to better hide them. Many boxes also have small locks on them that require a specialized key to open.
It's common for single kill traps to have a zig-zig in of wire mesh before the trap to stop hands reaching in through the entry directly to the trap. This is something that can work in bait stations but the bait inside has to be well secured or it could just be shaken out. This rules out using pellet bait. Securely mounting a station could help with this.
DOC recommends placing most types of traps or bait stations at least 1.3 meters off the ground when weka are present and placing the trap mechanism at least 265mm from the tunnel entrance, increased from 130mm. These changes accommodate for the maximum potential jump height and beak reach of weka. (Practical Guide to Trapping)
Dogs and cats can usually be kept out of bait stations or traps by securely attaching the structure to a surface so that bait can't be tipped out. Rodent blocks, a solid block of bait, can also be used rather than pellet bait to help with this. Making the tunnel entrances too small for them to enter and distances to the bait too long for them to reach is the standard method. (Practical Guide to Trapping)
The main way to prevent access for non-target species is to ensure that a station is securely mounted. If the station in question has a layout that fully excludes non-targets using a method like positioning the bait behind a zig-zag or at an angle to the entryway, then the only reasonable way for bait to be accessed would be flipping the station. If a station is flipped, using block bait that is slid onto a rod rather than loose pellet bait would help to prevent bait from falling out.
Closing stations with a clasp that requires a specialized key to open can also be a good way to stop a station from being opened.
Security
A station holding poison bait has to be able to withstand a reasonable amount of
investigation from people or curious animals like kaka.
This could mean having some form of simple locking mechanism. Stations also have to be well secured to a solid surface to stop them from being tilted and bait being tipped out.
Stations should also keep a large quantity of bait fresh and free of moisture for an
extended period of time. This helps to keep the bait attractive to rats.
Servicing
Stations can be serviced as often as once a week by PFW and stations can take some time to open, refill and close. Speeding up this process is a priority for my design.
Mounting
Ensuring that a station can be set up for the first time quickly, easily and securely in any environment will have a large impact on station placement operations.
Current station designs can be large and bulky, taking up a lot of space inside a pack. The form factor of a station is definitely worth considering.
1) What traps are placed in different contexts (backyard spaces
vs bush/coastlines/highly exposed areas) by PFW?
2) How much higher are interaction rates on very open traps
vs very closed ones? General interaction rate data on
different styles of traps has proved quite hard to come by.
3) What changes when bait isn’t “fresh” anymore, do rats no
longer eat it? What factors might make bait unpalatable
for rats?
4) Capabilities of non-target species to access bait in a station?
5) How do trap placement and recall operations in bush
areas work?
6) What do the placement operations look like?
7) Bag sizes and other equipment requirements?
8) General operation of station placement, and maintenance.
How is a station set, how is it refilled.
The cleaning of tunnels is a major aspect of their function. Each time a station is serviced they remove any debris that may have found its way into the tunnel, often with a small plastic scraper that can be hard to get into the small corners of the stations. Snails are often found in stations that they must remove. They suggested having an easy way to clear a tunnel of debris like the internal walls being attached to the top of the station, potentially a slide away floor.
Run through tunnels are preferred, designs where the rat can see all the way through the tunnel unobstructed so that they can see an exit and know they aren’t entering a fully enclosed space.
Stations are sometimes required to be placed in fully concreted areas like parking lots. In the past stations have been glued to heavy pavers to keep them in place. This is something to be especially considered moving into the CBD.
PFW rarely put more than 100 grams of bait in a station at a time confirming my earlier suspicions. When looking for full eradication John referred to presenting the bait as a “premium”. This means that the bait should be as attractive as possible to rats. Bait degrades fairly quickly out in the field and absorbs water making rats ignore it. This is part of the reason they replace bait so regularly.
When they refill stations they measure the amount of bait remaining in the station and measure out 100 grams of fresh bait. On a hopper design it could be possible to make that hopper removable and keep most of the unused bait inside. This would make the bait removal process much smoother. Putting the new bait in the hopper could also act as a scoop to measure out the right amount of bait and then directly clip back onto the station.
Often extra lures are placed inside the station like peanut butter to increase the smell of the station and to attract rats. Currently this is just smeared inside the station and can become another thing to clean out. Having a defined spot for this could be good.
Pre-Baiting as a technique is rarely used. It is only really applied in areas where there is a significant risk of a dog getting in and they want to check if a dog could actually break in first.
A modular clip design for the mounting points could be a good option. Think of a stake that could be pushed into the ground and then the station can clip on top. This could be swapped out for a unit that can be nailed to a post or tree or something to attach to concrete surfaces.
I went out with Jed, a field operator at Predator Free Wellington to observe station placement operations and identify pain points and issues with existing stations. The stations used were Zip Lola's that had been modified by the people at PFW.
The amount of different terrain is high:
During my time following Jed, six ZIP Lola stations were placed and each one was in slightly different positions. Notably one was slid deep underneath a tree trunk covered by dense vines.
This highlights the need for flexible mounting options if station placement is going to be fast and easy. The use of a screw on mounting system is a good option but only works when a vertical surface is available, which can be rare in the bush.
The GoldenRod and bungee cord system is obviously effective and something similar to that could be adapted into a design alongside a stake. Stakes can also find issues however and can be insufficient to hold a station secure in very soft ground or may not be able to enter very hard ground.
Entryways have to be flush with the ground:
One of the main considerations when placing a station was making sure that both ends of the tunnel were directly against the ground. This helps to remove barriers to entry for a rat and applies to most other station types as well.
Dirt and leaf litter is applied to the floor:
With each station placement a small amount of dirt and leaves were put into each tunnel to make it a more natural
feeling for rats. This is also done to any other stations that the rat would enter. The GoldenRod system could be improved: Jed mentioned that he had cut his fingers many times on the sharp edges of the rebar rods when trying to pull the bungee cords over the tunnel. It also sometimes took a few tries to find a bungee loop of the right length for the rod spacing.
Water damage is a major issue with existing designs:
Every one of the Lola stations had a strip of duct tape over the top and bottom to cover up the holes that can be used to screw the tunnel to an object.
PFW (and other operations) will often modify stations:
The Zip Lola tunnels that were used had modified bait mounting using a set of 4 screws punched through the bottom of the station. The bait blocks fitted over these screws were held secure by a small rubber cap. The standard method is a small tray. PFW also ignores 4 out of the 6 screws used to close the tunnel, seeing them
as a waste of time.
Cleaning out the stations is particularly fiddly:
Both the Pelgar and the protecta have a number of raised edges and compartments that make scraping
debris out the station difficult. A flat, smooth base can help with this.
Block bait is always used in public areas:
In stations placed in direct view of a road, path or in a backyard block bait is always used. This is because it can be fixed directly to a solid metal rod and is more secure inside the trap. A station has to be able to take both block and pellet bait easily.
Clearing out droppings is important:
Checking for droppings inside a station is an easy way to identify if rats have visited. Each service the droppings are removed so that any new droppings can beidentified to tell if rats have visited again.
There is a trade off to be had with bait blocks:
One advantage of the blocks of bait is that rat bite marks can be identified on the blocks that remain in the station. This can’t be done as easily with pellet bait. Some stations are mounted directly to solid objects: All of the Protecta stations were screwed directly to the side of a Wooden DOC trap. While this isn’t a placement strategy that is used often anymore it shows that mounting directly to a solid object works well.
A design where rats can easily enter and leave has a trade off:
If a station doesn’t require rats to fully enter they become unlikely to leave identifiable droppings. This makes it slightly harder to identify what is taking the bait and chew cards would be relied upon more. The trade off may be worth it though if a rat is more willing to enter a more open station.
Unattached stations can be knocked around easily:
The stations are made of light and thin plastic and if they aren’t strapped to the ground they can be knocked and
blown around.
Stations can require a considerable turn from the rats:
Both the Protecta and PelGar stations need the rat to enter a set of rooms separate to the main. A rat would have to turn roughly 90 degrees and move its shoulders and front legs into the compartment to access the bait. This is a point of interaction that could be smoothed out to remove barriers to entry.
Stations should be easy to clean
Each time a station is serviced, debris and old bait is removed, often with a scraper. This process should be quick and easy.
Run through tunnels are preferred
If a rat can see all the way through a station to an easy exit it is more likely to enter.
Bait must be protected from water
Bait will absorb water quickly in some stations requiring replacement and reducing the chance a rat will interact with it.
Function in urban spaces
Mounting points for areas without soft ground like the CBD must be considered.
Accommodation for Lures
Defining a place for lures to sit inside
the station can make cleaning and
application smoother.
Mounting flexibility must be high
The variety of places stations can be placed is high, the station must have
options for all of them.
Mounting must be stable
Stations have to have low risk of wobbling around as this can deter rats.
Entryways must be flush with a surface
This makes it easier for a rat to enter and removes obstacles for them.
Dirt and leaf litter can be applied
Placing dirt and leaf litter to the floor of a station can make it more normal feeling for rats
Must be highly durable
Stations can take a lot of abuse in the field, not just from the elements but from rats and other animals.
Must exclude non-target species
Species other than rats and mustelids must be fully excluded from entry.
Filling and servicing processes
The process of removing old bait and
adding new must be quick and easy.
Barriers inside the station
Removing walls and compartments on the inside of the station could require less effort from a rat to reach the bait.
Able to take many kinds of bait
Current stations have ways to hold both pellet form bait and block bait when higher security is required.
A simple inner layout
Simplifying the inner layout of the station and removing barriers for rats to access the bait could provide a distinct advantage over other stations.