Criminal Justice System
Tightening New Zealand's Justice System
Introduction
New Zealand's criminal justice system plays an imperative role in holding societal values, protecting individual rights, and maintaining public safety. As our nation strives for a more equal and efficient system, there is growing recognition of the need to tighten existing structures. By observing current challenges, drawing insights from global benchmarks, and considering evidence-based reforms, this report seeks to provide a brief analysis of the path forward. As the call for a more effective and just system gains momentum, the following sections will dig into proposed reforms and their potential outcomes, aiming to contribute to informed decision-making and a renewed commitment to a fair and balanced criminal justice structure.
What is the process for sentencing violent crimes in New Zealand?
First, we need to look at the sentencing process in order to understand. There are lots of crucial steps in the process of sentencing violent ofences in New Zealand. Following an investigation and an arrest, the criminal appears in court for the first time and enters a plee. It is possible to ask for a pre-sentence report that gives background information. A victim impact statement may be provided by the victim. The judge takes into account the nature of the offence, the harm done, the offender's responsibility, and the likelyhood of rehabilitation when determining the appropriate sentence. There are several possible punishments, such as jail time, fines, and community service. The sentence is apealable by both the prosecution and the defence. In incarceration instances, parole may be taken into account. The objective is to ensure that justice is done by thoroughly analyzing the particulars of each case.
What countries have the lowest crime rate, and what are their approaches?
Iceland, Japan, Switzerland, Singapore, and Norway are a few nations with a reputation for having lower crime rates. These countrys use a variety of strategies to keep crime rates low. Iceland places a heavy emphasis on social welfare and neighborhood-focused policing. Japan places a heavy focus on education, tight firearms regulation, and a shared feeling of responsibility for public safety. With its militia system and preference for rehabilitation over imprisonment, Switzerland encourages public participation in law enforcement. Singapore has strict penalties, stern law enforcement, and vast surveillance infrastructure. Rehabilatative care and social reintegration are given top priority in Norway, which also highlight the value of a strong welfare state and active participation by the public in crime prevention.
What New Zealand is Currently Doing to Deter Crime
New Zealand was employing an all-round approach to deter crime. NZ have been emphasising community-based initiatives, such as comunity policing, to build positive relationships between law enforcement and residents. Restorative justice programs have also been used, aiming to address the root causes of criminal behaviour and promoting accountability and reconciliation. Early intervention programs targeting at risk youth aim to provide support and guidance before delinquency occurs. New Zealand has been focusing on addressing social and economic factors that contribute to crime, including efforts to reduce poverty and improve access to education and healthcare. Moreover, a balance between punitive measures and rehabilitation has been sought, recognizing that both elements play a role in deterring crime. This includes diversionary programs for certain offenders to help them avoid the cycle of criminality. However, I have chosen three reliable and effective methods including rehabilitation, stricter laws, and early intervention.
Different Solutions
There are many different theoretical solutions to mitigate violent crimes. However, a great percentage of these are just ideologies and would take years to put into place. Some of these theories include the Situational Crime prevention theory which aims to change environments and focuses on the how rather than why a crime happens. It’s meant to reduce the risks and opportunities for crime. Another theory involves heavier or harsher punishment. The punishment could vary from physical bodily damage or VERY heavy fines. This is said to set an example to other criminals and the punished individual, making them think twice before commiting a crime. These solutions could be a possible crime prevention option, but they are too time-consuming and harsh. I present the following solutions: Rehabilitation, Stricter laws, Early intervention
Rehabilitation
Criminal rehabilitation involves addressing the underlying causes of criminal behaviour. It includes programs for skills development, education, and therapy to promote personal growth and reintegration into society. Restorative justice practices aim to repair harm caused by crimes and foster accountability. Offenders are encouraged to take responsibility, make amends to victims, and engage in community service. Rehabilitation efforts are often comunity-based, focusing on individual needs and cooperation among various agencies. The goal is to reduce recidivism and create opportunities for offenders to lead law-abiding lives, while also fostering safer and more inclusive communities.
Stricter Laws
Stricter laws in New Zealand act as deterents by increasing the perceived risks of commiting crimes. They raise the potential consequences for lawbreakers, discouraging criminal behaviour. By imposing harsher penalties, such as longer sentences or heavier fines, the legal system aims to dissuade individuals from engaging in illegal activities. The threat of severe punishment can influence potential offenders to reconsider their actions, contributing to a decrease in crime rates.
Early Intervention
Early intervention in New Zealand focuses on identifying and adressing risk factors in youth that could lead to criminal behaviour. By providing targeted support, such as counselling, mentorship, and skill development, at an early age, the aim is to prevent the development of delinquent tendencies. Addressing issues like family instability, substance abuse, and educational challenges can divert young people away from the path of crime. By intervening before behavioral patterns become entrenched, New Zealand's approach seeks to empower at-risk youth with the tools to make positive life choices.
Thesis
After looking at my fertile question, I have determined that tighter regulations and rules need to be implemented using my notes, numerical data, and PMI table. I believe this because tighter laws can give victims of violent crimes more protection and can send a clear message that a society does not accept violence and that those who conduct violent acts will face a severe response from the legal system. Policy makers anticipate that tougher penaltys for violent crimes will detter people from acting violently in the first place. The idea is that people will think twice before doing violent acts if they have the possibility of receiving harsh punishment.
The Final Conclusion
Using my notes, numerical data, and PMI table, I have established that the most effective and reliable solution out of rehabilitation, stricter laws and early intervention, calls for the implementation of stricter laws and regulations. I think this is because stricter rules can better protect victims of violent crimes and send the message loud and clear that society does not tolerate violence and that those who commit violent acts will be dealt with harshly by the judicial system. Vast surveillance will help ensure that public crimes are deterred as cameras will capture a description. Tougher punishments for violent crimes are anticipated by policymakers to deter people from acting aggressively in the first place. People are supposed to think twice before acting violently if they risk earning a severe punishment.
Bibliography
,Baier, Nadine. Fitting the Time to the Crime: Sentencing for Homicide. 23 Feb. 2020
com, Law. “New Zealand Law Commission: R139 Understanding Family Violence: Reforming the Criminal Law Relating to Homicide.” Www.lawcom.govt.nz, 26 Aug. 2011, www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/html-pubs/r139/Chapter+11+-+Sentencing+for+homicide/Sentencing+for+manslaughter.html. Accessed 2 Aug. 2, 2023.
Courts of New Zealand, “Sentencing Decisions.” Courts of New Zealand, 12 Sept. 2011, www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/about-the-judiciary/how-decisions-are-made/sentencing/. Accessed 8 Aug. 8, 2023.
,govt.nz, Justice. “Sentencing | New Zealand Ministry of Justice.” Www.justice.govt.nz, 15 Jan. 2013, www.justice.govt.nz/courts/going-to-court/without-a-lawyer/representing-yourself-criminal-high-court/sentencing/. Accessed 23 Apr. 2023.
“What Works to Reduce Crime | New Zealand Ministry of Justice.” Www.justice.govt.nz, 29 Sept. 2022, www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/what-works-to-reduce-crime/. Accessed 9 Aug. 9, 2023.
govt.nz, Police, “Prevention First.” New Zealand Police, 21 Apr. 2020, www.police.govt.nz/about-us/programmes-initiatives/prevention-first. Accessed 1 Aug. 1, 2023.
,Grant, Andrew. “Five Tools for Making NZ “Tough on Crime” – the Right Way.” The Spinoff, 7 Sept. 2022, thespinoff.co.nz/society/07-09-2022/five-tools-for-making-NZ-tough-on-crime-the-right-way. Accessed 4 Aug. 4, 2023.
Kawa, Te. Better Public Services Result 7: Reducing Serious Crime. 30 Oct. 2019.
MeanLibrary, Virtual. “SENTENCE of LIFE IMPRISONMENT -- WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN? | Office of Justice Programs Www.ojp.gov, 9 Dec. 2014, www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/sentence-life-imprisonment-what-does-it-really-mean. Accessed 10 Aug. 10, 2023.
Magazines, journals, “Crime Prevention Doc.” Govt.nz, 2023, www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj01/spj1-crime-prevention.doc. Accessed 10 Aug. 10, 2023.
Master, Nation. “New Zealand vs. the United Kingdom: Crime Facts and Stats.” Nationmaster.com, 22 Aug. 2019, www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/New-Zealand/United-Kingdom/Crime. Accessed 9 Aug. 9, 2023.
Émigré, JulyNorth, Samantha. “11 Safest Countries in the World: 2022 Edition.” Digital Émigré, 3, 2022, digitalemigre.com/relocation/safest-countries-in-the-world/. Accessed 8 Aug. 8, 2023.
of NZ, District Court. “Criminal Procedure | the District Court of New Zealand.” Www.districtcourts.govt.nz, 31 July 2022, www.districtcourts.govt.nz/criminal-court/criminal-procedure/. Accessed 1 Aug. 1, 2023.
F.,Pol, Ronald F. “Has New Zealand Identified the Causes of Crime?” Inquiries Journal, vol. 8, no. 02, 15 Nov. 2016, www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1349/has-New Zealand-identified-the-causes-of-crime. Accessed 11 Aug. 11, 2019.
Team, The Finder. “How Safe Is New Zealand: New Zealand Crime Rates?” Moovaz, 26 Oct. 2021, www.moovaz.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-new-zealand-crime-rates/. Accessed 5 Aug. 5, 2023.
ww.macrotrends.net, MayTrends, Macro . “New Zealand Crime Rate & Statistics 1990-2022.” Www.macrotrends.net, 18, 2021, www.macrotrends.net/countries/NZL/new-zealand/crime-rate-statistics. Accessed 3 Aug. 3, 2023.
NovemberTuruki, Beehive. TURUKI! TURUKI! MOVE TOGETHER! Transforming Our Criminal Justice System the Second Report of Te Uepū Hāpai I Te Ora Safe and Effective Justice Advisory Group. 3 Nov. 2021
Review, JulyWorld Population Review. “Crime Rate by Country 2023.” World Population Review, 13, 2023, worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/crime-rate-by-country. Accessed 7 Aug. 7, 2023.