I have worked on three projects at the intersection of these three subfields, all related to native language identification (NLI), a machine learning task that intends to identify one's native language based on one's L2 production. The task is based on the idea that cross-linguistic transfers leave "fingerprints" on the L2 production, thus making it possible to detect one's native language. I approach the task not from an engineering perspective -- focusing on achieving high accuracy -- but rather with the goal of gaining linguistic insights from the model results.
We discuss the potential of using the NLI task to automatically identify collocation transfer. Using training data in English, the model findings implied the potential to apply the method to understudied L2 languages to efficiently capture potential collocation transfers. The study also focuses on the interpretation of NLI results, revealing collocation transfer patterns.
https://doi.org/doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.bea-1.49This is a study of large-scale cross-linguistic L2 data (274 L1-L2 pairs), where we revealed the systematic influence of L1 on L2 production, manifested through the aspect of morphosyntax. We also show that certain morphosyntactic features (e.g., verb aspect, person of auxiliary, etc.) are more predictive of the native languages than others (e.g., main constituent order, number of auxiliary).
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2g87d428We take one step further to understand the impact of L1 typology on L2 production. Does L2 production from two typologically similar L1s share similar features? How is the production pattern impacted by the typological difference between L1s and L2s?
Work in progress.