Schedule at a Glance
(scroll down or click on link for access to presentation titles and abstracts)
**Open to single day delegates**
Professor Anne Watson, Emeritus Professor of Mathematics Education at the University of Oxford, has, since retirement, focused on working with teachers and teacher educators on the relationships among curriculum, tasks, pedagogy and learning from the points of view of fidelity with mathematical concepts and modes of inquiry. She says:
"During 2010 I was persuaded to convene the ICMI Study on Task Design. I was disappointed with what emerged from that study, and in my talk will say why, what I wish had emerged instead, where I find other examples of transformative thinking and why these might be problematic for teachers and education systems."
Presentation recording, slides
Leslie Dietiker: Narrative Characteristics of HS Math Lessons Students Find Interesting
This study compares the way the mathematical ideas emerge and develop across enacted lessons in lessons students rate as most interesting with those the same students rate as least interesting. Using the mathematical story framework, which interprets unfolding mathematical ideas as a form of narrative, it begins to answer the question: When enacted high school mathematics lessons are interpreted as mathematical stories, what narrative characteristics, if any, distinguish the lessons that hold broad aesthetic appeal from those that do not? This study offers clear evidence that the lessons that held broad appeal for students have distinctive characteristics of their mathematical plots, namely, their mathematical questions stayed open for more parts of the story, collectively spanned more of the story, and offered incremental progress periodically throughout the lesson. Furthermore, as a group, captivating lessons offered a far greater number of instances of misdirection. In contrast to lessons with low aesthetic value, the captivating lessons offered a dramatic rise in how many questions were open simultaneously, reflecting a thickening of the plot. The analysis demonstrates how analyzing lessons with this framework can enable a new way of understanding mathematical learning experiences and their impacts on students.
Beverly Irby and Rafael Lara-Alecio: Designing Research-based Virtual Professional Development and Virtual Mentoring and Coaching
Addressing professional development needs of leaders and teachers can be addressed through the use of effective Virtual Professional Development (VPD). This presentation will share the design and development of the VPD, along with Virtual Mentoring and Coaching (VMC), and we will share research that exemplify the impact of large scale efforts to provide school districts across the United States with access to a variety of online learning options to meet the growing professional needs. While VPD occurred before the COVID-19 pandemic, educators have found value in the expansion of the online offerings throughout the pandemic due to the value of timely and flexible professional development offered as a VPD, along with VMC.
Tom Button: Designing Data Science courses for pre-university Mathematics students
Over the past three years MEI has designed and implemented two optional data science courses for pre-university Mathematics students (aged 16-18). One of these courses is an open-access self-study course and the other is a taught programme, delivered via online lessons. In this session we will describe the major decisions taken when designing these courses.
We will cover three main issues that we have addressed: how to develop students’ ability to make decision based on the context of the data; how to use a programming language without the course feeling like a coding course; how to introduce machine learning to students working at this level. There will be an opportunity to explore some of the resources and also discuss the implications for introducing data science to students at this level.
Tabitha Gould: Coffee in the garden: Stirring metaphors and professional learning into the design of a new online resource for mathematics practitioners, from Cambridge Mathematics
Cambridge Mathematics aims to make use of the best quality available research and evidence to create the Framework; a dynamic offered vision of mathematics, a landscape, that is connected, flexible, coherent, and most importantly, accessible for all. As we consider ways in which we can design resources to enrich and communicate aspects of the Framework to support practitioners, we find ourselves teasing out more and more depth and detail from our design principles, all the time knee-deep in metaphors as we attempt to characterise both the resources and experiences that we imagine.
In this workshop we will focus on the principle of connectedness and coherence in mathematics, and the ways in which connections might be embodied within and between concepts. We will explore and challenge metaphors of mathematics as physical space and think about the ways in which these could be utilised to shift or reimagine perceptions of mathematics and the journeys that we invite learners to take. This will include a discussion of some specific design decisions that have, and could, be made, to create the beta-version of our online professional learning experience: Journeymaths.
Janette Bobis: Designing sequences of challenging tasks to promote student agency and inclusion
We report on the Exploring Mathematical Sequences of Connected, Cumulative and Challenging tasks [EMC3] research project that is examining how Variation Theory can inform the construction and implementation of sequences of learning experiences to promote student agency in mathematics learning for a diverse range of students. In this presentation we outline the rationale and some key components of the approach to teaching mathematics we adopted while working with early years students (5-8 years of age) and their teachers from two large Australian school systems over three years. Teacher questionnaire responses (n = 100) and interview data (n = 10) will be drawn upon to report their perspectives of the effectiveness of certain task design features and various teaching practices aimed at developing student conceptual understanding, agency and inclusion in mathematics.
Minoru Ohtani: Development of STEAM education in KUSH
This paper presents a development of STEM approach in mathematics at Kanazawa University Senior High School, which aims at inquiry-based, collaborative, and cross-curricular learning in high school mathematics. The mathematics department at Kanazawa University is focusing on the potential richness of the RME theory developed by the RME approach and is engaged in three main activities. These are (1) the use of Math A-lympiad tasks in integrated learning time, (2) the improvement of the content and teaching of existing subjects by utilizing the cross-curricular modules developed in the Mascil project, and (3) the organization of inquiry activities by extracurricular clubs using the National Common Exam questions developed by Cito. These activities are generally aimed at developing the ability to understand the phenomena of daily life and society mathematically, and to process and solve problems mathematically. In this paper, we discuss the qualities and abilities we aim to cultivate by presenting concrete examples of the three activities and point out the importance of the "reality principle," "interaction principle," and "association principle" in RME theory, respectively, for designing inquiry-based, collaborative, and cross-curricular learning.
Marita Barabash and Elena Naftaliev: Educated use of technology-based interactive resources: flexibility and versatility of the teachers’ mathematical knowledge is one of the crucial factors for success
The study focuses on ways of enhancing mathematics teachers’ educated use of Technology-Based Interactive Resources (TBIRs) in merging the Experimental-Mathematics (EM) with Formal Mathematics (FM). The study implies amalgamation of three aspects of teachers’ professional knowledge: mathematical knowledge needed for EM – FM merging (e.g., Borwein, 2016); pedagogical functions of TBIRs (e.g., Naftaliev, 2018); instrumentational orchestration (e.g., Gueudet & Trouche, 2012). Our search for causes enhancing and those impeding the teachers’ ability and vigilance in implementing this approach is ongoing. Nevertheless, one of our conclusions already at this point is that the teachers face the necessity of adjusting the familiar concepts, their definitions, appearances, and concept images to those relevant and applicable in computer platforms. Teachers’ versatility and flexibility in dealing with mathematical concepts appears to be sine qua non for successful and lasting implementation of the approach.
Frans van Galen & Chris Schunn: Rich mathematics education in a traditional context: Strategies for meeting in the middle through strategic educational design
Traditional mathematics education continues to be the dominant mode of instruction, and political rhetoric sometimes declares reform instruction as failed. Fully implementing reform instruction, with rich problem solving that extends over many days of classroom instruction, has been ruled out. What strategies can educational designers use to fit within what is allowable? We discuss two case studies, one from the Netherlands and one from the US, that involve lesson materials design/selection and teacher professional development that seek to find a middle ground.
Leslie Dietiker: Teacher Lesson Design with the Mathematical Story Framework
In this session, I will get feedback on the design of a Professional Learning module that supports secondary prospective teachers in learning about lesson design from the Mathematically Captivating Learning Experiences (MCLE) Project. Depending on how much time is allotted, I will share some or all of one lesson designed by a high school teacher using the mathematical story framework. Participants will be invited to reflect on the potential aesthetic opportunities of the mathematical development across the lesson and how its design supports (or thwarts) them. Then, some core design principles introduced in the module will be analyzed by pairs. Finally, the session will end with a discussion analyzing the use of a model lesson to support teacher learning of lesson design.
This panel will explore contemporary design issues in relation to mathematics and science learning. Contributions will primarily come from those currently involved in working closely with teachers involved in providing inclusive practices.
Contributing will be:
Daniel Alcazar-Roman, Associate Director of the The Learning Design Group at the Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkley.
Dr Andrew Howes, works in science education at the University of Manchester. His research is into science education and disadvantage and his design work has had this as a focus.
Dr Peter Wright, convenes the Teaching Maths for Social Justice Network and has recently designed lessons that support such teaching. He is currently in the process of moving positions at UCL, IoE to the University of Dundee.
Designing multi-representational learning
Professor Shaaron Ainsworth convenes the Learning Sciences Research Institute (LSRI) in the School of Education at the University of Nottingham. This is a vibrant, multi-disciplinary group who are learning about learning - through collaboration, invention, implementation, and dissemination. Her research interests are concerned with the development and evaluation of psychological theories of teaching and learning - broadly falling into the area of learning sciences.
presentation recording, slides
Elena Naftaliev and Marita Barabash: Experimental mathematics at school: teachers’ engagement with interactive resources
The study focuses on ways of enhancing mathematics teachers educated use of Technology-Based Interactive Resources (TBIRs) in merging the Experimental-Mathematics (EM) with Formal Mathematics (FM). In the research we refer to factors that, merged, have the potential not only of adjusting present teaching practices to newly available platforms and resources but also of supporting mathematics teachers in developing professional orientations that will lead them down the ever-evolving paths of educational technology, helping them to make educated choices about this aspect of their professional lives. We have designed and analysed professional development program offering the teachers relevant experience in learning, teaching, and designing resources on their own.
The study implies amalgamation of three aspects of teachers’ professional knowledge: mathematical knowledge needed for EM – FM merging (e.g., Borwein, 2016); pedagogical functions of TBIRs (e.g., Naftaliev, 2018); instrumentational orchestration (e.g., Gueudet & Trouche, 2012).
Tony Hall, Michelle Millar, Connie O'Regan, Natalie Walsh & Grace Mannion: Designing Futures: The role of educational design in embedding a large-scale transformative university initiative
Funded by the Irish Government (2020-2025), Designing Futures is a flagship educational programme at the University of Galway, Ireland, the purpose of which is to enhance students’ holistic learning experience in higher education, supporting their entrepreneurial confidence and capacity and their personal and professional career development. Designing Futures achieves national policy objectives in higher education, specifically in terms of preparing students for the complex and uncertain world we live in today. This research presentation focuses on how we can best deploy educational design to create sustainable and scalable, innovative initiatives in higher education, to enhance the experience of all students, across all disciplines, promoting student engagement, diversity and inclusion. The research presentation will outline the design and development of the Designing Futures project so far, including the range of innovations being implemented across campus in Galway. These include research-based collaborative projects undertaken by students alongside faculty (vertically integrated projects (VIPs); Stanford University’s Design Your Life/Life Design, to enhance student’s personal and career development; and the IdeasLab on campus, a bespoke space promoting students’ capacity for innovation and entrepreneurship, through design thinking, for example.
Shelley Rap and Alex Friedlander: Possibilities and limits in the design of an interdisciplinary program
David C. Webb: Spark Math: Lessons Learned in Co-Designing Instructional Resources for Mathematics that Support Executive Function and Student Engagement
Over the past two years, a team of researchers, school administrators and teachers (https://www.sparkmath.org/) have been co-designing Grade 6 mathematics resources that integrate executive function (EF) in ways that reflect better student interests. Executive function processes – e.g., working memory, inhibitory control, flexible thinking – have been introduced and developed alongside mathematical activities. Through this process we have explored the tensions and synergies between achieving mathematics content goals and ways to recognize and develop EF processes.
Multiple design challenges are at play in this project:
What are synergies among related goals for content and EF (i.e., EF+Math) that can be experienced as instructional activities?
How can students’ assets related to EF be elicited while attending to explicit discussions of EF processes that are interesting to Grade 6 students?
How can problem contexts, representations and games be used to create opportunities for the development of EF processes?
In this design presentation, participants will experience some Spark Math lessons and activities. In addition, I will also share lessons learned to date regarding the importance of co-design as a strategy support teacher and student use of unfamiliar and innovative instructional materials.
Kristen Tripet: Elementary mathematics teachers learning through inquiry
Researchers have examined different approaches, processes, and resources to understand and identify characteristics of effective professional learning (PL) for teachers. Some characteristics of effective PL that have emerged from this research work include: practice-based learning; drawing on teachers’ practical knowledge and experience; school-based programs; learning in community (Borko et al., 2010; Chapman, 2011).
In this presentation, we explore a PL program designed to build elementary teachers’ capability in delivering mathematics instruction. The program has been designed around effective characteristics of PL, with a key feature being school-based Communities of Inquiry (CoI), that is communities of teachers’ who engage in “systematic, intentional study of their own practice to create something new or different in terms of their knowledge and teaching” (Chapman, 2011). Those attending this presentation will experience selected aspects of the PL program and consider ways that CoI can be used more broadly to enhance teacher knowledge and practices.
This conversation will focus on designing for "out of school" learning. This will provide insight into how those with a remit to design for "informal" learning go about this task. The conversation will be stimulated by two plenary inputs: (i) from a designer involved in the UK's first National Maths Discovery Centre and a designer of approaches to introducing youngsters (and adults) to natural history - which recently has had a national qualification designed for 16-year olds.
Joe Krajcik of Michigan State University winner of the 2020 ISDDE Prize will provide a plenary in which he explores design principles in relation to his work that focuses on student active involvement and inquiry in science education.
presentation recording, slides
Marc Neesam: Designing professional development solutions for ministries of education: ideal vs practical vs reality
Ministries of education around the world issue tenders/requests for proposals and work directly with international and local organisations to generate and implement solutions to meet their needs e.g. a country shifting to competency-based learning may seek to support their teachers in that shift or a country implementing a new curriculum will want to upskill their workforce in the new expectations. At Cambridge, I lead the design of solutions focused on school leader and teacher professional development, both in response to ToRs/RfPs and through pro-active discussion with ministries. While we often start the design from an a position of providing an 'ideal' research informed solution the solution often needs to change to account for practical considerations and the reality the ministries are in such as; working at national scale, providing solutions within a fixed timeframe, having a limited budget or evolving needs. This workshop will explore the challenge of adaptive solution design for ministries of education through raising some case studies, discussion and a role-play game where participants can act as Cambridge solution designers who have to adapt to emerging information.
Mariam Makramalla: Cross-contextual Curricular Exchange: How to make it work best
The recent shift to a global classroom, initiated by the COVID pandemic has shed light on the growing trend of cross-contextual exchange in education. As we see a growing movement of displaced learners and a growing international trend of cross-border collaborations in curricular design and curricular implementation, it is imperative to bring together existing work on cross context curricular exchange, in order to facilitate a curricular implementation that is well aligned with the underpinning ethos of the curriculum design (which in many cases has taken place outside of the context aimed for in implementation). In this workshop, I am keen on utilising the collective expertise in the room in bringing together an initial framework for cross contextual curricular exchange. The framework is envisioned to spread out over two layers: one relating to cross contextual translation of curricular ethos and the other relating to the translation between curricular envisioning in the design phase and curricular integration in the implementation phase. I am keen to bring together stakeholders that have been recipients and transferrers of curricular exchange around the same table, in the interest of developing a framework that works for both parties.
Marie Joubert: Designing for mastery in maths: Key principles and design features
The Centres for Excellence in Mathematics project (2018 – 2023) works with students who had previously not attained well in mathematics. Within the project, a ‘teaching for mastery’ approach, which is based on five key principles, was promoted. Our team, at the University of Nottingham, developed a set of twelve exemplar lessons which aimed to support teachers in adopting a mastery approach in their teaching and to develop their understanding of the approach. The lessons were based on a implicit ‘design features’, which we attempted, post-hoc, to make more explicit.
In this workshop, we will analyse two of the lessons, through the two lenses of the key principles and the design features. We will consider whether and how the design features capture the essence and detail of the lessons and the extent to which these can be used to guide the development of future lessons.
Winner of the 2021 ISDDE Prize, Charles's work in Australia focuses on teachers and the act of teaching. His designing of mathematics materials support experiences that inform, challenge and support teachers in their day-to-day work. Modestly he has always claimed that the lessons "came from teachers across Australia" but it is remarkable how those that passed through Charles' hands proved exceptional!
presentation recording, access to maths300, Ed Designer paper
Jo Sibley: What's so hard about the C in CPD?
Why are teachers not just students, but taller? At MEI we're trying to address the subtle and less-subtle ways in which designing PD for teachers is different from lesson design for students and how these differences must be attended to if teachers are to be able to access AND engage with high quality ongoing development throughout their careers. We'll take a look at some examples of activities designed with this in mind.
Gary Benenson: Thinking Inside the (Computer) Box
Amid the worldwide push for education in computer science or computational thinking at all levels, the meaning of these terms is typically focused almost entirely on algorithms, coding and simulation. Little or no attention is given to how computers work, nor the principles guiding their operation. As a result, these ubiquitous devices remain mysterious. To demystify them, for example, students ought to gain some understanding of what “codes” are, before they are introduced to “coding”. This workshop is based on a a curriculum effort taking place at the City University of New York, and being tested at both teacher education and upper elementary levels. The concepts addressed include logic circuits, binary codes, representation of information in digital formats, binary computation, data communication and data storage. Each topic is introduced through connections drawn from everyday experience, such as use of emojis, and supermarket scanners. These lead to hands-on activities, such as translating between binary and decimal, computing in binary, examining individual pixels displayed by cell phones, detecting and correcting errors in messages and deconstructing bar codes. The proposed workshop will engage participants in some of these activities, and present examples of student work at both college and elementary levels.
Rachael Horsman and Thomas Carter: Using the Cambridge Mathematics Framework to design in parallel
The Cambridge Mathematics Framework is a dynamic representation of the mathematical ideas learners aged from 3 to 19 may encounter. It emphasises the connected nature of the subject and has been designed to act as a boundary object. Accessed by several communities and being used for a variety of tasks, it is flexible enough to meet multiple needs and satisfy the given constraints, yet robust enough to enable communication and a shared identity between those involved. In this workshop we will explore how the Framework has been used to design a coherent outline for a college calculus course and, together with internal and external partners, (Arizona State University and Cambridge Press and Assessment), guide authored content. We will explore the way in which the design of the Framework has developed to meet these varied needs whilst acting as a unifying structure, considering its structure, content and functionality, We will also share some of our challenges and successes, and offer an opportunity for others to share their own experiences of working across multiple stakeholder groups.