Prince Salim (who became Jahangir) at Allahabad 17th century, unknown artist
Jahangir's love for the art of painting was no less, and for realism it was more. Under him, Akbar's energetic naturalism was refined into a calmer and intensely realistic style capable of revealing not only the outer appearance but also its unique inner spirit.
Actually, as a rebel prince, he set up his independent studio at Allahabad much before he ascended the Mughal throne under the Persian painters Aqa Riza and his son Abu Hasan. He had equal appreciation for both, the simple version of his father's court art and the precise, flat and highly decorative style of Persian art, which Aqa Riza and his son practiced. After he ascended as the Emperor of Hindustan, he inspired his artists to develop their own individual styles, traits and talent and each to have a specialized area, Abu Hasan the court scenes and official portraits, Mansur nature study and history, Daulat all kinds of portraits and so on.
Jahangir Visiting the Ascetic Jadrup by artist Govardhan, circa 1616 - 1620, Musee Guimet, Paris
He favored elegant, small works with fewer illustrations worked singly by an artist. There was a shift in choice of themes also. Pleasures and pastimes of court life, portraits, studies of birds, animals and flowers, scenes derived from reproductions of European art, studies of holy men and so on were now the more favored subjects for painters. This suggests that Jahangir used art as both, as a thing of aesthetic beauty delighting the senses and heart, and as a record of those days, something that stored a thing or a moment for the concurrent human intellect as well for future
Whenever Jahangir was on outing for a pastime, hunting, or whatever, a team of his skilled artists accompanied him. A bird with the beauty of its feathers, or by its sportive frisking, or an unusual object, an animal, flower or anything, would catch his attention. Jahangir's art thus, presents the most authentic, and as much beautiful, natural history and to scholars studying birds and animals it is yet the most reliable data of the animal world of those days.
In fact, Jahangir's most valuable contribution to the knowledge of zoology was a portrait of the Mauritian bird, the dodo (Raphuscucullatus). An important link in the evolution of ducks, this flightless, primitive bird had become extinct by the end of the seventeenth century, "thanks to the active gastronomic interest taken in it by visiting European soldiers."
Modern scholars wishing to know its features had to depend for long on a not very accurate drawing by the Flemish artist Ronald Savery, made at Amsterdam between 1626 and 1628, while a Mughal depiction (attributed to the great artist Mansur) lay in oblivion. Dr. A. Ivanov of St Petersburg (Leningrad) discovered it in the collection of the Institute of Oriental studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. His paper created a sensation at the XII International Ornithological Congress at Helsinki in 1958; for this painting was found to be the most correct representation of the dodo. It was correctly made from a live specimen which seems to have been presented to Jahangir by a foreign visitor.
Professor Erwin Stresemann has dated this miniature to the last years of the emperor's life when ill-health had stopped his pen, and thus deprived the world of an eyewitness account of an exceedingly curious bird by one of the most interesting figures in Indian history and a naturalist par excellence.
Birds: Loriquet (Coryllis vernalis), Horned Pheasant (Tragopan melanocephalus), Dodo (Raphus cucullatus), Ducks, and Partridges (Illustration to the Baburnama),
Circa 1620 - 1625 (Institute of Oriental Studies. St. Petersburg)
Human portraits define another aspect of Jahangir's quest for record, this time to record the likeness of human world. Islam did not approve, or even his father Akbar did not favor portrayal, but for Jahangir it was no more a prohibited area, as without it the likeness of so many distinguished and great, would be lost. He was mad for the exceptional beauty of his queen Nurjahan.
He had exceptional regard for a 'sufi', a saint, or divine, and paid visit to his seat. He allowed Nurjahan to be portrayed and brought 'sufis', saints and divines, of course in the form of their portraits, to the walls of the chambers of household. One may not identify the portrayed figures today but at one point of time they existed and were before the eyes of the painter. Jahangir favored his artists inscribed their names on their works.
Jehangir and Nur Jahan, 16th century
Two things, symbolism and art-fiction, which immensely characterize Jahangir's art, however, appear to be contrary to his quest for recording the 'real'. But it actually does not. He wished poverty was eradicated, or that he could end his sworn enemy Malik Ambar, or that, as he was the emperor of the world, the Shah of Persia came to him to pay his homage, or his sense of great justice.
These were the intrinsic 'realities' of Jahangir's personality and thus the facts of history. His artists could realize them visually but only with the aid of symbols and art-fiction - Jahangir shooting the effigy of poverty or that of Malik Ambar, or embracing Shah of Persia, or Jahangir painted with a balance, or standing upon the globe. Thus, in Jahangir's art the historical perspective is not lost even in symbolic and fictional representation of things.
Jahangir Standing on a Globe Shooting Poverty, By Artist Abu'l Hasan, circa 1625 (Los Angeles County Museum of Art)
The artist has enveloped the target in a dark cloud to suggest that this is not a real person, but a human form used to symbolize an abstract quality. Such a mode of personification in art and literature is termed allegory. The Chain of Justice is shown descending from heaven. This is how Jahangir described the Chain of Justice in his memoirs:
After my accession, the first
order that I gave was for the
fastening up of the Chain
of Justice, so that if those
engaged in the administration
of justice should delay or
practice hypocrisy in the
matter of those seeking justice,
the oppressed might come to
this chain and shake it so
that its noise might attract
attention. The chain was
made of pure gold, 30 gaz in
length and containing 60 bells