Orbital precession
The study of the dynamics of a two-body system in modified gravity constitutes a more complex problem than in Newtonian gravity. Numerical methods are typically needed to solve the equations of geodesics. Despite the complexity of the problem, the study of a two-body system in f(R) gravity leads to a new exciting perspective hinting the right strategy to adopt in order to probe modified gravity. Our results point out some differences between the semiclassical (Newtonian) approach, and the relativistic (geodesic) one thus suggesting that the latter represents the best strategy for future tests of modified theories of gravity. Finally, we have also highlighted the capability of forthcoming observations to serve as smoking gun of modified gravity revealing a departure from GR or further reducing the parameter space of f(R) gravity [1,2,3].
Figure: Numerical integration of the equation of motion. Specifically, panels (a), (d), and (g) show the results of thesemiclassicalapproach, while in the other panels the results of the numerical integration of the geodesics are depicted.
We have applied our methodology to the stars orbiting the Galacitc Centre. For more details see S-Stars.
General prescriptions to analyze the orbital motion of S-stars
Relativistic equations of motion for massive particles can be obtained from the geodesic equations for time-like geodesics of the metric
These equations provide differential equations for the four space-time components t(s), r(s), θ(s), φ(s), where s is an affine parameter (the proper time of the star, in our case), that can be numerically integrated once the initial conditions are specified. Initial conditions t(0), r(0), θ(0), φ(0) and numerical values of the parameters are set to integrate numerically the aforementioned equations. A convenient way to place the initial conditions is to assume that θ(0)= π/2 (the star initially lies on the equatorial plane of the reference system) and that its first and second derivatives are equally set to zero (i.e. its initial velocity is initially parallel to the equatorial plane). Initial conditions for r and φ, on the other hand, can be inferred from the orbital elements describing the Keplerian orbit of the star: the semi-major axis a, the eccentricity e, the inclination i, the angle of the line of node Ω, the angle from ascending node to pericentre ω, the orbital period T and the time of the pericentre passage tp. These orbital parameters are time-dependent. Thus, they should be interpreted as the ones of the osculating ellipse at the initial time.
In particular, we set for simplicity the initial conditions at the time of passage at apocentre, where velocity is zero. Therefore, both the true anomaly φ and the eccentric anomaly Φ are equal to π. Thus, the Cartesian coordinates of the star, expressed in the orbital plane, at the initial time are:
Using these quantities, we retrieve the initial radial and angular coordinates on the orbital plane and the respective velocities. Finally, the initial condition for the first derivative of the time descends from the normalization of the metric to the speed of light. Once orbits are integrated, a projection in the reference frame of a distant observer is needed. Such a projection can be performed by means of the Thiele-Innes relations to obtain positions and velocities.
A few effects (both relativistic and classical) need to be taken into account to compare the predicted positions of S2 in the reference frame of a distant observer, (x, y, z), and their velocities in it, with the observational data.
The Rømer delay
Frequency shift
where
Other relativistic effects could potentially modify the astrometric positions of the observed star, like the Shapiro delay, the Lense-Thirring effect on both the orbit and the photon (in the case of a rotating BH) or the gravitational lensing of the light rays emitted by the star. At the present sensitivity of measurements, though, only the Rømer delay and the periastron advance (which is naturally considered in our treatment) are detectable.
More details can be found in the Supplementary Materials of Ref. [4]. Having this general scheme in mind we have applied it to:
Bibliography:
I. De Martino, R. Lazkoz, M. De Laurentis, "Analysis of the Yukawa gravitational potential in f (R) gravity I: semiclassical periastron advance", 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 97, 104067
M. De Laurentis, I. De Martino, R. Lazkoz, "Analysis of the Yukawa gravitational potential in f (R) gravity II: relativistic periastron advance", 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 97, 104068
M. De Laurentis, I. De Martino, R. Lazkoz, "Modified gravity revealed along geodesic tracks", 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C, 78, 916
De Martino, I., della Monica, R., De Laurentis, M., "f (R ) gravity after the detection of the orbital precession of the S2 star around the Galactic Center massive black hole", 2021,Phys. Rev. D, 104, L101502.
Della Monica, R., de Martino, I., de Laurentis, M., "Orbital precession of the S2 star in Scalar-Tensor-Vector-Gravity", 2022, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 510, 4757-4766
Della Monica, R., de Martino, I., "Unveiling the nature of SgrA* with the geodesic motion of S-stars", 2022, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 03, 007
Della Monica, R., de Martino, I., Vernieri, D., de Laurentis, M., "Testing Horndeski gravity with S2 star orbit", 2023, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc, 519, 1981-1988
M. Cadoni, M. De Laurentis, I. De Martino, R. Della Monica, M. Oi, A. P. Sanna, "Are nonsingular black holes with super-Planckian hair ruled out by S2 star data?", 2023, Physical Review D, 107, 044038
R. Fernández Fernández, R. Della Monica, I. de Martino, "Constraining an Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton-axion black hole at the Galactic Center with the orbit of the S2 star", 2023, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023, 039
Della Monica, R., de Martino, I., "Narrowing the allowed mass range of the ultralight bosons with S2 star", 2023, Astron. Astroph., L4, 8