Indian miniature art had a massive past of about a millennium across many turbulent periods of political and social history. Cultural and religious shifts were nonetheless significant. These were as much the concerns of art, especially the art of miniature painting, which always looked to politics and society for patronage and to religion and culture for its themes and preferences. They defined various phases of its growth and development as well of its deterioration and decadence.
Theme, kind of patronage, cultural conditions, religious bindings and the over-all philosophy of an era often determined the fact-fiction ratio, thrust and preferences, role of imagination and adherence to realism, recourse to myths, legends, tradition and history and an over-all character of art. For example, Prajnaparmita, being a sacred book, was bound to have a tale-tell character and moral thrust.
Nimatnama, a recipe book, was required by its theme to be informative;
Preparation of Sweets for the Sultan of Mandu, circa 1495 - 1505. The Nimatnama is a recipe book in Persian with methods for cooking all sorts of delicacies, aphrodisiacs, and other epicurean delights. The text is illustrated with 50 miniatures, showing the king looking on while some of his innumerable women attendants prepare the dishes.
Battle with the Hazars, from the Baburnama- the memoirs of Mughal Emperor Babur
Indian mythology had illustrative thrust while Islam illuminative. The great Mughal emperor Akbar preferred serialization of texts while his grandson Shahjahan random detached themes. The early Mewar (seat of Rajputs) rulers preferred religious and classical themes whereas their descendants loved to see in art harem life, hunting and pursuits of luxuries.
Hence, for a fuller appreciation of the art of Indian miniature painting it is required that each phase of its growth and each of its dimensions is dealt with singly and in appropriate details. Considering its very limited scope this article proposes to survey here onward Mughal miniatures for exploring how far they might serve as an alternative source of history.
The depiction of Krishna stealing butter could only be fanciful or fictional