0 

The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.

1-2. 

The student:

i. designs a basic testing method (for example, a single observation or short survey) to measure how successful the shoebox solution is

ii. states the overall success of the solution in general terms, with little or no reference to the design specifications or sustainability goals.

Typical example: The student tests the box once and says it “worked well” without showing data.

3-4 

The student:

i. designs a relevant testing method (such as a short questionnaire or simple drop test) that generates some data to measure success

ii. outlines the success of the solution against the design specification or sustainability criteria using limited product testing

iii. outlines ways the shoebox could be improved based on results

iv. outlines the impact of the shoebox on the client or target audience, such as its usefulness or appearance.

Typical example: The student collects some survey results and briefly connects them to one or two success criteria.

5-6

The student:

i. designs appropriate and varied testing methods (e.g. durability, capacity, and user feedback) that generate data to measure how successful and sustainable the shoebox is

ii. explains how well the solution meets each design specification and sustainability target using relevant product testing

iii. describes clear improvements to materials, structure, or usability based on testing evidence

iv. explains the impact of the shoebox on the client/target audience, showing awareness of both positive and negative aspects, with guidance.

Typical example: The student links charts or graphs from Google Forms to specific design criteria and explains what worked and what needs improvement.

7-8

The student:

i. describes detailed and relevant testing methods, producing accurate, reliable, and authentic data to measure the success and sustainability of the shoebox solution

ii. critically evaluates the success of the solution against all design specifications and sustainability criteria using evidence from comprehensive testing (physical trials, surveys, comparisons, or prototypes)

iii. explains, with evidence, how the shoebox could be improved—referencing results, client feedback, and sustainability analysis

iv. explains in detail the impact of the product on the client/target audience, considering usability, aesthetics, environmental responsibility, cost, and long-term effectiveness.

Typical example: The student triangulates physical test data (drop, load, and material audit) with user survey results, identifies strengths and weaknesses, and suggests tested improvements.